Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 213 - 227 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.20409/berj.2020.246 İndeks Tarihi: 05-05-2021

Mediating Role of Perceived Internal Status on the Relationship Between Perceived Psychological Empowerment and Loneliness at Workplace

Öz:
The aim of this research is to examine whether or not perceived internal status hasamediatingroleontherelationshipbetweenperceivedpsychological empowerment and loneliness at workplace and its subdimensions. The sample of the research is constituted by 219 employees who are affiliated to the public institutions in the body of governorship of one of our province. For gathering the data, questionnaire technique was used. Correlation analysis and regression analysis were utilized for determining the relationships between variables of the research and testing the hypotheses. According to the findings, it can be seen that perceived psychological empowerment has positive relationship with perceived internal status and negative relationship with loneliness at workplace. It is determined in this research that perceived internal status has a full mediating role on the relationship between perceived psychological empowerment and loneliness at workplace. This mediating role shapes as partial mediating role on lack of social companionship side while there isn’t observed any mediating role on emotional deprivation side as subdimensions of loneliness at workplace.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Altındiş, S., & Özutku, H. (2011). Psychological empowerment and factors affecting psychological empowerment: A research in Turkey state hospitals. Journal of Social Sciences, XIII(1), 162-191.
  • Akar, H. (2015).The relationship between the workaholic tendencies and loneliness of instructors in workplace. The Journal of International Education Science, 2(5), 405-417.
  • Armağan, A. (2014). Loneliness and interpersonal communication ability relationship: A research on unıversity students. The Journal of International Social Research, 7(30), 27-43.
  • Avolio, B. J., Zhu. W., Koh, W., &Puja, B . (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 951-968.
  • Akdoğan, A. A., & Köksal, O. (2014). The mediation role of trust in supervisor on the relationship between insider perception and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 18(1), 25-43.
  • Arnolds, C. A., & Boshoff, C. (2002). Compensation, esteem valence and job performance: An empirical assessment of Alderfer's ERG Theory. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(4), 697-719.
  • Ayazlar, A. R., & Ayazlar, G. (2016). The role of sense of belonging and life satisfaction on local people’s attitude towardstourism effects. Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 20(4), 1451-1470.
  • Ayazlar, G., & Güzel, B. (2014). The effect of loneliness in the workplace on organizational Commitment. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 131, 319-325.
  • Aykan, E. (2014). Effects of perceived psychological contract breach on turnover intention: Intermediary role of loneliness perception of employees. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 413-419.
  • Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies(Ed. Albert Bandura). Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.
  • Baron, M. R., & Kenny, A. D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social pyschological research. Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • Başoğlu, B., Şekeroğlu, Ö. M. Altun, E., & Dinçer, M. (2016). Examination of the relationship between teacher’s loneliness in professional life and demographical characteristics. CBU Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 11(2), 66-76.
  • Buonocore, F., Metallo, C., & Salvatore, D. (2009). Behavioural consequences of job insecurity and perceived insider status for contingent workers. System Congress, 1-29.
  • Cindiloğlu, M., Polatçı, S., Özçalık, F., & Gültekin,Z. (2017). The effects of workplace loneliness on job and life satisfaction: The mediating role of leader-member exchange. Ege Academic Review, 17(2), 191-200.
  • Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, N. R. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482.
  • Çakal, M., & Özdemir Y. (2016). Perceived insider status of emergency medical services workers. Suleyman Demirel University The Journal of Visionary, 7(14), 105-118.
  • Çalışkan, S. C. (2011). Impact of workplace friendships and organizational communication on employees perceptions of psychological empowerment. Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 20(3), 77-92.
  • Çetin, A., & Alacalar, Ç. A. (2016). The role of personality traits, perceived organizational and social support in predicting loneliness in the workplace. Int. Journal of Management Economics and Business, 12(27), 193-216.
  • Demirbaş, B., & Haşit, G. (2016). Loneliness at workplace and its effect on the intention to leave: An application on the academicians. Anadolu University Journal of Scial Sciences, 16(1), 137-158.
  • Doğan, T., Çetin, B., & Sungur, M. Z. (2009). Reliability and validity of the turkish version of loneliness at work scale. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 10, 271-7.
  • Eder, P., & Eisenberger,R. (2008). Perceived organizational support: Reducing the negative influence of coworker withdrawal behavior. Journal of Management, 34(1), 55-68.
