A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF GREEN PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETING IN SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Gonca GÜNGÖR GÖKSU (Sakarya Üniversitesi, Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi, Maliye Bölümü, Sakarya, Türkiye)
Sayıştay Dergisi
7 1
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 126 Sayfa Aralığı: 409 - 441 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.52836/sayistay.1170928 İndeks Tarihi: 18-11-2022

A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF GREEN PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETING IN SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Öz:
The fact that global warming and related environmental problems pose a serious threat to our planet has accelerated initiatives to support sustainable development (SD). Green public finance management (PFM) and budgeting practices have recently gained importance in this context. This study analysed green PFM and emphasised its stages in supporting SD. It aimed to explore the practices of green PFM and budgeting in the member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the European Union (EU). Therefore, a comparative cross-country analysis was performed using the data from “the Joint Survey on Emerging Green Budgeting Practices” conducted by OECD and EU. In addition, it evaluated government expenditures and tax revenues on environmental protection in member countries. It concluded that green PFM and budgeting are the new implementation in limited countries or have not been put into practice in most of them efficiently yet. It is considered that green PFM and budgeting will become more crucial in the future because of the effects of climate change and environmental degradation. The study is one of the limited studies that focused on the main stages of the green PFM in meeting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) regarding climate change and environmental issues.
Anahtar Kelime: Green Public Finance Management Budgeting Climate Change Environmental Degradation Sustainable Development

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMAYI DESTEKLEMEDE YEŞİL KAMU MALİ YÖNETİMİ VE BÜTÇELEMENİN ÜLKELER ARASI BİR ANALİZİ

Öz:
Küresel ısınma ve bağlantılı çevresel sorunların gezegenimiz için ciddi tehdit oluşturması, sürdürülebilir kalkınmayı desteklemeye yönelik girişimlere hız kazandırmıştır. Bu kapsamda yeşil kamu mali yönetimi (KMY) ve bütçeleme uygulamaları son yıllarda önem kazanmıştır. Çalışmada yeşil KMY analiz edilmekte ve sürdürülebilir kalkınmayı desteklemede aşamaları vurgulanmaktadır. Ayrıca Ekonomik İşbirliği ve Kalkınma Teşkilatı (EİKT) ile Avrupa Birliği’ne (AB’ye) üye ülkelerde yeşil KMY ve bütçeleme uygulamalarının incelenmesi de amaçlanmaktadır. Bu nedenle, OECD ve AB tarafından yürütülen “Gelişmekte Olan Yeşil Bütçeleme Uygulamalarına İlişkin Ortak Anket” aracılığıyla elde edilen veriler kullanılarak karşılaştırmalı ülkeler arası bir analiz yapılmıştır. Çalışma ayrıca üye ülkelerde çevre korumaya yönelik devlet harcamalarını ve vergi gelirlerini de değerlendirmiştir. Yeşil KMY ve bütçelemenin sınırlı ülkelerde yeni bir uygulama olduğu veya birçoğunda ise henüz etkin bir şekilde uygulanmadığı sonucuna varılmıştır. İklim değişikliği ve çevresel bozulmanın etkisi nedeniyle gelecekte yeşil KMY ve bütçelemenin daha da önemli hale geleceği düşünülmektedir. Çalışma, iklim değişikliği ve çevre sorunlarıyla ilgili Birleşmiş Milletler Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçlarına (BM SKA’lara) ulaşmada yeşil KMY’nin ana aşamalarına odaklanan sınırlı araştırmalardan biridir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Afanasiev, M.P. and Belenchuk, A. A. (2021). Towards to the first green federal budget of Russia: Basis and elaboration. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2021(11), 71-88.
  • Atli, M. B. (2022). Environmental and climate audits of Supreme Audit Institutions: Refle- ctions from WGEA survey. Journal of Turkish Court of Account, 33(124), 163-170.
  • Battersby, B., Blazey, A., Bova, E., Lelong, M., Pojar, S., Rentería, C. and Tim, T. (2021). Green budgeting: Towards common principles. The European Commission, Economic and Financial Affairs. Brussels.
  • Baur, M., Bruchez, P-A. and Nicol. S. (2020). Climate Change and Long Term Fiscal Sustai- nability Climate Change and Long Term Fiscal Sustainability. OECD Publishing, Paris.
  • Bova, E. (2021). Green budgeting practices in the EU: A first review. The European Commis- sion, Economic and Financial Affairs. Discussion Paper 140. Brussels.
  • Bovenberg, A.L. and Van der Ploeg, F. (1994). Green policies and public finance in a small open economy. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 343-363.
  • Candan, G. and Cengiz Toklu, M. (2022). Sustainable industrialization performance evalua- tion of European Union countries: An integrated spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and grey relational analysis approach. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology.
  • Carraro, C., Favero, A. and Massetti, E. (2012). Investments and public finance in a green, low carbon, economy. Energy Economics, 34, 15-28.
  • Cimpoeru, V. M. (2012). An empirical study on key indicators of environmental quality: Green budgeting - A catalyst for sustainable economy and a factor for institutional chan- ge. Amfiteatru Economic, XIV(32), 485-500.
  • Dabla-Norris, E., Daniel, J. and Nozaki, M. (2021). Fiscal policies to address climate chan- ge in Asia and the Pacific. International Monetary Fund. Departmental Paper No 2021/007. Washington (DC).
  • Dziwok, E. and Jäger, J. (2021). A classification of different approaches to green finance and green monetary policy. Sustainability, 13(21), 11902.
  • Eltokhy, K., Funke, K., Huang, G., Kim, Y. and Zinabou, G. (2021). Monitoring the climate impact of fiscal policy - Lessons from tracking the COVID-19 response. IMF Working Paper, WP/21/259, Washington (DC).
  • EC (2022). European Commission green budgeting reference framework. European Com- mission. https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/economic-and-fis- cal-policy-coordination/green-budgeting-eu_hr. Retrieved, July 06, 2022.
  • EC (2021a). European Green Deal: Commission proposes transformation of EU economy and society to meet climate ambitions. European Commission. Press release. Brus- sels.
  • EC (2021b). Green budgeting survey in the EU, results from the 2020 update. European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Brussels.
  • EC (2021c). Report on public finances in EMU 2020. European Commission, Economic and Financial Affairs. Institutional Paper 147. Brussels.
  • EC (2019). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Com- mittee of the Regions, the European Green Deal. 11.12.2019, COM (2019) 640 final. European Commission, Brussels.
  • European Parliament (2021). Green and sustainable finance. https://www.europarl.europa. eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/679081/EPRS_BRI(2021)679081_EN.pdf. Ret- rieved, July 13, 2022.
  • European Union (2020). Interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on budgetary dis- cipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management, as well as on new own resources, including a roadmap towards the introduction of new own resources. Official Journal of the European Union. LI 433/28.
  • Faqih, A., Hadi, S.P. and Purnaweni, H. (2017). Analysis on the implementation of green bud- geting in Central Java Province. Advanced Science Letters, 23(3), 2268-2272.
  • Fernandez, R. M. (2018). Interactions of regional and national environmental policies: The case of Spain. Cogent Economics & Finance, 6(1), 1442092.
  • Gonguet, F., Wending, C., Aydin, Ö. and Battersby, B. (2021). Climate-sensitive ma- nagement of public finances - “Green PFM”. International Monetary Fund. Staff Climate Note No 2021/002. Washington (DC).
  • IMF (2022). Climate change dashboard. Government policy indicators. International Money Fund. https://climatedata.imf.org/pages/go-indicators, Retrieved, September 20, 2022.
  • INTOSAI (2016). Greening SAIs. International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions. ht- tps://www.environmental-auditing.org/media/117588/wgea-10th_intosai_wgea_ survey_publication.pdf. Retrieved, August 19, 2022.
  • INTOSAI WGEA (2022). Greenlines. Vol. 23, No: 1, January. https://www.environmental-au- diting.org/newsletter. Retrieved 20 September, 2022.
