The question of enforcement of annulled foreign arbitral awards have handled differently in different countries’ law systems. Foreign awards annulled at the place of arbitration have been enforced in some jurisdictions such as the United States of America, France and Austria. According to article X of the New York Convention of 10 June 1958, the parties of an arbitration proceeding can claim in a Contracting State to enforce of the foreign arbitral award in all the other Contracting States of the Convention. Recognition and enforcement of the award may be refused if the award has not yet become binding on the parties, or has been set aside or suspended by a competent authority of the country in which, or under the law of which, that award was made (Article V, paragraph 1, e of the New York Convention). According to this provision the enforcing court has discretion to enforce the award despite the fact that it was successfully challenged at the place of arbitration. Similarly, according to the provision of article 62, paragraph 1, h of the Turkish Code on Private International Law and International Practice, if the award has not yet become final or binding on the parties, or has been set aside by a competent authority of the State, or pursuant to the law of the State where it has been rendered, the recognition and enforcement request of a foreign award in Turkey is refused by the enforcing court. The provision article V, paragraph 1, e of the New York Convention does not prevent enforcement of any annulment of the award by the judge of a State other than that of the seat of arbitration or pursuant to the law of the State where the award has been rendered.