Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 35 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 207 - 215 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21164 İndeks Tarihi: 27-10-2022

Alterations in Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Post-Facemask Treatment in Noncleft Skeletal Class III and Bilateral Cleft Lip Palate Class III Patients

Öz:
Objective: The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the alteration in the facial soft tissue thickness after rapid maxillary expansion with facemask treatment in bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) Class III patients and noncleft Class III patients. Methods: Case records including lateral cephalograms of 30 patients (19 females, 11 males) treated using a rapid maxillary expansion with facemask treatment were analyzed. Group I (age: 11.4 ± 1.02 years) (10 females, 5 males) consisted of noncleft skeletal Class III patients, and group II (age: 10.8 ± 0.84 years) (9 females, 6 males) comprised skeletal Class III patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate. Fifteen hard tissue and 10 soft tissue measurements were made at the beginning and at the end of the treatment to evaluate the change with rapid maxillary expansion combined facemask treatment. Results: The bilateral cleft lip and palate group displayed a statistically significant increase in the thickness of the subnasale, labrale superius, labrale inferius, labiomentale, and pogonion, whereas the thickness of the stomion was found to be significantly decreased. The noncleft group demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in the thickness of the stomion and gnathion. There was a statistically significant difference between the bilateral cleft lip and palate and noncleft groups in the facial soft tissue thickness measurements at labrale superius, gnathion, and subnasale points and in Y axis, U1-SN, U1-NA in the hard tissue measurements. Conclusion: The results of the study indicated that the rapid maxillary expansion with facemask treatment produced diverse alterations in the facial soft tissue thickness of bilateral cleft lip and palate patients and noncleft Class III patients
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Kilic N, Catal G, Kiki A, Oktay H. Soft tissue profile changes following maxillary protraction in Class III subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32(4):419- 424. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Ngan P, Hägg U, Yiu C, Merwin D, Wei SH. Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109(1):38-49. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Moshkelgosha V, Raoof A, Sardarian A, Salehi P. Photogrammetric comparison of facial soft tissue profile before and after protraction facemask therapy in Class III children (6-11 years old). J Dent (Shiraz). 2017;18(1):7-16.
  • 4. Arman A, Toygar TU, Abuhijleh E. Profile changes associated with different orthopedic treatment approaches in class III malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(6):733-740. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Hamid S, Abuaffan AH. Facial soft tissue thickness in a sample of Sudanese adults with different occlusions. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;266:209-214. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Kamak H, Celikoglu M. Facial soft tissue thickness among skeletal malocclusions: is there a difference? Korean J Orthod. 2012;42(1):23- 31. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Perović T, Blažej Z. Male and female characteristics of facial soft tissue thickness in different orthodontic malocclusions evaluated by cephalometric radiography. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:3415-3424. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Utsuno H, Kageyama T, Uchida K, Kibayashi K. Facial soft tissue thickness differences among three skeletal classes in Japanese population. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;236:175-180. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Utsuno H, Kageyama T, Uchida K, Yoshino M, Miyazawa H, Inoue K. Facial soft tissue thickness in Japanese children. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;199(1-3):109.e1-109.e6. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Utsuno H, Kageyama T, Uchida K, et al. Pilot study of facial soft tissue thickness differences among three skeletal classes in Japanese females. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;195(1-3):165.e1-165.e5. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Celikoglu M, Buyuk SK, Sekerci AE, Ersoz M, Celik S, Sisman Y. Facial soft-tissue thickness in patients affected by bilateral cleft lip and palate: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;146(5):573-578. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Erdur EA, Baka ZM, Fidanboy M, Erdur O. Evaluation of the facial soft-tissue thickness in patients with cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac. Surg J. 2019;30(6):1706-1709.
  • 13. Guyer EC, Ellis III EE, McNamara Jr JA, Behrents RG. Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod. 1986;56(1):7-30. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Mercado A, Vig K. The orthodontist’s role in a cleft palate–craniofacial team. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2012:965-990.
  • 15. Shetye PR, Evans CA. Midfacial morphology in adult unoperated complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(5):810-816. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Toffol LD, Pavoni C, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Cozza P. Orthopedic treatment outcomes in class III malocclusion: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(3):561-573. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Pavoni C, Gazzani F, Franchi L, Loberto S, Lione R, Cozza P. Soft tissue facial profile in class III malocclusion: long-term post-pubertal effects produced by the Face Mask Protocol. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41(5):531-536. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Krneta Đokić B, Zhurov A, Richmond S, Verdenik I, Ovsenik M. 3D soft tissue evaluation of a class III treatment with rapid maxillary expander and face mask in pre pubertal phase—a retrospective cohort study. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020;23(3):323-331. [CrossRef]
APA Ulusoy Mutluol E, Koyuncu S, Ceylan R, AKIN M (2022). Alterations in Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Post-Facemask Treatment in Noncleft Skeletal Class III and Bilateral Cleft Lip Palate Class III Patients. , 207 - 215. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21164
Chicago Ulusoy Mutluol Esra,Koyuncu Sema,Ceylan Rıdvan,AKIN Mehmet Alterations in Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Post-Facemask Treatment in Noncleft Skeletal Class III and Bilateral Cleft Lip Palate Class III Patients. (2022): 207 - 215. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21164
MLA Ulusoy Mutluol Esra,Koyuncu Sema,Ceylan Rıdvan,AKIN Mehmet Alterations in Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Post-Facemask Treatment in Noncleft Skeletal Class III and Bilateral Cleft Lip Palate Class III Patients. , 2022, ss.207 - 215. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21164
AMA Ulusoy Mutluol E,Koyuncu S,Ceylan R,AKIN M Alterations in Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Post-Facemask Treatment in Noncleft Skeletal Class III and Bilateral Cleft Lip Palate Class III Patients. . 2022; 207 - 215. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21164
Vancouver Ulusoy Mutluol E,Koyuncu S,Ceylan R,AKIN M Alterations in Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Post-Facemask Treatment in Noncleft Skeletal Class III and Bilateral Cleft Lip Palate Class III Patients. . 2022; 207 - 215. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21164
IEEE Ulusoy Mutluol E,Koyuncu S,Ceylan R,AKIN M "Alterations in Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Post-Facemask Treatment in Noncleft Skeletal Class III and Bilateral Cleft Lip Palate Class III Patients." , ss.207 - 215, 2022. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21164
ISNAD Ulusoy Mutluol, Esra vd. "Alterations in Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Post-Facemask Treatment in Noncleft Skeletal Class III and Bilateral Cleft Lip Palate Class III Patients". (2022), 207-215. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21164
APA Ulusoy Mutluol E, Koyuncu S, Ceylan R, AKIN M (2022). Alterations in Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Post-Facemask Treatment in Noncleft Skeletal Class III and Bilateral Cleft Lip Palate Class III Patients. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 35(3), 207 - 215. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21164
Chicago Ulusoy Mutluol Esra,Koyuncu Sema,Ceylan Rıdvan,AKIN Mehmet Alterations in Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Post-Facemask Treatment in Noncleft Skeletal Class III and Bilateral Cleft Lip Palate Class III Patients. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 35, no.3 (2022): 207 - 215. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21164
MLA Ulusoy Mutluol Esra,Koyuncu Sema,Ceylan Rıdvan,AKIN Mehmet Alterations in Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Post-Facemask Treatment in Noncleft Skeletal Class III and Bilateral Cleft Lip Palate Class III Patients. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, vol.35, no.3, 2022, ss.207 - 215. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21164
AMA Ulusoy Mutluol E,Koyuncu S,Ceylan R,AKIN M Alterations in Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Post-Facemask Treatment in Noncleft Skeletal Class III and Bilateral Cleft Lip Palate Class III Patients. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2022; 35(3): 207 - 215. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21164
Vancouver Ulusoy Mutluol E,Koyuncu S,Ceylan R,AKIN M Alterations in Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Post-Facemask Treatment in Noncleft Skeletal Class III and Bilateral Cleft Lip Palate Class III Patients. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2022; 35(3): 207 - 215. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21164
IEEE Ulusoy Mutluol E,Koyuncu S,Ceylan R,AKIN M "Alterations in Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Post-Facemask Treatment in Noncleft Skeletal Class III and Bilateral Cleft Lip Palate Class III Patients." Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 35, ss.207 - 215, 2022. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21164
ISNAD Ulusoy Mutluol, Esra vd. "Alterations in Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Post-Facemask Treatment in Noncleft Skeletal Class III and Bilateral Cleft Lip Palate Class III Patients". Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 35/3 (2022), 207-215. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21164