PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES

Osmanlı, Ziya; Koç, Simay; Kayacık, Bensu; Jabbarova, Lala; Haciguliyeva, Gülçin; Esen, Emine Ebrar; Er, Kürşat

PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES

Emine Ebrar ESEN, (Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Antalya, Türkiye)

Bensu KAYACIK, (Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Antalya, Türkiye)

Lala JABBAROVA, (Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Antalya, Türkiye)

Gulchin HAJGULIYEVA, (Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Antalya, Türkiye)

Ziya OSMANLI, (Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Antalya, Türkiye)

Simay KOÇ, (Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Antalya, Türkiye)

Kürşat ER (Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Antalya, Türkiye)

Clinical Dentistry and Research

7 3

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 45 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 127 - 134 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 19-05-2022

PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES

Öz:

Background and Aim: Different irrigation agitation (IA) techniques have been proposed to improve the efficacy of irrigation solutions. The aim of this study was to compare the organic tissue dissolution capacities of 3 different IA techniques. Materials and Methods: Fifty bovine pulp tissue samples were prepared and then placed in tubes. Samples were randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 10). The test groups were as follows: (1) saline (SS) (no activation), (2) sodium hypochlorite (SH) (no activation), (3) sonic irrigation (SI), (4) passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and (5) laser-activated irrigation (LAI). In the SS group; tissue samples were placed in tubes with 1.25 mL of SS. After resting for 6 min, the solution was withdrawn, and fresh SS was added (repeated 5 times). In the SH group, the same method in the SS group was achieved by replacing the SH. Samples in each agitation group waited in SH for 5 min and then 1 min activation with respective agitation device (repeated 5 times). The tissue samples were weighed before and after treatment. The percentage of weight loss was calculated and analyzed. Results: The test showed statistically significant differences between the activated and the non-activated groups. There was no significant difference between SI and LAI groups (p= 0.508), while the difference between these groups except the SH group and PUI group was significant (p< 0.05). Conclusion: IA techniques have been found to be effective in resolving bovine pulp tissue. Among these, SI and LAI were the most effective techniques.

Anahtar Kelime:

FARKLI İRRİGASYON AKTİVASYON TEKNİKLERİNİN PULPA DOKUSUNU ÇÖZME KAPASİTELERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Öz:

Amaç: İrrigasyon solüsyonlarının etkinliğini arttırmak için, farklı irrigasyon aktivasyon (İA) teknikleri önerilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, 3 farklı irrigasyon aktivasyon tekniğinin organik doku çözünme kapasitelerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Elli adet sığır diş pulpa örnekleri hazırlandı ve ardından tüplere yerleştirildi. Örnekler rastgele 5 deney grubuna (n= 10) ayrıldı. Test grupları; (1) salin (SS) (aktivasyon uygulanmadı), (2) sodyum hipoklorit (SH) (aktivasyon uygulanmadı), (3) sonik irrigasyon (SI), (4) pasif ultrasonik irrigasyon (PUI) ve (5) lazer-aktive irrigasyon (LAI). SS grubunda; doku örnekleri 1.25 mL SS’li tüplere yerleştirildi. Altı dakikalık bekleme süresinden sonra solüsyon alınıp yerine taze SS ilave edildi (5 defa tekrarlandı). SH grubunda, solüsyon olarak SH yerleştirilerek, SS grubundaki aynı prosedür uygulandı. Her bir aktivasyon grubunda SH 5 dak. tüp içerisinde bekletildi ve ardından 1 dak. aktivasyon uygulandı (5 defa tekrarlandı). Doku örnekleri işlem öncesi ve sonrasında tartıldı. Doku kayıp yüzdesi hesaplandı ve analiz edildi. Bulgular: Aktive ve aktive edilmeyen grupları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar bulundu. SI ve LAI grupları arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmazken, bu gruplar ile SH grubu ve PUI grubu arasındaki fark anlamlıydı (p< 0,05). Sonuç: İA tekniklerinin sığır pulpa dokusunu çözmede etkili olduğu bulunmuştur. Bunlar arasında SI ve LAI en etkili tekniklerdir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Versiani MA, Pecora JD, de Sousa-Neto MD. Flat-oval root canal preparation with Self-adjusting File instrument: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 2011; 37: 1002-1007.
2. Cameron J. The use of ultrasonics in the removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscope study. J Endod 1983; 9: 289- 292.
3. Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Kastrinakis E. Irrigant flow within a prepared root canal using various flow rates: a computational fluid dynamics study. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 144-155.
4. Cobankara FK, Ozkan HB, Terlemez A. Comparison of organic tissue dissolution capacities of sodium hypochlorite and chlorine dioxide. J Endod 2010; 36: 272-274.
5. Guneser MB, Arslan D, Usumez A. Tissue dissolution ability of sodium hypochlorite activated by photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming technique. J Endod 2015; 41: 729-732.
6. Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 2009; 35: 791-804.
7. de Gregorio C, Estevez R, Cisneros R, Heilborn C, Cohenca N. Effect of EDTA, sonic, and ultrasonic activation on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral canals: an in vitro study. J Endod 2009; 35: 891-895.
8. Gulabivala K, Ng Y, Gilbertson M, Eames I. The fluid mechanics of root canal irrigation. Physiol Meas 2010; 31: 49-84.
9. Klyn SL, Kirkpatrick TC, Rutledge RE. In vitro comparisons of debris removal of the EndoActivator System, the F File, ultrasonic irrigation, and NaOCl irrigation alone after hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. J Endod 2010; 36: 1367-1371.
10. Mancini M, Cerroni L, Iorio L, Armellin E, Conte G, Cianconi L. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study. J Endod 2013; 39: 1456-1460.
11. Van der Sluis L, Versluis M, Wu M, Wesselink P. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 415-426.
12. Lea S, Felver B, Landini G, Walmsley A. Ultrasonic scaler oscillations and tooth-surface defects. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 229- 234.
13. Topçuoğlu HS, Topçuoğlu G, Arslan H. The Effect of different irrigation agitation techniques on postoperative pain in mandibular molar teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2018; 44: 1451-1456.
14. Blanken J, De Moor RJG, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R. Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 1: a visualization study. Lasers Surg Med 2009; 41: 514-519.
15. Aldeen RZ, Aljabban O, Milly H, Allouch A, Hamadah O. Effect of Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation on dentine debris removal from different parts of the root canal system: an in vitro study. Dent Med Probl 2018; 55: 133-138.
16. Verstraeten J, Jacquet W, De Moor R, Meire M. Hard tissue debris removal from the mesial root canal system of mandibular molars with ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation: a micro-computed tomography study. Lasers Med Sci 2017; 32: 1965-1970.
17. DiVito E, Lloyd A. ER:YAG laser for 3-dimensional debridement of canal systems: use of photon-induced photoacoustic streaming. Dent Today 2012; 31: 124-127.
18. Arslan H, Capar ID, Saygili G, Gok T, Akcay M. Effect of photoninitiated photoacoustic streaming on removal of apically placed dentinal debris. Int Endod J 2014; 47:1072-1077.
19. Akcay M, Arslan H, Mese M, Durmus N, Capar ID. Effect of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming, passive ultrasonic and sonic irrigation techniques on dentinal tubule penetration of irrigation solution: a confocal microscopic study. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21: 2205-2212.
20. Kuştarcı A, Er K. Efficacy of laser activated irrigation on apically extruded debris with different preparation systems. Photomed Laser Surg 2015; 33: 384-389.
21. Arslan D, Guneser MB, Kustarci A, Er K, Siso SH. Pulp tissue dissolution capacity of QMix 2in1 irrigation solution. Eur J Dent. 2015; 9: 423-427.
22. Al-Jadaa A, Paque F, Attin T, Zehnder M. Necrotic pulp tissue dissolution by passive ultrasonic irrigation in simulated accessory canals: impact of canal location and angulation. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 59-65.
23. Macedo RG, Wesselink PR, Zaccheo F. Reaction rate of NaOCl in contact with bovine dentine: effect of activation, exposure time, concentration and pH. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 1108-1115.
24. Zehnder M, Kosicki D, Luder H, Sener B, Waltimo T. Tissuedissolving capacity and antibacterial effect of buffered and unbuffered hypochlorite solutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94: 756-762.
25. Walmsley A, Williams A. Effects of constraint on the oscillatory pattern of endosonic files. J Endod 1989; 15: 189-194.
26. Boutsioukis C, Verhaagen B, Walmsley A, Versluis M, Van der Sluis L. Measurement and visualization of file-to-wall contact during ultrasonically activated irrigation in simulated canals. Int Endod J 2013; 46: 1046-1055.
27. Conde A, Estevez R, Loroño G, Valencia de Pablo O, Rossi-Fedele G, Cisneros R. Effect of sonic and ultrasonic activation on organic tissue dissolution from simulated grooves in root canals using sodium hypochlorite and EDTA. Int Endod J 2017; 50: 976-982.
28. Galler K, Grubmüller V, Schlichting R, Widbiller M, Eidt A, Schuller C et al. Penetration depth of irrigants into root dentine after sonic, ultrasonic and photoacoustic activation. Int Endod J 2019; 52: 1210-1217.
29. Plotino G, Grande NM, Mercade M, Cortese T, Staffoli S, Gambarini G et al. Efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation devices in the removal of debris from canal irregularities in artificial root canals. J Appl Oral Sci 2019; 27, e20180045.
30. Cheng X, Tian T, Tian Y, Xiang D, Qiu J, Liu X et al. Erbium: yttrium aluminum garnet laser-activated sodium hypochlorite irrigation: a promising procedure for minimally invasive endodontics. Photomed Laser Surg 2017; 35: 695-701.
31. DiVito E, Peters OA, Olivi G. Effectiveness of the erbium: YAG laser and new design radial and stripped tips in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 273-280.
32. De Groot S, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink P, Van Der Sluis L. Laseractivated irrigation within root canals: cleaning efficacy and flow visualization. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 1077-1083.
33. Betancourt P, Merlos A, Sierra JM, Camps-Font O, Arnabat- Dominguez J, Viñas M. Effectiveness of low concentration of sodium hypochlorite activated by Er,Cr:YSGG laser against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Lasers Med Sci. 2019; 34: 247-254.

