The right to be forgotten, which is claimed to be used mostly against sharing in digital media, is a fundamental right by its nature and should be evaluated together with other fundamental rights such as the right to privacy and the privacy of private life. In addition to the legislative arrangements made to protect the right to be forgotten, the number of judicial decisions is increasing day by day. Although the protection of this right of individuals seems to be an idea that should be accepted, there may be some people who are harmed due to the use of this right. The right to be forgotten, which is an extension of some fundamental rights, conflicts with other fundamental rights such as freedom of expression and property rights. The removal of personal data, which constitutes the content of a post on social media, within the scope of the right to be forgotten, causes harm in terms of preventing the society's right to receive information and the property right of the individual sharing it, even if it is in the interest of the individual who has the data. It is clear that the use of the right to be forgotten by keeping a balance between the interests of the individual and the society will be more beneficial for all segments of the society. This work discusses Meta Threads, a new social media platform alongside Facebook, Twitter/X, and Instagram, cases where a user account opened on Meta Threads cannot be deleted alone or the profile name cannot be changed due to the fact that it works adjacent to the Instagram account, which may cause unlawful data processing pursuant to KVKK. This work aims to discuss the significance that social media platforms should be designed and released in a way that would protect the fundamental rights of individuals, taking into account the obligations of data controllers.