Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 1418 - 1422 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.16984/saufenbilder.346597 İndeks Tarihi: 07-11-2019
Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis
Öz: Selection of launch vehicle for a geostationary satellite is an important decision for satellite operators. Depending on only to the cost of the launcher may result unexpected consequences. Lifetime of the satellite is determined by the orbit parameters of the launcher. Success probability of the launcher can be deduced statistically by previous launches or using the insurance rate of the market for the selected launcher. Total cost of the satellite project includes insurance rate besides satellite and launcher costs. Design lifetime of a communication satellite is currently 15 years. Manufacturer warrants the operation of the satellite for 15 years via performance incentive or warranty payback mechanisms. But satellites continue to generate revenues during their maneuver lifetime which is more than 15 years. Expected value analysis is a powerful tool to include probabilistic nature of satellite projects. In this study a method proposed to select the best launcher for a given satellite program incuding satellite price, launch cost, insurance rate and lifetime parameters using expected value analysis.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- C.R. Welti, Satellite Basics for Everyone, iUniverse Inc., Bloomington, 2012.
- http://www.spacex.com.
- https://www.rocketbuilder.com.
- http://spacenews.com/space-insurers-warnthat- current-low-rates-are-not-sustainable/
- M. Nefes, M. Zor, T. Tetik, S. Gulgonul, “Determination of the Evaluation Criteria Weights for a Commercial Communication Satellite Program by Using AHP Method” 1st International Symposium on Critical and Analytical Thinking, April 2015.
- T. Tetik and G. S. Daş, "Launch vehicle selection for a geostationary communication satellite using data envelopment analysis," 8th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST), Istanbul, 2017.
- Jean-François Gauché, “Space Risks”, Centre d’Etude Actuarielle, December 2011.
- L. Virine, “Practical project risk management in 60 minutes” PMI Global Congress, North America, Dallas, TX, 2011.
- P. Ordyna, “Insuring Human Space Flight: An Underwriters Dilemma”, Journal of Space Law 36, 2010.
- Sullivan, Brook Rowland, “Technical And Economic Feasibility Of Telerobotic On- Orbit Satellite Servicing”, Thesis (Ph.D.) University of Maryland, College Park, 2005.
- Ted Perez, Daniel Pires, Gregory Singleton, “Methodology for the economic analysis of on-orbit servicing of satellites”, IEEE Systems and Information Design Symposium, University of Virginia, 2002.
- Franklin J. Stermole and John M. Stermole, “Economic Evaluation and Investment Decision Methods”, 14th Edition, 2014.
- S. Gulgonul, N. Sozbir, “Propellant budget calculation of geostationary satellites”, International Conference on Energy Systems Engineering, Karabük, 2017.
- Falcon 9 Launch Vehicle Payload User’s Guide, Rev 2, October 21, 2015. [15] Ariane-5 User’s Manual Issue 5 Revision 2 October 2016.
- Proton Launch System Mission Planner’s Guide, Revision 7, July 2009.
- H. Curtis, Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students, 3rd Edition, Elsevier, 2014.
- B.N. Agrawal, Design of Geosynchronous Spacecraft, Prentice-Hall, 1996.
- M. D. Griffinand J.R. French, SpaceVehicle Design, AIAA Education series(ed. Joseph A. Schetz), 2004.
- R.X. Meyer, Elements of Space Technology for Aerospace Engineers, academic Press, 1999.
- W.Ley, K. Wittmann and W. Halmann (Editors), Handbook of Space Technology, Wiley, 2009.
- B.A Campbell and S.N.McCandless, Introduction to Space science and Spacecraft Applications, Gulf Publishing Company, 1996.
- P. Fortescue, G. Swinerd and J. Stark (Editors), Spacecraft Systems Engineering, Wiley, 2011.
| APA | Gulgonul S, SOZBIR N (2018). Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis. , 1418 - 1422. 10.16984/saufenbilder.346597 |
| Chicago | Gulgonul Senol,SOZBIR NEDIM Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis. (2018): 1418 - 1422. 10.16984/saufenbilder.346597 |
| MLA | Gulgonul Senol,SOZBIR NEDIM Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis. , 2018, ss.1418 - 1422. 10.16984/saufenbilder.346597 |
| AMA | Gulgonul S,SOZBIR N Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis. . 2018; 1418 - 1422. 10.16984/saufenbilder.346597 |
| Vancouver | Gulgonul S,SOZBIR N Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis. . 2018; 1418 - 1422. 10.16984/saufenbilder.346597 |
| IEEE | Gulgonul S,SOZBIR N "Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis." , ss.1418 - 1422, 2018. 10.16984/saufenbilder.346597 |
| ISNAD | Gulgonul, Senol - SOZBIR, NEDIM. "Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis". (2018), 1418-1422. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.346597 |
| APA | Gulgonul S, SOZBIR N (2018). Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(5), 1418 - 1422. 10.16984/saufenbilder.346597 |
| Chicago | Gulgonul Senol,SOZBIR NEDIM Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 22, no.5 (2018): 1418 - 1422. 10.16984/saufenbilder.346597 |
| MLA | Gulgonul Senol,SOZBIR NEDIM Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol.22, no.5, 2018, ss.1418 - 1422. 10.16984/saufenbilder.346597 |
| AMA | Gulgonul S,SOZBIR N Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2018; 22(5): 1418 - 1422. 10.16984/saufenbilder.346597 |
| Vancouver | Gulgonul S,SOZBIR N Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2018; 22(5): 1418 - 1422. 10.16984/saufenbilder.346597 |
| IEEE | Gulgonul S,SOZBIR N "Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis." Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22, ss.1418 - 1422, 2018. 10.16984/saufenbilder.346597 |
| ISNAD | Gulgonul, Senol - SOZBIR, NEDIM. "Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis". Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 22/5 (2018), 1418-1422. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.346597 |
