Two Stages of Turkey’s Quest for a Regional Power Status in the Middle East: An Integrated Role-Status-seeking Approach

Tayyar ARI, (Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü, Bursa, Türkiye)
Omar MUNASSAR (Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü, Bursa, Türkiye)
Gazi Akademik Bakış
6 0
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 27 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 29 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 22-05-2021

Two Stages of Turkey’s Quest for a Regional Power Status in the Middle East: An Integrated Role-Status-seeking Approach

Öz:
Since 2002, Turkey has actively been seeking a regional power status in the Middle East through the articulation of regional roles based on historical legacy and liberal experience. Theoretically, the paper seeks to contribute to regional power literature by integrating role theory with status-seeking theory and examining the interactions between them. This integrated approach suggests that the role orienta-tionsof aspiring regional power and regional counter-roles determine the level of status recognition of that regional power in a given regional power hierarchy. Using this approach, the paper examines the fluctuations in Turkey’s pursuit of regional power status in the Middle East over two uneven stages before and after the Arab Spring. It shows that Turkey was able to play regional cooperative roles and improve its regional power status during the first stage (2002-2011) while has stumbled over the period since the Arab Spring.
Anahtar Kelime:

Türkiye’nin Orta Doğu’da Bölgesel Güç Statüsü Arayışındaki İki Aşama: Bütünleşik Rol-Statü Arayışı Yaklaşımı

Öz:
2002 yılından bu yana Türkiye, tarihsel miras ve liberal tecrübe iddiası temelinde bölgesellik rolünü vurgulayarak Orta Doğu’da bölgesel güç statüsü elde etmeye çalışmaktadır. Bu çalışma, teorik çerçe-vede rol teorisi ile statü arayışı (status-seeking) teorisini bir araya getirerek ve bunlar arasındaki ilişkiyi ele alarak bölgesel güç literatürüne katkı yapmayı hedeflemektedir. Bu bütünleşik yaklaşım, bölgesel güç olmayan çalışanlar aktörlerin rol eğilimleri ve bölgesel karşı-rollerin, bölgesel bir gücün belli bir bölgedeki hiyerarşi içerisindeki statüsünü tanımladığını ileri sürmektedir. Çalışma, bu yaklaşımın-dan yararlanarak Arap Baharı öncesi ve sonrası dönemde, Türkiye’nin Orta Doğu’daki bölgesel güç olma arayışındaki dalgalanmaları incelemektedir. Türkiye, 2002-2011 yılları arasındaki ilk aşamada bölgesel işbirliği rolünü oynayabilmiştir ve bölgesel güç statüsünü geliştirmiştir ancak Arap Baharı sonrasında bu rolü oynama konusunda zorluklar yaşamıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • ADIGBUO, Richard, “Beyond IR Theories: The Case for National Role Concep-tions.” Politikon, Vol, 34, No, 1,2007,83–97.
  • AKTÜRK, Şener, “The Fourth Style of Politics: Eurasianism as a Pro-Russian Re-thinking of Turkey’s Geopolitical Identity.” Turkish Studies, Vol,16.No,1,2015, 54-79.
  • AKTÜRK, Şener, “Turkey’s Role in the Arab Spring and the Syrian Conflict.” Turkish policy quarterly, Vol,15, No, 4, 2017,87–96.
  • “Toward a Turkish-Russian Axis? Conflicts in Georgia, Syria, and Ukraine, and Cooperation over Nuclear Energy.” Insight Turkey, Vol,16, No, 4,2014, 13–22.
  • AKBABA Yasemin, Özgür Özdamar, Role Theory in the Middle East and North Africa, New York, NY : Routledge, 2019.
  • ALTUNIŞIK, MB, “The Possibilities and Limits of Turkey’s Soft Power in the Middle East.” Insight Turkey, Vol, 10, No, 2,2008, 41–54.
  • “The Turkish Model and Democratization in the Middle East.” Arab Studies Quar-terly, Vol, 27, No, 1-2,2005, 45–64.
  • “Turkey’s ‘Return’ to the Middle East,” Regional Powers in the Middle East, Palgrave Macmillan US, 2014, 123–42.
  • ALTUNIŞIK, Meliha B., and Lenore G. Martin, “Making Sense of Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East under AKP.” Turkish Studies, Vol, 12, No, 4,2011, 569–587.
  • ARAS, Bülent, and Aylin Gorener. “National Role Conceptions and Foreign Pol-icy Orientation: The Ideational Bases of the Justice and Development Party’s Foreign Policy Activism in the Middle East.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Vol, 12, No, 1, 2010, 73–92.
  • ARAS, Bülent, and Emirhan Yorulmazlar, “State, Region and Order: Geopoli-tics of the Arab Spring.” Third World Quarterly, Vol, 37, No, 12, 2016,2259–2273.
  • ARAB CENTER WASHINGTON, “Turkey’s Growing Role in Libya: Motives, Background, and Responses,” 2020, http://arabcenterdc.org/policy_analyses/turkeys-growing-role-in-libya-motives-background-and-responses/#_edn3.
  • ARI, Tayyar, “Türk Dış Politikasının Kavramsal ve Kuramsal Temellerini Yeniden Tartışmak,” XI. Uluslararası Uludağ Uluslararası İlişkiler Kongresi, Bursa: Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, 2019, 1–8.
  • AYATA, Bilgin, “Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing Arab World : Rise and Fall of a Regional Actor ?” Journal of European Integration, Vol, 37, No, 1,2015, 95–112.
  • AYDIN Mustafa, “Foreign Policy, 1923–2018,” The Routledge Handbook of Turkish Politics, Routledge, 2019, 367–77
  • BANK André, Roy Karadag, “Before the Arab Revolts and After: Turkey’s Trans-formed Regional Power Status in the Middle East,” Regional Powers in the Middle East, Palgrave Macmillan US, 2014,103–21,
  • “The ‘Ankara Moment’: The Politics of Turkey’s Regional Power in the Middle East, 2007-11,” Third World Quarterly, Vol, 34, No, 2,2013, 287–304.
  • BENEŠ, Vít and, and Sebastian Harnisch, “Role Theory in Symbolization, In-teractionism: Czech Republic, Germany and the EU.” Cooperation and Conflict, Vol,50, No, 1, 2015, 146–165.
  • BECHEV Dimitar, Joost Hiltermann, “Turkey’s Forays into the Middle East,” Turkish Policy Quarterly, Vol, 16, No, 3,2017,49–59
  • BREUNING, Marijke, “Role Theory Research in International Relations: State of the Art and Blind Spots.” In Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and Analyses, 2011.
  • CANTIR, Cristian, and Juliet Kaarbo, “Contested Roles and Domestic Politics: Reflections on Role Theory in Foreign Policy Analysis and IR Theory1.” Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol, 8, No, 1,2012,5–24.
  • CHAFETZ, Glenn, Hillel Abramson, and Suzette Grillot, “Role Theory and Foreign Policy : Belarussian and Ukrainian Compliance with the Nuclear Nonprolifera-tion Regime.” International Society of Political Psychology, Vol,17, No, 4,1996, 727–757.
  • CHRISTINA Stolte, Brazil’s Africa Strategy Role Conception and the Drive for Interna-tional Status. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2015.
  • DAFOE, Allan, Jonathan Renshon, and Paul Huth, “Reputation and Status as Motives for War.” Annual Review of Political Science, Vol, 17, No, 1,2014, 371–393.
  • DEMIRTAS-Bagdonas, Özlem, “Reading Turkey’s Foreign Policy on Syria: The AKP’s Construction of a Great Power Identity and the Politics of Grandeur.” Turkish Studies, Vol, 15, No, 1,2014, 139–155.
  • DEMIRTAŞ-Bagdonas, Özlem, “Politics of National Honor in Turkish-Israeli Relations: An Alternative Account of the Recent Tensions.” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, Vol, 10, No, 38,2013,100–125.
  • DILEK, Oguz, Emre Iseri, and Nihat Celik, “Turkey ’ s Regional Powerhood Within Regional, In, Security Complex : Transformation From a Conflict-Rid-den Environment Into a Security Community.” Journal of Regional Security, Vol,10, No, 2,2015, 155–176.
  • DONELLI Federico, “Back to the Hardest: The U-Turn of Turkish Foreign Poli-cy,” Political Reflection Magazine, 2019.
  • DUQUE, Marina G, “Recognizing International Status: A Relational Approach.” International Studies Quarterly, Vol, 62, No, 3,2018, 577–592.
  • EBRAHIMI, Mansoureh, Kamaruzaman Yusoff, and Mir Mohamadali Seyed Jalili, “Economic, Political, and Strategi, Issues in Iran–Turkey Relations, 2002–2015.” Contemporary Review of the Middle East, Vol, 4, No, 1,2017,67–83.
  • EFRON, Shira. The Future of Israeli- Turkish Relations. RAND Corporation, 2018.
  • EHTESHAMI Anoushiravan, Suleyman Elik, “Turkey’s Growing Relations with Iran and Arab Middle East,” Turkish Studies, 2011.
  • ENNIS, Crystal A., and Bessma Momani, “Shaping the Middle East in the Midst of the Arab Uprisings: Turkish and Saudi Foreign Policy Strategies.” Third World Quarterly, Vol, 34, No, 6,2013, 1127–1144.
  • FREEDMAN, Joshua, “Status Insecurity and Temporality in World Politics.” Eu-ropean Journal of International Relations, Vol, 22, No, 4,2016, 797–822.
  • GALIP, Dalay, “Why Is Turkey Betting on Russia?” Brookings.2019. https://www.brook-ings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2019/07/15/why-is-turkey-betting-on-russia/.
  • HARNISCH, Sebastian, “Role Theory: Operationalization of Key Concepts.” Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and Analyses,2011, 7–15.
  • HASAN, Kösebalaban, Turkish Foreign Policy Islam, Nationalism, and Globalization, Cambridge: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
  • HAUGOM, Lars, “Turkish Foreign Policy under Erdogan: A Change in Interna-tional Orientation?,” Comparative Strategy, Vol, 38, No, 3,2019,206–23.
  • HE, Kai, “Role Conceptions, Order Transition and Institutional Balancing in the Asia-Pacific: A New Theoretical Framework.” Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol, 72, No, 2,2018,92–109.
  • HILL, Fiona, and Omer Taspinar, “Turkey and Russia: Axis of the Excluded?” Survival, Vol,48, No, 1,2006, 81–92.
  • HOLSTI, K. J, “National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy.” Inter-national Studies Quarterly, Vol, 14, No, 3,1970, 233–309.
  • International Crisis Group, “Turkey Wades into Libya’s Troubled Waters,” 2020. https://www.crisisgroup.org/europe-central-asia/western-europemediterra-nean/turkey/257-turkey-wades-libyas-troubled-waters.
  • JACOB, Magid, “Netanyahu Condemns Turkish Invasion of Syrian Kurdistan, Offers Aid.” The Times of Israel, October 10, 2019. Accessed December 1, 2019. https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-pans-turkish-invasion-of-syrian-kurdistan-offers-aid/.
  • JUNG, Dietrich, “Turkey and the Arab World: Historical Narratives and New Political Realities,” Mediterranean Politics, Vol, 10, No, 1 ,2005,1–17.
  • KALIN, Ibrahim, “Debating Turkey in the Middle East: The Dawn of a New Geo-political Imagination?” Insight Turkey, Vol, 11, No, 1,2009, 83–96.
  • KARIM, Moch Faisal, “Middle Power, Status-Seeking and Role Conceptions: The Cases of Indonesia and South Korea.” Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol, 72, No, 4,2018, 343–363.
  • KAVALSKI, Emilian, “The Struggle for Recognition of Normative Powers: Nor-mative Power Europe and Normative Power China in Context.” Cooperation and Conflict, Vol, 48, No, 2,2013,247–267.
