The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis

Ünalmış Aykar, Demet; acer, niyazi; DEMIR, HÜSEYIN; DOGAN, SERAP; YILMAZ, SEHER; Tokpinar, Adem

doi:10.14744/etd.2020.75768

The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis

Demet ÜNALMIŞ, (Erciyes Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Anatomi Bölümü, Kayseri, Türkiye)

Niyazı ACER, (Erciyes Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Anatomi Bölümü, Kayseri, Türkiye)

Seher YILMAZ, (Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Anatomi Bölümü, Yozgat, Türkiye)

Adem TOKPINAR, (Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Anatomi Bölümü, Yozgat, Türkiye)

Serap DOĞAN, (Erciyes Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Bölümü, Kayseri, Türkiye)

Hüseyin DEMİR (Erciyes Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Fiziksel Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü, Kayseri, Türkiye)

Erciyes Medical Journal

2 0

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 178 - 184 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/etd.2020.75768 İndeks Tarihi: 19-10-2020

The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis

Öz:

Objective: Osteoarthritis is non-inflammatory, degenerative, and chronic disease observed, especially as progressive in loadbearing joints. There are several studies that measure the volume and surface area of the knee joint cartilage in osteoarthritispatients. However, different methods were used in these studies.Materials and Methods: Our study population consisted of 25 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Twenty-five healthyindividuals were included in this study as a control group. In our study, planimetry and quadratic ruler method, which areamong stereological methods, were used over magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure the femoral condyle cartilagevolume and surface area.Results: The average cartilage volume measurement 6.54 cm3 in the female patient group and 13.51 cm3 in the femalecontrol group. In this measurement, 7.49 cm3 in male patients was measured in the control group 15.71 cm3. In the statistical comparison between the groups, it was determined that the values in the patient group decreased significantly comparedwith the control group (p<0.001).Conclusion: When compared with the literature, it is concluded that our method may be used as a valid method becausethe survey results are close to each other and the average values.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Heidari B. Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: Part I. Caspian J Intern Med 2011; 2(2): 205–12.
2. Harada Y, Tokuda O, Fukuda K, Shiraishi G, Motomura T, Kimura M, et al. Relationship between cartilage volume using MRI and KellgrenLawrence radiographic score in knee osteoarthritis with and without meniscal tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196(3): W298–304.
3. Faber SC, Eckstein F, Lukasz S, Mühlbauer R, Hohe J, Englmeier KH, et al. Gender differences in knee joint cartilage thickness, volume and articular surface areas: assessment with quantitative three-dimensional MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol 2001; 30(3): 144–50.
4. Eckstein F, Winzheimer M, Hohe J, Englmeier KH, Reiser M. Interindividual variability and correlation among morphological parameters of knee joint cartilage plates: analysis with three-dimensional MR imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001; 9(2): 101–11.
5. Raynauld JP, Kauffmann C, Beaudoin G, Berthiaume MJ, de Guise JA, Bloch DA, et al. Reliability of a quantification imaging system using magnetic resonance images to measure cartilage thickness and volume in human normal and osteoarthritic knees. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003; 11(5): 351–60.
6. Hudelmaier M, Glaser C, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Putz R, Eckstein F. Correlation of knee-joint cartilage morphology with muscle cross-sectional areas vs. anthropometric variables. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2003; 270(2): 175–84.
7. Garten CT Jr. A review of parameter values used to assess the transport of plutonium, uranium, and thorium in terrestrial food chains. Environ Res 1978; 17(3): 437–52.
8. Eckstein F, Cotofana S, Wirth W, Nevitt M, John MR, Dreher D, et al; Osteoarthritis Initiative Investigators Group. Greater rates of cartilage loss in painful knees than in pain-free knees after adjustment for radiographic disease stage: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2011; 63(8): 2257–67.
9. Martel-Pelletier J, Tardif G, Rousseau Trépanier J, Abram F, Dorais M, et al. The ratio adipsin/MCP-1 is strongly associated with structural changes and CRP/MCP-1 with symptoms in obese knee osteoarthritis subjects: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2019; 27(8): 1163–73.
10. Morgan SR, Waterton JC, Maciewicz RA, Leadbetter JE, Gandy SJ, Moots RJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging measurement of knee cartilage volume in a multicentre study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004; 43(1): 19–21.
11. Ding C, Cicuttini F, Scott F, Glisson M, Jones G. Sex differences in knee cartilage volume in adults: role of body and bone size, age and physical activity. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003; 42(11): 1317–23.
12. Acer N, Turgut M. Evaluation of Brachial Plexus Using Combined Stereological Techniques of Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tracking. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj 2019; 14(1): e16–23.
13. Değermenci M, Ertekin T, Ülger H, Acer N, Coşkun A. The Age-Related Development of Maxillary Sinus in Children. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27(1): e38–44.
14. Acer N, Sahin B, Ucar T, Usanmaz M. Unbiased estimation of the eyeball volume using the Cavalieri principle on computed tomography images. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20(1): 233–7.
15. Acer N, Uğurlu N, Uysal DD, Unur E, Turgut M, Camurdanoğlu M. Comparison of two volumetric techniques for estimating volume of intracerebral ventricles using magnetic resonance imaging: a stereological study. Anat Sci Int 2010; 85(3): 131–9.
16. Acer N, Turgut M. Stereological Estimation of Brain Volume and Surface Area from MR Images. In: Neurostereology: Unbiased Stereology of Neural Systems. Mouton PR, editor. 1st ed. USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2014.
17. Cruz-Orive LM, Ramos-Herrera ML, Artacho-Pérula E. Stereology of isolated objects with the invariator. J Microsc 2010; 240(2): 94–110.
18. Tokpınar A, Ülger H, Yılmaz S, Acer N, Ertekin T, Görkem SB, et al. Examination of inclinations of the spine at childhood and adolescence. Folia Morphol 2018; 78(1): 47–53.
19. Herek D, Nevzat K. Manyetik Rezonans Görüntüleme. TTD Toraks Cerrahisi Bülteni. 2010; 1(3): 214–22.
20. Oyar O. Clinical Applications and Indications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). J Harran Uni Fac Med 2008;5(2): 31–40.
21. Jones G, Ding C, Scott F, Glisson M, Cicuttini F. Early radiographic osteoarthritis is associated with substantial changes in cartilage volume and tibial bone surface area in both males and females. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004; 12(2): 169–74.
22. Wang Y, Wluka AE, Jones G, Ding C, Cicuttini FM. Use magnetic resonance imaging to assess articular cartilage. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2012; 4(2): 77–97.
23. Edelman RR, Wielopolski PA. Fast MRI. In: Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Edelman RR, Hessellink JR, editors. 2nd ed. Phileadelphia: W.B Saunders Company; 1996. p. 302.
24. Eckstein F, Heudorfer L, Faber SC, Burgkart R, Englmeier KH, Reiser M. Long-term and resegmentation precision of quantitative cartilage MR imaging (qMRI). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002; 10(12): 922–8.
25. Nishimura K, Tanabe T, Kimura M, Harasawa A, Karita K, Matsushita T. Measurement of articular cartilage volumes in the normal knee by magnetic resonance imaging: can cartilage volumes be estimated from physical characteristics?. J Orthop Sci 2005; 10(3): 246–52.
26. Buendía-López D, Medina-Quirós M, Fernández-Villacañas Marín MÁ. Clinical and radiographic comparison of a single LP-PRP injection, a single hyaluronic acid injection and daily NSAID administration with a 52-week follow-up: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Traumatol 2018; 19(1): 3.
27. Kato K, Kamishima T, Kondo E, Onodera T, Ichikawa S. Quantitative knee cartilage measurement at MR imaging of patients with anterior cruciate ligament tear. Radiol Phys Technol 2017; 10(4): 431–8.
28. Pan F, Laslett L, Tian J, Cicuttini F, Winzenberg T, Ding C, et al. Association Between Pain at Sites Outside the Knee and Knee Cartilage Volume Loss in Elderly People Without Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017; 69(5): 659–66.

APA	Ünalmış Aykar D, acer n, YILMAZ S, Tokpinar A, DOGAN S, DEMIR H (2020). The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis. , 178 - 184. 10.14744/etd.2020.75768
Chicago	Ünalmış Aykar Demet,acer niyazi,YILMAZ SEHER,Tokpinar Adem,DOGAN SERAP,DEMIR HÜSEYIN The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis. (2020): 178 - 184. 10.14744/etd.2020.75768
MLA	Ünalmış Aykar Demet,acer niyazi,YILMAZ SEHER,Tokpinar Adem,DOGAN SERAP,DEMIR HÜSEYIN The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis. , 2020, ss.178 - 184. 10.14744/etd.2020.75768
AMA	Ünalmış Aykar D,acer n,YILMAZ S,Tokpinar A,DOGAN S,DEMIR H The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis. . 2020; 178 - 184. 10.14744/etd.2020.75768
Vancouver	Ünalmış Aykar D,acer n,YILMAZ S,Tokpinar A,DOGAN S,DEMIR H The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis. . 2020; 178 - 184. 10.14744/etd.2020.75768
IEEE	Ünalmış Aykar D,acer n,YILMAZ S,Tokpinar A,DOGAN S,DEMIR H "The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis." , ss.178 - 184, 2020. 10.14744/etd.2020.75768
ISNAD	Ünalmış Aykar, Demet vd. "The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis". (2020), 178-184. https://doi.org/10.14744/etd.2020.75768

APA	Ünalmış Aykar D, acer n, YILMAZ S, Tokpinar A, DOGAN S, DEMIR H (2020). The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis. Erciyes Medical Journal, 42(2), 178 - 184. 10.14744/etd.2020.75768
Chicago	Ünalmış Aykar Demet,acer niyazi,YILMAZ SEHER,Tokpinar Adem,DOGAN SERAP,DEMIR HÜSEYIN The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis. Erciyes Medical Journal 42, no.2 (2020): 178 - 184. 10.14744/etd.2020.75768
MLA	Ünalmış Aykar Demet,acer niyazi,YILMAZ SEHER,Tokpinar Adem,DOGAN SERAP,DEMIR HÜSEYIN The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis. Erciyes Medical Journal, vol.42, no.2, 2020, ss.178 - 184. 10.14744/etd.2020.75768
AMA	Ünalmış Aykar D,acer n,YILMAZ S,Tokpinar A,DOGAN S,DEMIR H The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis. Erciyes Medical Journal. 2020; 42(2): 178 - 184. 10.14744/etd.2020.75768
Vancouver	Ünalmış Aykar D,acer n,YILMAZ S,Tokpinar A,DOGAN S,DEMIR H The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis. Erciyes Medical Journal. 2020; 42(2): 178 - 184. 10.14744/etd.2020.75768
IEEE	Ünalmış Aykar D,acer n,YILMAZ S,Tokpinar A,DOGAN S,DEMIR H "The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis." Erciyes Medical Journal, 42, ss.178 - 184, 2020. 10.14744/etd.2020.75768
ISNAD	Ünalmış Aykar, Demet vd. "The Calculation of the Femoral Condyle Cartilage Volume and Surface Area in Patients with Osteoarthritis". Erciyes Medical Journal 42/2 (2020), 178-184. https://doi.org/10.14744/etd.2020.75768