Yıl: 2009 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 429 - 440 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey

Öz:
Fen ve teknoloji ders kitaplarında alternatif kavramlara neden olabilecek kavramsal problemlerin belirlenmesi öğrencilerin ve öğretmenlerin başarılarının ilerletilmesi açısından oldukça önemlidir. Ders kitapları vasıtasıyla daha iyi bir öğretimin sağlanabilmesi için ders kitaplarının bu tür problemleri en aza indirecek veya ortadan kaldıracak şekilde düzenlenmesi oldukça önemlidir. Bu çalışmada, ilköğretimde okutulmakta olan fen ve teknoloji ders kitaplarında yer alan biyoloji konuları ile ilgili alternatif kavramlara neden olabilecek kavramsal problemlerin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda kitaplardaki biyoloji üniteleri doküman inceleme tekniğine göre sayfa sayfa analiz edilmiş ve her sayfada belirlenen kavramsal problemler sayfa numaralarıyla birlikte listelenmiştir. Tespit edilen kavramsal problemler “yanlış tanımlamalar”, “aşırı genellemeler”, “aşırı basitleştirmeler”, “eski kavram ve terimler” ve “sınırlandırmalar” şeklinde sınıflandırılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, fen ve teknoloji ders kitaplarında yer alan biyoloji konuları ile ilgili olarak alternatif kavramlara neden olabilecek çeşitli kavramsal problemlerin varlığını ortaya koymuştur. Elde edilen bu sonuçlar fen eğitimi literatürü ile karşılaştırılmış ve öğrenci ders kitaplarının iyi planlanması bakımından öneriler geliştirilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Türkiye'deki fen ve teknoloji ders kitaplarında biyoloji konuları ile ilgili kavramsal problemler

Öz:
Determination of conceptual problems which may cause alternative conceptions in science and technology textbooks is significant to increase in success of pupils and teachers. It is a vital issue to arrange books in a way removing or decreasing these faults in order to improve a better education via textbooks. This study aims to determine conceptual problems which may cause alternative conceptions in biology topics in science and technology textbooks of primary schools. In this study, the units of each textbook were analyzed page by page according to document examination method and conceptual problems were determined. The founded conceptual problems have been classified such as; misidentifications, overgeneralizations, oversimplifications, obsolete concepts and terms, under generalizations. The finding of research results have been shown that various conceptual problems which may cause alternative conceptions in pupils’ textbooks about biology topics. The obtained results of research were compared with related literature and in the light of findings some recommendations were developed for future planning and development activities pupils’ textbooks.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abimbola, I.O., & Baba, S. (1996). Misconceptions & alternative conceptions in science textbooks: The role of teachers as filters. The American Biology Teacher, 58(1), 14-19.
  • Ajewole, G.A. (1991). Effects of discovery and expository instructional methods on the attitude of students to biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(5), 401-409.
  • Alexander, P.A., & Kulikowich, J.M. (1994). Learning from physics text: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 895-911.
  • Ascı, Z., Özkan, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2001). Students’ misconceptions about respiration. Education and Science, 26(120), 29-36.
  • Bahar, M. (2003). Misconceptions in biology education and conceptual change strategies. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 3(1), 55-64.
  • Barrass, R. (1984). Some misconceptions and misunderstandings perpetuated by teachers and textbooks of biology. Journal of Biological Education, 18(3), 201-206.
  • Bishop, B.A., & Anderson, C.W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 415-427.
  • Blystone, R.V. (1987). College introductory biology textbooks: An important communication tool. The American Biology Teacher, 49(7), 418-425.
  • Brody, M.J. (1993, April). Student understanding of water and water resources: A review of the literature. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
  • Campbell, N.A., & Reece, J.B. (2006). Biology (6th ed.). California: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company.
  • Chiappetta, E.L., Ganesh, T.G., Lee, Y.H., & Philips, M.C. (2006, April). Examination of science textbook analysis research conducted on textbooks published over the past 100 years in the United States. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
  • Cho, H., Kahle, T.B., & Nordland, F.S. (1985). An investigation of high school biology textbooks as sources of misconception and difficulties in genetics and some suggestions for teaching genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 69(5), 707-719.
  • Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-71.
  • Clifford, P. (2002). The pressure-flow hypothesis of phloem transport: misconceptions in the A-level textbooks. Journal of Biological Education, 36(3), 110-112.
  • Çepni, S. (2005). Arastırma ve Proje Çalısmalarına Giris. Trabzon: Pegem.net.
  • Dikmenli, M., & Çardak, O. (2004). A study on misconceptions in the 9th grade high school biology textbooks. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17, 130-141.
  • Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 481-490.
  • Eyidogan, F., & Güneysu, S. (2002, Eylül). lkögretim 8. sınıf fen bilgisi kitaplarındaki kavram yanılgılarının incelenmesi. V. Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Egitimi Kongresi, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Hershey, D. R. (2004). Avoid misconceptions when teaching about plants. Retrieved December 27, 2008 from Web site: hhtp://www.actionbioscience.org /education/hershey.html.
  • Hersey, D.R. (2005) Avoid misconceptions when teaching about plants. Retrieved December 27, 2008 from actionbioscience.org. hhtp://www.actionbioscience.org /education/hershey3.html.
  • Kaptan, F. (1999). Fen bilgisi ögretimi. stanbul: Milli Egitim Basımevi.
  • Köse, S., Ayas, A., Costu, B., & Karamustafaoglu, S. (2004). Fotosentez konusunun islenisinin belirli kriterlere göre degerlendirilmesi. Türk Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 181-189.
  • Köseoglu, F., Atasoy, B., Kavak, N., Akkus, H., Budak, E., Tumay, H., et al. (2003). Bir fen ders kitabı nasıl olmalıdır? Ankara: Asil Yayın Dagıtım.
  • Kuru, M. (2006). Omurgalı hayvanlar. Ankara: Palme Yayınları.
  • Odom, A.L. (1993). Action potentials and biology textbooks: Accurate, misconceptions or avoidance? The American Biology Teacher, 55(8), 468-472.
  • Özay, E., & Hasenekoglu, İ. (2007). Lise-3 biyoloji ders kitaplarındaki görsel sunumda gözlenen bazı sorunlar. Türk Fen Egitimi Dergisi, 4(1), 80-91.
  • Pines L.A., & West, L.H.T. (1986). Conceptual understanding and science learning: An interpretation of research within a sources-of-knowledge framework. Science Education, 70(5), 583-604.
  • Rees, P.A. (2007). The evolution of textbook misconceptions about Darwin. Journal of Biological Education, 41(2), 53-55.
  • Sadler, T.W. (1995). Medical embriology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
  • Sewell, A. (2002). Constructivism and student misconceptions. Why every teacher needs to know about them. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 48(4), 24-28.
  • Schmidt, H.J. (1997). Students’ misconceptions. Looking for a pattern. Science Education, 81(2) 123- 135.
  • Schmidt, H.J., & Volke, D. (2003). Shift of meaning and students’ alternative concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1409-1424.
  • Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  • Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
  • Schussler, E.E. (2008). From flowers to fruits: How children’s books represent plant reproduction. International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1677-1696.
  • Shymansky, J.A., Yore, L.D., & Good, R. (1991). Elementary school teachers’ beliefs about the perceptions of elementary school science, science reading, science textbooks and supportive instructional factors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(5), 437-454.
  • Storey, R.D. (1989). Textbook errors and misconceptions in biology: Photosynthesis. The American Biology Teacher, 51(5), 271-274.
  • Storey, R.D. (1991). Textbook errors and misconceptions in biology: Cell metabolism. The American Biology Teacher, 53(6), 339-343.
  • Storey, R.D. (1992). Textbook errors and misconceptions in biology: Cell energetics. The American Biology Teacher, 54(3), 161-166.
  • Tekkaya, C., Çapa, Y., & Yılmaz, O. (2000). Biyoloji ögretmen adaylarının genel biyoloji konularındaki kavram yanılgıları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18, 140-147.
  • Tekkaya, C. (2002). Misconceptions as barrier to understanding biology. Journal of Hacettepe University Educaion Faculty, 23, 259-266.
  • Thiele, R.B., & Treagust, D.F. (1994). The nature and extend of analogies in secondary chemistry textbooks. Instructional Science, 22(1), 61-74
  • Wandersee, J.H., Mintzes, J.J., & Novak, J.D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D.L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177-210). New York: Macmillan.
  • Wandersee, T. (1985). Guest editorial - The bugbear of scientific accuracy. The American Biology Teacher, 47(7), 392-393.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Simsek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Arastırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Yılmaz, Ö., Tekkaya, C., Geban, Ö., & Özden, Y. (1998, Eylül). Lise 1. sınıf ögrencilerinin hücre bölünmesi ünitesindeki kavram yanılgılarının tespiti. III. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri Egitimi Sempozyumu, Trabzon, Türkiye.
APA DİKMENLİ M, ÇARDAK O, ÖZTAŞ F (2009). Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey. , 429 - 440.
Chicago DİKMENLİ MUSA,ÇARDAK OSMAN,ÖZTAŞ FULYA Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey. (2009): 429 - 440.
MLA DİKMENLİ MUSA,ÇARDAK OSMAN,ÖZTAŞ FULYA Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey. , 2009, ss.429 - 440.
AMA DİKMENLİ M,ÇARDAK O,ÖZTAŞ F Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey. . 2009; 429 - 440.
Vancouver DİKMENLİ M,ÇARDAK O,ÖZTAŞ F Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey. . 2009; 429 - 440.
IEEE DİKMENLİ M,ÇARDAK O,ÖZTAŞ F "Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey." , ss.429 - 440, 2009.
ISNAD DİKMENLİ, MUSA vd. "Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey". (2009), 429-440.
APA DİKMENLİ M, ÇARDAK O, ÖZTAŞ F (2009). Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), 4(4), 429 - 440.
Chicago DİKMENLİ MUSA,ÇARDAK OSMAN,ÖZTAŞ FULYA Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) 4, no.4 (2009): 429 - 440.
MLA DİKMENLİ MUSA,ÇARDAK OSMAN,ÖZTAŞ FULYA Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), vol.4, no.4, 2009, ss.429 - 440.
AMA DİKMENLİ M,ÇARDAK O,ÖZTAŞ F Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik). 2009; 4(4): 429 - 440.
Vancouver DİKMENLİ M,ÇARDAK O,ÖZTAŞ F Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik). 2009; 4(4): 429 - 440.
IEEE DİKMENLİ M,ÇARDAK O,ÖZTAŞ F "Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey." International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), 4, ss.429 - 440, 2009.
ISNAD DİKMENLİ, MUSA vd. "Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) 4/4 (2009), 429-440.