Yıl: 2009 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 275 - 288 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The meaning of scientific literacy

Öz:
This paper sets out to provide an overview of scientific literacy specifically related to whether emphasis is placed on the ‘science’ or the ‘literacy’ aspect, accepting that literacy, wherever used, is wider than simply reading and writing. It does this from a general rather than a country perspective. The emphasis in giving meaning to scientific literacy is placed on the literacy component in recognition of the trend towards relating scientific literacy to skills and values appropriate for a responsible citizen. Rejected is a consideration that scientific literacy is related to an emphasis on the acquisition of content and this is especially considered, noting the social bias and cultural embedding of science. The emphasis on enhancing scientific literacy is placed on an appreciation of the nature of science, the development of personal attributes and the acquisition of socioscientific skills and values. Furthermore, in teaching towards this view of scientific literacy, a key component is seen as relevance and a model of relevance for science teaching is put forward based on relevance being seen from two perspectives. Relevance from both perspectives is very much geared to the view that scientific literacy is best taught by seeing science education as ‘education through science’ as opposed to ‘science through education.’
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans: A project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics and technology, Washington, DC: AAAS.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Baumert, J. (1997). Scientific literacy: A German perspective. In W.Graeber & C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy. An international symposium (p. 167-180). Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften (IPN): Kiel, Germany.
  • Bell, R., & Lederman, N. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352-377.
  • Bybee R.W. (1997). Towards an understanding of scientific literacy. In: W. Gräber & C. Bolte. (Eds.). Scientific literacy. An international symposium (p. 37-68). Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften (IPN): Kiel, Germany.
  • El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701.
  • Fensham, P. (2008). Science education policy-making. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Gallagher, J., & Harsch, G. (1997). Scientific literacy: Science education and secondary school students. In W.Graeber & C. Bolte. (Eds.). Scientific literacy: An international symposium (p. 13- 34). Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften (IPN): Kiel, Germany.
  • Gräber, W., Erdmann, T., & Schlieker, V. (2001). ParCIS: Partnership between Chemical Industry and Schools. Accessed November 2008 from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/_chik_symposium /sites/pdf/graeber.pdf
  • Hand, B. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1021-1035.
  • Holbrook, J., (2008). Introduction to the Special Issue of Science Education International Devoted to PARSEL, Science Education International, 19(3), 257-266.
  • Holbrook J. (1998). Operationalising scientific and technological literacy: A new approach to science teaching. Science Education International, 9(2), 15-19.
  • Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). Nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362.
  • Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (Eds.). (1997). Supplementary teaching materials promoting scientific and technological literacy. Tartu, Estonia: ICASE (International Council of Associations for Science Education).
  • Hurd, P.D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16(1), 13-16.
  • ICASE. (2003). The way forward. Document adopted by participants at the World Conference on the Relevance of Science and Technology Education for All. Malaysia, Penang: ICASE (International Council of Associations for Science Education) & RECSAM (Regional Education Centre for Science and Mathematics).
  • Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.). Instructional design theories: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Klein, P.D. (2006). The challenges of scientific literacy: from the viewpoint of second-generation cognitive science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 143-178.
  • Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383-409.
  • Laugksch R.C. (2000). Scientific Literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71-94.
  • Layton, D., Jenkins, E., Macgill, S., & Davey, A. (1993). Inarticulate science? Perspectives on the public understanding of science and some implications for science education. Driffield, UK: Studies in Education.
  • Levitt, K.E. (2001). An analysis of elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86(1), 1-22.
  • Maienschein, J. (1998). Scientific literacy. Science, 281, 917.
  • Matthews, B. (2004). Promoting emotional literacy, equity and interest in science lessons for 11-14 year olds; the ‘Improving Science and Emotional Development’ project. International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 281-308.
  • Millar, J. (1997). Civic scientific literacy in the United States: A developmental analysis from middle school through adulthood. In: W. Graeber & C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy: An international symposium (p. 121-142). Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften (IPN): Kiel, Germany.
  • National Science Education Standards (1996). National Academy of Sciences. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
  • Norris S.P., & Phillips, L.M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240.
  • National Science Teachers Association. (1991). Position statement. Washington DC: National Science Teachers Association.
