Cities are like the bodies of the people who lived there or the people with dreams, ideals and goals about that city. Most of the time, even if those people withdraw from there, their souls continue to govern or influence that city. So as to this great movement, whether be aware of or not in fact that the new generations has been affected by that city. The epistemic image of the cities in fact creates a spirit-image relationship that motivates the incarnation of those cities and infects the entire texture of the city includes all the details. Even if a city is not build of a direct engineering study, it must be a versatile form according to a certain motivation, value, belief and technology. This results in a particular human model with a special determination to form a complex pool of civilization. Naturally, cities take on the role of some kind of similarities, interactions, and natural heritage transmitters, but they take on the most inclusive and impressive mission of the civilization they have been captured or built. The interaction, conflict and competition between Eastern Islamic civilization and Western civilization is an important reality that determines the direction of history. It is obvious that this interaction and competition play an important role in the conquest, transformation or rebuilding of cities. In this context, this study aims to deal with a comparative, systematic critique by taking advantage of the possibilities of the discipline of “Imajoloji”, based on the phenomenon of city, which makes the comparison of East-Islamic civilization and Western civilization possible in many ways.