We aimed to compare fastrach, which is a new modified laringeal mask with standart laryngoscopy. After obtaining ethic committee approval, 60 ASA I-II adult patients were randomly divided into two groups. Either blind endotracheal intubation through fastrach or intubation with laryngoscopy were performed. The time for intubation, the number of attempts required for successful intubation and blood on on the laryngeal mask or blade were recorded. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures, heart rate and peripheral oxygen saturation were monitored. It was founded that the time for intubation and the number of attempts required for successful intubation were significantly higher in fastrach group than laryngoscopy group (p<0.05), respectively 34.2+6.5, 16.7+2 seconds and 1.4+0: 1.1+0.1). The groups were similar with respect to blood on laryngeal mask or blade, respectively (6/30: 2/30). İntubation was performed with laryngoscopy in two cases whom were failed to be intubated vie fastrach. But all of patients were intubated in the laryngoscopy group. In fastrach group, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and heart rate reduced after intubation. (p<0.05) We concluded that the technique of blind intubation through fastrach is time-consuming, but it provides more hemodynamic stability and might be an alternative in patients needed hemodynamic stabilization during intubation.