  • Erdil, O., & Ertosun, Ö. (2011). The relationship between social climate and loneliness in the workplace andeffects on employee well-being. The 7th International Strategic Management Conference, Paris.
  • Eroğluer, K., & Yılmaz, Ö. (2015). The effect of ethical leadership behavior on perceived organizational climate: Mediating role of work loneliness. Journal of Business Research-Türk, 7(1), 280-308.
  • Ertenü, B. (2008). The role of psychological empowerment between managerıal practices and organizational citizenship behavior. PhD Thesis, Marmara University, İstanbul. Evans, J. R., & Lindsay, W. M. (1993). The management and control of quality(2nd Ed.). West Publishing Company.
  • Ghadi, Y. M. (2017). The impact of workplace spirituality on voluntary turnover intentions through loneliness in work. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 33(1), 81-110.
  • Hales, C., & Klidas, A. (1998). Empowerment in five-star hotels: Choice, voice or rhetoric? Contemporary Hopitality Management, 10(3), 88-95.
  • Hall, M. (2008). The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment andmanagerial performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 141-163.
  • Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 273-281.
  • Horng, J. S., Tsai, C. Y., Hu, D. C., & Liu, C. H. (2016). The role of perceived insider status in employee creativity: developing and testing a mediation and three-way interaction model. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research,21(1), 53-75.
  • Hu, S. L. Y., &Leung, L. (2003). Effects of expectancy-value, attitudes, and use of the internet on psychological empowerment experienced by Chinese women at the workplace. Telematics and Informatics, 20(4), 365-382.
  • Hui, C., Lee, C., & Wang, H. (2014). Organizational inducements and employee citizenship behavior: The mediating role ofperceived insider status and the moderating role of collectivism. Human Resource Management, 54(3), 439–456.
  • Jha, S. (2014). Transformational leadership and psychological empowerment determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. South Asian Journal of Global Business Research, 3(1), 18-35.
  • Kanbur, A., & Kanbur, E. (2015). The effect of leader -member exchange on organizational cynicism: The mediating role of perceived internal status. Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken, 7(2), 193-216.
  • Kanbur, E. (2018). Investigation of relationships between psychological empowerment, job performance and intention to leave in aviation sector. Int. Journal of Management Economics and Business, 14(1), 147-162.
  • Kanbur, E., Canbek, M., & Özyer, K. (2016). The effect on perceptions of self-sufficiency of employees of role ambiguity and role conflict in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior Research,1(1), 16-34.
  • Karakaş, A., & Serçek, S. (2014). The impacts of psychological empowerment perception on organizational loyalty: A research on hotel employees. Journal of Travel and Hospitality Management, 11(2), 90-107.
  • Karakaya, A., Büyükyılmaz, Ö., & Ay, A. F. (2015). The effect of workplace loneliness on workaholism: A study in Kardemir Inc.. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 13(3), 79-100.
  • Kesen, M. (2015). Does psychological empowerment decrease social loafing behaviors of employees? Journal of Yasar University, 10(38), 6478-6554.
  • Keser, A., & Karaduman, M. (2014). The correlation between loneliness at work-life and organizational citizenship and a research on teachers. HAK-İŞ International Journal of Labor and Society, 3(7), 178-197.
  • Kim, T. Y., Hon, A. H., & Crant, J. M. (2009). Proactive personality, employee creativity, and newcomer outcomes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(1), 93-103.
  • Knapp, J. R., Smith, B. R., & Sprinkle, T. A. (2014). Clarifying the relational ties of organizational belonging: Understanding the roles of perceived insider status, psychological ownership, and organizational identification. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,21(3), 273-285.
  • Kunst, M., Bogaerts, S., & Winkel, F. W. (2010). Domestic violence and mental health ina Dutch community sample: The adverse role of loneliness. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20, 419-425.
  • Lam, L. W., & Lau, D. C. (2012). Feeling lonely at work: Investigating the consequences of unsatisfactory workplace relationships. TheInternational Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(20), 4265-4282.
  • Laschinger, H. K. S., Finegan, J. E., Shamian, J., & Wilk, P. (2004). A longitudinal analysis of the ımpact of workplace empowerment on work satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 527-545.
  • Masterson, S. S., & Stamper, C. L. (2003). Perceived organizational membership: An aggregate framework representing the employee-organization relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 473-490.
  • Mercan, N. Oyur, E. Alamur, B. Gül, S., & Bengül, S. (2012). A resource on the relationship between loneliness at work and social phobia. Journal of Organization and Management Sciences,4(1), 213-226.
  • Oğuz, E., &Kalkan, M. (2014). Relationship between loneliness and perceived social support of teachers in the workplace. Elementary Education Online,13(3), 787-795.
  • Ouyang K., Lam W., & Wang, W. (2015). Roles of gender and identification on abusive supervision and proactive behavior. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32, 671-691.
  • Peng, J., Chen, Y., Xia, Y., & Ran, Y. (2017). Workplace loneliness, leader-member exchange and creativity: The cross-level moderating role of leader compassion. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 510-515.
  • Rokach, A. (2014). Leadership and loneliness. International Journal of Leadership and Change, 2(1), 48-58.
  • Robbins, S. P., & Decenzo, D. A. (2001). Concepts, controversies and applications: Organizational behaviour. New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
  • Rook, K. S. (1984). Promoting social bonding: Strategies for helping the lonely and socially isolated. American Psychologist, 39, 1389-1407.
  • Russell, D., Cutrona, C. E., Rose, J., & Yurko, K., (1984). Social and emotional loneliness: An examination of Weiss’s typology of loneliness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1313-1321.
  • Shanock, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 689-95.
  • Singh, M., Gupta, A., & Handa, P. (2015). Domain satisfaction predictors of psychological empowerment and determinants. Journal of Strategic Human Resource Management, 4(2), 56-64.
  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Soeiai struetural characteristies of psychologieal empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483 504.
  • Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., & Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23(5), 679-704.
  • Spreitzer, M. G. (2007). Taking stok: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work. In J. Barling & CP. Cooper (Ed.), Sage handbook of organizational behaviour. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sürgevil, O., Tolay, E., & Topoyan, M. (2013). The validty and reliability analysis of structural empowerment and psychological empowerment scales. Journal of Yasar University, 8 (31), 5371-5391.
  • Stamper, C. L., & Masterson, S. S. (2002). Insider or outsider? How employee perceptions of insider status affect their work behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(8), 875-894.
  • Stamper, C. L., Masterson, S. S., & Knapp, J. (2007). A typology of organizational membership: Understanding different membership relationships through the lens of social exchange. Management and Organization Review, 5(3), 303-328.
  • Stoica, M., Brate, T. A., Bucuta, M., Dura, H., & Morar, S. (2014). The association of loneliness atthe workplace with organisational variables. European Journal of Science and Theology, 10(5), 101-112.
  • Taştan, Ş. (2012). The examination of the moderating role of organizational identification as being a positive psychology concept on the relationship between psychological empowerment and voluntary performance behavior: A research in food sector. Journal of Organization and Management Sciences, 4(1), 227-238.
  • Toplu, D., & Akça, M. (2013). The effect of learning organizations on psychological empowerment: A research in public sector. Istanbul Commerce University Journal of Social Sciences, 12(23), 221-235.
  • Wang, L., Chu, X., & Ni, J. (2010). Leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior: A new perspective from perceived insider status and Chinese traditionality. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 4(1), 148-169.
  • Wang, J., & Kim, T. Y. (2013). Proactive socialization behavior in China: The mediating role of perceived insider status and the moderating role of supervisors’ traditionality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34 (3), 389-406.
  • Weiss, R. S. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Whitakera, G. B., & Westerman, W. J. (2014). Linking spirituality and values to personal initiative through psychological empowerment. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 11(3), 269-291.
  • Wright, S. L. (2005). Loneliness in the workplace. PhD Thesis, University of Canterbury.
  • Wright, S. L., Burt, C. D. B., & Strongman, K. T. (2006). Loneliness in the workplace: Construct definition and scale development. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 59-68.
  • Wright, S. L. (2012). Is it lonely at the top? An empirical study of managers’ and nonmanagers’ loneliness in organizations. The Journal of Psychology, 146(1-2), 47-60.
