Yıl: 2009 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 65 - 82 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Neoliberalizmin minimal devlet yaklaşımına bir eleştiri

Öz:
Bu çalışmada, 1980’li yıllarla birlikte yeni bir görünüme bürünen liberalizmde, devlete atfedilen yeni rollerin sorgulanması amaçlanmaktadır. Kapitalist sistem ve devlet arasındaki ilişkinin tarihsel perspektiften gelişimine bakılarak ilişkinin boyutları, süreç içinde değişen rolleri, devletin kapitalist gelişme sürecindeki etkisi ve etkinliği, merkez ve çevre ülkelerde minimal devlet anlayışının uygulanma pratikleri gösterilmeye çalışılacaktır. Çevre ülkelere, devletin ekonomik anlamda küçülmesine yönelik pek çok uygulama önerilmesine ve bu önerilerin hayata geçirtilmesine rağmen, gelişmiş merkez ülkelerdeki pratiğin farklı oluşu ile zaman içinde devletin geleneksel rolleri yerine, benzer boyutta bir etkinlikle, ancak ekonomide farklı roller almak durumunda olması vurgulanmak istenmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih Siyasi Bilimler İktisat

A critics to minimal state approach of neoliberalism

Öz:
The aim of this article is to criticize the new role of the state in the neoliberal era of 80s. The dimension of the relation between the state and the capitalist system, the changed role of the state during the period, the efficiency and the influence of the state in capitalist development, the difference of the minimal state practice in the center and periphery are tried to be emphasized in its historical context. Even it is advised to peripherial countries to minimize the role of the state ineconomy. It should not have been applied for the Central economies, This challange is to be emphasises.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih Siyasi Bilimler İktisat
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aybar, Sedat ve Costas Lapavitsas, Financial System Design and the Post- Washington Consensus (eds.) B. Fine; C. Lapavitsas, Development Policy in the 20th Century, Beyond the Post-Washington Consensus, Routledge, 2000.
  • Balassa, Bella, Structural Adjustment Policies in Developing Countries, World Development, 10.1, 1982.
  • Baylis, Kate ve Christopher Cramer, Privatization and Post-Washington Consensus, Between the Lab and the Real World?, (eds.) B. Fine; C. Lapavitsas, Development Policy in the 20th Century, Beyond the Post-Washington Consensus, Routledge, 2000.
  • Cerny, Philip G., Paradoxes of the Competition State: the Dynamics of Political Globalization, Government and Opposition, Vol 32, No 2, 1997.
  • Clarke, Simon, The State Debate, Macmillan, London,: 1991.
  • Colclough, Christopher, Structuralism versus Neo-liberalism: An Introduction, (eds.) C. Colclough; J. Manor, States or Markets? Neo-liberalism and the Development Policy Debate, Clarendon Press, Oxford: 1991.
  • Cypher, James M. ve James L. Dietz, The Process of Economic Development, Routledge, 1997.
  • Evans, Peter, The State as Problem and Solution: Predation, Embedded Autonomy, and Structural Change, (eds.) S. Haggard; R. Kaufman , The Politics of Economic Adjustment, International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts and the State, 1992.
  • Evans, Peter, The Eclipse of the State? Reflections on Stateness in an Era of Globalization, World Politics, 50,1, 1990.
  • Franko, Patrice, The Puzzle of Latin American Economic Development, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1999.
  • Gill, Stephan, Knowledge, Politics and Neoliberal Political Economy (eds.) R. Stubbs; G. Underhill, Political Economy and the Changing Global Order, 2000.
  • Gill, Stephan, Globalization, Democratization and the Politics of Indifference, (eds.) J. Mittelman, Globalization: Critical Reflections, IPE Yearbook, Vol 9, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1996.
  • Gore, Charles, The Rise and Fall of Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries, World Development, Vol 28, No 5, 2000.
  • Jones, Barry, R.J., The World Turned Upside Down? Globalization and the Future of the State, Manchester University Press, 2000.
  • Kabeer, Naila ve John Humphrey, Neo-liberalism, Gender and the Limits of the Market (eds.) C. Colclough; J. Manor, States or Markets? Neo-liberalism and the Development Policy Debate, Clarendon Press, Oxford: 1991.
  • Katseli, Louka, Economic Integration in the Enlarged European Community: Structural Adjustment of the Greek Economy, (eds.) C. Bliss; J. Braga de Macedo, Unity with Diversity in the European Economy: the Community’s Southern Frontier, edt., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1990.
  • Kazgan, Gülten, Küreselleşme ve Ulus-Devlet: Yeni Ekonomik Düzen, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul: 2002.