  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2007). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Retrieved November 2008 from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/63/35/37464175.pdf
  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework. Retrieved November 2008 from: http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/46/14/33694881.pdf
  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1998). Instrument design: A framework for assessing scientific literacy. Report of Project Managers Meeting, Arnhem, The Netherlands: Programme for International Student Assessment.
  • Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus- group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441-467.
  • Ramsden, J.M. (1998). Mission impossible? Can anything be done about attitudes to science? International Journal of Science Education, 20(2), 125-137.
  • Rannikmäe, A., Rannikmäe, M., & Holbrook, J. (2006). The nature of science as viewed by nonscience undergraduate students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2(10), 77-84.
  • Rychen, D.S. & Salganik, L.H. (Eds.). (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a well functioning society. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.
  • Sadler, T., Chambers, F., & Zeidler, D. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 387-409.
  • Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Schwartz, R., & Lederman, N. (2008). What scientists say: Scientist’s views of nature of science ,and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 6, 727-771.
  • Sjoberg, S. (2002). Science and technology education: Current challenges and possible solutions. In S. Sjoberg (Ed.), Three contributions to science education (pp. 5-36). Acta Didactica, No.2. University of Oslo.
  • Teppo, M., & Rannikmae, M. (2008). Paradigm shift for teachers: More relevant science teaching. In J. Holbrook, M. Rannikame, P. Reiska & P. Isley (Eds.), The need for a paradigm shift in science education for post-Soviet societies (pp. 25-46). Germany: Peter Lang.
  • Tytler, R., Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2001). Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 815-832.
  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. (1993). Final Report: International forum on scientific and technological literacy for all. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Van Aalsvoort, J. (2004). Logical postitivsm as a tool to analyse the problem of chemistry’s lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1151-1168.
  • Za’rour, G. I. (2001). Relevant Teaching: Incorproating Curriculuim, Teaching Approaches and Assessment Aspects. In N. Valanides (Ed.), Science and technology Education: Preparing Future Citizens. Proceedings of the IOSTE Symposium in Southern Europe (pp. 3-12). Paralimni, Cyprus: International Organisation of Science and Technology Educators (IOSTE).
  • Zeidler, D., Walker, K., Ackett, W., & Simmons, M. (2002). Tangled up views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86, 343-367.
  • Zoller, U. (2001). HOCS problem-solving vs. LOCS exercise solving: What do college science students prefer? In: D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, G. Bisdikian, G. Fassoulopoulos, E. Hatzikraniotis & M. Kallery, M. (Eds.), Science Education Research in the Knowledge Based Society. Proceedings of the 3rd ESERA Conference (p. 201-208). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
APA HOLBROOK J, RANNIKMAE M (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. , 275 - 288.
Chicago HOLBROOK Jack,RANNIKMAE Miia The meaning of scientific literacy. (2009): 275 - 288.
MLA HOLBROOK Jack,RANNIKMAE Miia The meaning of scientific literacy. , 2009, ss.275 - 288.
AMA HOLBROOK J,RANNIKMAE M The meaning of scientific literacy. . 2009; 275 - 288.
Vancouver HOLBROOK J,RANNIKMAE M The meaning of scientific literacy. . 2009; 275 - 288.
IEEE HOLBROOK J,RANNIKMAE M "The meaning of scientific literacy." , ss.275 - 288, 2009.
ISNAD HOLBROOK, Jack - RANNIKMAE, Miia. "The meaning of scientific literacy". (2009), 275-288.
APA HOLBROOK J, RANNIKMAE M (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), 4(3), 275 - 288.
Chicago HOLBROOK Jack,RANNIKMAE Miia The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) 4, no.3 (2009): 275 - 288.
MLA HOLBROOK Jack,RANNIKMAE Miia The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), vol.4, no.3, 2009, ss.275 - 288.
AMA HOLBROOK J,RANNIKMAE M The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik). 2009; 4(3): 275 - 288.
Vancouver HOLBROOK J,RANNIKMAE M The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik). 2009; 4(3): 275 - 288.
IEEE HOLBROOK J,RANNIKMAE M "The meaning of scientific literacy." International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), 4, ss.275 - 288, 2009.
ISNAD HOLBROOK, Jack - RANNIKMAE, Miia. "The meaning of scientific literacy". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) 4/3 (2009), 275-288.