Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 443 - 454 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.14744/nci.2021.69077 İndeks Tarihi: 24-05-2022

Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability

Öz:
OBJECTIVE: Epidemic and pandemic outbreak periods are as stressful for psychiatric symptoms as well as the physical symptoms of the epidemic disease and can trigger and aggravate psychiatric symptoms, especially anxiety. There is no scale specific to the outbreak period and which can be used in other outbreaks. In this study, it was planned to develop a scale to evaluate the anxiety associated with epidemic disease, especially during the epidemic period. METHODS: In this study, a Likert type scale with 15 items was developed by our research team to evaluate outbreak disease anxiety, and the scale form created was transferred to online use and the reliability of validity was evaluated by obtaining the results of 311 participants in the online environment. The internal consistency of the scale was assessed with Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients. Split-half reliability was estimated using Spearman-Brown coefficients unequel length. Explanatory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis in AMOS, correlation analysis, and construct validity analysis (convergent validity and discriminant validity) were conducted. Beck Anxiety Inventory and Health Anxiety Inventory was used to evaluate concurrent and discriminant validity. RESULTS: The Cronbach Alpha coefficient calculated for the evaluation of the internal consistency (homogeneity) of the outbreak anxiety scale was determined as 0.94 and this value shows that the scale has high reliability. With the results of this study, the scale’s content validity and construct validity, discrimination, and criterion validity were evaluated and it was shown to have acceptable valid features in all. CONCLUSION: Outbreak anxiety scale is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate anxiety related with outbreak of epidemic and pandemic disease.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N, et al. Factors Associated With Mental Health Out-comes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e203976.
  • 2. Ren SY, Gao RD, Chen YL. Fear can be more harmful than the severe acute respiratory synd-rome coronavirus 2 in controlling the corona virus disease 2019 epidemic. World J Clin Cases 2020;8:652–7.
  • 3. Wong TW, Gao Y, Tam WWS Anxiety among university students during the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong. Stress Health 2007;23:31– 5.
  • 4. WHO. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report – 97. Available at: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/ situation-reports/20200426-sitrep-97-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn= d1c3e800_6. 2019. Accessed Apr 27, 2020.
  • 5. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, et al. Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:1729.
  • 6. Li S, Wang Y, Xue J, Zhao N, Zhu T. The Impact of COVID-19 Epidemic Declaration on Psychological Consequences: A Study on Active Weibo Users. Int J Environ Res Public He-alth 2020;17:2032.
  • 7. Hays JN, Epidemics and pandemics: their impacts on human history. Abc-clio.December 2005 https://products.abc-clio.com/abc-cliocorporate/ product.aspx?pc=A1507C. Accessed 26 Nov, 2020.
  • 8. Nicola M, Alsafi Z, Sohrabi C, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, Iosifidis C, et al. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. Int J Surg 2020;78:185–93.
  • 9. Bao Y, Sun Y, Meng S, Shi J, Lu L. 2019-nCoV epidemic: address mental health care to em-power society. Lancet 2020;395:e37–8. 10. Küçükkömürler S. Psychological Effects of Uncertainty. Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi 2017;5:329–44.
  • 11. Boelen PA, Carleton RN. Intolerance of uncertainty, hypochondriacal concerns, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and worry. J Nerv Ment Dis 2012;200:208–13.
  • 12. Dar KA, Iqbal N, Mushtaq A. Intolerance of uncertainty, depression, and anxiety: Examining the indirect and moderating effects of worry. Asian J Psychiatr 2017;29:129–33.
  • 13. Xiang YT, Yang Y, Li W, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Cheung T, et al. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed. Lancet Psychiatry 2020;7:228–9.
  • 14. Tsang HW, Scudds RJ, Chan EY. Psychosocial impact of SARS. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:1326–7.
  • 15. Torales J, O’Higgins M, Castaldelli-Maia JM, Ventriglio A. The outbreak of COVID-19 co-ronavirus and its impact on global mental health. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2020;66:317–20.
  • 16. Ahorsu DK, Lin CY, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Development and Initial Validation. Int J Ment Health Addict 2020:1–9.
  • 17. Alpar R. Uygulamalı istatistik ve geçerlik-güvenirlik: spor, sağlık ve eğitim bilimlerinden örneklerle. 3rd ed. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık; 2014.
  • 18. Ayre C, Scally AJ. Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 2014;47:79–86.
  • 19. Lawshe CHA. Quantitative approach to content Valid ity. Personnel Psychology 1975;28:563–75.
  • 20. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psyc-hometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988;56:893–7.
  • 21. Ulusoy M, Sahin NH Erkmen H. Turkish version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory: psychometric properties. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy 1998;12:63–72.
  • 22. Salkovskis PM, Rimes KA, Warwick HM, Clark DM. The Health Anxiety Inventory: deve-lopment and validation of scales for the measurement of health anxiety and hypochondriasis. Psychol Med 2002;32:843–53.
  • 23. Karaer Karapıçak O, Aktas K, Aslan S. Turkish validity and reliability study of Health Anxiety Inventory (weekly short form) in cases of panic disorders. J Clin Psy 2012;15:41–8.
  • 24. Aydemir Ö, Kirpinar I, Sati T, Uykur B and Cengisiz C. Reliability and Validity of the Tur-kish Version of the Health Anxiety Inventory. Archives of Neuropsychiatry 2013;50:325–31.
  • 25. Tezbaşaran AA. Likert tipi ölçek geliştirme kılavuzu. 3. sürüm. Mersin: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları; 2008.
  • 26. Özdamar K. Paket programlar ile istatiksel veri analizi. 10th ed. Ankara: Nisan Kitabevi; 2017.
  • 27. Erkorkmaz U, Etikan I, Demir O, Ozdamar K, Sanisoglu S. Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Fit Indices: Review. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci. 2013;33(1):210–23.
  • 28. Ercan I, Kan I. Ölçeklerde Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2004;30:211–6.
  • 29. Aktürk Z, Acemoğlu H. Reliability and validity in medical research. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 2012; 39: 316–9.
  • 30. Özdamar K. Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi 1. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi; 1999.
  • 31. Warrens MJ. On Cronbach’s alpha as the mean of all split-half reliabilities. In: Millsap RE, Bolt DM, van der Ark LA, Wang WC, editors. Quantitative Psychology Research. The 78th Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 293–300.
  • 32. Bartlett MS. Tests Of Significance In Factor Analysis. British Journal of Statistical Psychology 1950;3:77–85.
  • 33. Çokluk Ö, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik. SPSS ve LİSREL uygulamaları. 3rd ed. Ankara: Pegem Akadademi; 2014. p. 177–241.
  • 34. Tatlıdil H. Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli Istatiksel Analiz. Ankara: Ziraat Matbacılık; 2002.
APA Yazici E, KÖSE E, Turan C, Yazici A (2021). Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability. , 443 - 454. 10.14744/nci.2021.69077
Chicago Yazici Esra,KÖSE Elif,Turan Caglar,Yazici Ahmet Bulent Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability. (2021): 443 - 454. 10.14744/nci.2021.69077
MLA Yazici Esra,KÖSE Elif,Turan Caglar,Yazici Ahmet Bulent Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability. , 2021, ss.443 - 454. 10.14744/nci.2021.69077
AMA Yazici E,KÖSE E,Turan C,Yazici A Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability. . 2021; 443 - 454. 10.14744/nci.2021.69077
Vancouver Yazici E,KÖSE E,Turan C,Yazici A Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability. . 2021; 443 - 454. 10.14744/nci.2021.69077
IEEE Yazici E,KÖSE E,Turan C,Yazici A "Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability." , ss.443 - 454, 2021. 10.14744/nci.2021.69077
ISNAD Yazici, Esra vd. "Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability". (2021), 443-454. https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2021.69077
APA Yazici E, KÖSE E, Turan C, Yazici A (2021). Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, 8(5), 443 - 454. 10.14744/nci.2021.69077
Chicago Yazici Esra,KÖSE Elif,Turan Caglar,Yazici Ahmet Bulent Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri 8, no.5 (2021): 443 - 454. 10.14744/nci.2021.69077
MLA Yazici Esra,KÖSE Elif,Turan Caglar,Yazici Ahmet Bulent Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, vol.8, no.5, 2021, ss.443 - 454. 10.14744/nci.2021.69077
AMA Yazici E,KÖSE E,Turan C,Yazici A Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri. 2021; 8(5): 443 - 454. 10.14744/nci.2021.69077
Vancouver Yazici E,KÖSE E,Turan C,Yazici A Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri. 2021; 8(5): 443 - 454. 10.14744/nci.2021.69077
IEEE Yazici E,KÖSE E,Turan C,Yazici A "Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability." İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, 8, ss.443 - 454, 2021. 10.14744/nci.2021.69077
ISNAD Yazici, Esra vd. "Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability". İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri 8/5 (2021), 443-454. https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2021.69077