  • Krueger, Anne, External Sector Liberalization and the Appropriate Economic Policy Mix, Coordinatin Stabilization and Structural Reform, (eds.) R. Barth, International Monetary Fund, Washington: 1993.
  • Lafay, Jean-Dominique ve Jacques Lecaillon, The Political Dimension of Political Adjustment, Development Center of OECD, 1993.
  • Martinussen, John, Society, State and Market, a Guide to Competing Theories of Development, Zed Books Ltd, London: 1997.
  • Meurs, Mieke, Are Markets Like Mushrooms? And other Neoliberal Quandaries, Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 32, Issue 3, September 2000.
  • Panitch, Leo, The State in a Changing World: Social-Democratizing Global Capitalism, Monthly Review, 50.5, October 1998.
  • Pereira, Luiz Carlos Bresser, Economic Reforms and Economic Growth: Efficiency and Politics in Latin America, (eds.) L. Pereira, Economic Reforms in New Democracies, A Social Democratic Approach, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  • Phillips, Nicola ve Richard Higgott, Global Governance and the Public Domain: Collective Goods in a ‘Post-Washington Consensus’ Era, CSGR Working Paper No 47/99, University of Warwick, U.K.: 1999.
  • Rao, Mohan, Development in a Time of Globalization, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, WP 1, 1998.
  • Tanzi, Vito, The Role of the State and the Quality of the Public Sector, CEPAL Review 71, August 2000a.
  • Tanzi, Vito, Policies, Institutions and the Dark Side of Economics, Edward Elgar, Northampton,:2000b.
  • Taylor, Lance, “Introduction” (eds). L. Taylor, After Neoliberalizm: What Next for Latin America, University of Michigan Press, 1999.
  • Wade, Robert, States, Markets and Industrial Policy, Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization, Princeton University Press, Princeton:1991
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel, States? Sovereignty? The Dilemmas of Capitalist in the Age of Transition, (eds.) D. Smith; D. Solinger, States and Sovereignty in the Global Economy, Routledge, London: 1999.
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel, Development: Lodestar or Illusion?, (eds.) L. Sklair, Capitalism and Development, Routledge, London: 1994.
  • Weiner, Klaus-Peter, Between Political Regionalization and Economic Globalization, Problems and Prospects of European Integration, International Journal of Political Economy, Spring 1992.
  • World Bank, World Development Report (1997): “State”, Oxford University Press.
  • World Bank, World Development Report (1991): “The Challenge of Development”,Oxford University Press.
  • World Bank, World Development Report (1988): “Opportunities and Risks in Managing the World Economy, Public Finance in Development”, Oxford University Press.
  • World Bank, World Development Report (1987): “Barriers to Adjustment and Growth in the World Economy Industrialization and Foreign Trade”, Oxford University Press.
APA ZAFİR BAHÇEKAPILI C (2009). Neoliberalizmin minimal devlet yaklaşımına bir eleştiri. , 65 - 82.
Chicago ZAFİR BAHÇEKAPILI CERAN ZEYNEP Neoliberalizmin minimal devlet yaklaşımına bir eleştiri. (2009): 65 - 82.
MLA ZAFİR BAHÇEKAPILI CERAN ZEYNEP Neoliberalizmin minimal devlet yaklaşımına bir eleştiri. , 2009, ss.65 - 82.
AMA ZAFİR BAHÇEKAPILI C Neoliberalizmin minimal devlet yaklaşımına bir eleştiri. . 2009; 65 - 82.
Vancouver ZAFİR BAHÇEKAPILI C Neoliberalizmin minimal devlet yaklaşımına bir eleştiri. . 2009; 65 - 82.
IEEE ZAFİR BAHÇEKAPILI C "Neoliberalizmin minimal devlet yaklaşımına bir eleştiri." , ss.65 - 82, 2009.
ISNAD ZAFİR BAHÇEKAPILI, CERAN ZEYNEP. "Neoliberalizmin minimal devlet yaklaşımına bir eleştiri". (2009), 65-82.
APA ZAFİR BAHÇEKAPILI C (2009). Neoliberalizmin minimal devlet yaklaşımına bir eleştiri. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 65 - 82.
Chicago ZAFİR BAHÇEKAPILI CERAN ZEYNEP Neoliberalizmin minimal devlet yaklaşımına bir eleştiri. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 7, no.2 (2009): 65 - 82.
MLA ZAFİR BAHÇEKAPILI CERAN ZEYNEP Neoliberalizmin minimal devlet yaklaşımına bir eleştiri. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.7, no.2, 2009, ss.65 - 82.
AMA ZAFİR BAHÇEKAPILI C Neoliberalizmin minimal devlet yaklaşımına bir eleştiri. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi. 2009; 7(2): 65 - 82.
Vancouver ZAFİR BAHÇEKAPILI C Neoliberalizmin minimal devlet yaklaşımına bir eleştiri. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi. 2009; 7(2): 65 - 82.
IEEE ZAFİR BAHÇEKAPILI C "Neoliberalizmin minimal devlet yaklaşımına bir eleştiri." Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7, ss.65 - 82, 2009.
ISNAD ZAFİR BAHÇEKAPILI, CERAN ZEYNEP. "Neoliberalizmin minimal devlet yaklaşımına bir eleştiri". Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 7/2 (2009), 65-82.