THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING

Argon, Türkan; SEZEN GÜLTEKİN, GÖZDE

THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING

Gözde SEZEN GÜLTEKİN, (Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya, Türkiye)

Türkan ARGON (Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Bolu, Türkiye)

IOJET

15 4

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 1470 - 1491 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 06-05-2021

THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING

Öz:

This study aimed to introduce a structural equation model of testing the mediation role oforganizational resilience in the relationship between organizational myopia andorganizational sustainability. Thus, it was designed with structural regression model. In thestudy, it was aimed to collect data from a higher education organization which had alreadyreceived “Turkey Continuity in Excellence Award”. For this purpose, the participants of thestudy comprised purposefully selected 322 academics at Sakarya University, which was theonly university in Turkey having the relevant award holistically. For the data collection,“Organizational Sustainability Scale” developed by Sezen-Gültekin (2019), “OrganizationalResilience Scale” and “Organizational Myopia Scale” adapted to educational organizationsby Sezen-Gültekin (2019) were utilized. As result, it was found that the established modelhad acceptable and excellent compliance values. In addition, it was determined that theorganizational myopia independent variable directly affected the organizational resiliencedependent variable, while it was both directly and indirectly organizational sustainabilitydependent variable. It was also seen that the organizational resilience independent variabledirectly affected the organizational sustainability dependent variable. In addition, it wasobserved that the organizational myopia and the organizational resilience variables hadindirect effects on the sub-dimensions of executive, economic, social, cultural andenvironmental sustainability.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Akbaba Altun, S. (2009). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin akademik başarısızlıklarına ilişkin veli, öğretmen ve öğrenci görüşlerinin incelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 8(2), 567-586.
Aktan, C.C. & Gencel, U. (2007). Yükseköğretimde akreditasyon. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 137-146.
Altınay, A., Mercan, N., Aksanyar, Y., & Sert, S. (2012). Işletme körlüğü, silo sendromu ve çözüm önerisi olarak örgütsel zekâ. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 13-19.
Aykaç, M. & Kar, B. B. (2018). Yükseköğretimde devlet ve vakıf üniversiteleri: sorunlar ve politika önerileri. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 55(642), 69-92.
Aytemiz Seymen, O., Kılıç, T. & Kinter, O. (2016). Örgütsel körlüğün (örgüt miyopisi) ayrıntılı kavramsal analizi ve ölçümü: geliştirilen bir ölçek yardımıyla değerlendirme. Sözlü sunum. 15. Ulusal İşletmecilik Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 26-28 Mayıs 2016, İstanbul.
Barasa, E., Mbau, R. & Gilson, L. (2018). What is resilience and how can it be nurtured? A systematic review of empirical literature on organizational resilience. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(6), 491-503.
Baskan, G.A. (2001). Türkiye’de yükseköğretimin gelişimi. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1), 21-32.
Baş, A. (2013). İşletmeleri Dönüştürme Aracı Olarak Pazarlama Miyopisinin Stratejik Değerlendirilmesi: Türkiye Tekstil Işletmelerinde Araştırma. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Isparta.
Baumgartner, H. & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161.
Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: AMOS uygulamaları. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
Bentler, P.M. & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
Birleşmiş Milletler Kalkınma Programı (United Nations Development Programme-UNDP) 2014.
Bollen, K.A. (1990). Overall fit in covariance structure models: Two types of sample size effects. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 256-259.
Bouaziz, F. & Smaoui Hachicha, Z. (2018). Strategic human resource management practices and organizational resilience. Journal of Management Development, 37(7), 537-551.
Bowen, D.J. (2018). Leading the way to organizational resilience. Healthcare Executive, Jan/Feb(2018), 8-9.
Browne, M.W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing Structural Equation Models (Eds. Kenneth A. Bollen & J. Scott Long), pg.136-162. Sage Publications.
Brundtland, G.H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future. Official Records of the General Assembly, fortysecond Session, supplement No. 25 (A/42/25).
http://www.channelingreality.com/Documents/Brundtland_Searchable.pdf Erişim tarihi: 09.10.2017.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı (14. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Yayınevi.
Byrne, B.M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, application, and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Catino, M. (2013). Organizational myopia: Problems of rationality and foresight in organizations. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com.tr/booksid=fCjs6A_SKjwC&printsec=frontcover&dq=catino &hl=tr&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=catino&f=false.
Chikudate, N. (2002a). Collective myopia and defective higher educations behind the scenes of ethically bankrupted economic systems: A reflexive note from a Japanese university and taking a step toward transcultural dialogues. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(3), 205-225.
Chikudate, N. (2002b). Collective myopia and disciplinary power behind the scenes of unethical practices: A diagnostic theory on Japanese organization. Journal of Management Studies, 39(3), 289-307.
Coblentz, J.B. (2002). Organizational sustainability: The three aspects that matter. Oral presentation. ERNWACA’s first Strategy Session, Dakar.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Day, C. & Gu, Q. (2014). Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times. London and New York: Routledge.
Gedikoğlu, T. (2005). Avrupa birliği sürecinde Türk eğitim sistemi: Sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 66-80.
Gül, S.S. ve Gül, H. (2015). Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimin gelişimi, güncel durumu ve eleştirisi. Toplum ve Demokrasi Dergisi, 8(17-18), 51-66.
Güneş, F. (2012). Bologna süreci ile yükseköğretimde öngörülen beceri ve yetkinlikler. Journal of Higher Education & Science/Yüksekögretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 2(1), 1-9.
Hareket, E., Erdoğan & Dündar, H. (2016). Türk eğitim sistemine ilişkin bir durum çalışması. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi (Journal of Research in Education and Teaching), 5(1), 287-299.
Harris, J. (2011). The Interconnected User Interface. Information Management, 21(6), 28.
Helvacı, M.A. (2010). İlköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin etik liderlik davranışı gösterme düzeyleri. ZfWT Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken/Journal of World of Turks, 2(1), 391-410.
Higher Education Council (Yükseköğretim Kurulu) (2007). Türkiye’nin yükseköğretim stratejisi. Yayınevi: Meteksan A.Ş., Ankara.
http://www.eoq.org/home.html retrieved on 11.04.2019.
http://www.kalder.org/tarihce retrieved on 11.04.2019.
http://www.meb.gov.tr/meb/teskilat.php retrieved on 15.01.2019.
http://tr.urapcenter.org/2018/hakkimizda.php retrieved on 15.01.2019.
Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Jeong, J. (2015). Enhancing organizational survivability in a crisis: Perceived organizational crisis responsibility, stance, and strategy. Sustainability, 7(9), 11532-11545.
Joreskog, K.G. & Sorbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific International Software, Inc.
Kantur, D. & İşeri-Say, A. (2015). Measuring organizational resilience: A scale development. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 4(3), 456-472.
Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (24. baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Kartal, S. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının görüşlerine göre eğitim sistemimizde değiştirilmesi gereken noktalar. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2013(14), 248-262.
Kavak, Y. (2011). View and outlook of higher education in Turkey. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 1(2), 55-58.
Kesik, F. & Bayram, A. (2015). Eğitim sisteminin eleştirel pedagoji perspektifinden bir değerlendirmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(3), 900-921.
Kılıç, R. (1999). Türkiye'de yükseköğretimin kapsamı ve tarihsel gelişimi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (3), 289-310.
Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
Lattimore, P. (2016). Resilience vs sustainability. https://exchange.cim.co.uk/blog/resiliencevs-sustainability/ adresinden 11.10.2017. tarihinde alınmıştır.
Laverty, K.J. (1993). Time Preferences, Time Horizons, And Strategic Choice: Towards An Understanding Of Organizational Myopia. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. University of California, Los Angeles, ABD.
Malik, K. (2014). Human Development Report 2014, Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience. United Nations Development Programme: New York, NY, USA.
Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J. & Peschar, J.L. 2006. OECD’s brief selfreport measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Crosscultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311-360.
Mertler, C.A. & Vanatta, R.A. (2005). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods (3rd Ed.). Glendale, CA: Pyrzcak Publishing.
Nartgün, S. S., Sezen-Gültekin, G., & Limon, İ. (2017). Examination of 2015 Human Development Index in Terms of Education: Comparison of the Continents and Turkey. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(3), 37-47.
OECD (2014). Strengthening resilience through education and skills: PISA results. Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level, Paris, 6-7 May, 2014.
Özer, M., Gür, B.S. & Küçükcan, T. (2011). Kalite Güvencesi: Türkiye yükseköğretimi için stratejik tercihler. Journal of Higher Education & Science/Yüksekögretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 1(2), 59-65.
Robb, D. (2000). Building Resilient Organizations Resilient Organizations actively build and integrate Performance and Adaptive Skills. Od Practitioner, 32(3), 27-32.
Sarıbaş, S. ve Babadağ, G. (2015). Temel eğitimin temel sorunları. E-AJELI (Anatolian Journal of Educational Leadership and Instruction), 3(1), 18-34.
Schermelleh-Engel, K. & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
Sezen-Gültekin, G. (2019). Yükseköğretimde örgütsel körlük ve örgütsel sürdürülebilirlik arasındaki ilişkide örgütsel dayanıklılığın aracı rolü. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Bolu: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Steiger, J.H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893-98.
Süngü, H. & Bayrakcı, M. (2010). Bolonya süreci sonrasi yükseköğretimde akreditasyon çalişmalari. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(4), 895-912.
Tanaka, J.S. & Huba, G.J. (1985). A fit index for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 197- 201.
T.C. Resmi Gazete (1981). 2547 Sayılı Yükseköğretim Kanunu. http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.2547.pdf retrieved on 11.04.2019.
Tezsürücü, D. & Bursalıoğlu, S. A. (2013). Yükseköğretimde değişim: Kalite arayışları. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(2), 97-108.
UNESCO (2015). UNESCO 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals. http://en.unesco.org/education2030-sdg4 adresinden 02.07.2017 tarihinde alınmıştır.
Vogus, T.J. & Sutcliffe, K.M. (2007.) Organizational resilience: towards a theory and research agenda. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, ISIC, 7–10 October, Montreal, 3418.
Wals, A.E. & Schwarzin, L. (2012). Fostering organizational sustainability through dialogic interaction. The Learning Organization, 19(1), 11-27.
White, A.L. (1999). Sustainability and the accountable corporation. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 41(8), 30-43.
Wokutch, R.E., Singal, M., Gerde, V.W. ve Naar, A. (2016). Exploring the Antecedents of Organization Resilience: A Conceptual Approach. In Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society, July(27), 269-281.
Yılmaz, K. & Altınkurt, Y. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının Türk eğitim sisteminin sorunlarına ilişkin görüşleri. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 942-973.
Yılmaz Fındık, L. (2016). What makes a difference for resilient students in Turkey? Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 62, 91-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.64.5.
Yilmaz-Börekçi, D., İşeri-Say, A. & Rofcanin, Y. (2015). Measuring supplier resilience in supply networks. Journal of Change Management, 15(1), 64-82.
Yükseköğretim Bilgi Yönetim Sistemi (2018). Üniversite bazında öğretim elemanı sayıları raporu. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/.

APA	SEZEN GÜLTEKİN G, Argon T (2020). THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING. , 1470 - 1491.
Chicago	SEZEN GÜLTEKİN GÖZDE,Argon Türkan THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING. (2020): 1470 - 1491.
MLA	SEZEN GÜLTEKİN GÖZDE,Argon Türkan THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING. , 2020, ss.1470 - 1491.
AMA	SEZEN GÜLTEKİN G,Argon T THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING. . 2020; 1470 - 1491.
Vancouver	SEZEN GÜLTEKİN G,Argon T THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING. . 2020; 1470 - 1491.
IEEE	SEZEN GÜLTEKİN G,Argon T "THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING." , ss.1470 - 1491, 2020.
ISNAD	SEZEN GÜLTEKİN, GÖZDE - Argon, Türkan. "THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING". (2020), 1470-1491.

APA	SEZEN GÜLTEKİN G, Argon T (2020). THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING. IOJET, 7(4), 1470 - 1491.
Chicago	SEZEN GÜLTEKİN GÖZDE,Argon Türkan THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING. IOJET 7, no.4 (2020): 1470 - 1491.
MLA	SEZEN GÜLTEKİN GÖZDE,Argon Türkan THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING. IOJET, vol.7, no.4, 2020, ss.1470 - 1491.
AMA	SEZEN GÜLTEKİN G,Argon T THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING. IOJET. 2020; 7(4): 1470 - 1491.
Vancouver	SEZEN GÜLTEKİN G,Argon T THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING. IOJET. 2020; 7(4): 1470 - 1491.
IEEE	SEZEN GÜLTEKİN G,Argon T "THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING." IOJET, 7, ss.1470 - 1491, 2020.
ISNAD	SEZEN GÜLTEKİN, GÖZDE - Argon, Türkan. "THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING". IOJET 7/4 (2020), 1470-1491.