FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 40 - 55 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.54688/ayd.1105843 İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING
Öz: Drones, which have recently grown in popularity and provide endless potential in a variety of fields, are a useful commercial tool in addition to being a fun hobby. This study aimed to analyse the direct effects of perceived trust, perceived speed, and problem awareness on positive word-of-mouth communication intention for drone-based delivery services. In addition, the effect of drone-based delivery service on positive word-of-mouth communication intention and whether consumers' positive word-of-mouth communication intentions for drone-based delivery service differ significantly by gender and generation were also analysed. The online survey method was used to reach 433 people for the study. Many different statistical analyses were used to analyse the obtained data. As a result of the study, it was concluded that the positive effect of the drone-based delivery service on positive word-of-mouth communication intention was significant. It has also been concluded that perceived trust, perceived speed, and problem awareness have direct significant and positive effects on positive word of mouth communication intention for drone-based delivery services. However, no significant difference was found in consumers' positive word-of-mouth communication intentions by gender and generation. The results of the study were discussed, and suggestions were made.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V. & Day, G. S., (2007). Marketing research. (9. Edition). John Wiley & Sons.
- Anderson, E. W. (1998). Customer satisfaction and word-of-mouth. Journal of Service Research, 1 (1), 1-14.
- Aydın, İ. (2021). Investigation of the effect of robot waiter usage desire on word-of-mouth communication and robot waiter usage attitude in restaurants. Turkish Business Journal, 2 (4), 93-105.
- Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y. & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6 (3), 421-458.
- Belanche, D., Flavián, M. & Pérez-Rueda, A. (2020). Mobile apps use and WOM in the food delivery sector: The role of planned behaviour, perceived security and customer lifestyle compatibility. Sustainability, 12 (10), 4275.
- Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi için el kitabı. (20. Baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
- Cha, S. S. (2020). Customers’ intention to use robot-serviced restaurants in Korea: Relationship of coolness and mci factors. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32 (9), 2947-2968.
- Chiasson, M. A., Shaw, F. S., Humberstone, M., Hirshfield, S. & Hartel, D. (2009). Increased HIV disclosure three months after an online video intervention for men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS Care, 21 (9), 1081-1089.
- Chu, S. C. & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking site. International Journal of Advertising, 30 (1), 47-75.
- Del Rio, A. B., Vazquez, R. & Iglesias, V. (2001). The effects of brand associations on consumer response. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18 (5), 410-425.
- Dichter, E. (1966). How word-of-mouth advertising Works. Harvard Business Review, 44, 147-166.
- Divanoğlu, S. U. (2016). Ağızdan ağıza iletişim ile tüketicilerin alışveriş merkezi tercih etme davranışı arasındaki ilişki. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8 (1), 97-106.
- Ennew, C. T., Banerjee, A. K. & Li, D. (2000). Managing word of mouth communication: Empirical evidence from India. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 18 (2), 75-83.
- Floreano, D. & Wood, R. J. (2015). Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones. Nature, 521 (7553), 460-466.
- Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50.
- Gao, Y. L., Mattila, A. S. & Lee, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of behavioural intentions for environment-friendly initiatives in hospitality research. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 54, 107-115.
- Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. (2. Edition). Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Hair, J. F., Black, Jr., William C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. (7. Edition). Uppersaddle River.
- Han, H., Al-Ansi, A., Chi, X., Baek, H. & Lee, K. S. (2020). Impact of environmental CSR (corporate social responsibility), service quality, emotional attachment, and price perception on word-of-mouth for full-service airlines. Sustainability, 12 (10), 3974.
- Huang, C. C. (2017). Cognitive factors in predicting continued use of information systems with technology adoption models. Information Research, 22 (2), 1-29.
- Hwang, J. & Kim, H. (2019). Consequences of a green image of drone food delivery services: The moderating role of gender and age. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28 (5), 872-884.
- Hwang, J., Kim, W. & Kim, J. J. (2020). Application of the value-belief-norm model to environmentally friendly drone food delivery services: The moderating role of product involvement. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32 (5), 1775-1794.
- Jalilvand, M. R., Salimipour, S., Elyasi, M. & Mohammadi, M. (2017). Factors influencing word of mouth behaviour in the restaurant industry. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 35 (1), 81-110.
- Jin, S. V., Muqaddam, A. & Ryu, E. (2019). Instafamous and social media influencer marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 37 (5), 567-579.
- Joerss, M., Schröder, J., Neuhaus, F., Klink, C. & Mann, F. (2016). Parcel delivery: The future of last mil. McKinsey & Company, 1-32.
- Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39 (1), 31-36.
- Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
- Kayış, A. (2005). Parametrik hipotez testler, spss uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. İçinde Ş. Kalaycı (Ed.), SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri, (ss.403-419). Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
- Kim, S. H. (2020). Choice model-based analysis of consumer preference for drone delivery service. Journal of Air Transport Management, 84, 101785.
- Kim, J. J. & Hwang, J. (2020). Merging the norm activation model and the theory of planned behaviour in the context of drone food delivery services: Does the level of product knowledge really matter? Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 42, 1-11.
- Kirschstein, T. (2021). Energy demand of parcel delivery services with a mixed fleet of electric vehicles. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 5, 100322.
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Methodology in the social sciences. Guilford Press.
- Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
- Kulviwat, S., Bruner II, G. C., Kumar, A., Nasco, S. A. & Clark, T. (2007). Toward a unified theory of consumer acceptance technology. Psychology & Marketing, 24 (12), 1059-1084.
- Kumar, S., Jain, A. & Hsieh, J. K. (2021). Impact of apps aesthetics on revisit intentions of food delivery apps: The mediating role of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 102686.
- Lee, H. L., Chen, Y., Gillai, B. & Rammohan, S. (2016). Technological disruption and innovation in last-mile delivery. Stanford Graduate School of Business.
- Leon, S., Chen, C. & Ratcliffe, A. (2021). Consumers’ perceptions of last mile drone delivery. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications.
- Lu, L., Zhang, P. & Zhang, T. C. (2021). Leveraging human-likeness of robotic service at restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102823.
- Machi, V. (2017). Worldwide military drone production to swell over next decade. National Defense, 102 (770), 1-12.
- Matos, C. A. & Rossi, C. A. V. (2008). Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (4), 578-596.
- Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 709-734.
- Odabaşı Y. & Oyman M. (2004). Pazarlama iletişimi yönetimi. (7. Baskı). Mediacat Yayınları.
- Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H. & Xue, Y. (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31 (1), 105-136.
- Roca, J. C., García, J. J. & De La Vega, J. J. (2009). The importance of perceived trust, security and privacy in online trading systems. Information Management & Computer Security, 17 (2), 96-113.
- Rodríguez-Ardura, I. & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2020). Editorial: How to prevent, detect and control common method variance in electronic commerce research. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 15 (2), I-V.
- Said, H. M., Sukarno, A. F. M., Razak, Z. A., Bayaah, S. & Ahmad, S. R. (2018). The impact of service quality on customers’ positive word of mouth towards food truck business in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8 (9), 1919-1940.
- Sampat, B. H. & Sabat, K. C. (2021). What leads consumers to spread eWOM for food ordering apps? Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 29 (4), 50-77.
- Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. (3. Edition). Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Sun, L. B. & Qu, H. (2011). Is there any gender effect on the relationship between service quality and word- of-mouth? Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 28 (2), 210-224.
- Sundaram, D. S., Mitra, K. & Webster, C. (1998). Word-of-mouth communications: A motivational analysis. Advances in Consumer Research, 25, 527-531.
- WilsonVon Voorhis, C. R. & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3 (2), 43-50.
- Wu, J. J., Hwang, J. N., Sharkhuu, O. & Tsogt-Ochir, B. (2018). Shopping online and off-line? Complementary service quality and image congruence. Asia Pacific Management Review, 23 (1), 30-36.
- Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 74-85.
- Yazıcı Ayyıldız, A. & Eroğlu, E. (2021). Restoranlarda kullanılan akıllı teknolojiler ve robot restoranlar hakkında tripadvisor’da yapılan yorumların değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 9 (2), 1102-1122.
- Yoo, W., Yu, E. & Jung, J. (2018). Drone delivery: Factors affecting the public’s attitude and intention to adopt. Telematics and Informatics, 35 (6), 1687-1700.
- Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Lin R. & W. Zhang (2019). The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 98, 207-220.
| APA | dülek b, ÇELİK Z (2022). FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING. , 40 - 55. 10.54688/ayd.1105843 |
| Chicago | dülek bulut,ÇELİK ZÜBEYİR FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING. (2022): 40 - 55. 10.54688/ayd.1105843 |
| MLA | dülek bulut,ÇELİK ZÜBEYİR FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING. , 2022, ss.40 - 55. 10.54688/ayd.1105843 |
| AMA | dülek b,ÇELİK Z FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING. . 2022; 40 - 55. 10.54688/ayd.1105843 |
| Vancouver | dülek b,ÇELİK Z FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING. . 2022; 40 - 55. 10.54688/ayd.1105843 |
| IEEE | dülek b,ÇELİK Z "FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING." , ss.40 - 55, 2022. 10.54688/ayd.1105843 |
| ISNAD | dülek, bulut - ÇELİK, ZÜBEYİR. "FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING". (2022), 40-55. https://doi.org/10.54688/ayd.1105843 |
| APA | dülek b, ÇELİK Z (2022). FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 13(1), 40 - 55. 10.54688/ayd.1105843 |
| Chicago | dülek bulut,ÇELİK ZÜBEYİR FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi 13, no.1 (2022): 40 - 55. 10.54688/ayd.1105843 |
| MLA | dülek bulut,ÇELİK ZÜBEYİR FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, vol.13, no.1, 2022, ss.40 - 55. 10.54688/ayd.1105843 |
| AMA | dülek b,ÇELİK Z FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi. 2022; 13(1): 40 - 55. 10.54688/ayd.1105843 |
| Vancouver | dülek b,ÇELİK Z FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi. 2022; 13(1): 40 - 55. 10.54688/ayd.1105843 |
| IEEE | dülek b,ÇELİK Z "FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING." Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 13, ss.40 - 55, 2022. 10.54688/ayd.1105843 |
| ISNAD | dülek, bulut - ÇELİK, ZÜBEYİR. "FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING". Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi 13/1 (2022), 40-55. https://doi.org/10.54688/ayd.1105843 |
