Yıl: 2009 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 107 - 139 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The role of competition law in the Turkish privatization process

Öz:
Özelleştirme Türkiye'de 1980'lerde politik ajandaya girmiştir. 1990'larda özelleştirmeyi destekleyen yönde önemli politik değişiklikler olmuştur, fakat bu çabalarm çoğu sonuç üretmek konusunda başarısızlığa uğramışlardır. Milenyum ile birlikte Türkiye 'deki özelleştirme hareketi önemli bir İvme kazanmıştır; özellikle son 5 yılda özelleştirme rakamları rekor seviyelere ulaşmıştır. Politik etkileri bir yana bırakırsak, bu durum Özelleştirmenin bağımsız bir kamu kurumu —Özelleştirme İdaresi Başkanlığı— tarafından yürütülmesi yönündeki yasal reformlarının bir sonucudur. Diğer taraftan, Türkiye 1990'ların sanımda, başka bir bağımsız kamu kurumu — Rekabet Kurumu — oluşturulmasını öngören modem rekabet hukuku düzenlemelerini kabul etti. Rekabet Kurumu rekabet hukukunun uygulanmasında merkezi bir role sahiptir. Özelleştirme ve rekabet hukuku birbiri ile doğal hir bağlantı içerisindedir. Türk hukuk sistemi özelleştirme sonrası rekabete aykırı durumların oluşmasını engellemek için bir takım hukuk kuralları koymuştur. Bunun sonucu olarak Rekabet Kurumu özelleştirme sürecinde önemli roller üstlenmektedir. Rekabet Kurumu 'nun Türkiye 'deki özelleştirme sürecinin her aşamasındaki rolünün tartışılmasına ihtiyaç vardır. Bu makale, bu ihtiyacı giderme amacındadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Hukuk

-

Öz:
hi Turkey, privatization entered into the political agenda in the 1980s. In the 1990s, there were significant policy changes favoring privatizations but most of the attempts made failed to produce privatizations in the end. The privatization movement in Turkey gained real momentum with the new miUennium; especially in the last five years, the number of privatizations has reached record figures. Leaving political factors aside, this is a result of legal reforms that created an efficient system by conducting privatization through an independent public authority - the Privatization Authority. On the other hand, Turkey introduced modern competition regulations in the late 1990s which created another independent public authority, the Competition Authority. The Competition Authority is at the center of enforcement of competition laws. Naturally, privatization and competition laws are interrelated. Turkish legal system has produced a set of rules to prevent anti-competitive situations after privatization, so the Competition Authority plays an important role in the privatization process. There is a need to discuss the role of competition law in the Turkish privatization process at all stages of the privatization process; this article attempts to fill that need.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Hukuk
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Almon, Maria A. O., Maria A. S. Dominguez, and Francisco Gonzalez-Gomez, Privatization, Deregulation and Competition: Evidence from Spain, 6 REVISTA DE ECONOMIA DEL ROSARJO I (2003).
  • Baytan, İlhan, ÖZELLEŞTİRME (TRT Publishing, 1999).
  • Bülent, Seven, Legal Aspects of Privatization: A Comparative Study of European Implementations (Dissertation.com, 2002).
  • Earle, John S. and Saul Estrin, PRIVATIZATION, COMPETITION AND BUDGET CONSTRAINTS: DISCIPLINING ENTERPRISES IN RUSSIA (Stockholm Institute for Transitional Economies, 1998).
  • Maher, Dabbah, COMPETITION LAW AND POLICY IN THE MIDDLE EAST (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
  • OECD. Competition Law and Po/icy In Turkey, 8 OECD JOURNAL OF COMPETITION LAW AND POLICY 227 (2006).
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, GLOSSARY OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANISATION ECONOMICS AND COMPETITION LAW (R. S. Khemani and D. M. Shapiro, ed., 1993).
  • Siragusa, Mario, Privatization and EC Competition Law, 19 FORDHAM INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 999 (1996).
  • REKABET KURUMU, REKABET POLITIKASI VE ÖZELLEŞTIRME SEMPOZYUMU, 5 KASIM 1999 (Turkish Competition Authority, Ankara, 2000).
  • Suju, Kim, Relationship between Competition Authority and the Regulatoiy Authority regarding the Power to Regulate Abuse of Market Dominance, UNCTAD's Seventh Session of the Intergovernmental Group of Experts on Competition Law and Policy, Geneva, Switz., Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 2006.
  • Vrcek, Bojana, Croatian and EC Competition Law: State and the Problem of the Adjustment Problem, 5 EUROPEAN BUSINESS ORGANIZATION LAW REVIEW 363 (2004).
APA Eroğlu M, ERKAN F (2009). The role of competition law in the Turkish privatization process. , 107 - 139.
Chicago Eroğlu Muzaffer,ERKAN Fikret The role of competition law in the Turkish privatization process. (2009): 107 - 139.
MLA Eroğlu Muzaffer,ERKAN Fikret The role of competition law in the Turkish privatization process. , 2009, ss.107 - 139.
AMA Eroğlu M,ERKAN F The role of competition law in the Turkish privatization process. . 2009; 107 - 139.
Vancouver Eroğlu M,ERKAN F The role of competition law in the Turkish privatization process. . 2009; 107 - 139.
IEEE Eroğlu M,ERKAN F "The role of competition law in the Turkish privatization process." , ss.107 - 139, 2009.
ISNAD Eroğlu, Muzaffer - ERKAN, Fikret. "The role of competition law in the Turkish privatization process". (2009), 107-139.
APA Eroğlu M, ERKAN F (2009). The role of competition law in the Turkish privatization process. Ankara Law Review, 6(2), 107 - 139.
Chicago Eroğlu Muzaffer,ERKAN Fikret The role of competition law in the Turkish privatization process. Ankara Law Review 6, no.2 (2009): 107 - 139.
MLA Eroğlu Muzaffer,ERKAN Fikret The role of competition law in the Turkish privatization process. Ankara Law Review, vol.6, no.2, 2009, ss.107 - 139.
AMA Eroğlu M,ERKAN F The role of competition law in the Turkish privatization process. Ankara Law Review. 2009; 6(2): 107 - 139.
Vancouver Eroğlu M,ERKAN F The role of competition law in the Turkish privatization process. Ankara Law Review. 2009; 6(2): 107 - 139.
IEEE Eroğlu M,ERKAN F "The role of competition law in the Turkish privatization process." Ankara Law Review, 6, ss.107 - 139, 2009.
ISNAD Eroğlu, Muzaffer - ERKAN, Fikret. "The role of competition law in the Turkish privatization process". Ankara Law Review 6/2 (2009), 107-139.