  • INTOSAI WGEA (2021). 10 th INTOSAI WGEA Survey. INTOSAI Working Group on Environ- mental Auditing, Helsinki/Finland.
  • INTOSAI WGEA (2012). Improving National Performance: Environmental Auditing Supports Better Governance and Management. INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing, Helsinki/Finland.
  • IPCC (2018). Summary for policymakers. In V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (Eds), An IPCC special report on the impacts of global war- ming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emissi- on pathways. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  • Jones, B. (2011). Driving a green economy through public finance and fiscal policy reform. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 2(02), 325-349.
  • Kang, Y. K. (2015). Budgeting for green growth in the Republic of Korea: Using public finan- cial management systems to implement major initiatives while maintaining fiscal balance. World Bank Group. Washington (DC).
  • Khan, B. F. (2018). Greening Public financial management for sustainable development: A green fiscal framework for Bangladesh. https://www.greengrowthknowledge.org/ research/greening-public-financial-management-sustainable-development-gre- en-fiscal-framework. Retrieved, June 15, 2022.
  • Kurniawan, B., Ma’ruf, M. F., Eprilianto, D. F. and Fanida, E. H. (2020). Green budgeting policy of Gresik regency government. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS 2020).
  • Lamperti, F., Mazzucato, M., Roventini, A. and Semieniuk, G. (2019). The green transition: Public policy, finance, and the role of the state. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschafts- forschung, 88(2), 73-88.
  • Macfarlane, L. and Kumar, C. (2021). Greening public finance. The UK’s public finance ecosystem and the net zero transition. The New Economics Foundation. https:// neweconomics.org/uploads/files/NEF_Greening-public-finance.pdf. Retrieved, June 27, 2022.
  • Moretti, D. (2021). Greening public financial management (PFM). International Monetary Fund. https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/d8files/event-documents/Delphi- ne%20Moretti_IMF_Green%20PFM_14Sept21.pdf. Retrieved, June 15, 2022.
  • Moshiri, S. and Daneshmand, A. (2020). How effective is government spending on environ- mental protection in a developing country?: An empirical evidence from Iran. Jour- nal of Economic Studies, 47(4), 789-803.
  • Nicol, S. and Parker, A. (2021). Green budgeting in OECD countries. OECD Publishing, Paris.
  • OECD (2021a). Government at a glance 2021. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Publishing, Paris.
  • OECD (2021b). Green budget tagging: Introductory guidance & principles. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Publishing, Paris.
  • OECD (2020a). Green budgeting and tax policy tools to support a green recovery. OECD Po- licy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Publishing, Paris.
  • OECD (2020b). OECD green budgeting framework-highlights. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Publishing, Paris.
  • OECD (2019). Budgeting for outcomes. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Deve- lopment. http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/performance-results-meeting-2019. htm. Retrieved, August 19, 2022.
  • OECD (2018). Paris collaborative on green budgeting. Organisation for Economic Co-opera- tion and Development. https://www.oecd.org/environment/green-budgeting/. Ret- rieved, August 09, 2022.
  • O’Sullivan, P. and Joyce, O. (2021). Budget 2022: A review of green budgeting from a tax perspective. https://www.gov.ie/en/collection/e20037-revised-estimates/. Retrie- ved, June 12, 2022.
  • Petrie, M. (2021). The evolution of green budgeting. Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance. Environmental Governance and Greening Fiscal Policy, 61-108. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Petri, H. (2021). Short guide to the use of Rio markers. https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/ public-environment-climate/wiki/short-guide-use-rio-markers. Retrieved, Sep- tember 21, 2022.
  • Poterba, J. M. (1993). Global warming policy: A public finance perspective. Journal of Econo- mic Perspectives, 7(4), 47-63.
  • Russel, D. and Benson, D. (2014). Green budgeting in an age of austerity: A transatlantic comparative perspective. Environmental Politics, 23(2), 243-262.
