The Adaptation Study of The Student Engagement in the General Chemistry Laboratory Scale to Turkish
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 103 - 118 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.19126/suje.1208528 İndeks Tarihi: 22-05-2023
The Adaptation Study of The Student Engagement in the General Chemistry Laboratory Scale to Turkish
Öz: Chemistry laboratories are an essential and indispensable part of chemistry education; however, the process in the laboratory cannot fully provide the desired gains. Although various scales in the literature address the process in the chemistry laboratory from different perspectives and enable evaluations, a new perspective on the process is student engagement. By determining to what extent and how students engage in the process, the chemistry laboratory can be carried out more effectively, and the efficiency of the teaching process can be increased by making the necessary arrangements. This study aimed to adapt the scale (Smith and Alonso, 2020) from international literature to Turkish and to determine its validity and reliability. For this purpose, the original scale went through the translation phase, and its language validity was checked. The sample of this study consists of 242 students who continue their education in Sakarya University (N= 158) and Gazi University (N=84) Education faculties, Science teaching and Classroom teaching departments. Then its construct validity was ensured by Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Its reliability was studied by determining the internal consistency coefficient. At the same time, the comparison of the data according to some demographic characteristics was also carried out. As a result, The Student Engagement in The General Chemistry Laboratory Scale adapted to our language is a valid and reliable scale consisting of 25 items and six factors.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Alkan, F. (2016). Development of chemistry laboratory self-efficacy beliefs scale. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(3), 350-359. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.350
- Alkan, F., & Erdem, E. (2012). Laboratuvar becerilerine yönelik tutum ölçeği geliştirme çalışması [Development of an attitude scale for laboratory skills]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1, 22-31. http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/shw_artcl-605.html
- Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (6. Baskı). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Azizoğlu, N., & Uzuntiryaki, E. (2006). Kimya laboratuvarı endişe ölçeği [Chemistry laboratory anxiety scale]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(30), 55-62. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/5109
- Bowen, C. W. (1999). Development and score validation of a chemistry laboratory anxiety instrument (CLAI) for college chemistry students. Educational and psychological measurement, 59(1), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164499591012
- Bretz, S. L. (2019). Evidence for the importance of laboratory courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 193–195. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00874
- Bruck, L. B., Towns, M., & Bretz, S. L. (2010). Faculty perspectives of undergraduate chemistry laboratory: Goals and obstacles to success. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(12), 1416-1424. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed900002d
- Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Özcan, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods] (21. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
- Canpolat, N., Pınarbaşı, T., Bayrakçeken, S., & Geban, Ö. (2004). Kimyadaki bazı yaygın yanlış kavramalar [Some common misconceptions in chemistry]. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(1), 135-146. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gefad/issue/6760/90936
- Cengiz, C., & Karatas, F. O. (2015). Examining the effects of reflective journals on pre-service science teachers’ general chemistry laboratory achievement. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 40(10), 125–146. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.557763492058690
- Cengiz, C., Karataş, F. Ö., & Aslan, A. (2017). Genel kimya laboratuvarı dersinde öğrenci gelişim dosyalarının kullanımının başarı üzerindeki etkililiğinin belirlenmesi [Determination of the effectiveness of using student progress files on achievement in general chemistry laboratory course]. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(23), 185-207. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/befdergi/issue/30012/264009
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2. Ed). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Çelikler, D., Güneş, H., Güneş, T., & Şendil, K. (2008). V diyagramı uygulamalarının temel kimya laboratuvarı dersinde öğrenci başarısına etkisi [The effect of V diagram applications on student success in basic chemistry laboratory course]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 51-58. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kefad/issue/59525/856030
- DeKorver, B. K., & Towns, M. H. (2015). General chemistry students’ goals for chemistry laboratory coursework. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(12), 2031-2037. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00463
- Ding, N., & Harskamp, E. G. (2011). Collaboration and peer tutoring in chemistry laboratory education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 839-863. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.498842
- Feyzioğlu, B., Demirdağ, B., Akyıldız, M., & Altun, E. (2012). Kimya öğretmenlerinin laboratuvar uygulamalarına yönelik algıları ölçeği geliştirilmesi [Developing a scale of chemistry teachers' perceptions towards laboratory practices]. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 9(4), 44-63. http://88j.76d.mywebsitetransfer.com/index.php/tused/article/view/470
- Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C. ve Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
- Galloway, K. R. ve Bretz, S. L. (2015a). Development of an assessment tool to measure students’ meaningful learning in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(7), 1149–1158. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500881y
- Galloway, K. R. ve Bretz, S. L. (2015b). Measuring meaningful learning in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory: A national, cross-sectional study. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(12), 2006–2018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00538
- George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Allyn ve Bacon.
- Güneş, M. H., Şener, N., Topal-Germi, N., & Can, N. (2013). Fen ve teknoloji dersinde laboratuvar kullanımına yönelik öğretmen ve öğrenci değerlendirmeleri [Teacher and student evaluations on the use of laboratory in science and technology course]. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, 1-11. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/zgefd/issue/47944/606567
- Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6. Ed.). Prentice-Hall.
- Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected a. aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543052002201
- Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
- ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second Edition) (2017). Retrieved from www.intestcom.org
- Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x
- Kılınç Alpat, S., & Altun, E. (2017). Genel kimya III laboratuarında uygulanan kısa sınavların fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının akademik başarısı ve görüşlerine etkisi [The effect of quizzes in general chemistry III laboratory on pre-service science teachers' academic achievement and opinions]. Education Sciences, 12(1), 20-39. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/nwsaedu/issue/27296/271093
- Nakiboğlu, C., & Sarıkaya, Ş. (2000). Kimya öğretmenlerinin derslerinde laboratuvar kullanımına mezun oldukları programın etkisi [The effect of graduation program on chemistry teachers' use of laboratory in their lessons]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 8(1), 95-106. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jotcsc/issue/30533/330311
- Nakiboğlu, C., & Meriç, G. (2000). Genel kimya laboratuvarlarında V-diyagramı kullanımı ve uygulamaları [Use and applications of V-diagram in general chemistry laboratories]. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(1), 58-75. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/baunfbed/issue/24788/261894
- Özgür, S. D., Odabaşı, Z., & Erdoğan, Ü. İ. (2017). Öğretmen adaylarını kimya laboratuvar uygulamaları ile öğretmenlik mesleğine hazırlama [Preparing prospective teachers for teaching profession with chemistry laboratory applications]. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(61), 534-550. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.304691
- Reid, N., & Shah, I. (2007). The role of laboratory work in university chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90026C
- Sadler, T. D., Puig, A., & Trutschel, B. K. (2011). Laboratory instructional practices inventory: A tool for assessing the transformation of undergraduate laboratory instruction. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(1), 25-32. https://mydigitalpublication.com/publication/?i=77830
- Seçkin, M., & Yılmaz, S. (2014). Örnek olay yönteminin öğretmen adaylarının kimya laboratuvarı dersine karşı endişelerine etkisi [The effect of case study method on pre-service teachers' anxiety towards chemistry laboratory course]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(2), 215-227. http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/shw_artcl-90.html
- Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 2–20. https://dspace.alquds.edu/handle/20.500.12213/742
- Smith, K. C., & Alonso, V. (2020). Measuring student engagement in the undergraduate general chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21, 399-411. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00167G
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
- Taber, K. S. (2001). Building the structural concepts of chemistry: Some considerations from educational research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2(2), 123–158. https://doi.org/10.1039/B1RP90014E
- Uysal, İ., & Kılıç, A. F. (2022). Normal distribution dilemma. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 12(1), 220-248. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.962653
- Yükseköğretim Kurumu (2018). Yeni öğretmen yetiştirme lisans programları [New teacher training undergraduate programs]. https://www.yok.gov.tr/kurumsal/idari-birimler/egitim-ogretim-dairesi/yeni-ogretmen-yetistirme-lisans-programlari
| APA | Atabek-Yigit E, ŞENÖZ A (2023). The Adaptation Study of The Student Engagement in the General Chemistry Laboratory Scale to Turkish. , 103 - 118. 10.19126/suje.1208528 |
| Chicago | Atabek-Yigit Elif,ŞENÖZ AHMET BURAK The Adaptation Study of The Student Engagement in the General Chemistry Laboratory Scale to Turkish. (2023): 103 - 118. 10.19126/suje.1208528 |
| MLA | Atabek-Yigit Elif,ŞENÖZ AHMET BURAK The Adaptation Study of The Student Engagement in the General Chemistry Laboratory Scale to Turkish. , 2023, ss.103 - 118. 10.19126/suje.1208528 |
| AMA | Atabek-Yigit E,ŞENÖZ A The Adaptation Study of The Student Engagement in the General Chemistry Laboratory Scale to Turkish. . 2023; 103 - 118. 10.19126/suje.1208528 |
| Vancouver | Atabek-Yigit E,ŞENÖZ A The Adaptation Study of The Student Engagement in the General Chemistry Laboratory Scale to Turkish. . 2023; 103 - 118. 10.19126/suje.1208528 |
| IEEE | Atabek-Yigit E,ŞENÖZ A "The Adaptation Study of The Student Engagement in the General Chemistry Laboratory Scale to Turkish." , ss.103 - 118, 2023. 10.19126/suje.1208528 |
| ISNAD | Atabek-Yigit, Elif - ŞENÖZ, AHMET BURAK. "The Adaptation Study of The Student Engagement in the General Chemistry Laboratory Scale to Turkish". (2023), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1208528 |
| APA | Atabek-Yigit E, ŞENÖZ A (2023). The Adaptation Study of The Student Engagement in the General Chemistry Laboratory Scale to Turkish. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 13(1), 103 - 118. 10.19126/suje.1208528 |
| Chicago | Atabek-Yigit Elif,ŞENÖZ AHMET BURAK The Adaptation Study of The Student Engagement in the General Chemistry Laboratory Scale to Turkish. Sakarya University Journal of Education 13, no.1 (2023): 103 - 118. 10.19126/suje.1208528 |
| MLA | Atabek-Yigit Elif,ŞENÖZ AHMET BURAK The Adaptation Study of The Student Engagement in the General Chemistry Laboratory Scale to Turkish. Sakarya University Journal of Education, vol.13, no.1, 2023, ss.103 - 118. 10.19126/suje.1208528 |
| AMA | Atabek-Yigit E,ŞENÖZ A The Adaptation Study of The Student Engagement in the General Chemistry Laboratory Scale to Turkish. Sakarya University Journal of Education. 2023; 13(1): 103 - 118. 10.19126/suje.1208528 |
| Vancouver | Atabek-Yigit E,ŞENÖZ A The Adaptation Study of The Student Engagement in the General Chemistry Laboratory Scale to Turkish. Sakarya University Journal of Education. 2023; 13(1): 103 - 118. 10.19126/suje.1208528 |
| IEEE | Atabek-Yigit E,ŞENÖZ A "The Adaptation Study of The Student Engagement in the General Chemistry Laboratory Scale to Turkish." Sakarya University Journal of Education, 13, ss.103 - 118, 2023. 10.19126/suje.1208528 |
| ISNAD | Atabek-Yigit, Elif - ŞENÖZ, AHMET BURAK. "The Adaptation Study of The Student Engagement in the General Chemistry Laboratory Scale to Turkish". Sakarya University Journal of Education 13/1 (2023), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1208528 |
