Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 787 - 795 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

An Analysis of High School Students' Mental Models of Solid Friction in Physics

Öz:
Students often have difficulties understanding abstract physics concepts, such as solid friction. This study examines high school students' mental models of solid friction through a case study of 215 high school students in the ninth through twelfth grades. An achievement test with three open-ended questions was created, with questions limited to descriptive and visual responses regarding the concept of solid friction. The gathered data were analyzed in terms of rubrics that were used in related literature. By using the rubrics, the various levels of understanding by students were determined separately by the two researchers. The percentage of case agreement between the researchers was calculated as 90% for description and 84% for visualization. The results showed that students mostly think about solid friction at the macroscopic level and have difficulties making sense of it at the microscopic level (i.e., students' mental models are not scientific). In the light of these results, it is recommended that instructors endeavor to explain solid friction at macroscopic, mesoscopic, and microscopic levels
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M., & Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A cross-age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147-165.
  • Besson, U., Borghi, L., De Ambrosis, A., & Mascheretti, P. (2007). How to teach friction: Experiments and models. American Journal of Physics, 75(12), 1106-1113.
  • Besson, U., & Viennot, L. (2004).Using models at the mesoscopic scale in teaching physics: Two experimental interventions in solid friction and fluid statics. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1083-1110.
  • Bower, G. H., & Morrow, G. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science, 247, 44-48.
  • Brown, D. E. (1989). Students' concept of force: The importance of understanding Newton's third law. Physics Education, 24, 353-358.
  • Çalık, M., & Ayas, A. (2005). A comparison of level of understanding of grade 8 students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 638-667.
  • Clement, J. (1982). Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-72.
  • Dekkers, P. J. J. M., & Thijs, G. D. (1998). Making productive use of students' initial conceptions in developing the concept of force. Science Education, 82, 31-51.
  • Halloun, I. (1998). Schematic concept for schematic models of the real world: The Newtonian concept of force. Science Education, 82(2), 239-263.
  • Hanke, U. (2008). Realizing model-based instruction:The model of model-based instruction. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Understanding models for learning and instruction (pp. 175-186). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.
  • Hanke, U., & Huber, E. (2010). Acceptance of model-based instruction among students in Spanish and mathematics. In J. M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, P. Isaías, Kinshuk, & D. Sampson (Eds.), Learning and instruction in the digital age (pp. 225- ). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.
  • Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary students' mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, (5), 509-534.
  • Helm, H. (1980). Misconceptions in physics amongstSouth African students. Physics Education, 15, 92-105.
  • Hestenes, D. (2006). Notes for a modeling theory of science, cognition and instruction. In E. van den Berg, T. Ellermeijer, & O. Slooten (Eds.), Proceedings GIREP Conference 2006: Modelling in Physics and Physics Education (pp. 34-65). Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Heywood, D., & Parker, J. (2001). Describing the cognitive landscape in learning and teaching about forces. International Journal of Science Education, 23(11), 1177-1199.
  • Hill, B. R. (2010). Mental models. Retrieved from http:// mentalmodelassessment.org/mental-models/
  • İyibil, Ü. (2010). Farklı programlarda öğrenim gören öğretmen adaylarının temel astronomi kavramlarını anlama düzeylerinin ve ilgili kavramlara ait zihinsel modellerinin analizi [The Analysis of the Understanding Levels and Mental Models of Candidate Teachers Studying at Different Departments about Basic Astronomy Concepts] (Master's thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Jimenez-Valladares, J. D., & Perales-Palacios, F. J. (2001). Graphic representation of force in secondary education: Analysis and alternative educational proposals. Physics Education, 36(3), 227-235.
  • Kalyoncu, C., Tütüncü, A., Değirmenci, A., Çakmak, Y., & Bektaş, E. (2008). Ortaöğretim fizik 9 ders kitabı [Physics textbook for grade 9]. İstanbul: Devlet Kitapları.
  • Knight, R. D. (2008). Physics for scientists and engineers: A strategic approach with modern physics. New York, NY: Pearson Education.
  • Kurnaz, M. A. (2011). Enerji konusunda model tabanlı öğrenme yaklaşımına göre tasarlanan öğrenme ortamlarının zihinsel model gelişimine etkisi [The effect of learning environments based on model-based learning approach to mental model development about energy subject] (Doctoral dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Kurnaz, M. A., Değermenci, A., Kalyoncu, C., Pektaş, E., Bayraktar, G., Aydın, U., & Moradaoğlu, Y. (2012). 11. sınıf fizik ders kitabı [Physics textbook for grade 11]. Ankara:Devlet Kitapları, Başak Matbaacılık,
  • Kurt, Ş., & Akdeniz, A. R. (2004). Öğretmen adaylarının kuvvet kavramı ile ilgili yanılgılarını gidermede keşfedici laboratuvar modelinin etkisi [The effect of discovery laboratory model to remedy student teachers' misconceptions about force concept]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 196-205.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.