  • Semmler, W., Braga, J. P., Lichtenberger, A., Toure, M. & Hayde, E. (2021). Fiscal poli- cies for a low-carbon economy. The World Bank. Washington (DC). https://doi. org/10.1596/35795
  • Shah, A., Maken, A., Meng, T., Markosyan, S., Biswas, S. and Venkatramani, S. (2021). Bud- geting for climate change: A guidance note for governments to integrate climate change into budgeting. United Nations Development Programme. The Governance of Climate Change Finance Team. Bangkok.
  • Siddikee, M. J. A. (2018). The development of the green capital budgeting approaches based on traditional capital budgeting approaches. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 25(1), 253-262.
  • Sunbul, Y. (2020). INTOSAI development initiative sustainable development goals audit mo- del (ISAM). Journal of Turkish Court of Account, 31(116), 143-146.
  • UN (2015). Paris Agreement. United Nations https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_ paris_agreement.pdf. Retrieved, June 08, 2022.
  • Wang, C., Qiao, Y. and Li, X. (2020). A systems approach for green public procurement imp- lementation. Journal of Public Procurement, 20(3), 287-311.
  • WB (2019). The coalition of finance ministers for climate action: An overview. World Bank- IMF Spring Meetings. Washington (DC). https://www.financeministersforclimate. org/. Retrieved, June 15, 2022.
  • Zarali, F. (2021). Audits by SAIs on the sustainable development goals of the UN. Journal of Turkish Court of Account, 32(123): 175-184.
  • Zhang, D., Mohsin, M., Rasheed, A. K., Chang, Y. and Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2021). Public spending and green economic growth in BRI region: Mediating role of green finance. Energy Policy, 153.
  • Zhou, R. and Segerson, K. (2012). Are green taxes a good way to help solve state budget deficits?. Sustainability, 4(6), 1329-1353.
APA güngör göksu g (2022). A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF GREEN PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETING IN SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. , 409 - 441. 10.52836/sayistay.1170928
Chicago güngör göksu gonca A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF GREEN PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETING IN SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. (2022): 409 - 441. 10.52836/sayistay.1170928
MLA güngör göksu gonca A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF GREEN PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETING IN SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. , 2022, ss.409 - 441. 10.52836/sayistay.1170928
AMA güngör göksu g A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF GREEN PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETING IN SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. . 2022; 409 - 441. 10.52836/sayistay.1170928
Vancouver güngör göksu g A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF GREEN PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETING IN SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. . 2022; 409 - 441. 10.52836/sayistay.1170928
IEEE güngör göksu g "A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF GREEN PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETING IN SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT." , ss.409 - 441, 2022. 10.52836/sayistay.1170928
ISNAD güngör göksu, gonca. "A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF GREEN PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETING IN SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT". (2022), 409-441. https://doi.org/10.52836/sayistay.1170928
APA güngör göksu g (2022). A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF GREEN PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETING IN SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Sayıştay Dergisi, 33(126), 409 - 441. 10.52836/sayistay.1170928
Chicago güngör göksu gonca A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF GREEN PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETING IN SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Sayıştay Dergisi 33, no.126 (2022): 409 - 441. 10.52836/sayistay.1170928
MLA güngör göksu gonca A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF GREEN PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETING IN SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Sayıştay Dergisi, vol.33, no.126, 2022, ss.409 - 441. 10.52836/sayistay.1170928
AMA güngör göksu g A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF GREEN PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETING IN SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Sayıştay Dergisi. 2022; 33(126): 409 - 441. 10.52836/sayistay.1170928
Vancouver güngör göksu g A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF GREEN PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETING IN SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Sayıştay Dergisi. 2022; 33(126): 409 - 441. 10.52836/sayistay.1170928
IEEE güngör göksu g "A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF GREEN PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETING IN SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT." Sayıştay Dergisi, 33, ss.409 - 441, 2022. 10.52836/sayistay.1170928
ISNAD güngör göksu, gonca. "A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF GREEN PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETING IN SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT". Sayıştay Dergisi 33/126 (2022), 409-441. https://doi.org/10.52836/sayistay.1170928
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
25-04-2024 5:18

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları