The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey

KANKILIÇ, TEOMAN; ÇOLAK, ERCÜMENT; KANKILIÇ, Tolga; YİĞİT, Nuri; Çolak, Reyhan; Özkurt, Şakir Önder; SOZEN, MUSTAFA

The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey

Ercüment ÇOLAK, (Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Nuri YİĞİT, (Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Mustafa SÖZEN, (Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Zonguldak, Türkiye)

Reyhan ÇOLAK, (Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

ŞAKİR ÖNDER ÖZKURT, (Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Zonguldak, Türkiye)

Tolga KANKILIÇ, (Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Teoman KANKILIÇ (Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Zoology

11 0

Yıl: 2006 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 309 - 317 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey

Öz:

Türkiye'deki değişik yerlerden toplanan Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus'a ait 529 örnek morfolojik, bakulum ve fallus özellikleri bakımından incelendi. ZI indeksi M. domesticus'ta 0.32 - 0.47 and M. macedonicus'ta ise 0.60 - 0.85 olarak belirlendi. H+B/T indeksi M. domesticus'ta 0.87 -1.05 and M. macedonicus'ta, ise 1.08 - 1.78 arasında değiştiği saptandı. Zygomatic plaka M. domesticus ve M. macedonicus'ta düz ya da dış bükeydir. Parietal kemiklerin ventral kenarları M. domesticus'ta zikzak, M. macedonicus'ta ise düz ya da öne doğru girinti yapmış biçimdedir. M1'de anterolabial mine adacığı M. domesticus'ta kayıp olmuş ya da az belirgin M. macedonicus'ta ise belirgindir. Bakulum ve phallus özellikleri M. domesticus'u M. macedonicus'tan ayırmadı.

Anahtar Kelime: taksonomi Mus macedonicus Hydrophilidae Coleoptera Mus domesticus fauna Cezayir yeni coğrafik kayıtlar coğrafi dağılım

Konular: Biyoloji

Türkiye' de yayılış gösteren Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia)' un morfolojik analizi

Öz:

We examined 529 specimens of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus from Turkey, in terms of their morphological, bacular, and phallic aspects. The zygomatic index (ZI) varied from 0.32 to 0.47 in M. domesticus, and 0.60 to 0.85 in M. macedonicus. The head plus body length/tail length (H+B/T) index varied from 0.87 to 1.05 in M. domesticus, and 1.08 to 1.78 in M. macedonicus. The zygomatic plate is straight or convex in M. domesticus and M. macedonicus. The ventral wing of the parietal is generally tortuous in M. domesticus and is protruding or straight in M. macedonicus. The anterolabial cusp on M1 is missing or indistinct in M. domesticus and is forwardly prominent in M. macedonicus. Characteristics of the baculum and phallus did not differentiate M. domesticus from M. macedonicus.

Anahtar Kelime: Coleoptera Mus domesticus fauna Algeria new geographic records geographical distribution taxonomy Mus macedonicus Hydrophilidae

Konular: Biyoloji

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Auffray J. C, Tchernov E., Bonhomme F., Heth G., Simson S. and Nevo E. 1990. Presence and ecological distribution of Mus "spretoides" and Mus musculus domesticus in Israel. Circum-Mediterranean vicariance in the genus Mus. Zeitschift fur Sâugetierkunde 55: 1 -10.
2. Bonhomme F., Catalan J., Gerasimov S., Orsini P. and Thaler L. 1983. Le complexe d'especes du genre Mus en Europe centrale et orientale. 1-Genetique. Zeitschift fur Sâugetierkunde 48: 78-85.
3. Boursot P., Auffray J. C, Britton-Davidian J. and Bonhomme F. 1993. The evolution of house mouse. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 119-152.
4. Gözcelioğlu, B., Çolak, R., Çolak, E. and Yiğit, N. 2005. A Study on Mus domesticus Rutty, 1772 and Mus macedonicus Petrov and Ruzic, 1983 (Mammalia: Rodentia) distributed along the line of Ankara, Bolu and zonguldak. Turk J Zool 29: 133-140.
5. Harrison D.L. and Bates P.JJ. 1991. The mammals of Arabia. Harrison Zoological Museum Publication, London: 1-354.'
6. Kock D. 1974. Zur sâugetierfauna der İnsel Chios, Âgâis (Mammalia). Senckenbergiana Biologies 55, 1-19.
7. Kock D., Krupp F. and Schneider W. 1994. Einige sâsugetier aus dem Nahr al-Khabur-Gebiet, NE-Syrien. Sâugetierkundliche Mitteilungen 35: 177-183.
8. Krystufek B. and Macholan M. 1998. Morphological differentiation in Mus spicilegus and the taxonomic status of mound-building mice from the Adriatic coast of Yugoslavia. Journal of Zoology 245: " 185-196.
9. Krystufek B. and Vohralfk V. 2001. Mammals of Turkey and Cyprus. Knjiznica Annales Majora. 1-1-40.
10.Lidicker W.Z. 1968. A phylogeny of New Guine rodent genera based on phallic morphology. Journal of Mammalogy 49: 609-643.
11.Macholân M. and Zima J. 1994. Mus domesticus in western Bohemia: a new mammal for the Czech Republic. Folia Zoologica 43: 39-41.
12.Macholan M. 1996. Key to European mice (Mus). Folia Zoologica 45: 209-217.
13.Marshall J. T. and Sage R. D. 1981. Taxonomy of the house mouse. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 47: 15-25.
14.Marshall J. T. 1986. Systematics of the genus Mus. Current Topic in Microbiology and Immunollogy 127: 12-18.
15.Mezhzherin S. V., Kotenkova E. V. and Mikhailenko A. G. 1998. The house mice, Mus musculus s. I., hybrid zone of Transcaucasus. Zeitschift fur Sâugetierkunde 63: 154-168.
16.Musser G. G. and Carleton M. D. 1993. Family Muridae. In: Wilson, D.E. and Reeder, D.M. (eds.), Mammal species of the world. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London: 501-755.
17.Ondrias C. 1966. The taxonomy and geographical distribution of the rodents of Greece. Sâugetierkundliche Mitteilungen 14: 1-136.
18.Orsini P., Bonhomme F., Britton-Davidian J., Croset H., Gerasimov S. and. Thaler L. 1983. Le complexe d'especes du genre Mus en Europe Centrale et Orientale. II. Criteres d'identification, repartitions et caracteristiques ecologiques. Zeitschift fur Sâugetierkunde 48: 86-95.
19.Özkan B. 1999. Rodent fauna of Imbros and Tenedos (Mammalia: Rodentia). Turkish Journal of Zoology 23: 133-157.
20.Özkan B. and Krystufek B. 1999. Wood mice, Apodemus of two Turkish islands: Gökçeada and Bozcaada. Folia Zoologica 48: 17-24.
21.Sage R. D. 1981. Wild mice. In: Small, J.D. and Fox, J.G. (eds.), The mouse in biomedical research, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York: 40-90.
22.Thaler L. Bonhomme F., Britton-Davidian J. and Hamar M. 1981a. The house mouse complex of species: Sympatric occurrence of biochemical groups Mus 2 and 4 in Romania. Zeitschift fur Sâugetierkunde 46: 169-173.
23.Thaler L, Bonhomme F. and Britton-Davidian J. 1981b. Processes of speciation and semi-speciation in the house mouse. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 47: 27-41.
24.Vohralik V. and Sofiannidou T S. 1992. Small mammals (lnsectivora,Rodentia) of Thrace, Greece. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Biologica 36: 341-369.