  • KIRISCI, Kemal, Gareth M. Winrow, and Gareth M. Winrow, The Kurdish Question and Turkey. Routledge, 2013.
  • KROTZ, Ulrich, National Role Conceptions and Foreign Policies: France and Germany Compared. CES Germany & Europe Working Papers, No, 02.4, 2002.
  • LARSON, Deborah Welch, and Alexei Shevchenko, “Status Concerns and Mul-tilateral Cooperation.” In International Cooperation: The Extents and Limits of Multi-lateralism, edited by I. William Zartman and Saadia Touval, 182–207.Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  • LEBOW, Richard Ned, A Cultural Theory of International Relations. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  • MARKEY, Daniel, “Prestige and the Origins of War: Returning to Realism’s Roots.” Agricultural History Review, Vol, 8, No, 4,1999, 126–172.
  • MCCOURT, David M, “The Roles States Play: A Meadian Interactionist Approach.” Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol, 15, No, 3,2012, 370–392.
  • MCCOURT, DAVID M, “Role-Playing and Identity Affirmation in International Politics: Britain’s Reinvasion of the Falklands, 1982.” Review of International Stud-ies, Vol, 37, No, 4,2011,1599–1621.
  • METIN, Gurcan, “Turkey’s New ‘Erdogan Doctrine,’” Al-Monitor,2016, https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/11/turkey-wants-use-its-hard-pow-er-solve-regional-problems.html.
  • MONIER, Elizabeth, “The Arabness of Middle East Regionalism: The Arab Spring and Competition for Discursive Hegemony between Egypt, Iran and Turkey.” Contemporary Politics, Vol, 20, No, 4,2014,421–434.
  • MOROZOV, Viatcheslav, and Bahar Rumelili, “The External Constitution of Eu-ropean Identity: Russia and Turkey as Europe-Makers.” Cooperation and Conflict, Vol, 47, No, 1,2012,28–48.
  • MUSTAFA, Gurbuz, “Turkey’s Challenge to Arab Interests in the Horn of Africa | ACW.” Arab Center Washington DC.2018. http://arabcenterdc.org/policy_analyses/turkeys-challenge-to-arab-interests-in-the-horn-of-africa/.
  • NAFAA, Hassan, The ’Turkish Model’ in the Mirror of the Arab Spring.Turkey and the Arab Spring: Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy from a Transatlantic Perspective. Med-iterranean Paper Series, 2011.
  • ÖNIŞ, Ziya, “Turkey and the Middle East after September 11: The Importance of the EU Dimension,” Turkish Policy Quarterly, Vol, 2, No, 4,2003,83–92.
  • PAOLO, Valenti, “Obama Says Turkey Should Be Full Member of Europe.” 2019. https://www.corriere.it/International/english/articoli/2010/07/08/Barack-Obama-exclusive-interview-Corriere-della-Sera.shtml.
  • PARLAR DAL, Emel, “Assessing Turkey’s ‘Normative’ Power in the Middle East and North Africa Region: New Dynamics and Their Limitations.” Turkish Studies, Vol, 14, No, 4, 2013,709–734.
  • “Conceptualising and Testing the ‘Emerging Regional Power’ of Turkey in the Shifting International Order.” Third World Quarterly, Vol, 37, No, 8,2016,1425–1453.
  • “The Transformation of Turkey’s Relations with the Middle East: Illusion or Awakening?” Turkish Studies, Vol, 13, No, 2,2012,245–267.
  • “Status-Seeking Policies of Middle Powers in Status Clubs: The Case of Turkey in the G20.” Contemporary Politics, Vol, 25, No, 5,2019,586–602.
  • PARLAR DAL, Emel, and Emre Erşen, “Reassessing the ‘Turkish Model’ in the Post-Cold War Era: A Role Theory Perspective.” Turkish Studies, Vol, 15, No, 2,2014, 258–282.
  • PAUL, T. V., Deborah Welch Larson, and William C. Wohlforth, Status in World Politics. Edited by T.V. Paul, Deborah Welch Larson, and William C. Wohlforth. Status in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
  • POULIOT, Vincent, International Pecking Orders. Cambridge University Press, 2016.
