ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH

TAKUNYACI, Mithat

ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH

Mithat TAKUNYACI (Sakarya Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Matematik ve Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Bölümü, Matematik Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalı, Sakarya, Türkiye)

EKEV AKADEMİ DERGİSİ

7 3

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 87 Sayfa Aralığı: 413 - 434 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 08-01-2022

ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH

Öz:

Self-efficacy in teaching mathematics can be explained as teachers’ personal beliefs about their self-efficacy beliefs in teaching mathematics and personal perceptions of their self-ability to teach mathematics to others. Also, teachers’ attitudes, believes, and behaviors have a significant effect on students’ preparation and their academic success. So, it is important to examine teachers’ efficacy beliefs towards teaching mathematics. Not more quantitative research was found on the evaluation tools for determining teaching mathematics efficiency belief of teachers in Turkey. The purpose of the current study is to adapt the Teaching Mathematics Efficacy Belief Inventory (TMEBI) to the Turkish language. The sample of the study consists of 426 prospective mathematics teachers (54.5% female and 45.5% male). The scale that was used in the study was developed by Enochs, Smith, and Huinker (2000) to determine teaching efficacy belief towards mathematics. Firstly, for linguistic equivalence study, the correlation coefficient was examined, and then validity and reliability analysis were conducted. Validity and reliability studies were applied to adapting the Turkish form. Findings showed the highreliability coefficients of the scale were found (Cronbach’s α (.91), McDonald’s ω (.85), and Two-Half Test (r =.83)). Finally, it can be said that the MTEBI, which was adapted to the Turkish language is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

Anahtar Kelime:

Matematik Öğretimi Yeterlik İnancı Envanteri (MÖYİE)’nin Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması

Öz:

Matematik öğretiminde öz-yeterlik, öğretmenlerin matematik öğretiminde öz-yeterlik inançlarına ilişkin kişisel inançları ve başkalarına matematik öğretme öz yeterliklerine ilişkin kişisel algıları olarak açıklanabilir. Ayrıca, öğretmenlerin tutumları, inançları ve davranışları öğrencilerin hazırlanmaları ve akademik başarıları üzerinde önemli bir etkiye sahiptir. Bu nedenle, öğretmenin matematik öğretimine yönelik yeterlik inançlarını incelemek önemlidir ve Türkiye’de öğretmenlerin matematik öğretimi inançlarını belirlemeye yönelik değerlendirme araçlarına ilişkin nicel araştırmalara rastlanmamıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Matematik Öğretimi Yeterlilik İnanç Envanteri’ni (MÖYİE) Türkçe diline uyarlamaktır. Araştırmanın örneklemini 426 matematik öğretmeni adayı (%54,5 kadın ve %45,5 erkek) oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada kullanılan ölçek Enochs, Smith ve Huinker (2000) tarafından matematik öğretimi yeterlik inancını belirlemek için geliştirilmiştir. Dilsel eşdeğerlik çalışması için öncelikle korelasyon katsayısı incelenmiş, ardından geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik analizi yapılmıştır. Türkçe formun uyarlanmasında geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışmaları yapılmıştır. Bulgular, ölçeğin yüksek güvenirlik katsayılarının bulunduğunu (Cronbach’s α (.91), McDonald’s ω (.85) ve İki Yarı Testi (r = .83) göstermiştir. Son olarak Türkçeye uyarlanan MÖYİE’nin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Acar Güvendir, M. and Özer Özkan, Y. (2015) Türkiye’deki eğitim alanında yayımlanan bilimsel dergilerde ölçek geliştirme ve uyarlama konulu makalelerin incelenmesi [The examination of scale development and scale adaptation articles published in Turkish academic journals on education]. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(52), 23-33.
Aerni, P.W. (2008). Teacher self-efficacy and beliefs for teaching mathematics in inclusion settings. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. The College of William and Mary in Virginia. UMI Number: 3353198.
Aksu, H. H. (2008). Öğretmen adaylarının matematik öğretimine yönelik öz-yeterlilik inançları [Prospective teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs regarding mathematics teaching]. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 1610- 170.
Aksu, Z. and Kul, U. (2019). The mediating role of mathematics teaching efficacy on the relationships between pedagogical content knowledge and mathematics teaching anxiety. SAGE Open 9(3), 1-10.
Akyıldız, P. and Çınar, C. (2016). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının lineer cebir dersine yönelik tutumları ve alan dili yeterliklerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of pre-service primary mathematics teachers’ attitudes towards linear algebra course and competences of the field language]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(1), 1-22.
Allinder, R.M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 86-95.
Allinder, R.M. (1995). An examination of the relationship between teacher efficacy and curriculum-based measurement and student achievement. Remedial and Special Education, 16(4), 247-254.
Allison, P.D. (2002). Missing Data. California: Sage Publication, Inc.
Ashton, P., Buhr, D. and Crocker, L. (1984). Teachers’ sense of efficacy: A self- or normreferenced construct? Florida Journal of Educational Research, 26(1), 29-41.
Ashton, P.T., and Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. Longman Press.
Askar, P., and Umay, A. (2001). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin bilgisayarla ilgili öz yeterlik algısı [Perceived Computer Self-Efficacy of the Students in The Elementary Mathematics Teaching Programme]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 1-8.
Aydın, S., and Çelik, D. (2016). Preservice elementary mathematics teachers’ beliefs about preparedness to teach mathematics: scale adaptation and validation study. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 469-510.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Başpınar, K., and Peker, M. (2016). The relationship between pre-service primary school teachers’ mathematics teaching anxiety and their beliefs about teaching and learning mathematics. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 9(1), 1-14.
Borko, H., and Putnam, R.T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner and R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (p. 673–708). Macmillan Library Reference; Prentice Hall International.
Bryman, A., and Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for windows: A guide for social scientists. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780 203471548.
Bursal, M. (2010). Turkish pre-service elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs regarding mathematics and science teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 649-666.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Handbook of data analysis for social sciences]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
Cakiroglu, E. (2000). Preservice elementary teachers’ sense of efficacy in reformoriented mathematics. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.
Can, A. (2013). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in the scientific research process with SPSS]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
Charalambous, C.Y., Philippou, G. N., and Kyriakides, L. (2008). Tracing the development of preservice teachers’ efficacy beliefs in teaching mathematics during fieldwork. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 125-142.
Chester, M., and Beaudin, B.Q. (1996). Efficacy beliefs of newly hired teachers in urban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 233-257.
Comrey, A. L., and Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Dede, Y. (2008). Matematik öğretmenlerinin öğretimlerine yönelik öz yeterlik inançları [Mathematics teachers’ self-efficacy belief towards teaching]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(4), 741–757.
Delice, A. and Ergene, Ö. (2015). Ölçek geliştirme ve uyarlama çalışmalarının incelenmesi: Matematik eğitimi makaleleri örneği. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(1), 60-75.
Deniz, L., and Koç, T. (2020). Development of the mathematics teaching self-efficacy belief scale. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 7(1), 82-98.
Demir, E., and Parlak, B. (2012). Türkiye’de eğitim araştırmalarında kayıp veri sorunu [The problem of missing data in educational research in Turkey]. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3(1), 230-241.
Doruk, M., and Kaplan, A. (2012). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının matematik öğretimlerine yönelik öz-yeterlik inançlarının incelenmesi [Examining prospective primary school teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs toward mathematics teaching]. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies., 5(7), 291-302.
Enochs, L.G., Smith, P. L., and Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 194-201.
Ergene, Ö. (2020). Matematik eğitimi alanında ölçek geliştirme ve ölçek uyarlama makaleleri: Betimsel içerik analizi [Scale Development and Adaptation Articles in the Field of Mathematics Education: Descriptive Content Analysis]. Journal of Education for Life, 34(2), 360-383.
Erkuş, A. (2012). Psikolojide ölçme ve ölçek geliştirme-1: Temel kavramlar ve işlemler. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
Esendemir, Ö., Çırak, S., and Samancıoğlu, M. (2015). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematik öğretimi yeterliklerine ilişkin görüşleri [Pre-service Elementary Math Teachers’ Opinions About Mathematics Teaching Competencies]. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1), 217- 239.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd Ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 39-50.
Fraenkel, J. R., and Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill Press.
Gibson, S., and Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 4, 569-582.
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Fink, B., and MacArthur, C. A. (2001). Teacher efficacy in writing: A construct validation with primary grade teachers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 177-202.
Gorsuch, R. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Press.
Guskey, T.R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63-69.
Guskey, T., and Passaro, P. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 627-643.
Gül, Ş. and Sözbilir, M. (2015). Fen ve matematik eğitimi alanında gerçekleştirilen ölçek geliştirme araştırmalarına yönelik tematik içerik analizi [Thematic content analysis of scale development studies published in the field of science and mathematics education]. Education and Science, 40(178), 85-102. DOI: 10.15390/EB.2015.4070.
Hacıömeroğlu, G., and Şahin-Taşkın, Ç. (2010). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının matematik öğretimi yeterlik inançları [Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Belief]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 539-555.
Hackett, G., and Betz, N. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy/ mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 261-273.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R.E., and Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed). Hoboken: Prentice-Hall Press.
Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoy, A.W. (2000). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA. Retrieved from https://www.learningforwardpa. org/uploads/2/0/8/5/20859956/changes_in_teacher_efficacy.pdf.
Jöreskog, K.G., and Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. LINCOLNWOOD: Scientific Software International, Inc.
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The applications of electronic computer to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
Keith, T.Z., and Cool, V.A. (1992). Testing models of school learning: Effects of quality of instruction, motivation, academic coursework, and homework on academic achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 7, 207-226.
Knapp, M.S., Copland, M.A., and Talbert J.E. (2003). Leading for learning: Reflective tools for school and district leaders. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. Washington: University of Washington.
Koyuncu, I., Güzeller, C.O., and Akyüz, D. (2017). The development of a self-efficacy scale for mathematical modeling competencies. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 4(1), 19-36.
Koyuncu, İ., and Kılıç, A.F. (2019). The Use of Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses: A Document Analysis. Education and Science, 44(198), 361-388.
Little, R.J.A, and Rubin, D.B. (1987). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 2nd edition. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Maasepp, B., and Bobis, J. (2014). Prospective primary teachers’ beliefs about mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(2), 89–107.
Maddux, J.E., Norton, L.W., and Stoltenberg, C.D. (1986). Self-efficacy expectancy, outcome expectancy, and outcome value: Relative effects on behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 783-789.
Mertler, C.A., and Vannatta, R.A. (2005), Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: practical application and interpretation (3rd Ed.). Los Angeles: Pyrczak Publishing.
Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., and Eccles, J. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self- and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 247-258.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Press. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578.
Pajares, F., and Miller, M.D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 193-203.
Peker, M. (2009). Pre-service teachers’ teaching anxiety about mathematics and their learning styles. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(4), 335-345.
Peters, G. J. Y. (2014). The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: why and how to abandon Cronbach’s alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale quality. European Health Psychologist, 16(2), 56-69.
Podell, D.M., and Soodak, L.C. (1993). Teacher efficacy and bias in special education referral. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 247-253.
Ross, J.A. (1994). Beliefs that make a difference: the origins and impacts of teacher efficacy. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Canadian association for curriculum studies.
Secada, W.G. (1992). Race, ethnicity, social class, language, and achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 623-660). New York: MacMillan Press.
Swackhamer, L.E., Koellner, K., Basile, C., and Kimbrough, D. (2009). Increasing the self-efficacy of in-service teachers through content knowledge. Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(2), 63-78.
Swars, S.L. (2005). Examining perceptions of mathematics teaching effectiveness among elementary preservice teachers with differing levels of mathematics teacher efficacy. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32, 139-147.
Şahin, M. G., and Boztunç Öztürk, N. (2018). Eğitim alanında ölçek geliştirme süreci: Bir içerik analizi çalışması [Scale Development Process in Educational Field: A Content Analysis Research]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(1), 191-199.
Şan, İ. (2013). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının öğretimi planlama ve düzenleme yeterlikleri hakkında öz yeterlik düzeyleri [The level of self-efficacy of prospective mathematics teachers about competencies for planning and organizing instruction]. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8(3), 517-537.
Tabachnik, B.G., and Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statics. London: Pearson New International Edition.
Takunyaci, M., and Takunyaci, M. (2014). Preschool teachers’ mathematics teaching efficacy belief. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 673–678.
Taşdemir, C. (2019). Examination of Teacher Candidates’ Self-efficacy Beliefs for Mathematics Teaching, Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 20(1), 55-68.
Wertheim, C., and Leyser, Y. (2002). Efficacy beliefs background variables and differentiated instruction of Israeli prospective teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 54-64.
Yıldırım, S. (2011). Öz-yeterlik, içe yönelik motivasyon, kaygı ve matematik başarısı: Türkiye, Japonya ve Finlandiya’dan Bulgular [Self-efficacy, Intrinsic Motivation, Anxiety and Mathematics Achievement: Findings from Turkey, Japan and Finland]. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1),277- 291.
Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91.

APA	TAKUNYACI M (2021). ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH. , 413 - 434.
Chicago	TAKUNYACI Mithat ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH. (2021): 413 - 434.
MLA	TAKUNYACI Mithat ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH. , 2021, ss.413 - 434.
AMA	TAKUNYACI M ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH. . 2021; 413 - 434.
Vancouver	TAKUNYACI M ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH. . 2021; 413 - 434.
IEEE	TAKUNYACI M "ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH." , ss.413 - 434, 2021.
ISNAD	TAKUNYACI, Mithat. "ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH". (2021), 413-434.

APA	TAKUNYACI M (2021). ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH. EKEV AKADEMİ DERGİSİ, 0(87), 413 - 434.
Chicago	TAKUNYACI Mithat ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH. EKEV AKADEMİ DERGİSİ 0, no.87 (2021): 413 - 434.
MLA	TAKUNYACI Mithat ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH. EKEV AKADEMİ DERGİSİ, vol.0, no.87, 2021, ss.413 - 434.
AMA	TAKUNYACI M ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH. EKEV AKADEMİ DERGİSİ. 2021; 0(87): 413 - 434.
Vancouver	TAKUNYACI M ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH. EKEV AKADEMİ DERGİSİ. 2021; 0(87): 413 - 434.
IEEE	TAKUNYACI M "ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH." EKEV AKADEMİ DERGİSİ, 0, ss.413 - 434, 2021.
ISNAD	TAKUNYACI, Mithat. "ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH". EKEV AKADEMİ DERGİSİ 87 (2021), 413-434.