APA	ÇOLAK E, YİĞİT N, SOZEN M, Çolak R, Özkurt Ş, KANKILIÇ T, KANKILIÇ T (2006). The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey. , 309 - 317.
Chicago	ÇOLAK ERCÜMENT,YİĞİT Nuri,SOZEN MUSTAFA,Çolak Reyhan,Özkurt Şakir Önder,KANKILIÇ Tolga,KANKILIÇ TEOMAN The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey. (2006): 309 - 317.
MLA	ÇOLAK ERCÜMENT,YİĞİT Nuri,SOZEN MUSTAFA,Çolak Reyhan,Özkurt Şakir Önder,KANKILIÇ Tolga,KANKILIÇ TEOMAN The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey. , 2006, ss.309 - 317.
AMA	ÇOLAK E,YİĞİT N,SOZEN M,Çolak R,Özkurt Ş,KANKILIÇ T,KANKILIÇ T The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey. . 2006; 309 - 317.
Vancouver	ÇOLAK E,YİĞİT N,SOZEN M,Çolak R,Özkurt Ş,KANKILIÇ T,KANKILIÇ T The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey. . 2006; 309 - 317.
IEEE	ÇOLAK E,YİĞİT N,SOZEN M,Çolak R,Özkurt Ş,KANKILIÇ T,KANKILIÇ T "The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey." , ss.309 - 317, 2006.
ISNAD	ÇOLAK, ERCÜMENT vd. "The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey". (2006), 309-317.

APA	ÇOLAK E, YİĞİT N, SOZEN M, Çolak R, Özkurt Ş, KANKILIÇ T, KANKILIÇ T (2006). The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 30(3), 309 - 317.
Chicago	ÇOLAK ERCÜMENT,YİĞİT Nuri,SOZEN MUSTAFA,Çolak Reyhan,Özkurt Şakir Önder,KANKILIÇ Tolga,KANKILIÇ TEOMAN The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology 30, no.3 (2006): 309 - 317.
MLA	ÇOLAK ERCÜMENT,YİĞİT Nuri,SOZEN MUSTAFA,Çolak Reyhan,Özkurt Şakir Önder,KANKILIÇ Tolga,KANKILIÇ TEOMAN The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, vol.30, no.3, 2006, ss.309 - 317.
AMA	ÇOLAK E,YİĞİT N,SOZEN M,Çolak R,Özkurt Ş,KANKILIÇ T,KANKILIÇ T The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology. 2006; 30(3): 309 - 317.
Vancouver	ÇOLAK E,YİĞİT N,SOZEN M,Çolak R,Özkurt Ş,KANKILIÇ T,KANKILIÇ T The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology. 2006; 30(3): 309 - 317.
IEEE	ÇOLAK E,YİĞİT N,SOZEN M,Çolak R,Özkurt Ş,KANKILIÇ T,KANKILIÇ T "The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey." Turkish Journal of Zoology, 30, ss.309 - 317, 2006.
ISNAD	ÇOLAK, ERCÜMENT vd. "The morphological analysis of Mus domesticus and Mus macedonicus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey". Turkish Journal of Zoology 30/3 (2006), 309-317.