  • PRESIDENCY of the Republic of Turkey, “‘Our Motto “The World Is Bigger than Five” Is the Biggest-Ever Rise against Global Injustice.’” Last modified 2018. https://www.tccb.gov.tr/en/news/542/89052/our-motto-the-world-is-bigger-than-five-is-the-biggest-ever-rise-against-global-injustice.
  • The Biggest Threat to Syria’s Future Is the PKK and Its Extension PYD/YPG,’” 2019, https://www.tccb.gov.tr/en/news/542/109649/-the-biggest-threat-to-syr-ia-s-future-is-the-pkk-and-its-extension-pyd-ypg-.
  • LE PRESTRE, Philippe G, Role Quests in the Post-Cold War Era: Foreign Policies in Transition. McGill-Queen’s Press -1997.
  • RENSHON, Jonathan, Fighting for Status: Hierarchy and Conflict in World Politics. Princeton University Press, 2017.
  • “Status Deficits and War.” International Organization, Vol, 70, No, 3,2016,513–550.
  • SABAH Daily, “Turkey’s New Security Concept,” Daily Sabah, 10/26/2016, https://www.dailysabah.com/columns/duran-burhanettin/2016/10/26/turkeys-new-se-curity-concept.
  • “Turkey Fighting against Oppressors, Not Syrians, Erdoğan Says,” Daily Sabah, 10/16/2019, https://www.dailysabah.com/war-on-terror/2019/10/16/turkey-not-fighting-against-syrians-its-fighting-against-oppressors-erdogan-says.
  • SEEBERG, Peter, “Analysing Security Subcomplexes in a Changing Middle East—the Role of Non-Arab State Actors and Non-State Actors.” Palgrave Com-munications,2016.
  • SHIH, Chih-yu, “National Role Conception as Foreign Policy Motivation: The Psychocultural Bases of Chinese Diplomacy.” International Society of Political Psy-chology Stable, Vol, 9, No, 4,1988,599–631.
  • TELHAMI, Shibley, Mike Lebson, Evan Lewis, and Abe Medoff, “2011 Annual Arab Public, Opinion Survey.” University of Maryland, 2011. https://cdn.mashregh-news.ir/old/files/fa/news/1390//7/113016_247.pdf.
  • THEODORE, Karasik, Giorgio Cafiero, “Turkey’s Move into the Red Sea Un-settles Egypt | Middle East Institute.” Middle East Institute. Last modified 2018. https://www.mei.edu/publications/turkeys-move-red-sea-unsettles-egypt.
  • THIES, Cameron G, “The Roles of Bipolarity: A Role Theoreti, Understanding of the Effects of Ideas and Material Factors on the Cold War.” International Studies Perspectives, Vol, 14, No, 3,2013,269–288.
  • mTHIES, Cameron G., and Angguntari C. Sari, “A Role Theory Approach to Mid-dle Powers : Making Sense of Indonesia’s Place in the International System.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International & Strategic Affairs, Vol, 40, No, 3,2018,397–421.
  • Time, “Saudi Prince Says Turkey and Iran Anchor ‘Triangle of Evil.’” Time, March 7, 2018. https://time.com/5189385/saudi-prince-turkey-iran-evil/.
  • UZER, Umut, “The Revival of Ottomanism in Turkish Foreign Policy:” The World Is Greater than Five.” Turkish Policy Quarterly, Vol, 16, No, 4,2018,29–36.
  • WALKER, Stephen G, “Symbolic,Interactionism and International Politics: Role Theory’s Contribution to International Organization.” In Contending Dramas: A Cognitive Approach to Post-War International Organizational Processes, 19–38, 1992.
  • WASTNIDGE, Edward, “Imperial Grandeur and Selective Memory: Reassess-ing Neo-Ottomanism in Turkish Foreign and Domestic Politics.” Middle East Critique, Vol, 28, No, 1,2019,7–28.
  • WEHNER, Leslie E., and Cameron G. Thies, “Role Theory, Narratives, and In-terpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles.” International Studies Review, Vol, 16, No, 3,2014,411–436.
  • WISH, Naomi Bailin, “Foreign Policy Makers and Their National Role Concep-tions.” International Studies Quarterly, Vol, 24, No, 4,1980,532–454.
  • WOLF, Reinhard, “Respect and Disrespect in International Politics: The Sig-nificance of Status Recognition.” International Theory, Vol, 3, No, 1,2011,105–142.
  • “Taking Interaction Seriously: Asymmetrical Roles and the Behavioral Foun-dations of Status.” European Journal of International Relations, Vol, 25, No, 4,2019, 1186–1211.
  • YILMAZ, Ihsan, Galib Bashirov, “The AKP after 15 Years: Emergence of Erdo-ganism in Turkey,” Third World Quarterly, Vol, 39, No, 9,2018,1812–30.
APA ARI T, Munassar O (2020). Two Stages of Turkey’s Quest for a Regional Power Status in the Middle East: An Integrated Role-Status-seeking Approach. , 1 - 29.
Chicago ARI Tayyar,Munassar Omar Two Stages of Turkey’s Quest for a Regional Power Status in the Middle East: An Integrated Role-Status-seeking Approach. (2020): 1 - 29.
MLA ARI Tayyar,Munassar Omar Two Stages of Turkey’s Quest for a Regional Power Status in the Middle East: An Integrated Role-Status-seeking Approach. , 2020, ss.1 - 29.
AMA ARI T,Munassar O Two Stages of Turkey’s Quest for a Regional Power Status in the Middle East: An Integrated Role-Status-seeking Approach. . 2020; 1 - 29.
Vancouver ARI T,Munassar O Two Stages of Turkey’s Quest for a Regional Power Status in the Middle East: An Integrated Role-Status-seeking Approach. . 2020; 1 - 29.
IEEE ARI T,Munassar O "Two Stages of Turkey’s Quest for a Regional Power Status in the Middle East: An Integrated Role-Status-seeking Approach." , ss.1 - 29, 2020.
ISNAD ARI, Tayyar - Munassar, Omar. "Two Stages of Turkey’s Quest for a Regional Power Status in the Middle East: An Integrated Role-Status-seeking Approach". (2020), 1-29.
APA ARI T, Munassar O (2020). Two Stages of Turkey’s Quest for a Regional Power Status in the Middle East: An Integrated Role-Status-seeking Approach. Gazi Akademik Bakış, 14(27), 1 - 29.
Chicago ARI Tayyar,Munassar Omar Two Stages of Turkey’s Quest for a Regional Power Status in the Middle East: An Integrated Role-Status-seeking Approach. Gazi Akademik Bakış 14, no.27 (2020): 1 - 29.
MLA ARI Tayyar,Munassar Omar Two Stages of Turkey’s Quest for a Regional Power Status in the Middle East: An Integrated Role-Status-seeking Approach. Gazi Akademik Bakış, vol.14, no.27, 2020, ss.1 - 29.
AMA ARI T,Munassar O Two Stages of Turkey’s Quest for a Regional Power Status in the Middle East: An Integrated Role-Status-seeking Approach. Gazi Akademik Bakış. 2020; 14(27): 1 - 29.
Vancouver ARI T,Munassar O Two Stages of Turkey’s Quest for a Regional Power Status in the Middle East: An Integrated Role-Status-seeking Approach. Gazi Akademik Bakış. 2020; 14(27): 1 - 29.
IEEE ARI T,Munassar O "Two Stages of Turkey’s Quest for a Regional Power Status in the Middle East: An Integrated Role-Status-seeking Approach." Gazi Akademik Bakış, 14, ss.1 - 29, 2020.
ISNAD ARI, Tayyar - Munassar, Omar. "Two Stages of Turkey’s Quest for a Regional Power Status in the Middle East: An Integrated Role-Status-seeking Approach". Gazi Akademik Bakış 14/27 (2020), 1-29.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 17:50

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları