BİLGİ, FİKRİ MÜLKİYET VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM: DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ’Nİ KURUMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVEYE OTURTMAK

Erkan GÜRPINAR (Ankara Sosyal Bilimler Üniversitesi Ekonomi Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi
8 2
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 77 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 407 - 426 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.33630/ausbf.105431 İndeks Tarihi: 10-10-2022

BİLGİ, FİKRİ MÜLKİYET VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM: DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ’Nİ KURUMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVEYE OTURTMAK

Öz:
Sanayi 4.0 günümüzde yapay zeka, makine öğrenmesi, nesnelerin interneti, akıllı fabrikalar gibi teknolojileri ve beraberinde getirdiği kurumsal değişimi tanımlamak için başvurulan bir kavramdır. Sadece yeni teknolojilerin rolüne odaklanmak teknolojik değişimin toplumsal boyutunu göz ardı etmemize neden olabilmektedir. Burada kastedilen, yeni teknolojilerin nasıl bir kurumsal çerçevede seçildiğinin ve geliştirildiğinin anlaşılmasıdır. Bu bağlamda, yazıda teknolojik değişim ile fikri mülkiyet hakları arasındaki ilişki ele alınmaktadır. Sanayi 4.0 tartışmalarına ilişkin teknolojik değişimler iki alandaki fikri mülkiyet hakları genişlemesiyle sıkı sıkıya ilişkilidir. İlki 1980’lerden sonra hızlanan ve bilimsel bilgiyi içeren düzenlemeleri kapsarken, tarihsel olarak daha gerilere dayanan ikinci gelişme işyerindeki bilginin yasal statüsüyle ilgilidir. Bu iki alandaki yararlı bilgi son iki yüzyılda firmanın malı haline gelmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Knowledge, Intellectual Property, and Institutional Change: An Institutional Framework for the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Öz:
Industry 4.0 has become a frequently used concept to describe technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, internet of things, smart factories, and the institutional change it brings. Focusing only on the role of new technologies may lead us to ignore the social dimension of technological change. What is meant here is to understand how new technologies are selected and developed in an institutional framework. In this context, the article discusses the relationship between technological change and intellectual property rights. New technologies associated with Industry 4.0 debate are closely related to the expansion of intellectual property rights in two areas. While the first covers the regulations that accelerated after the 1980s and include scientific knowledge, the second historical development is related to the legal status of knowledge in the workplace. In these areas, useful knowledge have become the property of the firm in the last two centuries.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akçomak, İ. Semih, Erkan Erdil, Murat Tiryakioğlu ve Teoman Pamukçu (2016), Bilim, Teknoloji ve Yenilik (İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları).
  • Alchian, Alchian ve Harold Demsetz (1972), “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization”, American Economic Review, 62(5): 777-795.
  • Andrews, Evan (2019), “Who were the Luddites?” https://www.history.com/news/who-were-the-luddites (03.06.2021) Aoki, Masahiko (2001), Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis (Cambridge: MIT Press).
  • Arrow, K. (1962), “Economic Welfare and the allocation of resources for invention”, NBER Chapters (Der.) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (Princeton Univ. Press): 609-626
  • Basalla, Geroge (1988), The Evolution of Technology (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press).
  • Benkler, Yochai (2002), “Coase’s penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm”, Yale Law Journal, 112(3): 369-446.
  • Benkler, Yochai (2006), The Wealth of Networks (New Haven: Yale University Press).
  • Besen Stanley, ve Leo J. Raskind (1991), “An introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual property”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1): 3-27.
  • Bok, Derek (2003), Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education (Princetton Univ. Press: Princeton). Boldrin, Michele ve David Levine (2008), Against Intellectual Monopoly (05.06.2021).
  • Boulding, Kenneth (1966), “The Economics of Knowledge and the Knowledge of Economics”, American Economic Review, 56(2): 1-13.
  • Bowles, Samuel (2006), Microeconomics (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).
  • Boyle, James (2003), ‘The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain’ Law and Contemporary Problems, 66: 33-74.
  • Braudel, Fernand (1982), Civilization and Capitalism (New York: Herper and Row).
  • Braverman, Harry (1974), Labor and Monopoly Capital (New York: Monthly Review Press).
  • Cameron, Rondo ve Larry Neal (2003), A Concise Economic History of the World (New York: Oxford Univeristy Press).
  • Chang, Ha-Joon (2001), “Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Development: Historical lessons and emerging issues”, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 2(2): 287-309.
  • Chang, Ha-Joon (2002), Kicking Away the Ladder (London: Anthem Press).
  • Coriat, Benjamin ve Fabienne Orsi (2002), “Establishing a New Intellectual Property Rights Regime in the United State: Origins, Content and Problem”, Research Policy, 31: 1491-1507.
  • Coriat, Benjamin ve Olivier Weinstein (2011), “Patent regimes and the Commodification of Knowledge”, LEM Working Paper Series, 2011/17.
  • Cowan, Richard, Paul David ve Dominique Foray (2000), “The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2): 211-253.
  • Dasgupta, Partha ve Paul David (1994), “Toward a New Economics of Science”, Research Policy, 23(5): 487-521.
  • David, Paul, (1993), “Intellectual Property Institutions and the Panda's Thumb: Patents, Copyrights, and Trade Secrets in Economic Theory and History”, Mitchel Wallerstein, Mary Mogee ve Robin Schoen (Der.) Global Dimension of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology (Washington DC: National Academy Press).
  • Demsetz, Harold (1967), “Toward a theory of property rights,” American Economic Review, 57(2): 347-359.
  • Demsetz, Harold (1969), “Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint” Journal of Law and Economics, 12: 1-22.
  • Dosi, Giovanni (1982), “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories”, Research Policy, 11: 147-162.
  • Dow, Gregory (2003), Governing the Firm (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press).
  • Durgun, Özlem ve Özgür Aslan (2013), “Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Teknoloji Politikaları: Genel Bir Değerlendirme”, Journal of Yaşar University, 30(8): 5123-5142.
  • Edquist, Charles (1997), Systems of innovation, Linda: Pinter Publishers. Elkin-Koren, Niva ve Salzberger Eli (2004), Law, Economics and Cyberspace The Effects of Cyberspace on the Economic Analysis of Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing).
  • Elkin-Koren ve Salzberger E. (2013), The Law and Economics of Intellectual Property in the Digital Age, Routledge: Londra ve New York.
  • Erdil, Erkan ve Karagöl, Burak (2013), “Information and Communication Technologies in Turkey and Other OECD Member Countries,” Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 23(85): 1-22.
  • Fisk, Catherine (1998), “Removing the Fuel of Interest from the Fire of Genius: Law and The Employee-Inventor, 1830-1930”, University of Chicago Law Review, 65: 1127-1198.
  • Fisk, Catherine (2001), “Working Knowledge: Trade Secrets, Restrictive Covenants in Employment, and the Rise of Corporate Intellectual Property, 1800-1920”, Hastings Law Journal, 52: 441-535.
  • Fisk, Catherine (2009), Working Knowledge (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press).
  • Foray, Dominique (2004), Economics of Knowledge (Cambridge and London: MIT Press).
  • Freeman Chirs ve Luc Soete (2003), Yenilik İktisadı (TÜBİTAK Yayınları) (Çev. Ergun Türkcan)
  • Frischmann, Brett, Michale Madison Katherine Strandburg (2014), Governing Knowledge Commons (New York: Oxford University Press). Gürdal, Oya (2004), “Bilgi Ekonomisi ve/veya Yeni Ekonomi’nin Reddettikleri”, Bilgi Dünyası, 5(1): 48-73.
  • Gürpınar, Erkan (2013), “Notes on Institutional Complementarities and Organizational Forms” Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica e Statistica, Universita di Siena, n. 678
  • Gürpınar, Erkan (2016a), “Organizational forms in the knowledge economy: a comparative institutional analysis,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 26(3): 501-518
  • Gürpınar, Erkan (2016b), “Institutional Complementarities, intellectual property rights and technology in the knowledge economy,” Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(3): 565-578
  • Hardin, Gerret (1968), “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Science, 162: 1243-1248.
  • Hart, Oliver (1995), Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure (New York: Oxford University Press).
  • Heller, Michale (1998), ‘The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets’ Harvard Law Review, 111(3): 622–688.
  • Heller, Michale ve Rebecca Eisenberg (1998), “Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research,” Science, 280(5364): 698-701
  • Hess Charlotte ve Elinor Ostrom (2003), “Ideas, artefacts and facilities: information as a common-pool resource”, Law & Contemporary Problems, 66(1/2), 111–45.
  • Hess, Charlotte ve Elinor Ostrom (2011), Understanding Knowledge as a Commons (Cambridge Mass. and London, England: MIT Press). Hodgson, Geoffrey (1999), Economics and Utopia (London: Routledge).
  • Hodgson, Geoffrey (2017), “1688 and All That: property rights the glorious revolution and the rise of the British capitalism”, Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(1): 79-107
  • Hyde, Alan (2003), Working in Silicon Valley (M. E. Sharpe).
  • Jaffe, Adam ve Josh Lerner (2004), Innovation and Its Discontents (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press).
  • Karahan, Özcan (2006), “Production Strategies in Knowledge- Based Economy”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 61(2): 111-128.
  • Kasap, Orçun ve Altuğ Yalçıntaş (2021), “Commodification 2.0: How Does Spotify Provide Its Services for Free?”, Review of Radical Political Economics, 53(1): 157-172.
  • Kuznets, Simon (1965), Economic Growth and Structure (New York: W. W. Norton).
  • Leijenhufvud, Alex (1986), “Capitalism and the Factory System,” Richard Langlois (Der.) Economics as a Process: Essays in the New Institutional Economics (New York: Camridge Univ. Press): 203-223.
  • Lessig, Lawrence (2004), Free Culture (US: Penguin Press).
  • Lundavll, Bengt-Ake (1992), National Systems of Innovation (London: Pinter Publishers).
  • Machlup, Fritz ve Edith Penrose (1950), “The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century”, Journal of Economic History, 10(1): 1-29. Marshall, Alfred (1919), Industry and Trade (London: Macmillan).
  • Mercan, Boran Ali ve Altuğ Yalçıntaş (2021), “Deconstructing the Discourse of Self-Corrective Intellectual Property Markets”, Rethinking Marxism, 33(2): 281-303.
  • Merges, Robert (1999), “The Law and Economics of Employee Invention”, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 13(1): 1-54.
  • Mokyr, Joel (2002), The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press).
  • Mokyr, Joel (2009), “Intellectual Property Rights, the Industrial Revolution, and the Beginnings of Modern Economic Growth”, American Economic Review, 99(2): 349-355.
  • Moody, Glyn (2001), Rebel Code: Inside Linux and the Open Source Revolution (New York: Basic Books).
  • Nelson, Richard (1959), “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research”, Journal of Political Economy, 67(3): 297-306.
  • Nelson, Richard (1993), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Institutional Analysis (London and New York: Oxford University Press).
  • Nightingale, Paul (2003), “If Nelson and Winter are only half right about tacit knowledge, which half? A Searlean critique of ‘codification”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2): 149-183
  • North, Douglass (2002), Kurumlar, Kurumsal Değişim ve Ekonomik Performans (İstanbul: Sabancı Üniv. Yayınevi) (Çev: Gül Çağalı güven) North, Douglass ve Robert Thomas (1973), The Rise of the Western World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Orsi, Fabienne ve Benjamin Coriat (2006), “The New Role and Status of Intellectual Property Rights in Contemporary Capitalism”, Competition and Change, 10(2): 162-179.
  • Ostrom, Elinor (1990), Governing the Commons (New York: Cambridge Univ. Press).
  • Özveren, Eyüp (2021), “İktisat Tarihçilerininin Görgüsü, Bilgisi; ya da İktisat Tarihi Eğitim-Öğretiminde Ders Kitapları”, Ufuk Karakoç ve Alp Yücel Kaya (Der.) İktisat Tarihinin Dönüşü (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları): 381-419.
  • Pagano, Ugo ve Maria Alessandra Rossi (2004), “Incomplete Contracts, Intellectual Property and Institutional Complementarities”, European Journal of Law and Economics, 18(1): 55-76.
  • Pagano, Ugo ve Robert Rowthorn (1994), “Ownership, Technology and Institutional Stability”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5(2): 221-242.
  • Perez, Carlota (1985), “Microelectronics, Long Waves and World Structural Change: New Perspectives for Developing Countries”, World Development, 13(3): 441-463.
  • Piore, Michael ve Charles Sabel (1984), The Second Industrial Divide (New York: Basic Books).
  • Polanyi, Michael (1958), Personal Knowledge (Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press).
  • Polanyi, Michael (1967), The Tacit Dimension (London: Routledge).
  • Potts, Jason (2019), Innovation Commons: The Origin of Economic Growth (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press).
  • Rosenberg, Natha ve Richard Nelson (1994), “American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry”, Research Policy, 23: 323-348.
  • Saxenian, AnnaLee (1994), Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
  • Schwab, Klaus (2016), Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimi (İstanbul: Optimist Yayınları) (Çev: Zülfü Dicleli).
  • Schwab, Klaus ve Nicholas Davis (2019), Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimini Şekillendirmek (İstanbul: Optimist Yayınları) (Çev: Nadir Özata).
  • Screpanti, Ernesto (2001), The Fundamental Institutions of Capitalism (London and New York: Routledge).
  • Sulaoğlu, Taylan (2002), “Bilgi Ekonomisinde İşçi İşveren İlişkilerinin Yeni Düzeni ve İnsan Kaynakları Yönetiminde Beklenenler”, Öneri, 5(17): 169-173.
  • Stallman, Richard (2002), Free Software Free Society (Boston: GNU Press).
  • Taylor, Frederick Winslow (2016[1911]), Bilimsel Yönetimin İlkeleri (İstanbul: Adres Yayınları) (Çev: Bahadır Akın).
  • Taymaz, Erol (2001), Ulusal Yenilik Sistemi (TÜBİTAK/TTGV/DİE).
  • Türkcan, Ergun (2009), Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de Bilim, Teknoloji ve Politika (İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları).
  • Uçkan, Özgür (2006), “Bilgi Politikası ve Bilgi Ekonomisi: Verimlilik, İstihdam, Büyüme ve Kalkınma”, Bilgi Dünyası, 7(1): 23-48.
  • von Hippel, Eric (2005), Democratizing Innovation (Cambridge: MIT Press).
  • Williamson, Oliver (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press).
  • Wootton, David (2019), Bilimin İcadı (İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları) (Çev: Nurettin Elhüseyni).
  • Yılmaz, Malik (2013), “Küreselleşmenin Oluşumuna Zemin Hazırladığı Yeni Ekonomik Anlayış: Bilgi Ekonomisi”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 27(1): 241-255.
  • Zuboff, Shoshana (1989), In the Age of the Smart Machine (Basic Books).
APA GURPINAR E (2022). BİLGİ, FİKRİ MÜLKİYET VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM: DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ’Nİ KURUMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVEYE OTURTMAK. , 407 - 426. 10.33630/ausbf.105431
Chicago GURPINAR Erkan BİLGİ, FİKRİ MÜLKİYET VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM: DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ’Nİ KURUMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVEYE OTURTMAK. (2022): 407 - 426. 10.33630/ausbf.105431
MLA GURPINAR Erkan BİLGİ, FİKRİ MÜLKİYET VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM: DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ’Nİ KURUMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVEYE OTURTMAK. , 2022, ss.407 - 426. 10.33630/ausbf.105431
AMA GURPINAR E BİLGİ, FİKRİ MÜLKİYET VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM: DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ’Nİ KURUMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVEYE OTURTMAK. . 2022; 407 - 426. 10.33630/ausbf.105431
Vancouver GURPINAR E BİLGİ, FİKRİ MÜLKİYET VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM: DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ’Nİ KURUMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVEYE OTURTMAK. . 2022; 407 - 426. 10.33630/ausbf.105431
IEEE GURPINAR E "BİLGİ, FİKRİ MÜLKİYET VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM: DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ’Nİ KURUMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVEYE OTURTMAK." , ss.407 - 426, 2022. 10.33630/ausbf.105431
ISNAD GURPINAR, Erkan. "BİLGİ, FİKRİ MÜLKİYET VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM: DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ’Nİ KURUMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVEYE OTURTMAK". (2022), 407-426. https://doi.org/10.33630/ausbf.105431
APA GURPINAR E (2022). BİLGİ, FİKRİ MÜLKİYET VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM: DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ’Nİ KURUMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVEYE OTURTMAK. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 77(2), 407 - 426. 10.33630/ausbf.105431
Chicago GURPINAR Erkan BİLGİ, FİKRİ MÜLKİYET VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM: DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ’Nİ KURUMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVEYE OTURTMAK. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 77, no.2 (2022): 407 - 426. 10.33630/ausbf.105431
MLA GURPINAR Erkan BİLGİ, FİKRİ MÜLKİYET VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM: DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ’Nİ KURUMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVEYE OTURTMAK. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, vol.77, no.2, 2022, ss.407 - 426. 10.33630/ausbf.105431
AMA GURPINAR E BİLGİ, FİKRİ MÜLKİYET VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM: DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ’Nİ KURUMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVEYE OTURTMAK. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi. 2022; 77(2): 407 - 426. 10.33630/ausbf.105431
Vancouver GURPINAR E BİLGİ, FİKRİ MÜLKİYET VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM: DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ’Nİ KURUMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVEYE OTURTMAK. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi. 2022; 77(2): 407 - 426. 10.33630/ausbf.105431
IEEE GURPINAR E "BİLGİ, FİKRİ MÜLKİYET VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM: DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ’Nİ KURUMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVEYE OTURTMAK." Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 77, ss.407 - 426, 2022. 10.33630/ausbf.105431
ISNAD GURPINAR, Erkan. "BİLGİ, FİKRİ MÜLKİYET VE KURUMSAL DEĞİŞİM: DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ’Nİ KURUMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVEYE OTURTMAK". Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 77/2 (2022), 407-426. https://doi.org/10.33630/ausbf.105431
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
10-05-2024 13:35

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları