Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 30 - 36 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.32707/ercivet.1085242 İndeks Tarihi: 09-08-2022
Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats
Öz: This study was aimed to determine the possible differences between two different oscillometric devices measured blood pressure. Additionally, it was carried out to determine the range levels of blood pressure measured in healthy cats admitted to a small animal clinic. In different breeds, healthy 50 cats, the median age was 8.75 months, and ranged between 3 to 36 months) were included in this study. Blood pressure values and pulse measurements of the cats were measured using the wall mounted (WMD) and mobile (MD) BP monitors. BP measurements were taken from the right front leg, arteria radialis on the mid of the antebrachium and tail root over the arteria coccygea medialis on the median line. Mean SBP measurements taken from right forelimb (135.90±16.34 mmHg) and tail (145.32±21.20 mmHg) by WMD were statistically different (P=0.020). Mean DBP (mmHg), MAP (mmHg) and Pulse (bpm) measurements were not different on different sites by each device (P>0.05). Mean SBP, DBP, MAP and pulse values of the right front forelimb using the mobile device were 136.10±16.37 mmHg, 83.74±17.0, 101.62±16.13 mmHg and 167 (134-227) bpm respectively. As a result, oscillometric blood pressure mobile devices and wall-mounted devices are compatible and can be used interchangeably in measuring the blood pressure in healthy cats. It is recommended to use the right forelimb for measuring blood pressure in cats. The reference ranges derived from in this study can be used by veterinary clinicians or technicians.
Anahtar Kelime: Sağlıklı Kedilerde Duvara Monta ve Mobil Cihaz ile Ölçülen Kan Basıncı Değerlerinin Karşılaştırılması
Öz: Bu çalışma, küçük hayvan kliniğine getirilen sağlıklı kedilerde, iki farklı osilometrik kan basıncı ölçüm cihazı arasındaki olası farklılıkların belirlenmesi ve kliniğimizde kan basıncı referans değerlerinin oluşturulması amacıyla yapıldı. Farklı ırklardan, sağlıklı, ortanca 8.75 aylık (3-36), 50 kedi (28 erkek, 22 dişi) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Kedilerin kan basıncı değerleri ve nabız ölçümleri duvara monte (WMD) ve mobil (MD) kan basıncı monitörleri kullanılarak ölçüldü. Sağ ön ekstremite ölçümlerinde; manşetin kese kısmı, antebrachium’un orta kısmına gelecek şekilde, arteria radialis üzerine yerleştirildi. Kuyruk bölgesinden ölçülen değerleri için; manşetin kese kısmı arteria coccygea medialis üzerine gelecek şekilde mümkün olduğunca kuyruk köküne yakın yerleştirildi. Duvara monta edilmiş cihaz ile sağ ön ekstremite (135.90±16.34 mmHg) ve kuyruk (145.32±21.20 mmHg) bölgesinden ölçülen sistolik kan basıncı (SBP) değerleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde bir fark görüldü (P=0.020). Her iki cihaz ile sağ ön ekstremite ve kuyruktan ölçülen DBP (mmHg), MAP (mmHg) ve Nabız (bpm) değerleri arasında ise bir fark görülmedi (P>0.05). Mobil kan basıncı ölçüm cihazı ile sağ ön ekstremiteden alınan SBP, DBP, MAP ve nabız değerleri, sırasıyla; 136.10±16.37 mmHg, 83.74±17.0, 101.62±16.13 mmHg ve 167 (134-227) bpm olarak ölçüldü. Sonuç olarak, her iki osilometrik kan basıncı ölçüm cihazının uyumlu olduğu ve sağlıklı kedilerin kan basıncının ölçülmesinde birbirinin yerine kullanılabileceği görüldü. Bu çalışma ile ERÜ Veteriner Fakültesi kliniklerinde türetilen KB değerlerinin veteriner hekimler veya teknisyenleri tarafından güvenle kullanılabileceğine karar verilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Ash AR, Harvey AM, Tasker S. Primary hyperaldosteronism in the cat: A series of 13 cases. J Feline Med Surg 2005; 7(3): 173-82.
- Bijsmans ES, Jepson RE, Chang YM, Syme HM, Elliott J. Changes in systolic blood pressure over time in healthy cats and cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2015; 29(3): 855-61.
- Binns SH, Sisson DD, Buoscio DA, Schaeffer DJ. Doppler ultrasonographic, oscillometrics phygmomanometric and photoplethysmographic techniques for noninvasive blood pressure measurement in anesthetized cats. J Vet Intern Med 1995; 9(6): 405-14.
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8(2): 135-60.
- Bodey AR, Sansom J. Epidemiological study of blood pressure in domestic cats. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39(12): 567-73.
- Branson KR, Wagner-Mann CC, Mann FA. Evaluation of an oscillometric blood pressure monitor on anaesthetised cats and the effect of cuff placement and fur on accuracy. Vet Surg 1997; 26(4): 347-53.
- Brown S, Atkins C, Bagley R, Carr A, Cowgill L, Davidson M, Egner B, Elliott J, Henik R, Labato M, Littman M, Polzin D, Ross L, Snyder P, Stepien R. Guidelines for the identification, evaluation and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med 2007; 21(3): 542-58.
- Brown SA, Henik RA. Diagnosis and treatment of systemic hypertension. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1998; 28(6): 1481-94.
- Cannon MJ, Brett J. Comparison of how well conscious cats tolerate blood pressure measurement from the radial and coccygeal arteries. J Feline Med Surg 2012; 148(12): 906-9.
- Carr AJ. Blood pressure measurement in small animal practice. Vet Tech 1994; 15: 163-7.
- Caulkett NA, Cantwell SL, Houston DM. A comparison of indirect blood pressure monitoring techniques in the anesthetized cat. Vet Surg 1998; 27(4): 370-7.
- Cerejo SA, Teixeira-Neto FJ, Garofalo NA, Rodrigues JC, Celeita-Rodríguez N, Lagos-Carvajal AP. Comparison of two species-specific oscillometric blood pressure monitors with direct blood pressure measurement in anesthetized cats. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2017; 27(4): 409-18.
- Chetboul V, Lefebvre HP, Pinhas C, Clerc B, Boussouf M, Pouchelon JL. Spontaneous feline hypertension: clinical and echocardiographic abnormalities, and survival rate. J Vet Intern Med 2003; 17(1): 89-95.
- Dorsch JA, Dorsch SE. Noninvasive blood pressure monitors. In: Understanding Anesthesia Equipment. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008, pp. 837-43.
- Durham HE. Arterial, blood pressure measurement. Vet Tech 2019; 1: 1-19.
- Grandy JL, Dunlop CI, Hodgson DS, Curtis CR, Chapman PL. Evaluation of the Doppler ultrasonic method of measuring systolic arterial blood pressure in cats. Am J Vet Res 1992; 53(7): 1166-9.
- Haberman CE, Morgan JD, Kang CW, Brown SA. Evaluation of Doppler ultrasonic and oscillometric methods in cats. J Appl Res Vet Med 2004; 2(4): 279-89.
- Hersh LT, Sesing JC, Luczyk WJ, Friedman BA, Zhou S, Batchelder PB. Validation of a conical cuff on the forearm for estimating radial artery blood pressure. Blood Press Monit 2014; 19(1): 38-45.
- Hori Y, Heishima Y, Yamashita Y, Iguchi M, Nakamura K, Isayama N, Onodera H, Kitade A, Kanno N, Hirakawa A, Katagi M, Ibaragi T, Yamano S, Aramaki Y, Sawmda T. Epidemiological study of indirect blood pressure measured using oscillometry in clinically healthy cats at initial evaluation. J Vet Med Sci 2019; 81(4): 513-6.
- Hori Y, Heishima Y, Yamashita Y, Isayama N, Kanno N, Nakamura K, Iguchi M, Ibaragi T, Onodera H, Aramaki Y, Hirakawa A, Yamano S, Katagi M, Kitade A, Sawmda T. Relationship between indirect blood pressure and various stages of chronic kidney disease in cats. J Vet Med Sci 2018; 80(3): 447-52.
- Mandigers P. Noninvasive blood pressure measurements in dogs and cats. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 2005; 130(7): 198-201.
- Nelson OL, Reidesel E, Ware WA, Christensen WF. Echocardiographic and radiographic changes associated with systemic hypertension in cats. J Vet Intern Med 2002; 16(4): 418-25.
- NIBP Cuff Selection and Placement: Accessed Address: http://www.leadingedgevet.com/node/196; Accessed Date: 02.10.2020.
- Payne JR, Brodbelt DC, Luis Fuentes V. Blood pressure measurements in 780 apparently healthy cats. J Vet Intern Med 2017; 31(1): 15-21.
- Sansom J, Rogers KS, Wood JLN. Blood pressure assessment in healthy cats and cats with hypertensive retinopathy. Am J Vet Res 2004; 65(2): 245-52.
- Smulyan H, Asmar RG, Rudnicki A, London GM, Safar ME. Comparative effects of aging in men and women on the properties of the arterial tree. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37(5): 1374-80.
- Taylor SS, Sparkers AH, Briscoe K, Carter J, Sala SC, Jepson RE, Reynolds BS, Scansen BA. ISFM Consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of hypertension in cats. J of Feline Med Surg 2017; 19(3): 288-303.
- Wimpole JA, Adagra CFM, Billson MF, Pillai DN, Foster DF. Plasma free metanephrines in healthy cats, cats with nonadrenal disease and a cat with suspected phaeochromocytoma. J Feline Med Surg 2010; 12(6): 435-40.
- Zeugswetter FK, Tichy A, Weber K. Radial vs coccygeal artery Doppler blood pressure measurement in conscious cats. J Feline Med Surg 2018; 20(10): 968-72.
| APA | Gunes V, Onmaz A, KELES I, ÇITIL M, EKİNCİ G, TÜFEKÇİ E (2022). Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats. , 30 - 36. 10.32707/ercivet.1085242 |
| Chicago | Gunes Vehbi,Onmaz Ali Cesur,KELES IHSAN,ÇITIL MEHMET,EKİNCİ GENCAY,TÜFEKÇİ EMRE Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats. (2022): 30 - 36. 10.32707/ercivet.1085242 |
| MLA | Gunes Vehbi,Onmaz Ali Cesur,KELES IHSAN,ÇITIL MEHMET,EKİNCİ GENCAY,TÜFEKÇİ EMRE Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats. , 2022, ss.30 - 36. 10.32707/ercivet.1085242 |
| AMA | Gunes V,Onmaz A,KELES I,ÇITIL M,EKİNCİ G,TÜFEKÇİ E Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats. . 2022; 30 - 36. 10.32707/ercivet.1085242 |
| Vancouver | Gunes V,Onmaz A,KELES I,ÇITIL M,EKİNCİ G,TÜFEKÇİ E Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats. . 2022; 30 - 36. 10.32707/ercivet.1085242 |
| IEEE | Gunes V,Onmaz A,KELES I,ÇITIL M,EKİNCİ G,TÜFEKÇİ E "Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats." , ss.30 - 36, 2022. 10.32707/ercivet.1085242 |
| ISNAD | Gunes, Vehbi vd. "Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats". (2022), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.32707/ercivet.1085242 |
| APA | Gunes V, Onmaz A, KELES I, ÇITIL M, EKİNCİ G, TÜFEKÇİ E (2022). Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 30 - 36. 10.32707/ercivet.1085242 |
| Chicago | Gunes Vehbi,Onmaz Ali Cesur,KELES IHSAN,ÇITIL MEHMET,EKİNCİ GENCAY,TÜFEKÇİ EMRE Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 19, no.1 (2022): 30 - 36. 10.32707/ercivet.1085242 |
| MLA | Gunes Vehbi,Onmaz Ali Cesur,KELES IHSAN,ÇITIL MEHMET,EKİNCİ GENCAY,TÜFEKÇİ EMRE Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.19, no.1, 2022, ss.30 - 36. 10.32707/ercivet.1085242 |
| AMA | Gunes V,Onmaz A,KELES I,ÇITIL M,EKİNCİ G,TÜFEKÇİ E Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 19(1): 30 - 36. 10.32707/ercivet.1085242 |
| Vancouver | Gunes V,Onmaz A,KELES I,ÇITIL M,EKİNCİ G,TÜFEKÇİ E Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 19(1): 30 - 36. 10.32707/ercivet.1085242 |
| IEEE | Gunes V,Onmaz A,KELES I,ÇITIL M,EKİNCİ G,TÜFEKÇİ E "Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats." Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, ss.30 - 36, 2022. 10.32707/ercivet.1085242 |
| ISNAD | Gunes, Vehbi vd. "Comparison of Wall Mounted and Mobile Blood Pressure Devices Values Obtained from Healthy Cats". Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 19/1 (2022), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.32707/ercivet.1085242 |
