Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain

KIZILTAŞ, ÖMER; Koçak, Fatmanur Aybala; okçu, mehmet; TUNCAY, FİGEN

doi:10.5606/tftrd.2022.8905

Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain

Ömer KIZILTAŞ, (Dinar Devlet Hastanesi Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Kliniği, Afyonkarahisar, Türkiye)

Mehmet OKÇU, (Marmara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Figen TUNCAY, (Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, Kırşehir, Türkiye)

Fatmanur AYBALA KOÇAK (Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, Kırşehir, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

5 0

Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 68 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 399 - 408 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8905 İndeks Tarihi: 20-05-2023

Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain

Öz:

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, hot pack, and therapeutic ultrasound) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP). Patients and methods: Ninety-one patients with chronic LBP were included in the study and randomized to groups that received ESWT or conventional physiotherapy; of these, 70 completed the study (37 males, 33 females; mean age: 46.4±13.3 years; range, 18 to 65 years). Outcome measures included the Visual Analog Scale, the pressure pain algometer, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), fingertip-to-floor distance, and the Beck Depression Inventory. The assessments were made before treatment and at the first and 12th weeks after treatment. Results: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy was more effective than conventional physical therapy in terms of Visual Analog Scale scores, the pressure algometer, ODI, HAQ, and fingertip-to-floor distance at the first and 12th week. Conclusion: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is superior to conventional physical therapy in terms of improving pain, spinal mobility, and functional status in patients with chronic LBP.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Woolf A, Blyth F, Vos T, et al. Measuring the global burden of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010;24:155-65.
2. Balagué F, Mannion AF, Pellisé F, Cedraschi C. Non- specific low back pain. Lancet 2012;379:482-91.
3. Delitto A, George SZ, Van Dillen L, Whitman JM, Sowa G, Shekelle P, et al. Low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42:A1-57.
4. Minobes-Molina E, Nogués MR, Giralt M, Casajuana C, de Souza DLB, Jerez-Roig J, et al. Effectiveness of specific stabilization exercise compared with traditional trunk exercise in women with non-specific low back pain: A pilot randomized controlled trial. PeerJ 2020;8:e10304.
5. van Tulder MW, Assendelft WJ, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Spinal radiographic findings and nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of observational studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:427-34.
6. Haldeman S, Kopansky-Giles D, Hurwitz EL, Hoy D, Mark Erwin W, Dagenais S, et al. Advancements in the management of spine disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2012;26:263-80.
7. Quittan M. Management of back pain. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:423-34.
8. Jauregui JJ, Cherian JJ, Gwam CU, Chughtai M, Mistry JB, Elmallah RK, et al. A meta-analysis of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for chronic low back pain. Surg Technol Int 2016;28:296-302.
9. Cheing GL, Hui-Chan CW. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: Nonparallel antinociceptive effects on chronic clinical pain and acute experimental pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:305-12.
10. French SD, Cameron M, Walker BF, Reggars JW, Esterman AJ. A Cochrane review of superficial heat or cold for low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:998-1006.
11. Durmuş D, Akyol Y, Cengiz K, Terzi T, Cantürk F. Effects of therapeutic ultrasound on pain, disability, walking performance, quality of life, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized, placebo controlled trial. Turk J Rheumatol 2010;25:82-7.
12. Khan S, Shamsi S, Alyaemni A, Abdelkader S. Effect of ultrasound and exercise combined and exercise alone in the treatment of chronic back pain. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal 2013;7:202.
13. Ebadi S, Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Jalaei S, Sadat M, Bagheri H, et al. The effect of continuous ultrasound on chronic non-specific low back pain: A single blind placebo- controlled randomized trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012;13:192.
14. Mariotto S, de Prati AC, Cavalieri E, Amelio E, Marlinghaus E, Suzuki H. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in inflammatory diseases: Molecular mechanism that triggers anti-inflammatory action. Curr Med Chem 2009;16:2366-72.
15. Ciampa AR, de Prati AC, Amelio E, Cavalieri E, Persichini T, Colasanti M, et al. Nitric oxide mediates anti- inflammatory action of extracorporeal shock waves. FEBS Lett 2005;579:6839-45.
16. Lee S, Lee D, Park J. Effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy on patients with chronic low back pain and their dynamic balance ability. J Phys Ther Sci 2014;26:7-10.
17. Han H, Lee D, Lee S, Jeon C, Kim T. The effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, and depression of chronic low back pain patients. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27:397-9.
18. Walewicz K, Taradaj J, Rajfur K, Ptaszkowski K, Kuszewski MT, Sopel M, et al. The effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded pilot study. Clin Interv Aging 2019;14:1859-69.
19. Çelik A, Altan L, Ökmen BM. The effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability and life quality of chronic low back pain patients. Altern Ther Health Med 2020;26:54-60.
20. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63 Suppl 11:S240-52.
21. Schenk P, Laeubli T, Klipstein A. Validity of pressure pain thresholds in female workers with and without recurrent low back pain. Eur Spine J 2007;16:267-75.
22. Smeets R, Köke A, Lin CW, Ferreira M, Demoulin C. Measures of function in low back pain/disorders: Low Back Pain Rating Scale (LBPRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE), Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS), and Roland- Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63 Suppl 11:S158-73.
23. Pennington B, Davis S. Mapping from the Health Assessment Questionnaire to the EQ-5D: The impact of different algorithms on cost-effectiveness results. Value Health 2014;17:762-71.
24. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4:561-71.
25. Yakut E, Düger T, Oksüz C, Yörükan S, Ureten K, Turan D, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:581-5.
26. Küçükdeveci AA, Sahin H, Ataman S, Griffiths B, Tennant A. Issues in cross-cultural validity: Example from the adaptation, reliability, and validity testing of a Turkish version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:14-9.
27. Hisli N. Beck depresyon envanterinin üniversite öğrencileri için geçerliği, güvenirliği. Psikoloji Dergisi 1989;7:3-13. 28. Perret C, Poiraudeau S, Fermanian J, Colau MM, Benhamou MA, Revel M. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the fingertip-to-floor test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1566-70.
29. Fricová J, Rokyta R. The effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain patients. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2015;36:161-4.
30. Nedelka T, Nedelka J, Schlenker J, Hankins C, Mazanec R. Mechano-transduction effect of shockwaves in the treatment of lumbar facet joint pain: Comparative effectiveness evaluation of shockwave therapy, steroid injections and radiofrequency medial branch neurotomy. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2014;35:393-7.
31. Kim SH, Park KN, Kwon OY. Pain intensity and abdominal muscle activation during walking in patients with low back pain: The STROBE study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e8250.
32. Evcik D, Sonel B. Kronik mekanik bel ağrılı olgularda spinal mobilite, ağrı ve özürlülük ilişkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001;47.
33. Salvetti Mde G, Pimenta CA, Braga PE, Corrêa CF. Disability related to chronic low back pain: Prevalence and associated factors. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2012;46 Spec No:16- 23. Portuguese.
34. Madenci E, Herken H, Yağız E, Keven S, Gürsoy S. Kronik ağrılı ve fibromiyalji sendromlu hastalarda depresyon düzeyleri ve ağrı ile başa çıkma becerileri. Türk Fiz Tıp Rehab Derg 2006;52:19-21.
35. Tütüncü R, Günay H. Kronik ağrı, psikolojik etmenler ve depresyon. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 2011;38:257-62.
36. Ataoğlu S, Özçetin A, Ataoğlu A, İçmeli C, Makarç S, Yağlı M. Fibromyaljili ve romatoid artritli hastalarda ağrı şiddeti ile anksiyete ve depresyon ilişkisi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi 2002;3:223-6.
37. Dündar Ü, Solak Ö, Demirdal ÜS, Toktaş H, Kavuncu V. Kronik bel ağrılı hastalarda ağrı, yeti yitimi ve depresyonun yaşam kalitesi ile ilişkisi. Genel Tip Dergisi 2009;19:99-104.
38. Mariotto S, Cavalieri E, Amelio E, Ciampa AR, de Prati AC, Marlinghaus E, et al. Extracorporeal shock waves: From lithotripsy to anti-inflammatory action by NO production. Nitric Oxide 2005;12:89-96.
39. Ito K, Fukumoto Y, Shimokawa H. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy as a new and non-invasive angiogenic strategy. Tohoku J Exp Med 2009;219:1-9.
40. Sun Y, Jin K, Childs JT, Xie L, Mao XO, Greenberg DA. Vascular endothelial growth factor-B (VEGFB) stimulates neurogenesis: Evidence from knockout mice and growth factor administration. Dev Biol 2006;289:329-35.
41. Takahashi N, Wada Y, Ohtori S, Saisu T, Moriya H. Application of shock waves to rat skin decreases calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactivity in dorsal root ganglion neurons. Auton Neurosci 2003;107:81-4.
42. Khadilkar A, Odebiyi DO, Brosseau L, Wells GA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;2008:CD003008.
43. Ebadi S, Henschke N, Forogh B, Nakhostin Ansari N, van Tulder MW, Babaei-Ghazani A, et al. Therapeutic ultrasound for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;7:CD009169.

APA	KIZILTAŞ Ö, okçu m, TUNCAY F, Koçak F (2022). Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain. , 399 - 408. 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8905
Chicago	KIZILTAŞ ÖMER,okçu mehmet,TUNCAY FİGEN,Koçak Fatmanur Aybala Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain. (2022): 399 - 408. 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8905
MLA	KIZILTAŞ ÖMER,okçu mehmet,TUNCAY FİGEN,Koçak Fatmanur Aybala Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain. , 2022, ss.399 - 408. 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8905
AMA	KIZILTAŞ Ö,okçu m,TUNCAY F,Koçak F Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain. . 2022; 399 - 408. 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8905
Vancouver	KIZILTAŞ Ö,okçu m,TUNCAY F,Koçak F Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain. . 2022; 399 - 408. 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8905
IEEE	KIZILTAŞ Ö,okçu m,TUNCAY F,Koçak F "Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain." , ss.399 - 408, 2022. 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8905
ISNAD	KIZILTAŞ, ÖMER vd. "Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain". (2022), 399-408. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2022.8905

APA	KIZILTAŞ Ö, okçu m, TUNCAY F, Koçak F (2022). Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68(3), 399 - 408. 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8905
Chicago	KIZILTAŞ ÖMER,okçu mehmet,TUNCAY FİGEN,Koçak Fatmanur Aybala Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 68, no.3 (2022): 399 - 408. 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8905
MLA	KIZILTAŞ ÖMER,okçu mehmet,TUNCAY FİGEN,Koçak Fatmanur Aybala Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol.68, no.3, 2022, ss.399 - 408. 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8905
AMA	KIZILTAŞ Ö,okçu m,TUNCAY F,Koçak F Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2022; 68(3): 399 - 408. 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8905
Vancouver	KIZILTAŞ Ö,okçu m,TUNCAY F,Koçak F Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2022; 68(3): 399 - 408. 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8905
IEEE	KIZILTAŞ Ö,okçu m,TUNCAY F,Koçak F "Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain." Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68, ss.399 - 408, 2022. 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8905
ISNAD	KIZILTAŞ, ÖMER vd. "Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain". Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 68/3 (2022), 399-408. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2022.8905