  • Ministry of National Education. (2011a). Ortaöğretim sınıf fizik dersi öğretim programı [Secondary school 9th grade physics lesson program]. Ankara: Author.
  • Ministry of National Education. (2011b). Ortaöğretim 11. sınıf fizik dersi öğretim programı [Secondary school 11th grade physics lesson program]. Ankara: Author.
  • Ministry of National Education. (2011c). Ortaöğretim 12. sınıf fizik dersi öğretim programı [Secondary school 12th grade physics lesson program]. Ankara: Author.
  • Ministry of National Education. (2012). 12. sınıf fizik ders kitabı [Physics textbook for grade 12]. Ankara: Devlet Kitapları, Koza Yayıncılık. Nersessian, N. J. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere (Eds.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 3-44). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Nuhoğlu, H. (2008). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin hareket ve kuvvet hakkındaki bilgilerinin değerlendirilmesi Evaluation of the secondary school pupils' view about force and motion]. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(16), 123-140.
  • Pell, T., & Jarvis, T. (2001). Developing attitude to science scales for use with children of ages from five to eleven years.
  • International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 847-862. Rapp, D. (2005). Mental models: Theoretical issues for visualizations in science education. In John K. Gilbert
  • (Ed.), Visualization in Science Education (pp. 43-60). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Sağlam Arslan, A. (2009). Cross-grade comparison of students' understanding of energy concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(3), 303-313.
  • Sağlam Arslan, A., & Devecioğlu, Y. (2010). Student teachers' levels of understanding and model of understanding about Newton's laws of motion. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), Article 7.
  • Şahin, Ç. (2010). İlköğretim 8. Sınıf "kuvvet ve hareket" ünitesinde "zenginleştirilmiş 5E öğretim modeli"ne göre rehber Materyaller tasarlanması, uygulanması ve Değerlendirilmesi [Design, implementation and evaluation of the guided materials based on the "Enriched 5E Instructional Model" for the elementary 8th grade "Force and Motion" unit] (Doctoral dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/ Trumper, R., & Gorsky, P. (1996). A cross-college age study about physics students' conceptions of force in pre-service training for high school teachers. Physics Education, 31, 236.
  • Trumper, R., & Gorsky, P. (1997). A survey of biology students' conceptions of force in pre-service training for high school teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 15, 133-149.
  • Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69.
  • Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123-183.
  • Westbrook, S. L., & Marek, E. A. (1992). A cross-age study of student understanding of the concept of homeostasis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(1), 51-61.
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
APA KURNAZ M, EKSİ C (2015). An Analysis of High School Students' Mental Models of Solid Friction in Physics. , 787 - 795.
Chicago KURNAZ Mehmet Altan,EKSİ Cigdem An Analysis of High School Students' Mental Models of Solid Friction in Physics. (2015): 787 - 795.
MLA KURNAZ Mehmet Altan,EKSİ Cigdem An Analysis of High School Students' Mental Models of Solid Friction in Physics. , 2015, ss.787 - 795.
AMA KURNAZ M,EKSİ C An Analysis of High School Students' Mental Models of Solid Friction in Physics. . 2015; 787 - 795.
Vancouver KURNAZ M,EKSİ C An Analysis of High School Students' Mental Models of Solid Friction in Physics. . 2015; 787 - 795.
IEEE KURNAZ M,EKSİ C "An Analysis of High School Students' Mental Models of Solid Friction in Physics." , ss.787 - 795, 2015.
ISNAD KURNAZ, Mehmet Altan - EKSİ, Cigdem. "An Analysis of High School Students' Mental Models of Solid Friction in Physics". (2015), 787-795.
APA KURNAZ M, EKSİ C (2015). An Analysis of High School Students' Mental Models of Solid Friction in Physics. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 15(3), 787 - 795.
Chicago KURNAZ Mehmet Altan,EKSİ Cigdem An Analysis of High School Students' Mental Models of Solid Friction in Physics. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 15, no.3 (2015): 787 - 795.
MLA KURNAZ Mehmet Altan,EKSİ Cigdem An Analysis of High School Students' Mental Models of Solid Friction in Physics. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, vol.15, no.3, 2015, ss.787 - 795.
AMA KURNAZ M,EKSİ C An Analysis of High School Students' Mental Models of Solid Friction in Physics. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2015; 15(3): 787 - 795.
Vancouver KURNAZ M,EKSİ C An Analysis of High School Students' Mental Models of Solid Friction in Physics. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2015; 15(3): 787 - 795.
IEEE KURNAZ M,EKSİ C "An Analysis of High School Students' Mental Models of Solid Friction in Physics." Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 15, ss.787 - 795, 2015.
ISNAD KURNAZ, Mehmet Altan - EKSİ, Cigdem. "An Analysis of High School Students' Mental Models of Solid Friction in Physics". Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 15/3 (2015), 787-795.