  • Yıldırım, H. (2011). Personel güçlendirme-empowerment: Çağdaş bir yönetim yaklaşımı. In İ. Bakan (Ed.), Çağdaş yönetim yaklaşımları: İlkeler, kavramlar ve yaklaşımlar(pp.93-111). İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
  • Yılmaz, A., & Aslan, H. (2013). Examination of relationship between teachers' loneliness at workplace and their life satisfaction. Pegem Journal of Education & Instruction, 3(3), 59-69.
  • Yurcu, G., & Kocakula, Ö. (2015). The effect of worker loneliness in workplace on subjective well-being in hospitality. Adnan Menderes University Journal of Social Sciences Instıtute, 2(1), 30-41.
  • Yürür, Ş., & Demir, K. (2011). An analysis of the relationships between organizational justice and psychological empowerment. Suleyman Demirel University The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science, 16(3), 311-335.
  • Zimmerman, A. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581-599.
APA KANBUR E, Kanbur A (2020). Mediating Role of Perceived Internal Status on the Relationship Between Perceived Psychological Empowerment and Loneliness at Workplace. , 213 - 227. 10.20409/berj.2020.246
Chicago KANBUR Engin,Kanbur Aysun Mediating Role of Perceived Internal Status on the Relationship Between Perceived Psychological Empowerment and Loneliness at Workplace. (2020): 213 - 227. 10.20409/berj.2020.246
MLA KANBUR Engin,Kanbur Aysun Mediating Role of Perceived Internal Status on the Relationship Between Perceived Psychological Empowerment and Loneliness at Workplace. , 2020, ss.213 - 227. 10.20409/berj.2020.246
AMA KANBUR E,Kanbur A Mediating Role of Perceived Internal Status on the Relationship Between Perceived Psychological Empowerment and Loneliness at Workplace. . 2020; 213 - 227. 10.20409/berj.2020.246
Vancouver KANBUR E,Kanbur A Mediating Role of Perceived Internal Status on the Relationship Between Perceived Psychological Empowerment and Loneliness at Workplace. . 2020; 213 - 227. 10.20409/berj.2020.246
IEEE KANBUR E,Kanbur A "Mediating Role of Perceived Internal Status on the Relationship Between Perceived Psychological Empowerment and Loneliness at Workplace." , ss.213 - 227, 2020. 10.20409/berj.2020.246
ISNAD KANBUR, Engin - Kanbur, Aysun. "Mediating Role of Perceived Internal Status on the Relationship Between Perceived Psychological Empowerment and Loneliness at Workplace". (2020), 213-227. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2020.246
APA KANBUR E, Kanbur A (2020). Mediating Role of Perceived Internal Status on the Relationship Between Perceived Psychological Empowerment and Loneliness at Workplace. Business and Economics Research Journal, 11(1), 213 - 227. 10.20409/berj.2020.246
Chicago KANBUR Engin,Kanbur Aysun Mediating Role of Perceived Internal Status on the Relationship Between Perceived Psychological Empowerment and Loneliness at Workplace. Business and Economics Research Journal 11, no.1 (2020): 213 - 227. 10.20409/berj.2020.246
MLA KANBUR Engin,Kanbur Aysun Mediating Role of Perceived Internal Status on the Relationship Between Perceived Psychological Empowerment and Loneliness at Workplace. Business and Economics Research Journal, vol.11, no.1, 2020, ss.213 - 227. 10.20409/berj.2020.246
AMA KANBUR E,Kanbur A Mediating Role of Perceived Internal Status on the Relationship Between Perceived Psychological Empowerment and Loneliness at Workplace. Business and Economics Research Journal. 2020; 11(1): 213 - 227. 10.20409/berj.2020.246
Vancouver KANBUR E,Kanbur A Mediating Role of Perceived Internal Status on the Relationship Between Perceived Psychological Empowerment and Loneliness at Workplace. Business and Economics Research Journal. 2020; 11(1): 213 - 227. 10.20409/berj.2020.246
IEEE KANBUR E,Kanbur A "Mediating Role of Perceived Internal Status on the Relationship Between Perceived Psychological Empowerment and Loneliness at Workplace." Business and Economics Research Journal, 11, ss.213 - 227, 2020. 10.20409/berj.2020.246
ISNAD KANBUR, Engin - Kanbur, Aysun. "Mediating Role of Perceived Internal Status on the Relationship Between Perceived Psychological Empowerment and Loneliness at Workplace". Business and Economics Research Journal 11/1 (2020), 213-227. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2020.246