Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis

KILIÇOĞLU, ÖNDER İSMET; PEHLIVANOGLU, Tuna; CAKMAK, Mehmet Fevzi; BALCI, Halil İbrahim; Yazicioglu, Onder; demirel, mehmet

doi:10.1016/j.aott.2019.07.001

Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis

Tuna PEHLİVANOĞLU, (İstanbul Üniversitesi)

Halil İbrahim BALCI, (İstanbul Üniversitesi)

Mehmet DEMİREL, (İstanbul Üniversitesi)

Mehmet Fevzi CAKMAK, (İstanbul Üniversitesi)

Önder YAZICIOĞLU, (İstanbul Üniversitesi)

Önder İsmet KILIÇOĞLU (İstanbul Üniversitesi)

Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica

1 0

Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 53 Sayı: 6 Sayfa Aralığı: 420 - 425 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.07.001 İndeks Tarihi: 08-04-2020

Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis

Öz:

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is an increased risk of anterior kneepain (AKP) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing in patients with rheumatoidarthritis (RA) versus primary osteoarthritis (OA).Methods: This study was a retrospective review of 388 patients (577 knees) who underwent TKA withoutpatellar resurfacing between 2003 and 2011, with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Patients weredivided into two groups: Group OA (273 knees of 206 patients; 83 males, 123 females; mean age: 64.4(47e87) years) and Group RA (304 knees of 182 patients; 92 males, 90 females; mean age: 50.7 (21e72)years). In the clinical evaluation, the knee range of motion (ROM) and several outcome measures such asThe Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were used preoperatively and atthe final follow-up visit. The quality of life was measured using Short Form (SF)-36 MCS and PCS scores.The primary outcome was the frequency and severity of patient-reported AKP. The AKP Scale was used todetermine the severity of AKP.Results: The IKDC raised from 21.62 (range, 13e29.9) preoperatively to 85.1 (range, 80e88) for group OAand from 21.8 (range, 13e29.9) to 85.2 (range, 81e88) for group RA (p < 0.001). The mean KSS improvedfrom 28.35 (range, 22e38) preoperatively to 90.04 (range, 88e95) for group OA and from 21.9 (range, 18e35) preoperatively to 89.7 (range, 86e95) for group RA. The mean WOMAC increased from 20.61(range, 17.4e24.2) preoperatively to 95.7 (range, 90.9e97.7) for group OA (p < 0.001) and from 20.2(range, 16.7e24.2) preoperatively to 95.8 (range, 90.9e98.5) for group RA (p < 0.001). The mean ROMimproved from 80.14 (range, 55e130) preoperatively to 113.17 (range, 95e140) in group OA(P ¼ 0.003) and from 73.4 (range, 10e130) to 112.8 (range 90e140) in group RA (P ¼ 0.003)postoperatively. The frequency of AKP was 8% in Group OA and 7% in Group RA (p ¼ 0.27). For patientswith AKP, the mean AKP Scale was 92.74 (range, 84e98) in Group OA and 93.39 (range, 82e98) in GroupRA (p ¼ 0.3).Conclusion: After TKA without resurfacing the patella, patients with RA were determined to have asimilar risk for AKP as those with OA.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Ortopedi

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

1. Meftah M, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. The natural history of anterior knee pain in 2 posterior-stabilized, modular total knee arthroplasty designs. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(8):1145e1148.
2. Indelli P, Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Baldini A. The Insall-Burstein II prosthesis: a 5-to 9- year follow-up study in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(5): 544e549.
3. Li S, Chen Y, Su W, Zhao J, He S, Luo X. Systematic review of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2011;35(3):305e316.
4. Pais-Brito J, Rafols-Urquiza B, Gonzalez-Massieu L, Herrera-Perez M, Aciego-De Mendoza M, De Bergua Domingo J. Reduced patellofemoral and walking pain with mobile-bearing vs. fixed-bearing total knee replacements: a mid-term prospective analytic study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(4):375e381.
5. Ranawat C. History of total knee replacement. J South Orthop Assoc. 2001;11(4): 218e226.
6. Helmy N, Anglin C, Greidanus NV, Masri BA. To resurface or not to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(11): 2775e2783.
7. Breeman S, Campbell M, Dakin H, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: five-year clinical and economic results of a large randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(16):1473e1481.
8. Metsna V, Vorobjov S, Martson A. Prevalence of anterior knee pain among patients following total knee arthroplasty with nonreplaced patella: a retrospective study of 1778 knees. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2014;50(2): 82e86.
9. Holt G, Miller N, Kelly M, Leach W. Retention of the patella in total knee arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis. Jt Bone Spine. 2006;73(5):523e526.
10. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(3):262e267.
11. Hanssen AD. Bone-grafting for severe patellar bone loss during revision knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(2):171.
12. Deehan DJ, Phaltankar PM, Pinder IM. Do we need to replace the patella in knee arthroplasty for rheumatoid disease? Acta Orthop Belg. 2008;74(4): 478e482.
13. Parvizi J, Rapuri VR, Saleh KJ, Kuskowski MA, Sharkey PF, Mont MA. Failure to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty may result in more knee pain and secondary surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438(1): 191e196.
14. Feller JA, Bartlett RJ, Lang DM. Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(2):226e228.
15. Shoji H, Yoshino S, Kajino A. Patellar replacement in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. A study of patients who had rheumatoid arthritis and no gross deformity of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(6):853e856.
16. Kon E, Altadonna G, Filardo G, Matteo BD, Marcacci M. Knee scoring systems. In: Bentley G, ed. European Surgical Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Berlin: Springer; 2014:3371e3388.
17. Wolfe F, Kong SX. Rasch analysis of the Western Ontario MacMaster questionnaire (WOMAC) in 2205 patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999;58(9):563e568.
18. Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Hurme M, Nelimarkka O. Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy. 1993;9(2):159e163.
19. Kramers-de Quervain IA, Engel-Bicik I, Miehlke W, Drobny T, Munzinger U. Fat-pad impingement after total knee arthroplasty with the LCS A/P-Glide system. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13(3):174e178.
20. Ma HM, Lu YC, Kwok TG, Ho FY, Huang CY, Huang CH. The effect of the design of the femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(3):408e412.
21. Nizard RS, Biau D, Porcher R, et al. A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;432(3):196e203.
22. Pakos EE, Ntzani EE, Trikalinos TA. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(7):1438e1445.
23. Pavlou G, Meyer C, Leonidou A, As-Sultany M, West R, Tsiridis E. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: does design matter? A meta-analysis of 7075 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(14):1301e1309.
24. Patel K, Raut V. Patella in total knee arthroplasty: to resurface or not toea cohort study of staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2011;35(3):349e353.
25. He JY, Jiang LS, Dai LY. Is patellar resurfacing superior than nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Knee. 2011;18(3):137e144.
26. Swan JD, Stoney JD, Lim K, Dowsey MM, Choong PF. The need for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a literature review. ANZ J Surg. 2010;80(4):223e233.
27. Bhan S, Malhotra R, Eachempati KK. Total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;450(9):157e163.
28. Biau D, Mullins MM, Judet T, Piriou P. Mobile versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: mid-term comparative clinical results of 216 prostheses. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(10):927e933.
29. Picetti Gd, McGann W, Welch R. The patellofemoral joint after total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(9):1379e1382.
30. Fern E, Winson I, Getty C. Anterior knee pain in rheumatoid patients after total knee replacement. Possible selection criteria for patellar resurfacing. Bone Joint J. 1992;74(5):745e748.
31. Bourne RB. To resurface the patella or not? Better assessments needed to address the benefits for total knee replacement: commentary on an article by George Pavlou, BSc, MRCS, et al.: “Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: does design matter? A meta-analysis of 7075 cases”. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(14):e82.
32. Levitsky KA, Harris WJ, Mcmanus J, Scott RD. Total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing: clinical outcomes and long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:116e121.
33. Peng CW, Tay BK, Lee BP. Prospective trial of resurfaced patellaversus nonresurfaced patella in simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement. Singapore Med J. 2003;44(7):347e351.

APA	PEHLIVANOGLU T, BALCI H, demirel m, CAKMAK M, Yazicioglu O, KILIÇOĞLU Ö (2019). Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis. , 420 - 425. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.07.001
Chicago	PEHLIVANOGLU Tuna,BALCI Halil İbrahim,demirel mehmet,CAKMAK Mehmet Fevzi,Yazicioglu Onder,KILIÇOĞLU ÖNDER İSMET Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis. (2019): 420 - 425. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.07.001
MLA	PEHLIVANOGLU Tuna,BALCI Halil İbrahim,demirel mehmet,CAKMAK Mehmet Fevzi,Yazicioglu Onder,KILIÇOĞLU ÖNDER İSMET Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis. , 2019, ss.420 - 425. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.07.001
AMA	PEHLIVANOGLU T,BALCI H,demirel m,CAKMAK M,Yazicioglu O,KILIÇOĞLU Ö Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis. . 2019; 420 - 425. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.07.001
Vancouver	PEHLIVANOGLU T,BALCI H,demirel m,CAKMAK M,Yazicioglu O,KILIÇOĞLU Ö Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis. . 2019; 420 - 425. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.07.001
IEEE	PEHLIVANOGLU T,BALCI H,demirel m,CAKMAK M,Yazicioglu O,KILIÇOĞLU Ö "Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis." , ss.420 - 425, 2019. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.07.001
ISNAD	PEHLIVANOGLU, Tuna vd. "Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis". (2019), 420-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.07.001

APA	PEHLIVANOGLU T, BALCI H, demirel m, CAKMAK M, Yazicioglu O, KILIÇOĞLU Ö (2019). Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 53(6), 420 - 425. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.07.001
Chicago	PEHLIVANOGLU Tuna,BALCI Halil İbrahim,demirel mehmet,CAKMAK Mehmet Fevzi,Yazicioglu Onder,KILIÇOĞLU ÖNDER İSMET Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 53, no.6 (2019): 420 - 425. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.07.001
MLA	PEHLIVANOGLU Tuna,BALCI Halil İbrahim,demirel mehmet,CAKMAK Mehmet Fevzi,Yazicioglu Onder,KILIÇOĞLU ÖNDER İSMET Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol.53, no.6, 2019, ss.420 - 425. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.07.001
AMA	PEHLIVANOGLU T,BALCI H,demirel m,CAKMAK M,Yazicioglu O,KILIÇOĞLU Ö Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2019; 53(6): 420 - 425. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.07.001
Vancouver	PEHLIVANOGLU T,BALCI H,demirel m,CAKMAK M,Yazicioglu O,KILIÇOĞLU Ö Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2019; 53(6): 420 - 425. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.07.001
IEEE	PEHLIVANOGLU T,BALCI H,demirel m,CAKMAK M,Yazicioglu O,KILIÇOĞLU Ö "Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis." Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 53, ss.420 - 425, 2019. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.07.001
ISNAD	PEHLIVANOGLU, Tuna vd. "Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis". Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 53/6 (2019), 420-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.07.001