APA	Esen E, Kayacık B, Jabbarova L, Haciguliyeva G, Osmanlı Z, Koç S, Er K (2021). PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES. , 127 - 134.
Chicago	Esen Emine Ebrar,Kayacık Bensu,Jabbarova Lala,Haciguliyeva Gülçin,Osmanlı Ziya,Koç Simay,Er Kürşat PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES. (2021): 127 - 134.
MLA	Esen Emine Ebrar,Kayacık Bensu,Jabbarova Lala,Haciguliyeva Gülçin,Osmanlı Ziya,Koç Simay,Er Kürşat PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES. , 2021, ss.127 - 134.
AMA	Esen E,Kayacık B,Jabbarova L,Haciguliyeva G,Osmanlı Z,Koç S,Er K PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES. . 2021; 127 - 134.
Vancouver	Esen E,Kayacık B,Jabbarova L,Haciguliyeva G,Osmanlı Z,Koç S,Er K PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES. . 2021; 127 - 134.
IEEE	Esen E,Kayacık B,Jabbarova L,Haciguliyeva G,Osmanlı Z,Koç S,Er K "PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES." , ss.127 - 134, 2021.
ISNAD	Esen, Emine Ebrar vd. "PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES". (2021), 127-134.

APA	Esen E, Kayacık B, Jabbarova L, Haciguliyeva G, Osmanlı Z, Koç S, Er K (2021). PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES. Clinical Dentistry and Research, 45(3), 127 - 134.
Chicago	Esen Emine Ebrar,Kayacık Bensu,Jabbarova Lala,Haciguliyeva Gülçin,Osmanlı Ziya,Koç Simay,Er Kürşat PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES. Clinical Dentistry and Research 45, no.3 (2021): 127 - 134.
MLA	Esen Emine Ebrar,Kayacık Bensu,Jabbarova Lala,Haciguliyeva Gülçin,Osmanlı Ziya,Koç Simay,Er Kürşat PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES. Clinical Dentistry and Research, vol.45, no.3, 2021, ss.127 - 134.
AMA	Esen E,Kayacık B,Jabbarova L,Haciguliyeva G,Osmanlı Z,Koç S,Er K PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES. Clinical Dentistry and Research. 2021; 45(3): 127 - 134.
Vancouver	Esen E,Kayacık B,Jabbarova L,Haciguliyeva G,Osmanlı Z,Koç S,Er K PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES. Clinical Dentistry and Research. 2021; 45(3): 127 - 134.
IEEE	Esen E,Kayacık B,Jabbarova L,Haciguliyeva G,Osmanlı Z,Koç S,Er K "PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES." Clinical Dentistry and Research, 45, ss.127 - 134, 2021.
ISNAD	Esen, Emine Ebrar vd. "PULP TISSUE DISSOLUTION CAPACITIES OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AGITATION TECHNIQUES". Clinical Dentistry and Research 45/3 (2021), 127-134.