Güvenlik çalışmalarında yeni açılımlar: Yeni güvenlik çalışmaları

Pınar BİLGİN (Bilkent Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
SAREM Stratejik Arastirmalar Dergisi
99 26
Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 14 Sayfa Aralığı: 69 - 96 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Güvenlik çalışmalarında yeni açılımlar: Yeni güvenlik çalışmaları

Öz:
Bu makalede yeni güvenlik çalışmaları tanıtılmakta, öneri ve katkıları tartışılmaktadır. Birinci bölümde Soğuk Savaş yıllarında oluşan geleneksel güvenlik çalışmalarının zaman içindeki dönüşüm koşulları ve süreci inceleniyor. Ardından Soğuk Savaş sonrasında ortaya çıkan “yeni güvenlik” yaklaşımının temel nitelikleri kısaca gözden geçiriliyor. Bunu yaparken bu yeni yaklaşımın sadece eskisinin güvenlik anlayışının genişletilmesinden ibaret olmadığı vurgulanıyor. Bu bölümde son olarak “yeni güvenlik” yaklaşımının ne olmadığı açıklanıyor. Makalenin ikinci bölümünde yeni güvenlik çalışmalarının ana hatları ortaya koyuluyor. Bunu yaparken özellikle öncü katkıda bulunmuş olan Aberystwyth ve Kopenhag ekollerine odaklanılıyor. En son olarak da yeni güvenlik çalışmalarının en önemli görülebilecek katkısının, güvenlik kuram ve uygulamalarının (theory/practice) karşılıklı evrilmesinin nasıl incelendiğinin üzerinde duruluyor.
Anahtar Kelime:

New approaches on security studies: New security studies

Öz:
This article introduces New Security Studies and discusses its main propositions and contributions. The first part of the article analyses how Cold War Security Studies were transformed in response to critics’ contributions thus making possible the emergence of ‘New Security’. This part of the article clarifies what ‘new security’ through discussing what it is not. The second part lays out the main tenets of New Security Studies. In doing so, the article focuses on two main schools, the Aberystwyth School and the Copenhagen School, their commonalities and differences. Lastly, the article discusses what could be considered as a crucial contribution of New Security Studies, a novel understanding of theory/practice relationship, or the mutually constitutive relationship between thinking about and doing security.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abraham, I. (1998), The Making of the Indian Atomic Bomb: Science, Secrecy and the Postcolonial State, New York, NY, Zed Books.
  • Alker, H. (2005), Emancipation in the Critical Security Studies Project. IN Booth, K. (Ed.) Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Boulder, CO, Lynne Rienner: 189-213.
  • Barkawi, T. & M. Laffey (2006), The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies, Review of International Studies, 32, 329-352.
  • Bigo, D. (2000), When Two Become One: Internal and External Securitisations in Europe. IN Keltsrup, M. & Williams, M. C. (Eds.) International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security, and Community, London; New York, Routledge: 171-204.
  • Bigo, D. (2002), Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease. Alternatives, 27, 63-92.
  • Bilgin, P. (2002), Beyond Statism in Security Studies? Human Agency and Security in the Middle East, Review of International Affairs, 2, 100.
  • Bilgin, P. (2003), Individual and Societal Dimensions of Security, International Studies Review, 5, 203-222.
  • Bilgin, P. (2004), Whose Middle East? Geopolitical Inventions and Practices of Security,International Relations, 18, 17-33.
  • Bilgin, P. (2005), Regional Security in the Middle East: A Critical Perspective, New York, Routledge.
  • Bilgin, P. K. Booth, & R. Wyn Jones (1998), Security Studies: The Next Stage. Naçao e Defesa, 82, 131-157.
  • Bilgin, P. & A. D. Morton (2002), Historicising Representations of 'Failed States': Beyond the Cold-War Annexation of the Social Sciences? Third World Quarterly, 23, 55-80.
  • Bilgin, P. & A. D. Morton (2004), From 'Rogue' to 'Failed' States? The Fallacy of Short-Termism, Politics, 24, 169-180.
  • Booth, K. (1991), Security and Emancipation, Review of International Studies, 17, 313-326.
  • Booth, K. (1995), Human Wrongs and International Relations, International Affairs, 71, 103-126.
  • Booth, K. (1997), Security and Self: Reflections of a Fallen Realist. IN Krause, K. & Williams, M. C. (Eds.) Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press: 83-119.
  • Booth, K. (1999a), Nuclearism, Human Rights and Constructions of Security, International Journal of Human Rights, 3, 1-24.
  • Booth, K. (1999b), Nuclearism, Human Rights and Contructions of Security (Part 2)International Journal of Human Rights, 3, 44-61.
  • Booth, K. (2005a), Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Booth, K. (2008), Theory of World Security, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Booth, K. (Ed.) (2001), The Kosovo Tragedy : The Human Rights Dimensions, London; Portland, OR, Frank Cass.
  • Booth, K. (Ed.) (2005b), Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Boulder, Colo., Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Booth, K., T. Dunne & M. Cox (Eds.) (2001), How Might We Live? : Global Ethics in a New Century, Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, Cambridge University Press.
  • Booth, K. & P. Vale (1995), Security in Southern Africa: After Apartheid, Beyond Realism, International Affairs, 71, 285.
  • Buzan, B., O. Wæver & J. De Wilde (1998), Security : A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, Colo., Lynne Rienner Pub.
  • Campbell, D. (1992), Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, Manchester, Manchester University Press.
  • Campbell, D. (1998), National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity and Justice in Bosnia, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
  • Cox, R. W. (1981), Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory, Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 10, 126-155.
  • Dillon, M. (1995), Sovereignty and Governmentality: From the Problematics of the ''New World Order'' to the Ethical Problematic of the World Order, Alternatives-Social Transformation and Humane Governance, 20, 323-368.
  • Dillon, M. & J. Reid (2000), Global Governance, Liberal Peace, and Complex Emergency, Alternatives-Social Transformation and Humane Governance, 25, 117-143.
  • Elbe, S. (2006), Should Hiv/Aids Be Securitized? The Ethical Dilemmas of Linking Hiv/Aids and Security, International Studies Quarterly, 50, 119-144.
  • Enloe, C. (1990), Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics, Berkeley, University of California Press.
  • Guzzini, S. & A. Leander (2006), Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics, London, Routledge.
  • Huysmans, J. (1998), Revisiting Copenhagen: Or, on the Creative Development of a Security Studies Agenda in Europe, European Journal of International Relations, 4, 479-505.
  • Huysmans, J. (2006), The Politics of Insecurity : Fear, Migration, and Asylum in the EU, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, Routledge.
  • Jervis, R. (1976), Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press.
  • Kaplan, F. (1991), The Wizards of Armageddon, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
  • Kennedy-Pipe, C. (2004), Whose Security? State-Building and the 'Emancipation' of Women in Central Asia International Relations, 18, 91-107.
  • Krause, K. & M. C. Williams (1996), Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods, International Studies Quarterly, 40, 229-254.
  • Krause, K. & M. C. Williams (Eds.) (1997), Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases, Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press.
  • Mcsweeney, B. (1999), Security, Identity and Interests: A Sociology of International Relations, Cambridge University Press.
  • Neufeld, M. (2004), Pitfalls of Emancipation and Discourses of Security: Reflections on Cadana's 'Security with a Human Face', International Relations, 18, 109-123.
  • Pasha, M. K. (1996), Security as Hegemony, Alternatives-Social Transformation and Humane Governance, 21, 283-302.
  • Said, E. W. (1994), Representations of the Intellectual : The 1993 Reith Lectures, New York, Pantheon Books.
  • Smith, S. (1996), Positivism and Beyond, in Booth, K., Smith, S. & Zalewski, M. (Eds.)International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 11-44.
  • Stamnes, E. (2004), Critical Security Studies and the United Nations Preventive Deployment in Macedonia, International Peacekeeping (13533312), 11, 161-181.
  • Stamnes, E. & R. Wyn Jones (2000), Burundi: A Critical Security Perspective, Peace and Conflict Studies, 7, 37-55.
  • Tickner, J. A. (1992), Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security, New York, Columbia University Press.
  • Tickner, J. A. (1995), Re-Visioning Security, IN Booth, K. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theory Today, Cambridge, Polity Press.
  • Tooze, R. (2005), The Missing Link: Security, Critical International Political Economy,and Community. In Booth, K. (Ed.) Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Boulder, CO, Lynne Rienner: 133-158.
  • Vale, P. C. J. (2003), Security and Politics in South Africa: The Regional Dimension, Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Waever, O. (1990), Three Competing Europes: German, French, Russian, International Affairs, 66, 477.
  • Waever, O. (1995a), Identity, Integration and Security, Journal of International Affairs, 48, 389.
  • Waever, O. (1995b), Securitization and Desecuritization. IN Lipschutz, R. D. (Ed.) On Security, New York, Columbia University Press: 46-86.
  • Waever, O. (1998), In Adler, E. & Barnett, M. (Eds.) Security Communities, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 69-118.
  • Waever, O. & B. Buzan (2003), Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Waever, O., B. Buzan & J. De Wilde (1998), Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Waever, O., B. Buzan, M. Kelstrup & P. Lemaitre (1993), Identity, Migration and theNew Security Agenda in Europe, London, Pinter Publishers.
  • Walker, R. B. J. (1990), Security, Sovereignty and the Challenge of World Politics,Alternatives, 15, 3-28.
  • Weldes, J. (1999), Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
  • Weldes, J., M. Laffey, H. Gusterson & R. Duvall (1999), Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities and the Production of Danger, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
  • Weldes, J. & D. Saco (1996), Making State Action Possible: The United States and the Discursive Construction of 'the Cuban Problem', 1960-1994, Millennium- Journal of International Studies, 25, 361-395.
  • Wendt, A. (1992), Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics, International Organization, 46, 391-425.
  • Whitworth, S. (2005), Militarized Masculinities and the Politics of Peacekeeping. IN Booth, K. (Ed.) Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Boulder, CO, Lynne Rienner: 89-106.
  • Williams, M. C. (2003), Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics, International Studies Quarterly, 47, 511-531.
  • Williams, P. (2000), South African Foreign Policy: Getting Critical? Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies, 27, 73-91.
  • Wolfers, A. (1952), National Security as an Ambiguous Symbol, Political Science Quarterly, 67, 481-502.
  • Wyn Jones, R. (1999), Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory, Boulder, Colo., Lynne Rienner Publishers.
APA Bilgin P (2010). Güvenlik çalışmalarında yeni açılımlar: Yeni güvenlik çalışmaları. , 69 - 96.
Chicago Bilgin Pınar Güvenlik çalışmalarında yeni açılımlar: Yeni güvenlik çalışmaları. (2010): 69 - 96.
MLA Bilgin Pınar Güvenlik çalışmalarında yeni açılımlar: Yeni güvenlik çalışmaları. , 2010, ss.69 - 96.
AMA Bilgin P Güvenlik çalışmalarında yeni açılımlar: Yeni güvenlik çalışmaları. . 2010; 69 - 96.
Vancouver Bilgin P Güvenlik çalışmalarında yeni açılımlar: Yeni güvenlik çalışmaları. . 2010; 69 - 96.
IEEE Bilgin P "Güvenlik çalışmalarında yeni açılımlar: Yeni güvenlik çalışmaları." , ss.69 - 96, 2010.
ISNAD Bilgin, Pınar. "Güvenlik çalışmalarında yeni açılımlar: Yeni güvenlik çalışmaları". (2010), 69-96.
APA Bilgin P (2010). Güvenlik çalışmalarında yeni açılımlar: Yeni güvenlik çalışmaları. SAREM Stratejik Arastirmalar Dergisi, 8(14), 69 - 96.
Chicago Bilgin Pınar Güvenlik çalışmalarında yeni açılımlar: Yeni güvenlik çalışmaları. SAREM Stratejik Arastirmalar Dergisi 8, no.14 (2010): 69 - 96.
MLA Bilgin Pınar Güvenlik çalışmalarında yeni açılımlar: Yeni güvenlik çalışmaları. SAREM Stratejik Arastirmalar Dergisi, vol.8, no.14, 2010, ss.69 - 96.
AMA Bilgin P Güvenlik çalışmalarında yeni açılımlar: Yeni güvenlik çalışmaları. SAREM Stratejik Arastirmalar Dergisi. 2010; 8(14): 69 - 96.
Vancouver Bilgin P Güvenlik çalışmalarında yeni açılımlar: Yeni güvenlik çalışmaları. SAREM Stratejik Arastirmalar Dergisi. 2010; 8(14): 69 - 96.
IEEE Bilgin P "Güvenlik çalışmalarında yeni açılımlar: Yeni güvenlik çalışmaları." SAREM Stratejik Arastirmalar Dergisi, 8, ss.69 - 96, 2010.
ISNAD Bilgin, Pınar. "Güvenlik çalışmalarında yeni açılımlar: Yeni güvenlik çalışmaları". SAREM Stratejik Arastirmalar Dergisi 8/14 (2010), 69-96.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 15:33

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları