A Comparison of Auto Train Brain Neurofeedback Rewarding Interfaces in Terms of Efficacy
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 24 - 33 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.31067/acusaglik.1136359 İndeks Tarihi: 17-05-2023
A Comparison of Auto Train Brain Neurofeedback Rewarding Interfaces in Terms of Efficacy
Öz: - Auto Train Brain is a mobile app that was specifically developed for dyslexic children to increase their reading speed and reading comprehension. In the original mobile app, there was only one unique neurofeedback user interface that provided visually and audibly rewarding feedback to the subject with a red-green colored arrow on the screen. Later on, new modules are added to the app with the requests of the end-users. These are the “youtube” video-based interface, “Spotify” auditory-based interface, and arrow interface which gives visual and auditory cues. In this research, we have compared the efficacy of the neurofeedback rewarding interfaces. The experiment group consists of 20 dyslexic children aged 7-to 10 (15 males, 5 females) who have preferred one interface over the others each day and used it at home for more than six months. The result indicates that though the “youtube” interface is liked most by the participants, the arrow-based simple neurofeedback interface reduces theta brain waves more than other rewarding schemes. On the other hand, “youtube” and “spotify” based interfaces increase Beta band powers more than the arrow interface in the cortex. The ”Spotify” user interface improves the fast brain waves more on the temporal lobes (T7 and T8) as the feedback given was only auditory.
Anahtar Kelime: Auto Train Brain nörogeribildirim ödüllendirme arayüzlerinin etkinlik açısından karşılaştırılması
Öz: Arka plan/amaç: Auto Train Brain, disleksili çocukların okuma hızını ve anlama düzeyini artırmak için özel olarak geliştirilmiş bir mobil uygulamadır. Orijinal mobil uygulamada, yalnızca bir benzersiz nörogeribildirim kullanıcı arayüzü, ekranın kırmızı-yeşil renkli bir oku ile konuya görsel ve işitsel olarak ödüllendirici geri bildirimi sağlıyordu. Daha sonra, kullanıcı talepleriyle uygulamaya yeni modüller eklendi. Bunlar “youtube”video tabanlı arayüz ve “Spotify”işitsel tabanlı arayüzdür. Bu araştırmada, nörogeribildirim ödüllendirme arayüzlerinin etkinliğini karşılaştırdık. Malzemeler ve yöntemler: Deney grubu, 6 ay ve üzeri süreyle evde bir ödüllendirme arayüzü kullanan ve 7 ila 10 yaş arasında (15 erkek, 5 kadın) disleksili çocuktan oluşmaktadır. Sonuçlar: Sonuçlar, “youtube” arayüzünün katılımcılar tarafından en çok beğenilmesine rağmen, ok şeklindeki basit nörogeribildirim arayüzüne göre daha az theta beyin dalgaları azalttığını göstermektedir. Diğer yandan, “youtube” ve “Spotify” tabanlı arayüzler, kortekste ok arayüzlerinden daha fazla beta bant güçlerini artırmaktadır. “Spotify” kullanıcı arayüzü, sadece işitsel olarak verilen geri bildirim nedeniyle temporal loblarda (T7 ve T8) hızlı beyin dalgalarını daha da iyileştirir. Çalışmanın özeti: Sonuçlar, disleksili çocuğun özel durumuna göre ilgili nörogeribildirim ödüllendirme arayüzünün seçilmesi gerektiğini göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- [1] American Psychiatric Association. "Pedophilia." Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2000): 571-572.
- [2] Paulesu, Eraldo, et al. "Is developmental dyslexia a disconnection syndrome? Evidence from PET scanning." Brain 119.1 (1996): 143-157.
- [3] Thornton, Kirtley E., and Dennis P. Carmody. "Electroencephalogram biofeedback for reading disability and traumatic brain injury." Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics 14.1 (2005): 137-162.
- [4] Klimesch, Wolfgang, et al. "Alpha and beta band power changes in normal and dyslexic children." Clinical Neurophysiology 112.7 (2001): 1186-1195.
- [5] Walker, Jonathan E., and Charles A. Norman. "The neurophysiology of dyslexia: A selective review with implications for neurofeedback remediation and results of treatment in twelve consecutive patients." Journal of Neurotherapy 10.1 (2006): 45-55.
- [6] Breteler, Marinus HM, et al. "Improvements in spelling after QEEG-based neurofeedback in dyslexia: A randomized controlled treatment study." Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback 35.1 (2010): 5-11.
- [7] Coben, Robert, et al. "The impact of coherence neurofeedback on reading delays in learning disabled children: A randomized controlled study." NeuroRegulation 2.4 (2015): 168-168.
- [8] Eroğlu, Günet, et al. "A mobile app that uses neurofeedback and multi-sensory learning methods improves reading abilities in dyslexia: A pilot study." Applied Neuropsychology: Child (2021): 1-11.
- [9] Kober, Silvia E., et al. "BCI and games: playful, experience-oriented learning by vivid feedback?." Brain–Computer Interfaces Handbook. CRC Press, 2018. 209-234.
- [10] Niv, Sharon. "Clinical efficacy and potential mechanisms of neurofeedback." Personality and Individual Differences 54.6 (2013): 676-686.
- [11] Nazari, Mohammad Ali, et al. "The effectiveness of neurofeedback training on EEG coherence and neuropsychological functions in children with reading disability." Clinical EEG and neuroscience 43.4 (2012): 315-322.
- 12. Pérez-Elvira, R., Oltra-Cucarella, J., Carrobles, J. A., Teodoru, M., Bacila, C., & Neamtu, B. (2021). Individual alpha peak frequency, an important biomarker for live z-score training neurofeedback in adolescents with learning disabilities. Brain Sciences, 11(2), 167.
- 13. Agrawal, P., Khanna, P., Beaulah Soundarabai, P., & Joseph, N. P. Electroencephalogram based Brain Computer Interface System Analysis. IJITEE, ISSN, 2278-3075.
- 14. Spiel, K., & Gerling, K. (2021). The purpose of play: How HCI games research fails neurodivergent populations. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 28(2), 1-40.
- 15. Mladenović, J. (2021). Standardization of protocol design for user training in EEG-based brain-computer interface. Journal of Neural Engineering, 18(1), 011003.
| APA | Eroglu G (2023). A Comparison of Auto Train Brain Neurofeedback Rewarding Interfaces in Terms of Efficacy. , 24 - 33. 10.31067/acusaglik.1136359 |
| Chicago | Eroglu Gunet A Comparison of Auto Train Brain Neurofeedback Rewarding Interfaces in Terms of Efficacy. (2023): 24 - 33. 10.31067/acusaglik.1136359 |
| MLA | Eroglu Gunet A Comparison of Auto Train Brain Neurofeedback Rewarding Interfaces in Terms of Efficacy. , 2023, ss.24 - 33. 10.31067/acusaglik.1136359 |
| AMA | Eroglu G A Comparison of Auto Train Brain Neurofeedback Rewarding Interfaces in Terms of Efficacy. . 2023; 24 - 33. 10.31067/acusaglik.1136359 |
| Vancouver | Eroglu G A Comparison of Auto Train Brain Neurofeedback Rewarding Interfaces in Terms of Efficacy. . 2023; 24 - 33. 10.31067/acusaglik.1136359 |
| IEEE | Eroglu G "A Comparison of Auto Train Brain Neurofeedback Rewarding Interfaces in Terms of Efficacy." , ss.24 - 33, 2023. 10.31067/acusaglik.1136359 |
| ISNAD | Eroglu, Gunet. "A Comparison of Auto Train Brain Neurofeedback Rewarding Interfaces in Terms of Efficacy". (2023), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.1136359 |
| APA | Eroglu G (2023). A Comparison of Auto Train Brain Neurofeedback Rewarding Interfaces in Terms of Efficacy. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(1), 24 - 33. 10.31067/acusaglik.1136359 |
| Chicago | Eroglu Gunet A Comparison of Auto Train Brain Neurofeedback Rewarding Interfaces in Terms of Efficacy. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 14, no.1 (2023): 24 - 33. 10.31067/acusaglik.1136359 |
| MLA | Eroglu Gunet A Comparison of Auto Train Brain Neurofeedback Rewarding Interfaces in Terms of Efficacy. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.14, no.1, 2023, ss.24 - 33. 10.31067/acusaglik.1136359 |
| AMA | Eroglu G A Comparison of Auto Train Brain Neurofeedback Rewarding Interfaces in Terms of Efficacy. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2023; 14(1): 24 - 33. 10.31067/acusaglik.1136359 |
| Vancouver | Eroglu G A Comparison of Auto Train Brain Neurofeedback Rewarding Interfaces in Terms of Efficacy. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2023; 14(1): 24 - 33. 10.31067/acusaglik.1136359 |
| IEEE | Eroglu G "A Comparison of Auto Train Brain Neurofeedback Rewarding Interfaces in Terms of Efficacy." Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 14, ss.24 - 33, 2023. 10.31067/acusaglik.1136359 |
| ISNAD | Eroglu, Gunet. "A Comparison of Auto Train Brain Neurofeedback Rewarding Interfaces in Terms of Efficacy". Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 14/1 (2023), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.1136359 |
