Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 44 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 286 - 292 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/etd.2021.78545 İndeks Tarihi: 05-08-2022
Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire
Öz: Objective: Misophonia is a disorder in which certain specific patterns of sound provoke a strong negative reaction. This extreme sensitivity to typically ordinary sounds can cause significant disruption to daily life. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire (MAQ). This will be a useful tool to accurately assess the severity and frequency of misophonia in the Turkish population. Materials and Methods: A total of 210 patients who presented with complaints of misophonia were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the participants was 27.85±9.49 years (range: 18–57 years). The construct validity of the MAQ was determined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and the internal consistency was evaluated using the Cronbach alpha value. The concurrent validity of the MAQ was determined based on the directionality of its relationship with a visual analog scale (VAS) and the strength and of the correlation using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Results: The mean MAQ total score was 24.33±13.28. The EFA results revealed a 4-factor structure. The reliability of the instrument was extremely high: the Cronbach alpha for the total scale was 0.94 and subscale values ranged from 0.76 to 0.93. In a test-retest reliability assessment, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.970. A significant correlation between the MAQ and VAS scores was demonstrated (r=0.811, p<0.001). Conclusion: The Turkish version of MAQ is reliable and provides a valid scale to measure the impact and severity of misophonia symptoms.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Bernstein RE, Angell KL, Dehle CM. A brief course of cognitive behavioural therapy for the treatment of misophonia: a case example. Cogn Behav Ther 2013; 6: e10.
- 2. Jastreboff PJ, Jastreboff MM. Decreased sound tolerance: hyperacusis, misophonia, diplacousis, and polyacousis. Handb Clin Neurol 2015; 129: 375–87.
- 3. Dozier TH, Lopez M, Pearson C. Proposed diagnostic criteria for misophonia: A multisensory conditioned aversive reflex disorder. Front Psychol 2017; 8: 1975.
- 4. Schröder A, Vulink N, Denys D. Misophonia: diagnostic criteria for a new psychiatric disorder. PLoS One 2013; 8(1): e54706.
- 5. Edelstein M, Brang D, Rouw R, Ramachandran VS. Misophonia: physiological investigations and case descriptions. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 296.
- 6. Zhou X, Wu MS, Storch EA. Misophonia symptoms among Chinese university students: incidence, associated impairment, and clinical correlates. J Obsess-Compuls Rel 2017; 14: 7–12.
- 7. Wu MS, Lewin AB, Murphy TK, Storch EA. Misophonia: incidence, phenomenology, and clinical correlates in an undergraduate student sample. J Clin Psychol 2014; 70(10): 994–007.
- 8. Jastreboff PJ, Jastreboff MM. Treatments for decreased sound tolerance (hyperacusis and misophonia). Semin Hear 2014; 35(2): 105– 20.
- 9. Schwartz P, Leyendecker J, Conlon M. Hyperacusis and misophonia: the lesser-known siblings of tinnitus. Minn Med 2011; 94(11): 42–3.
- 10. Daniels EC, Rodriguez A, Zabelina DL. Severity of misophonia symptoms is associated with worse cognitive control when exposed to misophonia trigger sounds. PLoS One 2020; 15(1): e0227118.
- 11. Schneider RL, Arch JJ. Case study: a novel application of mindfulnessand acceptance-based components to treat misophonia. J Contextual Behav Sci 2017; 6(2): 221–5.
- 12. Johnson M. 50 cases of misophonia using the MMP. misophonia conference of the Tinnitus Practitioners Association, Atlanta, GA. 2014.
- 13. Siepsiak M, Śliwerski A, Łukasz Dragan W. Development and psychometric properties of misoquest-a new self-report questionnaire for Misophonia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(5): 1797.
- 14. Bauman N. Misophonia Physiological Response Scale (MPRS). Available from: URL: https://misophoniatreatment.com/wp-content/uploads/ 2014/06/MPRS.pdf.
- 15. Dozier TH. Counter conditioning treatment for misophonia. Clin Case Stud 2015; 14(5): 374–87.
- 16. Johnson M. Misophonia Assessment Questionaire (MAQ). 2017. Available from: URL: https://misophoniatreatment.com/wp-content/ uploads/2014/06/MAQ-2.pdf.
- 17. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166(10): 1092–7.
- 18. Konkan R, Senormanci O, Guclu O, Aydin E, Sungur MZ. Validity and reliability study for the Turkish adaptation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. Available from: URL: https://www.noropsikiyatriarsivi. com/sayilar/415/buyuk/53-58ing.pdf.
- 19. Freyd M. The graphic rating scale. J Educ Psychol 1923; 14(2): 83– 102.
- 20. Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R, Tatham R. Multivariate data analysis. 7th edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education. Inc, 2010.
- 21. Preacher KJ, MacCallum RC. Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding statistics: Statistical issues in psychology, education, and the social sciences 2003; 2(1): 13–43.
- 22. George D. SPSS for windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update, 10/e: Pearson Education India; 2011.
- 23. Sanchez TG, Silva FED. Familial misophonia or selective sound sensitivity syndrome : evidence for autosomal dominant inheritance?. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 84(5): 553–9.
- 24. Dozier TH. Etiology, composition, development and maintenance of misophonia: A conditioned aversive reflex disorder. Psychol Thought 2015; 8: 114–29.
- 25. Rouw R, Erfanian M. A large-scale study of misophonia. J Clin Psychol 2018; 74(3): 453–79.
- 26. Jager I, de Koning P, Bost T, Denys D, Vulink N. Misophonia: Phenomenology, comorbidity and demographics in a large sample. PLoS One 2020; 15(4): e0231390.
- 27. Claiborn JM, Dozier TH, Hart SL, Lee J. Self-identified misophonia phenomenology, impact, and clinical correlates. Psychol Thought 2020; 13(2): 349–75.
- 28. Kumar S, Tansley-Hancock O, Sedley W, Winston JS, Callaghan MF, Allen M, et al. The brain basis for misophonia. Curr Biol 2017; 27(4): 527–33.
- 29. Dozier TH, Morrison KL. Phenomenology of misophonia: initial physical and emotional responses. Amer J Psychol 2017; 130(4): 431–8.
- 30. Jastreboff MM, Jastreboff PJ. Decreased sound tolerance and tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT). Aust N Z J Audiol 2002; 24(2): 74–84.
- 31. Anari M, Axelsson A, Eliasson A, Magnusson L. Hypersensitivity to sound--questionnaire data, audiometry and classification. Scand Audiol 1999; 28(4): 219–30.
| APA | ALTIN B, AKSOY S (2022). Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire. , 286 - 292. 10.14744/etd.2021.78545 |
| Chicago | ALTIN Büşra,AKSOY Songul Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire. (2022): 286 - 292. 10.14744/etd.2021.78545 |
| MLA | ALTIN Büşra,AKSOY Songul Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire. , 2022, ss.286 - 292. 10.14744/etd.2021.78545 |
| AMA | ALTIN B,AKSOY S Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire. . 2022; 286 - 292. 10.14744/etd.2021.78545 |
| Vancouver | ALTIN B,AKSOY S Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire. . 2022; 286 - 292. 10.14744/etd.2021.78545 |
| IEEE | ALTIN B,AKSOY S "Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire." , ss.286 - 292, 2022. 10.14744/etd.2021.78545 |
| ISNAD | ALTIN, Büşra - AKSOY, Songul. "Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire". (2022), 286-292. https://doi.org/10.14744/etd.2021.78545 |
| APA | ALTIN B, AKSOY S (2022). Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire. Erciyes Medical Journal, 44(3), 286 - 292. 10.14744/etd.2021.78545 |
| Chicago | ALTIN Büşra,AKSOY Songul Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire. Erciyes Medical Journal 44, no.3 (2022): 286 - 292. 10.14744/etd.2021.78545 |
| MLA | ALTIN Büşra,AKSOY Songul Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire. Erciyes Medical Journal, vol.44, no.3, 2022, ss.286 - 292. 10.14744/etd.2021.78545 |
| AMA | ALTIN B,AKSOY S Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire. Erciyes Medical Journal. 2022; 44(3): 286 - 292. 10.14744/etd.2021.78545 |
| Vancouver | ALTIN B,AKSOY S Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire. Erciyes Medical Journal. 2022; 44(3): 286 - 292. 10.14744/etd.2021.78545 |
| IEEE | ALTIN B,AKSOY S "Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire." Erciyes Medical Journal, 44, ss.286 - 292, 2022. 10.14744/etd.2021.78545 |
| ISNAD | ALTIN, Büşra - AKSOY, Songul. "Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish version of Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire". Erciyes Medical Journal 44/3 (2022), 286-292. https://doi.org/10.14744/etd.2021.78545 |
