Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery

BİRSEN, ONUR; Karabekiroğlu, Aytül; oğuz, gülay; Batmaz, Sedat; Toker Uğurlu, Tuğçe; AL, MUZAFFER; MERT, Alper; Matsar, Ayinzeliha; Eles, Vedat; Derici Ülker, Begüm; Sözeri-Varma, Gülfizar

doi:10.5152/pcp.2022.22011

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery

Gülay OĞUZ, (Psikiyatri Kliniği, Samsun, Türkiye)

Sedat BATMAZ, (Psikoloji Bölümü, Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Fakültesi, Sosyal Bilimler Ankara Üniversitesi, Türkiye)

Tuğçe TOKER UĞURLU, (Pamukkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalı, Denizli, Türkiye)

Aytül KARABEKİROĞLU, (Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalı, Samsun, Türkiye)

Muzaffer AL, (Metabolik Cerrahi Kliniği, Büyük Anadolu Hastanesi, Samsun, Türkiye)

Alper MERT, (Servergazi Devlet Hastanesi Psikiyatri Kliniği, Denizli, Türkiye)

Onur BİRSEN, (Genel Cerrahi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Denizli, Türkiye)

Ayinzeliha Matsar, (Siverek Devlet Hastanesi Psikiyatri Kliniği, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye)

Vedat ELES, (Midyat Devlet Hastanesi Psikiyatri Kliniği, Mardin, Türkiye)

Begüm DERİCİ ÜLKER, (Medicana Hastanesi, Bursa, Türkiye)

Gülfizar SÖZERİ VARMA, (Pamukkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalı, Denizli, Türkiye)

Diğer Yazarlar

Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology (Online)

4 1

Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 32 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 331 - 343 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/pcp.2022.22011 İndeks Tarihi: 07-05-2023

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery

Öz:

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery which can be easily administered and used as a guide by health professionals who will be included in the treatment of patients who are potential candidates for bariatric surgery. Methods: A total of 310 patients who were admitted to health institutions for bariatric surgery in 3 different provinces of Turkey answered these questions in the Turkish translation of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery. Eating disorder examination questionnaire was also administered to the patients in addition to Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery. Results: Early life problems due to weight scores of women were significantly higher than men (P = .001). Among the age groups, both the early life problems due to weight scores (P = .008) and dysphoric feelings about weight scores (P < .001) of the 18-44 age group were significantly higher than the participants who are over the age of 45. There is a weak-to-medium and positive correlation between the total Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery total scores and all the subscale and total scores of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (P < .05 for all). These correlation results support the co-validity of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery and Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire. Internal consistency of the Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery was at a high level except for the subscale of positive treatment attitude and supportive environment. Cronbach’s ɑ values were calculated to be 0.902 for the subscale of emotional and binge eating, 0.820 for the early life problems due to weight, 0.856 for the dysphoric feelings about weight, 0.539 for the positive treatment attitude and supportive environment, and 0.919 for the whole scale. Conclusion: The analyses have shown that the Turkish version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery may be used in clinical interviews and psychiatric evaluation of bariatric surgery patients in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Türkiye Endokrinoloji ve Metabolizma Derneği (TEMD). Obezite Tanı ve Tedavi Kılavuzu; 2018. Available at: http://www.temd.org.tr/admin/uploads/tbl_gruplar/ 20180525144116-2018-05-25tbl_gruplar144108.pdf
2. Türkiye Endokrinoloji ve Metabolizma Derneği (TEMD). Bariyatrik Cerrahi Kılavuzu; 2018. Available at: https:// temd.org.tr/admin/uploads/tbl_kilavuz/201805161 62420-2018-05-16tbl_kilavuz162417.pdf
3. NIH conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obe- sity. Consens Dev Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(12):956-961. [CrossRef]
4. Hilgendorf W, Butler A, Timsina L, et al. A behavioral rating system predicts weight loss and quality of life after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(8):1167-1172. [CrossRef]
5. Sevinçer GM. Psychiatric management of obesity surgery in Turkey: the need for consensus and a guideline. Anad- olu Psikiyatri Derg. 2016;17(2):5-45. [CrossRef]
6. Mahony D. Psychological assessments of bariatric surgery patients. Development, reliability, and exploratory fac- tor analysis of the PsyBari. Obes Surg. 2011;21(9):1395- 1406. [CrossRef]
7. Fairburn CG, Beglin SJ. Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire? Int J Eat Disord. 1994;16(4):363-370. [CrossRef]
8. Yücel B, Polat A, İkiz T, et al. The Turkish version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire: reliability and validity in adolescents. Eur Eat Disorders Rev. 2011;19:509-511.
9. Steiger JH. Tests for comparing elements of a correla- tion matrix. Psychol Bull. 1980;87(2):245-251. [CrossRef]
10. Lorenzo-Seva U, Ferrando PJ. FACTOR: a computer pro- gram to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behav Res Methods. 2006;38(1):88-91. [CrossRef]
11. Muthén B, Kaplan DA. A Comparison of some methodolo- gies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert varia- bles. Brit J Math Stat Psy. 1985;38(2):171-189. [CrossRef]
12. Timmerman ME, Lorenzo-Seva U. Dimensionality assess- ment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analy- sis. Psychol Methods. 2011;16(2):209-220. [CrossRef]
13. Lambert ZV, Wildt AR, Durand RM. Approximating confi- dence intervals for factor loadings. Multivariate Behav Res. 1991;26(3):421-434. [CrossRef]
14. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th ed. Sage Publications; 2013. https://in.sagepub. com/en-in/sas/discovering-statistics-using-ibm-spss- statistics/book238032
15. Horn JL. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1965;30:179-185. [CrossRef]
16. Hutcheson GD, Sofroniou N. The Multivariate Social Sci- entist: an Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. Sage Publications; 1999. [CrossRef]
17. Berkowitz RI, Fabricatore AN. Obesity, psychiatric sta- tus, and psychiatric medications. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2011;34(4):747-764. [CrossRef]
18. Lin HY, Huang CK, Tai CM, et al. Psychiatric disorders of patients seeking obesity treatment. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:1. [CrossRef]
19. Lopresti AL, Drummond PD. Obesity and psychiatric dis- orders: commonalities in dysregulated biological path- ways and their implications for treatment. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013;45:92-99. [CrossRef]
20. Avila C, Holloway AC, Hahn MK, et al. An overview of links Between obesity and mental health. Curr Obes Rep. 2015;4(3):303-310. [CrossRef]
21. Halmi KA, Long M, Stunkard AJ, Mason E. Psychiatric diagnosis of morbidly obese gastric bypass patients. Am J Psychiatry. 1980;137(4):470-472. [CrossRef]
22. Kalarchian MA, Marcus MD, Levine MD, et al. Psychiatric disorders among bariatric surgery candidates: relationship to obesity and functional health status. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(2):328-34; quiz 374. [CrossRef]
23. Rosen LW, Aniskiewicz AS. Psychosocial functioning of two groups of morbidly obese patients. Int J Obes. 1983;7(1):53-59
24. Black DW, Goldstein RB, Mason EE. Prevalence of mental disorder in 88 morbidly obese bariatric clinic patients. Am J Psychiatry. 1992;149(2):227-234. [CrossRef]
25. Erbay LG, Akyüz M, Şahin İ, et al. Bariatrik cerrahi adayı morbid obezite hastalarının yaşam doyumunun beden algısı ve benlik saygısı ile ilişkisi. Firat J. 2018;23:1-5
26. Mahony D. Bariatric surgery attrition secondary to psy- chological barriers. Clin Obes. 2013;3(1-2):32-38. [CrossRef]
27. Kushner RF, Ryan DH. Assessment and lifestyle manage- ment of patients with obesity: clinical recommendations from systematic reviews. JAMA. 2014;312(9):943-952. [CrossRef]
28. Cassin S, Hawa R, Sockalingam S, eds. Psychological Care in Severe Obesity: A Practical and Integrated Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018.
29. Cooper Z, Fairburn CG, Hawker DM, eds. Cognitive- Behavioral Treatment of Obesity: A Clinician’s Guide. New York: Guilford Press; 2003.
30. Dalle Grave R, Sartirana M, El Ghoch M, Calugi S, eds. Treating Obesity with Personalized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2018.
31. Rollnick S, Miller WR, Butler C, eds. Motivational Inter- viewing in Health Care: Helping Patients Change Behav- ior. New York: Guilford Press; 2008.
32. de Zwaan M. Binge eating disorder and obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(1):S51-S55. [CrossRef]
33. Konttinen H, van Strien T, Männistö S, Jousilahti P, Hauk- kala A. Depression, emotional eating and long-term weight changes: a population-based prospective study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):28. [CrossRef]
34. Lazarevich I, Irigoyen Camacho ME, Velázquez-Alva MDC, Zepeda Zepeda M. Relationship among obesity, depres- sion, and emotional eating in young adults. Appetite. 2016;107:639-644. [CrossRef]
35. McCuen-Wurst C, Ruggieri M, Allison KC. Disordered eat- ing and obesity: associations between binge-eating dis- order, night-eating syndrome, and weight-related comorbidities. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1411(1):96-105. [CrossRef]
36. Yanovski SZ. Binge eating disorder and obesity in 2003: could treating an eating disorder have a positive effect on the obesity epidemic? Int J Eat Disord . 2003;34(suppl):S117-S120. [CrossRef]
37. Meany G, Conceição E, Mitchell JE. Binge eating, binge eating disorder and loss of control eating: effects on weight outcomes after bariatric surgery. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2014;22(2):87-91. [CrossRef]
38. Safer DL, Telch CF, Chen EY, eds. Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Binge Eating and Bulimia. New York: Guil- ford Press; 2009.
39. Safer DL, Adler S, Masson PC, eds. The DBT? Solution for Emotional Eating: A Proven Program to Break the Cycle of Bingeing and Out-of-Control Eating. New York: Guil- ford Publications; 2018.
40. Zweig RD, Leahy RL, eds. Treatment Plans and Interven- tions for Bulimia and Binge-Eating Disorder. New York: Guilford Press; 2012.
41. Mahony D. Psychological gender differences in bariatric sur- gery candidates. Obes Surg. 2008;18(5):607-610. [CrossRef]
42. Mahony D. Standardizing presurgical psychological eval- uations with the PsyBari psychological test. Bariatr Times. 2010;7(9):18-20.
43. Omalu BI, Ives DG, Buhari AM, et al. Death rates and causes of death after bariatric surgery for Pennsylvania residents, 1995 to 2004. Arch Surg . 2007;142(10):923- 929. [CrossRef]
44. Tindle HA, Omalu B, Courcoulas A, Marcus M, Hammers J, Kuller LH. Risk of suicide after long-term follow-up from bariatric surgery. Am J Med. 2010;123(11):1036-1042. [CrossRef]

APA	oğuz g, Batmaz S, Toker Uğurlu T, Karabekiroğlu A, AL M, MERT A, BİRSEN O, Matsar A, Eles V, Derici Ülker B, Sözeri-Varma G (2022). Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery. , 331 - 343. 10.5152/pcp.2022.22011
Chicago	oğuz gülay,Batmaz Sedat,Toker Uğurlu Tuğçe,Karabekiroğlu Aytül,AL MUZAFFER,MERT Alper,BİRSEN ONUR,Matsar Ayinzeliha,Eles Vedat,Derici Ülker Begüm,Sözeri-Varma Gülfizar Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery. (2022): 331 - 343. 10.5152/pcp.2022.22011
MLA	oğuz gülay,Batmaz Sedat,Toker Uğurlu Tuğçe,Karabekiroğlu Aytül,AL MUZAFFER,MERT Alper,BİRSEN ONUR,Matsar Ayinzeliha,Eles Vedat,Derici Ülker Begüm,Sözeri-Varma Gülfizar Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery. , 2022, ss.331 - 343. 10.5152/pcp.2022.22011
AMA	oğuz g,Batmaz S,Toker Uğurlu T,Karabekiroğlu A,AL M,MERT A,BİRSEN O,Matsar A,Eles V,Derici Ülker B,Sözeri-Varma G Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery. . 2022; 331 - 343. 10.5152/pcp.2022.22011
Vancouver	oğuz g,Batmaz S,Toker Uğurlu T,Karabekiroğlu A,AL M,MERT A,BİRSEN O,Matsar A,Eles V,Derici Ülker B,Sözeri-Varma G Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery. . 2022; 331 - 343. 10.5152/pcp.2022.22011
IEEE	oğuz g,Batmaz S,Toker Uğurlu T,Karabekiroğlu A,AL M,MERT A,BİRSEN O,Matsar A,Eles V,Derici Ülker B,Sözeri-Varma G "Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery." , ss.331 - 343, 2022. 10.5152/pcp.2022.22011
ISNAD	oğuz, gülay vd. "Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery". (2022), 331-343. https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2022.22011

APA	oğuz g, Batmaz S, Toker Uğurlu T, Karabekiroğlu A, AL M, MERT A, BİRSEN O, Matsar A, Eles V, Derici Ülker B, Sözeri-Varma G (2022). Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery. Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology (Online), 32(4), 331 - 343. 10.5152/pcp.2022.22011
Chicago	oğuz gülay,Batmaz Sedat,Toker Uğurlu Tuğçe,Karabekiroğlu Aytül,AL MUZAFFER,MERT Alper,BİRSEN ONUR,Matsar Ayinzeliha,Eles Vedat,Derici Ülker Begüm,Sözeri-Varma Gülfizar Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery. Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology (Online) 32, no.4 (2022): 331 - 343. 10.5152/pcp.2022.22011
MLA	oğuz gülay,Batmaz Sedat,Toker Uğurlu Tuğçe,Karabekiroğlu Aytül,AL MUZAFFER,MERT Alper,BİRSEN ONUR,Matsar Ayinzeliha,Eles Vedat,Derici Ülker Begüm,Sözeri-Varma Gülfizar Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery. Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology (Online), vol.32, no.4, 2022, ss.331 - 343. 10.5152/pcp.2022.22011
AMA	oğuz g,Batmaz S,Toker Uğurlu T,Karabekiroğlu A,AL M,MERT A,BİRSEN O,Matsar A,Eles V,Derici Ülker B,Sözeri-Varma G Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery. Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology (Online). 2022; 32(4): 331 - 343. 10.5152/pcp.2022.22011
Vancouver	oğuz g,Batmaz S,Toker Uğurlu T,Karabekiroğlu A,AL M,MERT A,BİRSEN O,Matsar A,Eles V,Derici Ülker B,Sözeri-Varma G Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery. Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology (Online). 2022; 32(4): 331 - 343. 10.5152/pcp.2022.22011
IEEE	oğuz g,Batmaz S,Toker Uğurlu T,Karabekiroğlu A,AL M,MERT A,BİRSEN O,Matsar A,Eles V,Derici Ülker B,Sözeri-Varma G "Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery." Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology (Online), 32, ss.331 - 343, 2022. 10.5152/pcp.2022.22011
ISNAD	oğuz, gülay vd. "Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery". Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology (Online) 32/4 (2022), 331-343. https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2022.22011