Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 28 Sayfa Aralığı: 3 - 29 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

“Dış politika”: yeni bir kavramsallaştırma bağlamında egemenlik mitinin analizi

Öz:
Bu makalede iç ve dış politikalar arasındaki sözde ayrımı meşrulaştırması ve böylelikle temel özelliği halkı üzerinde zorlayıcı güç uygulamak olan ulus devlete güçlü bir zemin sağlaması nedeniyle, dış politika ifadesinin masum bir kavram olmadığını ileri sürüyorum. Post-yapısalcı argümanları kullanarak söz konusu ayrımı ve üzerine inşa edildiği temel miti yapıbozumuna uğratmaya çalışıyorum. Bu mit, ulus devletlerin halkları üzerinde nihai gücü kullanmalarında temel dayanak kaynağı olan egemenliktir. Yine egemenliğin orada bir yerde bulunan bir gerçeklik olmadığını aksinse söylemler, pratikler ve metinler tarafından üretilen bir mit olduğunu ortaya koymaya çalışıyorum. Sonuçta dış politika kavramı yerine, bize sürekli bir şekilde kendisinin arkasında saklı olan iktidar ilişkilerini hatırlatan yeni bir kavramı yani dış politika ifadesini öneriyorum.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Siyasi Bilimler Uluslararası İlişkiler

“Foreign policy”: the analysis of the sovereignty myth as a new contextualization

Öz:
In this article, I argue that the term ‘foreign policy’ is not an innocent concept because it legitimizes the so-called distinction between domestic and foreign policies and therefore provides a strong case for the nation-state whose main characteristic is a coercive power on the people. By employing post-structuralist arguments, I attempt to deconstruct this distinction and the principal myth on which it has been constructed. Th e myth is sovereignty which is the main source of unconstrained authority for the nation-state on the people. I tried to show that sovereignty is not an out-there reality. Rather it is a myth reproduced by discourses, practices and texts. I also propose a new concept instead of the term ‘foreign policy’. It is a foreign policy, which always reminds us power relations hidden behind the concept.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Siyasi Bilimler Uluslararası İlişkiler
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Diğer Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Agnew, John A. ve Stuart Corbridge, Mastering Space: Hegemony, Territory and International Political Economy, London,Routledge, 1995.
  • Agnew, John “Mapping Political Power Beyond State Boundaries: Territory, Identity, and Movement in World Politics”, Millenium: Journal of International Studies, Cilt 28, No3, 1999.
  • Althusser, Louis “From Capital to Marx’s Philosophy”, Louis Althusser ve Etienne Balibar (der.), Reading Capital, (çev.Ben Brewster), London, Verso, 2006.
  • Anderson, Benedict Hayali Cemaatler, (çev.İskender Savaşır), İstanbul, Metis Yayınları, 1993.
  • Ashley, Richard K. “Foreign Policy as Political Performance”, International Studies Notes, Cilt 3, No 2, 1987.
  • Ashley, Richard K. “Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique”, Millenium:Journal of International Studies, Cilt 17, No 2, 1988.
  • Ashley, Richard K. “Living on Border Lines: Man, Poststructuralism, and War”, James Der Derian ve Michael J. Shapiro (der.), International/Intertextual Relations, New York, Lexington Books, 1989.
  • Ashley, Richard “Th e Powers of Anarchy: Th eory, Sovereignty, and the Domestication of Global Life”, James Der Derian (der.), International Th eory: Critical Investigation, London, Macmillan Press Ldt., 1995.
  • Ashley, Richard K. “Poverty of Neorealism”, Andrew Linklater (der.), International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science, Cilt 4, Routledge, London, 2000.
  • Ashley, Richard K. ve R. B. J. Walker, “Reading Dissidence/Writing the Discipline: Crisis and the Question of Sovereignty in International Studies”, Andrew Linklater (der.), International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science, Cilt 1, Routledge, London, 2000.
  • Balcı, Ali “Diskors ve Pratik Olarak Dış Politika”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Cilt 4, No 15, Güz 2007.
  • Balcı, Ali “Roland Robertson, Küreselleşme ve Kültür”, Bilgi, No 12, 2006.
  • Balibar, Etienne “Ulus Biçimi: Tarih ve İdeoloji”, Etienne Balibar ve Immanuel Wallerstein (der.), Irk, Ulus, Sınıf: Belirsiz Kimlikler, (çev. Nazlı Ökten), İstanbul, Metis Yayınları, 1995.
  • Barkin, Samuel J. “Th e Evolution of the Constitution of Sovereignty and the Emergence of Human Rights Norms”, Millenium: Journal of International Studies, Cit 27, No 2, 1998, s. 234-235.
  • Barkin, Samule J. ve Bruce Cronin, “The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations”, International Organization, Cit 48, No 1, Kış 1994.
  • Barnett, Michael “Sovereignty, Nationalism, and Regional Order in the Arab State System”, Th omas J. Biersteker ve Cynthia Weber (der.), State Sovereignty As Social Construct, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • Bartelson, Jens A Genealogy of Sovereignty, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  • Barthes, Roland Mythologies, (İngilizceye Çev. Anette Lavers), London, Vintage, Random House, 2000.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt Sosyolojik Düşünmek, (çev.Abdullah Yılmaz), İstanbul, Ayrıntı Yayınları, 1999.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt Parçalanmış Hayat: Postmodern Ahlak Denemeleri, (çev. İsmail Türkmen), İstanbul, Ayrıntı Yayınları, 2000.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt Siyaset Arayışı, (çev. Tuncay Birkan), İstanbul, Metis Yayınları, 2001.
  • Biersteker, Th omas J. “State, Sovereignty and Territory”, Walter Carlsnaes, Th omas Risse ve Beth A. Simmons (der.), Handbook of International Relations, Sage Publications, London, Biersteker, 2002.
  • Biersteker, Th omas J. ve Cynthia Weber, “Th e Social Construction of State Sovereignty”, Th omas J. Biersteker ve Cynthia Weber (der.), State Sovereignty As Social Construct, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.,
  • Bodin, Jean “Devlet Üstüne Altı Kitap’tan Seçme Parçalar”, Mete Tunçay (der.), Batı’da Siyasal Düşünceler Tarihi 2: Seçme Yazılar, Ankara, Teori Yayınları, 1986.
  • Booth, Ken “75 Years on: Rewriting the Subject’s Past –Reinventing its Future”, Steve Smith, Ken Booth ve Marysia Zalewski (der.), International Th eory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • Bull, Hedley Th e Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, New York, Columbia University Press, 1977.
  • Bull, Hedley et. al., Intervention in World Politics, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1986.Campbell, David Writing Security United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1992.
  • Costantinou, Costas M. “Before the Summit: Representation of Sovereignty on the Himalayas”, Millenium: Journal of International Studies, Cilt 27, No 1, 1998.
  • Cox, Robert W. “Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Th eory”, Robert W. Cox (Timothy J. Sinclair ile), Approaches to World Order, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • Derian, James Der, “Th e Value of Security: Hobbes, Marx, Nietzche, and Baudrillard”, Ronnie D. Lipschutz (der.), On Security, New York, Columbia University Press, 1995.
  • Derrida, Jacques Of Grammatology, (çev. Gayatri Chakravotry Spivak), Baltimore, Th e John Hopkins University Press, 1984.
  • Derrida, Jacques Writing and Diff erence, (çev.Alan Bass), London, Routledge, 2007.
  • Dessler, David “What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?”, International Organization, Cilt 43, No 3, Yaz 1989.
  • Deudney, Daniel “Binding Sovereigns: Authorities, Structures, and Geopolitics in Philadelphian Systems”, Th omas J. Biersteker ve Cynthia Weber (der.), State Sovereignty As Social Construct, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • Devetak, Richard “Th e Project of Modernity and International Relations Th eory”, Andrew Linklater (der.), International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science, Cilt 4, London, Routledge, 2000.
  • Doty, Roxanne Lynn “Sovereignty and the Nation: Constructing Th e Boundaries of National Identity”, Th omas J. Biersteker ve Cynthia Weber (der.), State Sovereignty As Social Construct, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Doty, Roxanne Lynn Imperial Encounters, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1996.
  • Edkins, Jenny Postsructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In, London, Lynne Rienner Publisher, 1999.
  • Elshtain, Jean Bethke “Sovereignty, Identity, Scrifi ce”, Andrew Linklater (der.), International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science, Volume: 5, London, Routledge, 2000.
  • Fink, Bruce, Th e Lacanian Subject Between Language and Jouissance, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1995.
  • Foucault, Michel Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, Colin Gordon (der.), New York, Pantheon Books, 1981.
  • Foucault, Michel “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History”, Paul Rabinow (der.), Th e Foucault Reader, New York, Pantheon Books, 1984.
  • Foucault, Michel, Th e Archaeology of Knowledge, (İngilizceye çev. A. M. Sheridan Smith), London, Routledge, 2006.
  • Gellner, Ernest Uluslar ve Ulusçuluk, (çev. Büşra E. Behar ve Günay G. Özdoğan), İstanbul, İnsan Yayınları, 1992.
  • Giddens, Anthony Th e Nation-State and Violence, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1985. Gilpin, Robert War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1981.
  • Gregory, D. U. “Foreword”, James Der Derian ve Michael J. Shapiro (der.), International/Intertextual Relations, New York, Lexington Books, 1989.
  • Hardt, Michael ve Antonio Negri, İmparatorluk, (çev Abdullah Yılmaz), İstanbul, Ayrıntı Yayınları, 2000.
  • Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Elements of the Philosophy of Right, (çev. H. B. Nisbet), Allen W. Wood (der.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991. Hobbes, Th omas, Leviathan, (çev. Semih Lim), İstanbul, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2001.
  • http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/defi nition/population. Hobsbawm, Eric Milletler ve Milliyetçilik, (çev.Osman Akınhay), İstanbul, Ayrıntı Yayınları, 1993.
  • Inayatullah, Naeem “Beyond the Sovereignty Dilemma: Quasi-States as Social Construct”, Th omas J. Biersteker ve Cynthia Weber (der.), State Sovereignty As Social Construct, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • İnat Kemal ve Ali Balcı, “Dış Politika: Teorik Perspektifl er”, Zeynep Dağı (der.), Uluslararası Politikayı Anlamak: Ulusdevletten Küreselleşmeye, İstanbul, Alfa Yayınları, 2007.
  • Jackson, Robert Sovereignty, Polity Press, Cambridge.Jackson, Robert H. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Th ird World, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • Jackson, Robert H. ve Carl G. Rosberg, “Why Africa’s Weak States Persist: Th e Empirical and Juridical Statehood”, World Politics, Volume: 35, No 1, Ekim 1982. Krasner, Stephen D. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, New Jersy, Princeton University Press, 1999.
  • Krasner, Stephen D., “Sovereignty”, Foreign Policy, No 122, Ocak-Şubat 2001.
  • Kratochwil, Friedrich “Sovereignty as Dominium: Is Th ere a Right of Humanitarian Intervention?”, Gene M. Lyons ve Michael Mastanduno (der.), Beyond Westphalia? State Sovereignty and International Intervention, Baltimore, Th e Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.
  • Lacan, Jacques Freud’s Papers on Technique: Th e Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book I, (çev. John Forrester), Jacques-Alain Miller (der.), New York, W. W. Norton & Company, 1988.
  • Lacan, Jacques On Feminine Sexuality the Limits of Love and Knowledge Encore 1972-1973, (çev. Bruce Fink), Jacques- Alain Miller (der.), New York, W. W. Norton & Company Inc., 1999.
  • Linklater, Andrew, “Th e Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Th eory: A Critical-Th eoretical Point of View”, Andrew Linklater (der.), International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science, Cilt 4, London, Routledge, 2000.
  • Lipschutz, Ronnie D. “(B)orders and (Dis)orders: Th e Role of Moral Authority in Global Politics”, Mathias Albert, David Jacopson ve Yosef Lapid (der.), Identities Borders Orders: Rethinking International Relations Th eory, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2001.
  • Little, Richard B. “Revisiting Intervention: A Survey of Recent Developments”, Review of International Studies, Cilt 13, No 1, 1987.
  • Morgenthau, Hans J. “Th e Problem of Sovereignty Reconsidered”, Columbia Law Review, Cilt 48, No3, Nisan 1948.
  • Morgenthau, Hans J. Politics Among Nations: Th e Struggle for Power and Peace, Kenneth W. Th ompson (Revised by), New York, McGraw-Hill, 1993.
  • Murphy, Alexander B. “Th e Sovereign State System as Political-Territorial Ideal: Historical and Contemporary Considerations”, Th omas J. Biersteker ve Cynthia Weber (der.), State Sovereignty As Social Construct, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • Nietzsche, Friedrich “Th e Birth of Tragedy Out of the Spirit of Music”, Basic Writings of Nietzsche, (Çev. ve der. Walter Kaufmann), New York, Th e Modern Library, 2000.
  • Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm Gay Science: With A Prelude in German Rhyms and an Appendix of Songs, Bernard Williams (der.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  • Osiander, Andreas “Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth”, International Organization, Cilt 55, No 2, Bahar 2001.
  • Paul, Darel E. “Sovereignty, Survival and the Westphalian Blind Alley in International Relations”, Review of International Relations, Cilt 25, No 2, Nisan 1999.
  • Pazarcı, Hüseyin Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri, II. Kitap, 5. Baskı, Ankara, Turhan Kitabevi Yayınları, 1998.
  • Philpott, Daniel “Westphalia, Authority and International Society”, Robert Jackson (der.), Sovereignty at the Millenium, Massachusetts, Blackwell Publisher, 1999.
  • Poggi, Gianfranco Th e State: Its Nature, Development, and Prospects, Standford, Standford University Press, 1990.
  • Ruggie, John Gerard Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization, London, Routledge, 1986.
  • Ruggie, John Gerard “Territoriality and Beyond, Problematizing Modernity in International Relations”, Andrew Linklater (der.), International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science, Cilt 4, Routledge, London, 2000.
  • Ryan, Christopher M. “Sovereignty, Intervention, and the Law: A Tenuous Relationship of Competing Principles”, Millenium: Journal of International Studies, Cilt 26, No 1, 1998.
  • Schmidt, Brian C. Th e Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations, Albany, StateUniversity of New York Press, 1998.
  • Scholte, Jan Aart “What is ‘Global’ about Globalization?”, David Held ve Anthony McGrew (der.), Th e Global Transformations Reader: An Indroduction to the Globalization Debate, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2004.
  • Smith, Anthony D. Küreselleşme Çağında Milliyetçilik, (çev. Derya Kömürcü), İstanbul, Everest Yayınları, 2002.
  • Somay, Bülent Bir Şeyler Eksik: Aşk, Cinsellik ve Hayat Hakkında Bilmek İstemediğimiz Şeyler, İstanbul, Metis Yayınları,2007.
  • Strang, David “Contested Sovereignty: Th e Social Construction of Colonial Imperialism”, Th omas J. Biersteker ve Cynthia Weber (der.), State Sovereignty As Social Construct, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • Strenski, Ivan Four Th eories of Myth in Twentieth-Century History: Cassirer, Eliade, Levi-Strauss and Malinowski, Iowa, University of Iowa Press, 1987. Şeyh Bedreddin, Varidat, (çev.Cengiz Ketene), Ankara, Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları, 1990
  • Tayfur, M. Fatih “Dış Politika”, Atilla Eralp (der.), Devlet ve Ötesi: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Temel Kavramlar, İstanbul, İletişim Yayınları, 2005.
  • Teschke, Benno Th e Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations, London, Verso,2003
  • Thompson, Jenice E. “State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging the Gap between Th eory and EmpiricalResearch”, International Organization, Cilt 39, No 2, Haziran 1995.
  • Tilly, Charles Coercion, Capital and European States, AD 990–1992, Blackwell, Oxford, 1992.
  • Vincent, Richard J. Human Rights and International Relations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1986.
  • Walker, R. B. J. “State Sovereignty and the Articulation of Political Space/Time”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Cilt 20, No3, 1991.
  • Walker, R. B. J. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Th eory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel “Th e Inter-state Structure of the Modern World-System”, Steve Smith, Ken Booth ve Marysia Zalewski (der.), International Th eory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel Modern Dünya Sistemi, Cilt 1, (çev. Latif Boyacı), İstanbul, Bakış Yayınları, 2002.
  • Waltz, Kenneth W. Man, the State and War: A Th eoretical Analysis, New York, Columbia University Press, 1959.
  • Waltz, Kenneth W. Th eory of International Politics, McGraw-Hill, Boston, 1979.
  • Waltz, Kenneth W. “Political Structures”, Robert O. Keohane (der.), Neorealism and Its Critics, New York, Columbia University Press, 1986.
  • Weber, Cynthia Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, Th e State and Symbolic Exchange, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  • Weber, Cynthia, International Relations: A Critical Introduction, London, Routledge, 2001.
  • Weber, Max “Meslek Olarak Siyaset”, H. H. Gerth ve C. Wright Mills (der.), Sosyoloji Yazıları, (çev. Taha Parla), İstanbul, İletişim Yayınları, 2004.
  • Wendt, Alexander “Th e Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Th eory, International Organization, Cilt 41, No 3, Yaz 1987.
  • Wendt, Alexander Social Th eory of International Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • Wendt, Alexander ve Daniel Friedheim, “Hierarchy under Anarchy: Informal Empire and the East German State”, Th omas J. Biersteker ve Cynthia Weber (der.), State Sovereignty As Social Construct, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • Werner, Wouter G. ve Jaap H. De Wilde, “Endurance of Sovereignty”, European Journal of International Relations, Cilt 7, No 3, 2001.
  • Wight, Martin Power Politics, (Revised Edition), London, Continuum International Publishing Group, 2002.
  • Zizek, Slavoj İdeolojinin Yüce Nesnesi, İstanbul, Metis Yayınları, 2002.
APA Balci A (2011). “Dış politika”: yeni bir kavramsallaştırma bağlamında egemenlik mitinin analizi. , 3 - 29.
Chicago Balci Ali “Dış politika”: yeni bir kavramsallaştırma bağlamında egemenlik mitinin analizi. (2011): 3 - 29.
MLA Balci Ali “Dış politika”: yeni bir kavramsallaştırma bağlamında egemenlik mitinin analizi. , 2011, ss.3 - 29.
AMA Balci A “Dış politika”: yeni bir kavramsallaştırma bağlamında egemenlik mitinin analizi. . 2011; 3 - 29.
Vancouver Balci A “Dış politika”: yeni bir kavramsallaştırma bağlamında egemenlik mitinin analizi. . 2011; 3 - 29.
IEEE Balci A "“Dış politika”: yeni bir kavramsallaştırma bağlamında egemenlik mitinin analizi." , ss.3 - 29, 2011.
ISNAD Balci, Ali. "“Dış politika”: yeni bir kavramsallaştırma bağlamında egemenlik mitinin analizi". (2011), 3-29.
APA Balci A (2011). “Dış politika”: yeni bir kavramsallaştırma bağlamında egemenlik mitinin analizi. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 7(28), 3 - 29.
Chicago Balci Ali “Dış politika”: yeni bir kavramsallaştırma bağlamında egemenlik mitinin analizi. Uluslararası İlişkiler 7, no.28 (2011): 3 - 29.
MLA Balci Ali “Dış politika”: yeni bir kavramsallaştırma bağlamında egemenlik mitinin analizi. Uluslararası İlişkiler, vol.7, no.28, 2011, ss.3 - 29.
AMA Balci A “Dış politika”: yeni bir kavramsallaştırma bağlamında egemenlik mitinin analizi. Uluslararası İlişkiler. 2011; 7(28): 3 - 29.
Vancouver Balci A “Dış politika”: yeni bir kavramsallaştırma bağlamında egemenlik mitinin analizi. Uluslararası İlişkiler. 2011; 7(28): 3 - 29.
IEEE Balci A "“Dış politika”: yeni bir kavramsallaştırma bağlamında egemenlik mitinin analizi." Uluslararası İlişkiler, 7, ss.3 - 29, 2011.
ISNAD Balci, Ali. "“Dış politika”: yeni bir kavramsallaştırma bağlamında egemenlik mitinin analizi". Uluslararası İlişkiler 7/28 (2011), 3-29.