EXTENDING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) WITH THE THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS

Mehmet Oytun CİBAROĞLU, (Bursa Teknik Üniversitesi, Bilgi Teknolojileri Bölümü, Bursa, Türkiye)
Naciye Güliz UĞUR, (Sakarya Üniversitesi, İşletme Fakültesi, Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Bölümü, Sakarya, Türkiye)
Aykut Hamit TURAN (Sakarya Üniversitesi, İşletme Fakültesi, Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Bölümü, Sakarya, Türkiye)
Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi
17 3
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 31 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 22 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.18092/ulikidince.700939 İndeks Tarihi: 07-10-2021

EXTENDING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) WITH THE THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS

Öz:
Technological developments provide numerous advantages for users; yet, competition conditions, investment costs, and consumer expectations make it challenging to hold products in the market. Hence, researchin technology acceptance and dissemination gains importance day by day, and they are carefully followed notonly by the researchers but also by the application community. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Technology Readiness Indices (TRI), which are among themost frequently used sources in the acceptance of innovations and in evaluating the technological susceptibility of individuals within the scope of an expanded model. The technology mentioned in the items wasOnline Attendance Systems (OASs), used in higher education. The extended model has been tested usingMultiple Linear Regression (MLR) procedures. The data set was composed of 389 faculty members' responsesfrom seven different universities in Turkey. According to the analysis results, the combination of TAM and TRIvariables scored a 58,6% explanation rate for Behavioral Intention, which is regarded as high predictive performance in technology acceptance literature.
Anahtar Kelime:

TEKNOLOJİ KABUL MODELİNİN (TKM) TEKNOLOJİYE HAZIR OLMA TEORİSİYLE GENİŞLETİLMESİ

Öz:
Teknolojik gelişmeler kullanıcılar için sayısız avantaj sağlarken, rekabet koşulları, yatırım maliyetleri ve tüketici beklentileri ürünlerin tutunmasını zorlaştırmaktadır. Bu nedenle, teknoloji kabulü ve yayılması alanında yapılan araştırmalar gün geçtikçe önem kazanmaktadır ve sadece araştırmacılar değil uygulama camiası tarafından da dikkatle takip edilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, yeniliklerin kabulünde ve kişilerin teknolojik yatkınlıklarının değerlendirilmesinde en sık başvurulan kaynaklardan olan Teknoloji Kabul Modeli (TKM) ve Teknolojiye Hazır Olma İndekslerinin (THİ) birleştirilerek genişletilmiş bir model kapsamında değerlendirilmesidir. İfadelerde konu edinilen teknoloji eğitim alanında kullanılan çevrimiçi yoklama sistemleridir. Genişletilmiş model Çoklu Lineer Regresyon (ÇLR) Analizi kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Araştırmanın veri seti Türkiye'deki yedi farklı üniversiteden 389 akademisyenin görüşleri ile oluşturulmuştur. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, TKM ve THİ değişkenlerinin birleştirilmesi, Davranışsal Niyeti %58,6 açıklama oranına erişerek, teknoloji kabul literatüründe yüksek olarak değerlendirilebilecek bir tahmin performansı ortaya koymuştur
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888-918.
  • Badri, M., Al Rashedi, A., Yang, G., Mohaidat, J., & Al Hammadi, A. (2014). Technology Readiness of School Teachers: An Empirical Study of Measurement and Segmentation. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 13, 257-275.
  • Blut, M. and Wang, C. (2019). Technology Readiness: A Meta-Analysis of Conceptualizations of the Construct and Its Impact on Technology Usage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11747-019-00680- 8.pdf,Accessed Date: May 28 2020.
  • Burton-Jones, A. and Hubona, G. S. (2006). The Mediation of External Variables in the Technology Acceptance Model. Information & Management, 43, 706-717.
  • Davis, F. (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems. Doctoral Thesis. MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge MA.
  • Davis, F. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  • Davis, F .D. (1993). User acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475-487.
  • Davis, F. D. and Venkatesh, V. (1996). A Critical Assessment of Potential Measurement Biases in the Technology Acceptance Model: Three Experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(1), 19-45.
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
  • Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M. and Williams, M. D. (2019). Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21, 719-734. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-017- 9774-y
  • Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C. and Strahan, E.J. (1999). Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research. Psychological Methods. 4(3): 272-299
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Pub.
  • Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.
  • Frost, J. (2017). Multicollinearity in Regression Analysis: Problems, Detection, and Solutions. Retrieved from https://statisticsbyjim.com/regression/multicollinearity-in-regression-analysis/, Accessed date: March 09 2020.
  • Ganciu, M. R. and Niculescu, A. (2019). Using Technology Acceptance Model to Adopt Intelligent Banking. FAIMA Business & Management Journal, 7(4), 13-23.
  • Gupta, V. S. and Garg, R. (2015). Technology Readiness Index of E-Banking Users: Some Measurement and Sample Survey Evidence. IUP Journal of Bank Management, 43-58.
  • Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis, (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Essex: Prentice Hall.
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. (2013). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Ke, C. K., Sun, H. M. and Yang, Y.C. (2012). Effects of User and System Characteristics on Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use for the Web-Based Classroom Response System.
  • The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 128-143. Kenton, W. (2019). Multiple Linear Regression - MLR Definition. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mlr.asp, Accessed date: March 09 2020.
  • Kim, T. and Chiu, W. (2019). Consumer Acceptance of Sports Wearable Technology: The Role of Technology Readiness. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 20(1), 109-126.
  • Koivisto, K., Makkonen, M., Frank, L. and Riekkinen, J. (2016). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Personal Innovativeness and Technology Readiness: A Comparison of Three Models. 29th Bled eConference Digital Economy June 19-22, 2016, 113-128. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325645938_Extending_the_Tec hnology_Acceptance_Model_with_Personal_Innovativeness_and_Technology_Readiness_A_Comparison_of_Three_Models, Accessed date: June 02 2020.
  • Koul, S. and Eydgahi, A. (2018). Utilizing Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) for Driverless Car Technology Adoption. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation. 13(4), 37-46.
  • Lai, M. L. (2008). Technology Readiness, Internet Self-Efficacy and Computing Experience of Professional Accounting Students. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 25(1), 18-29.
  • Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A. and Larsen, K. R. (2003). The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(50), 750-782.
  • Lin, J. C. and Chang, H. (2011). The Role of Technology Readiness in Self-Service Technology Acceptance. Managing Service Quality, 21(4), 424-444.
  • Ling, L. M. and Moi, C. M. (2007). Professional Students' Technology Readiness, Prior Computing Experience and Acceptance of an e-Learning System. Malaysian Accounting Review, 6(1), 85-99.
  • Ling, L. M. and Muhammad, I. (2006). Taxation and Technology: Technology Readiness of Malaysian Tax Officers in Petaling Jaya Branch. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 4(1), 147-163.
  • Massey, A. P., Khatri, V. and Montoya-Weiss, M. (2007). Usability of Online Services: The Role of Technology Readiness and Context. Decision Sciences, 38(2), 277-308.
  • Mohammadi, F. and Mahmoodi, F. (2019). Factors Affecting Acceptance and Use of Educational Wikis: Using Technology Acceptance Model (3). Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 10(1), 1-9. DOI: 10.5812/ijvlms.87484
  • Norusis, M. J. (1993). SPSS for Windows: Professional Statics, Release 6.0, Chicago: SPSS Inc.
  • Nughoro, M.A and Fajar, M.A. (2017). Effects of Technology Readiness Towards Acceptance of Mandatory Web-Based Attendance System. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 319-328.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Odlum, M. (2016). Technology Readiness of Early Career Nurse Trainees: Utilization of the Technology Readiness Index (TRI). Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 314-318.
  • Parasaruman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (TRI): A Multiple-Item Scale to Measure Readiness to Embrace New Technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307-320.
  • Parasaruman, A. and Colby, C. L. (2001). Techno-ready Marketing: How and Why Your Customers Adopt Technology. New York: The Free Press.
  • Parasaruman, A. and Colby, C. L. (2015). An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59-74.
  • Penz, D., Amorim, B. C., Nascimento, S. and Rossetto, C. R. (2017). The Influence of Technology Readiness Index in Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Study with Brazilian Entrepreneurs in the United States of America. International Journal of Innovation, 5(1), 66-76.
  • Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R. and Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making Sense of Factor Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis for Instrument Development in Health Care Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
  • Pires, P. J., Filho, B. A. C. and Cunha, J. C. (2011). Technology Readiness Index (TRI) Factors as Differentiating Elements between Users and Non-Users of Internet Banking, and as Antecedents of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). In M.M. Cruz-Cunha et al. (Eds.). CENTERIS 2011, Part II, CCIS 220, pp. 215–229. Springer: Berlin.
  • Raman, A. and Don, Y. (2013). Preservice Teachers' Acceptance of Learning Management Software: An Application of the UTAUT2 Model. International Education Studies, 6(7), 157-164
  • Rondan-Cataluna, F., Arenas-Gaitan, J. and Ramirez-Correa, P. E. (2015). A Comparison of the Different Versions of Popular Technology Acceptance Models. Kybernetes, 44(5), 788 - 805.
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2014-0184 Rose, J. and Fogarty, W. (2010). Technology Readiness and Segmentation Profile of Mature Consumers. In: 4th Biennial Conference of the Academy of World Business, Marketing and Management Development, July 12-15 2010, pp. 57-65, Finland.
  • Said, R. F. M., Rahman, S. A., Mutalib, S., Yusoff, M. and Mohamed, A. (2008). User Technology Readiness Measurement in Fingerprint Adoption at Higher Education Institution. In Gervasi O., Murgante B., Lagana A., Taniar D., Mun Y., Gavrilova M. L. (eds). Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2008. ICCSA 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5073, 91-104.
  • Springer: Berlin.Smith, M., Walford, N. G. and Bescos, C. J. (2018). Assessing the User Response to Differences in Functionality When Visualising 3D Models of Cultural Heritage Sites Using the Technology Readiness Index. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 10, 1-10.
  • Stoel, R. D. and Garre, F. G. (2011). Growth Curve Analysis Using Multilevel Regression and Structural Rquation Modeling. In J. J. Hox & J. K. Roberts (Eds.), European Association for Methodology series. Handbook for advanced multilevel analysis (p. 97-111). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Simiyu, S. C. and Kohsuvan, P. (2019). Understanding Consumers’ Mobile Banking Adoption through the Integrated Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model (TRAM) Perspective: A Comparative Investigation. Human Behavior, Development and Society, 20(4), 29-40.
  • Sun, S, Lee, P. C., Law, R and Hyun, S. S. (2020). An Investigation of the Moderating Effects of Current Job Position Level and Hotel Work Experience Between Technology Readiness And Technology Acceptance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 90, 1-10.
  • Şahinoğlu, K. T. and Yakut, S. G. (2019). Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Özgürlüklerin Ekonomik Performansa Etkisi Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 30, 1-20.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Pearson.
  • Taherdoost, H., Sahibuddin, S. and Jalaliyoon, N. (2014). Exploratory Factor Analysis; Concepts and Theory. Advances in Applied and Pure Mathematics, 375-382.
  • Tomarken, A. J. and Waller, N. G. (2005). Structural Equation Modeling: Strengths, Limitations, and Misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 31–65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144239.
  • UCLA. (n.d.). A Practical Introduction to Factor Analysis UCLA, Retrieved from, https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/sas/modules/sas-learning-moduleintroduction-to-the-features-of-sas, Accessed date: January 13 2021.
  • Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
  • Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2):186-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  • Yi, Y., Tung, L. L. and Wu, Z. (2003). Incorporating Technology Readiness (TR) Into TAM: Are Individual Traits Important to Understand Technology Acceptance? DIGIT 2003 Proceedings. 2. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/digit2003/2/, Accessed date: June 02 2020.
  • Yong, A.G. and Pearce, S. (2013). A Beginner's Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79-94.
  • Wu, M. C., Chen, C. C. and Tseng, C. H. (2013). Constructing a Technology Readiness Scale for Sports Center RFID Door Security System Users. The Journal of Global Business Management, 9(1), 12-21.
  • Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, 46, 186-204.
APA Cibaroğlu M, UĞUR N, Turan A (2021). EXTENDING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) WITH THE THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS. , 1 - 22. 10.18092/ulikidince.700939
Chicago Cibaroğlu Mehmet Oytun,UĞUR Naciye Güliz,Turan Aykut Hamit EXTENDING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) WITH THE THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS. (2021): 1 - 22. 10.18092/ulikidince.700939
MLA Cibaroğlu Mehmet Oytun,UĞUR Naciye Güliz,Turan Aykut Hamit EXTENDING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) WITH THE THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS. , 2021, ss.1 - 22. 10.18092/ulikidince.700939
AMA Cibaroğlu M,UĞUR N,Turan A EXTENDING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) WITH THE THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS. . 2021; 1 - 22. 10.18092/ulikidince.700939
Vancouver Cibaroğlu M,UĞUR N,Turan A EXTENDING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) WITH THE THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS. . 2021; 1 - 22. 10.18092/ulikidince.700939
IEEE Cibaroğlu M,UĞUR N,Turan A "EXTENDING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) WITH THE THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS." , ss.1 - 22, 2021. 10.18092/ulikidince.700939
ISNAD Cibaroğlu, Mehmet Oytun vd. "EXTENDING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) WITH THE THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS". (2021), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.700939
APA Cibaroğlu M, UĞUR N, Turan A (2021). EXTENDING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) WITH THE THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 0(31), 1 - 22. 10.18092/ulikidince.700939
Chicago Cibaroğlu Mehmet Oytun,UĞUR Naciye Güliz,Turan Aykut Hamit EXTENDING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) WITH THE THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi 0, no.31 (2021): 1 - 22. 10.18092/ulikidince.700939
MLA Cibaroğlu Mehmet Oytun,UĞUR Naciye Güliz,Turan Aykut Hamit EXTENDING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) WITH THE THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, vol.0, no.31, 2021, ss.1 - 22. 10.18092/ulikidince.700939
AMA Cibaroğlu M,UĞUR N,Turan A EXTENDING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) WITH THE THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi. 2021; 0(31): 1 - 22. 10.18092/ulikidince.700939
Vancouver Cibaroğlu M,UĞUR N,Turan A EXTENDING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) WITH THE THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi. 2021; 0(31): 1 - 22. 10.18092/ulikidince.700939
IEEE Cibaroğlu M,UĞUR N,Turan A "EXTENDING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) WITH THE THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS." Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 0, ss.1 - 22, 2021. 10.18092/ulikidince.700939
ISNAD Cibaroğlu, Mehmet Oytun vd. "EXTENDING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) WITH THE THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS". Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi 31 (2021), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.700939
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
02-05-2024 12:0

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları