Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations

Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 49 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 196 - 202 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations

Öz:
Amaç: Başa çıkma konusunda yapılan araştırmalarda kullanılan ölçekler çeşitli eksiklikleri nedeniyle uzun zamandır yoğun bir şekilde eleştirilmektedir. Stresli Durumlarla Başa Çıkma Envanteri (SDBÇE) güçlü psikometrik özellikleri nedeniyle umut vadeden bir ölçme aracı niteliğini taşımaktadır. Bu çalışmada Stresli Durumlarla Başa Çıkma Envanterinin Türkçe formunun psikometrik özelliklerinin oldukça geniş bir üniversiteli grubunda çalışılması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Araştırmanın katılımcılarını yaş ortalaması 20.11 (SS±2,55) olan 729 üniversite öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır (Grubun %67,49 kadındır; n=492). Bu çalışmada Stresli Durumlarla Başa Çıkma Envanteri (SDBÇE), Pozitif ve Negatif Duygulanım Ölçeği (PNDÖ), Yaşam Doyumu Ölçeği (YDÖ), ve COPE Envanteri uygulanmıştır. Madde istatistikleri, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, iç tutarlılık, 15 günlük test tekrar test güvenilirliği ve değişkenler arasında Pearson korelasyonları hesaplanmıştır. Bul gular: Onaylayıcı faktör analizleri üç ve dört faktörlü yapıların Türk öğrencilerden toplanan veriler için geçerliğine işaret etmektedir. Alt ölçekler için yüksek iç tutarlılık ve test-tekrar test güvenilirliği elde edilmiştir. SDBÇEnin pozitif ve negatif duygulanım ve COPE alt ölçekleriyle ölçüt bağıntı katsayıları incelenmiştir. SDBÇEnin alt ölçekleriyle pozitif ve negatif duygulanım, yaşam doyumu, COPE alt ölçekleri arasında orta düzeyden yükseğe doğru değişen korelasyonlar elde edilmiştir. Söz konusu psikolojik yapılarla SDBÇE arasında elde edilen ölçüt bağıntı ilişkileri, başa çıkma araştırmalarından elde edilen teorik sonuçlarla uyumlu olarak ölçme aracının geçerliğine ilişkin ek kanıtlar sunmaktadır. Sonuç: Ölçme aracının üç faktörlü yapısı araştırmalarda daha uygulanabilir niteliktedir. SDBÇEnin Türkçe formu yeterli geçerlik ve güvenilirlik düzeyine sahiptir. Sonuçlar SDBÇEnin güçlü psikometrik özellikleri olduğuna işaret etmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Nörolojik Bilimler Psikiyatri

Stresli durumlarla başa çıkma envanteri nin Türkçe formunun psikometrik Özellikleri

Öz:
Objective: The psychometric instruments used in coping research have long been criticised because of their various flaws. The Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) is a promising measure with its sound psychometric properties. The current investigation aimed at evaluating the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the CISS in a large group of college students. Methods: The sample consisted of 729 undergraduates - 492 females (67.49%) and 237 males (32.51%), - average age: 20.11 (SD±2.55) years -. The CISS, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), and the COPE Inventory were administered. Item statistics, confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency coefficients, 15-day test- retest reliability, and Pearson s correlation coefficients between psychological variables were computed.Major depression was excluded. Results: The confirmatory factor analyses revealed that both three- and four- factor structures of the CISS were valid for the data collected from the Turkish college students. The subscales demonstrated good internal consistency and temporal stability. The correlations of the CISS subscales with positive and negative affect, satisfaction with life, and the COPE subscales ranged from mediocre to high. Significant associations of CISS subscales with other psychological variables which were consistent with the previous theoretical considerations pertaining to coping research extended empirical support for the construct validity of the measure. Discussion: Using three-factor structure seems to be more applicable for research purposes. The Turkish version of the CISS has adequate validity and reliability. The results indicated that the CISS has sound psychometric properties.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Nörolojik Bilimler Psikiyatri
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
0
0
0
  • 1. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer, 1984.
  • 2. Folkman S, Moskowitz JT. Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annu Rev Psychol 2004; 55:745-774.
  • 3. Somerfield MR, McCrae RR. Stress and coping research: Methodological challenges, theoretical advances, and clinical applications. Am Psychol 2000; 55:620-625.
  • 4. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J Health Soc Behav 1980; 21:219-239.
  • 5. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. Manual for the Ways of Coping Questionnaire, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA., 1988.
  • 6. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 1989; 56:267-283.
  • 7. Moos RH. Coping Responses Inventory: CRI-Adult form professional manual, Psychological Assessment Resource Inc., Odessa, FL., 1993.
  • 8. Endler NS, Parker JDA. Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS): Manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems, 1990.
  • 9. Endler NS, Parker JDA. Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS): Manual (Second ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems, 1999.
  • 10. Parker JDA, Endler NS. Coping with coping assessment: A critical review. Eur J Pers 1992; 6:321-344.
  • 11. Stone AA, Greenberg MA, Kennedy-Moore E, Newman MG. Self- report, situation specific, coping questionnaires: what are they measures? J Pers Soc Psychol 1991; 61:648-658.
  • 12. Endler NS, Parker JDA. Assessment of multidimensional coping: Task, emotional, and avoidance strategies. Psychol Assess 1994; 6:50-60.
  • 13. Endler NS, Parker JDA. The assessment of coping: the Multidimensional Coping Inventory. Department of Psychology Reports, No 174, New York University, Toronto, 1988.
  • 14.Folkman S, Lazarus RS. If it changes it must be a process: a study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. J Pers Soc Psychol 1985; 48:150-170.
  • 15.Billing AG, Moss RH. The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the impact factor of stressful life events. J Behav Med 1981; 4:139-157.
  • 16.Pearlin LI, Schooler C. The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav 1978; 19:2-21.
  • 17.Amirkhan JH. A factor analytically derived measure of coping: the Coping Strategy Indicator. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990; 59:1066-1074.
  • 18.Endler NS, Parker JDA. Multidimensional assessment of coping: a critical evaluation. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990; 58:844-854.
  • 19.Cosway R, Endler NS, Sadler AJ, Deary IJ. The Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations: Factorial structure and associations with personality traits and psychological health. J Appl Biobehav Res 2001; 5:121-143.
  • 20.McWilliams LA, Cox BJ, Enns MW. Use of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations in a clinically depressed sample: factor structure, personality correlates, and prediction of distress. J Clin Psychol 2003; 59:423-437.
  • 21.Rafnsson FD, Smari J, Windle M, Mears SA, Endler NS. Factor structure and psychometric characteristics of the Icelandic version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS). Pers Individ Dif 2006; 40:1247-1258.
  • 22.Cook SW, Heppner PP. A psychometric study of three coping measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1997; 57:906-923.
  • 23.Ağargün MY, Beşiroğlu L, Kıran ÜK, Özer ÖA, Kara H. The psychometric properties of the COPE inventory in Turkish sample: a preliminary research. Anadolu Psikiyatr Derg 2005; 6:221-226.
  • 24.Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988; 47:1063-1070.
  • 25.Gençöz T. Positive and negative affect schedule: A study of validity and reliability. Turkish Journal of Psychology 2000; 15:27-28.
  • 26.Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess 1985; 49:71-77.
  • 27. Durak M, Senol-Durak E, Gençöz T. Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale among Turkish university students, correctional officers, and elderly adults. Soc Indic Res 2010; 99:413-429.
  • 28. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999; 6:1-55.
  • 29. Han K, Burns GN, Weed NC, Hatchett GT, Kurokawa NKS. Evaluation of an observer form of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS). Educational and Psychology Measurement 2009; 69:675-695.
  • 30. Furukawa T, Suzuki-Moor A, Saito Y, Hamanaka T. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the coping inventory for stressful situations (CISS): A contribution to the cross-cultural studies of coping. Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi 1993; 95:602-620.
  • 31. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. Coping as a mediator of emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988; 54:466-475.
  • 32. Lazarus RS. Emotion and Adaptation. New York, Oxford University Press, 1991.
  • 33. Akı ŞÖE, Arıkan Z, Işıklı S. Comparison of coping mechanisms between alcoholics in early remission and alcoholics in remission at least for one year and control group. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi 2008; 45:36-45.
  • 34. Çetinkaya S, Nur N, Ayvaz A, Özdemir D. Depression, anxiety levels and coping strategies with stress in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients in a university hospital. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi 2008; 45:78-84.
  • 35. Aslan SH, Alpaslan ZN, Gürkan SB, Aslan RO, Cenkseven F. The levels of social anxiety, alexithymia and coping styles among the university students. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi 1997; 34:127-134.
  • 36. Yurtbay T. Coping with stress and psychiatric symptoms in university students who live away from their families. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi 1996; 33:96-105.
  • 37. Endler NS, Parker JDA, Butcher JN. A factor analytic study of coping styles and the MMPI-2 content scales. J Clin Psychol 1993; 49:523-527.
  • 38. Connor-Smith JK, Flachsbart C. Relations between personality and coping: a meta-analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol 2007; 93:1080-1107.
APA BOYSAN M (2012). Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations. , 196 - 202.
Chicago BOYSAN MURAT Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations. (2012): 196 - 202.
MLA BOYSAN MURAT Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations. , 2012, ss.196 - 202.
AMA BOYSAN M Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations. . 2012; 196 - 202.
Vancouver BOYSAN M Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations. . 2012; 196 - 202.
IEEE BOYSAN M "Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations." , ss.196 - 202, 2012.
ISNAD BOYSAN, MURAT. "Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations". (2012), 196-202.
APA BOYSAN M (2012). Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, 49(3), 196 - 202.
Chicago BOYSAN MURAT Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi 49, no.3 (2012): 196 - 202.
MLA BOYSAN MURAT Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, vol.49, no.3, 2012, ss.196 - 202.
AMA BOYSAN M Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi. 2012; 49(3): 196 - 202.
Vancouver BOYSAN M Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi. 2012; 49(3): 196 - 202.
IEEE BOYSAN M "Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations." Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, 49, ss.196 - 202, 2012.
ISNAD BOYSAN, MURAT. "Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations". Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi 49/3 (2012), 196-202.