The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities
Yıl: 2009 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 259 - 274 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities
Öz: This study reports on the context and impact of the Communication in Science Inquiry Project (CISIP) professional development to promote teachers’ and students’ scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities. The theoretical underpinnings of the professional development model are presented and key professional development activities are described. Data are provided on teachers’ fidelity of implementation of the CISIP instructional strategies, their understanding of the nature of science communication, and their ability to write scientific investigation reports. Student data includes an analysis of scientific arguments and the perception of their classroom as a science classroom discourse community. Two instruments to measure fidelity of implementation are introduced; the Discourse in Inquiry Science Classrooms for classroom observations of teachers and My Science Classroom Survey to measure students’ perceptions of their teachers’ use of the CISIP instructional strategies in their classroom.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review. International journal of Science Education, 22, 665-701.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans: A project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington, DC: Author.
- Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Small-group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 1099-1114.
- Baker, D., Bueno-Watts, N., Lewis, E.B., Ozdemir, G., Perkins, G., Uysal, S., Wong, S., & Yasar- Purzer, S. (2008). Discourse in Inquiry Science Classrooms (DiISC): Reference Manual (Tech. Rep. No. 001). Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, The Communication in Science Inquiry Project (CISIP).
- Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Callaghan, M., Knapp, P., & Noble, G. (1999). Genre in practice. I. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 179-202). London: Falmer.
- Carrasquillo, A., & Rodriquez, V. (1996). Language minority students in the mainstream classroom. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.
- Chamot, A., & O’Malley, J. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 227-249.
- Chinn, C., & Brown, D. (200). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 109-138.
- Fradd, S., & Lee, O. (1999).Teachers’ roles in promoting science inquiry with students from diverse language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 28, 14-42.
- Herrel, A. & Jorden, M. (2007). Fifty strategies for teaching English language learners. Upper Saddlr River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Halliday, M., & Martin, J. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Kelly, G. (2007). Discourse in science classrooms. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science teaching (pp.443-470). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Kelly, G., & Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 883-915.
- Kelly, G., & Crawford, T. (1997). An ethnographic investigation of the discourse processes of school science. Science Education, 81, 533-559.
- Kelly, G., & Green, J. (1998). The social nature of knowing: Toward a sociocultural perspective on conceptual change and knowledge construction. In B. Guzzetti & C. Hynd (Eds.), Perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 145-182). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Keys, C. (1999). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science. Science Education, 83,115-130.
- Klein, P. (1999). Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 203-270.
- Kittleson, J., & Southerland, S. (2004). The role of discourse in group knowledge construction: A case study of engineering students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 267-293.
- Lave, J., & Wegner, E. (1992). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Lee, O., & Fradd, S.(1996). Literacy skills in science learning among linguistically diverse students. Science Education, 80, 651-671.
- Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Lieberman, A., & McLaughlin, M., (1992). Networks for educational change: Powerful and problematic. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(9), 673-677.
- Moje, E.B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality”? Language, literacy and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 469-498.
- National Research Council. (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics and science in the classroom, A targeted Report for Teachers. M Donovan & J. Branford (Eds.), Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
- National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning, Chapters 2 & 6. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 553-576.
- Roberts, D. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.). Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729-780). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Rivard, L. (1994).A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 969-983.
- Yasar-Purzer, S., Uysal, S., Baker, D., Lewis, E. & Lang, M. (2008). Teachers’ progress towards a modernist view of the nature of science communication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore: MD.
- Wayne, A., Yoon, K., Zhu, Cronen, S., & Garet, M. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 469-479.
- Wegner, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Woodruff, E., & Meyer, K. (1997). Explanations from intra- and inter-group discourse: Students building knowledge in the science classroom. Research in Science Education, 27, 25-39.
- Yore, L., Hand, B., & Florence, M. (2004). Scientists’ views of science, models of writing, and science writing practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 338-369.
- Yore, L. Hand, B., & Prain, V. (1999, January). Writing-to-learn science: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises. Paper presented at the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Austin:TX.
| APA | BAKER D, LEWIS E, PURZER S, WATTS N, PERKINS G, UYSAL SATILMIŞ S, WONG S, BEARD R, LANG M (2009). The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities. , 259 - 274. |
| Chicago | BAKER Dale R.,LEWIS Elizabeth B.,PURZER Senay,WATTS Nievita Bueno,PERKINS Gita,UYSAL SATILMIŞ SİBEL,WONG Sissy,BEARD Rachelle,LANG Michael The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities. (2009): 259 - 274. |
| MLA | BAKER Dale R.,LEWIS Elizabeth B.,PURZER Senay,WATTS Nievita Bueno,PERKINS Gita,UYSAL SATILMIŞ SİBEL,WONG Sissy,BEARD Rachelle,LANG Michael The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities. , 2009, ss.259 - 274. |
| AMA | BAKER D,LEWIS E,PURZER S,WATTS N,PERKINS G,UYSAL SATILMIŞ S,WONG S,BEARD R,LANG M The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities. . 2009; 259 - 274. |
| Vancouver | BAKER D,LEWIS E,PURZER S,WATTS N,PERKINS G,UYSAL SATILMIŞ S,WONG S,BEARD R,LANG M The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities. . 2009; 259 - 274. |
| IEEE | BAKER D,LEWIS E,PURZER S,WATTS N,PERKINS G,UYSAL SATILMIŞ S,WONG S,BEARD R,LANG M "The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities." , ss.259 - 274, 2009. |
| ISNAD | BAKER, Dale R. vd. "The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities". (2009), 259-274. |
| APA | BAKER D, LEWIS E, PURZER S, WATTS N, PERKINS G, UYSAL SATILMIŞ S, WONG S, BEARD R, LANG M (2009). The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), 4(3), 259 - 274. |
| Chicago | BAKER Dale R.,LEWIS Elizabeth B.,PURZER Senay,WATTS Nievita Bueno,PERKINS Gita,UYSAL SATILMIŞ SİBEL,WONG Sissy,BEARD Rachelle,LANG Michael The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) 4, no.3 (2009): 259 - 274. |
| MLA | BAKER Dale R.,LEWIS Elizabeth B.,PURZER Senay,WATTS Nievita Bueno,PERKINS Gita,UYSAL SATILMIŞ SİBEL,WONG Sissy,BEARD Rachelle,LANG Michael The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), vol.4, no.3, 2009, ss.259 - 274. |
| AMA | BAKER D,LEWIS E,PURZER S,WATTS N,PERKINS G,UYSAL SATILMIŞ S,WONG S,BEARD R,LANG M The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik). 2009; 4(3): 259 - 274. |
| Vancouver | BAKER D,LEWIS E,PURZER S,WATTS N,PERKINS G,UYSAL SATILMIŞ S,WONG S,BEARD R,LANG M The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik). 2009; 4(3): 259 - 274. |
| IEEE | BAKER D,LEWIS E,PURZER S,WATTS N,PERKINS G,UYSAL SATILMIŞ S,WONG S,BEARD R,LANG M "The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities." International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), 4, ss.259 - 274, 2009. |
| ISNAD | BAKER, Dale R. vd. "The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) 4/3 (2009), 259-274. |
