Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia

bayrak, seval; kursun-cakmak, sebnem; Akbulut, Sibel; Karadeniz, Seçil Nigar; Orhan, Kaan; SAHIN, SERKAN

doi:10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.725

Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia

Sibel AKBULUT, (Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı, Tokat, Türkiye)

Secil Nigar KARADENİZ, (Sağlık Bakanlığı, Ağız Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye)

Emine Sebnem KURSUN CAKMAK, (Sağlık Bakanlığı, Dentomaksillofasiyal Radyoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Seval BAYRAK, (Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Dentomaksillofasiyal Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Bolu, Türkiye)

SERKAN ŞAHİN, (Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Antropoloji Bölümü, Kırşehir, Türkiye)

Kaan ORHAN (Ankara Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Dentomaksillofasiyal Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)

Annals of Medical Research

2 0

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 1246 - 1251 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.725 İndeks Tarihi: 11-10-2020

Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia

Öz:

AbstractAim: This study aims to provide insights into the evolutionary adaptation of human, via comparing the craniofacial characteristics of living subjects and ancient skulls from Anatolia.Material and Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) generated 2D cephalometric projections of 32 ancient skulls and well matched lateral cephalometric images of 32 patients were evaluated. Sixteen widely used cephalometric measurements were performed. Intra-class correlation coefficients were used to examine intra-observer reliability. Mann–Whitney tests and chi-squaretests were used to compare cephalometric measurements of the groups.Results: : The linear measurements of living subjects were smaller than the linear measurements of ancient skulls (p<0.05). Significant differences were found between the groups in the cranial base lengths, maxillary and mandibular dimensions (p<0.05). The maxilla and mandible were found more prognathic in ancient men and women (p<0.001).Conclusion: Environmental factors and genetic changes lead to a reduction in the sagittal and vertical dimensions of the human craniofacial complex. Dental practitioners should consider these evolutionary changes during the treatment planning process.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Argyropoulos E, Sassouni V, Xeniotou A. A comparative cephalometric investigation of the Greek craniofacial pattern through 4,000 years. Angle Orthod 1989;59:195-204.
2. Rock W, Sabieha A, Evans R. A cephalometric comparison of skulls from the fourteenth, sixteenth and twentieth centuries. Br Dent J 2006;200:33.
3. Papagrigorakis MJ, Kousoulis AA, Synodinos PN. Craniofacial morphology in ancient and modern Greeks through 4,000 years. Anthropol Anz 2014;71:237-57.
4. Cappabianca S, Perillo L, Esposito V, et al. A computed tomography-based comparative cephalometric analysis of the Italian craniofacial pattern through 2,700 years. Radiol Med 2013;118:276-90.
5. Kuhn SL. Paleolithic Archeology in Turkey. Evol Anthropol 2002;11:198-210.
6. Kilinc GM, Koptekin D, Atakuman C, et al. Archaeogenomic analysis of the first steps of Neolithization in Anatolia and the Aegean. Proc Biol Sci 2017;284.
7. Seddon RP. A cephalometric study of the RomanoBritish. Eur J Orthod 1984;6:303-12.
8. Brothwell DR. Digging up bones: the excavation, treatment, and study of human skeletal remains. 3rd edition. Cornell University Press 1981.
9. Ubelaker DH. Manuals on Archeology. In: Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation. 3rd edition. Washington: Taraxacum 1999.
10. Luther F. A cephalometric comparison of medieval skulls with a modern population. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:315-25.
11. Defraia E, Camporesi M, Marinelli A, et al.Morphometric investigation in the skulls of young adults. A comparative study between 19th century and modern Italian samples. Angle Orthod 2008;78:641-6.
12. Debelmas A, Ketoff S, Lanciaux S, et al. Reproducibility assessment of Delaire cephalometric analysis using reconstructions from computed tomography. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;121:35-9.
13. Esclassan R, Noirrit E, Guyonnet JJ, et al.Comparative study between medieval (12th -14th c.) and modern skulls samples of five cranio-facial measures. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2006;107:17-22.
14. Hopkin GB, Houston WJ, James GA. The cranial base as an aetiological factor in malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1968;38:250-5.
15. Moss ML, Greenberg SN. Postnatal growth of the human skull base. The Angle Orthodontist 1955;25:77- 84.
16. Gong A, Li J, Wang Z, et al. Cranial base characteristics in anteroposterior malocclusions: A meta-analysis. Angle Orthod 2016;86:668-80.
17. Lozanoff S, Jureczek S, Feng T, eet al. Anterior cranial base morphology in mice with midfacial retrusion. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1994;31:417-28.
18. Brin I, Ben-Bassat Y, Smith P. Craniofacial morphology of Jews from the Hellenistic period. Int J Anthropol 1992;7:19-25.
19. Moore WJ, Lavelle CL, Spence TF. Changes in the size and shape of the human mandible in Britain. Br Dent J 1968;125:163-9.
20. Weiland FJ, Jonke E, Bantleon HP. Secular trends in malocclusion in Austrian men. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:355-9.
21. Altug-Atac AT, Erdem D. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:510-4.
22. Cirpan S, Kumbuloglu O, Yonguc GN, et al. Anatomical and Radiological Investigation of Dry Bone Adult Mandibles Having Impacted Third Molar Teeth. J Craniofac Surg 2018;29:1060-3

APA	Akbulut S, Karadeniz S, kursun-cakmak s, bayrak s, SAHIN S, Orhan K (2020). Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia. , 1246 - 1251. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.725
Chicago	Akbulut Sibel,Karadeniz Seçil Nigar,kursun-cakmak sebnem,bayrak seval,SAHIN SERKAN,Orhan Kaan Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia. (2020): 1246 - 1251. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.725
MLA	Akbulut Sibel,Karadeniz Seçil Nigar,kursun-cakmak sebnem,bayrak seval,SAHIN SERKAN,Orhan Kaan Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia. , 2020, ss.1246 - 1251. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.725
AMA	Akbulut S,Karadeniz S,kursun-cakmak s,bayrak s,SAHIN S,Orhan K Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia. . 2020; 1246 - 1251. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.725
Vancouver	Akbulut S,Karadeniz S,kursun-cakmak s,bayrak s,SAHIN S,Orhan K Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia. . 2020; 1246 - 1251. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.725
IEEE	Akbulut S,Karadeniz S,kursun-cakmak s,bayrak s,SAHIN S,Orhan K "Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia." , ss.1246 - 1251, 2020. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.725
ISNAD	Akbulut, Sibel vd. "Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia". (2020), 1246-1251. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.725

APA	Akbulut S, Karadeniz S, kursun-cakmak s, bayrak s, SAHIN S, Orhan K (2020). Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia. Annals of Medical Research, 27(4), 1246 - 1251. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.725
Chicago	Akbulut Sibel,Karadeniz Seçil Nigar,kursun-cakmak sebnem,bayrak seval,SAHIN SERKAN,Orhan Kaan Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia. Annals of Medical Research 27, no.4 (2020): 1246 - 1251. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.725
MLA	Akbulut Sibel,Karadeniz Seçil Nigar,kursun-cakmak sebnem,bayrak seval,SAHIN SERKAN,Orhan Kaan Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia. Annals of Medical Research, vol.27, no.4, 2020, ss.1246 - 1251. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.725
AMA	Akbulut S,Karadeniz S,kursun-cakmak s,bayrak s,SAHIN S,Orhan K Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia. Annals of Medical Research. 2020; 27(4): 1246 - 1251. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.725
Vancouver	Akbulut S,Karadeniz S,kursun-cakmak s,bayrak s,SAHIN S,Orhan K Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia. Annals of Medical Research. 2020; 27(4): 1246 - 1251. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.725
IEEE	Akbulut S,Karadeniz S,kursun-cakmak s,bayrak s,SAHIN S,Orhan K "Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia." Annals of Medical Research, 27, ss.1246 - 1251, 2020. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.725
ISNAD	Akbulut, Sibel vd. "Comparison of cephalometric measurements of living subjects and ancient skulls in Anatolia". Annals of Medical Research 27/4 (2020), 1246-1251. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.725