THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ACID TREATMENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA AND DENTIN SURFACE
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 9 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7126/cumudj.804149 İndeks Tarihi: 09-08-2022
THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ACID TREATMENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA AND DENTIN SURFACE
Öz: Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of dentin surface treatments with citric, tartaric, phosphoric, and boric acids on the bonding strength of monolithic zirconia. Materials and Methods: A hundred human molar teeth were randomly divided into subsets (n=10) based on acid treatment modalities and thermocycling procedure. Monolithic zirconia superstructures were fabricated using CAD/CAM system in the final dimensions of 7 mm in diameter and 3 mm in thickness. After application of acid treatments to dentin surface, shear bond strength test was performed to assess the effectiveness of surface modifications that were also examined using a scanning electron microscope. Results: The study groups were ranked respectively as (citric acid>tartaric acid>phosphoric acid>boric acid>control) for the set of groups without thermocycling and (citric acid>tartaric acid) and (phosphoric acid>boric acid>control) for the set of thermocycling groups (p<0.05) based on highest value. The bonding strength of tartaric acid group was not significantly different from the bonding strength of phosphoric acid group (p>0.05). Conclusions: In both procedures with and without thermal cycling; based on order of efficacy, citric, tartaric, phosphoric, and boric acids were more effective in improving the shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia and dentin surface. The thermal cycling procedure decreased the bonding strength in all the groups.
Anahtar Kelime: Monolitik Zirkonya Materyalinin Dentine Bağlanma Dayanımı Üzerine Farklı Tür Asit Yüzey Uygulamalarının Etkilerinin Araştırılması
Öz: Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, dentin yüzeyine uygulanan sitrik, tartarik, fosforik ve borik asit uygulamasının, monolitik zirkonyanın bağlanma dayanımına etkisini araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada, 100 adet insan dişi rastgele seçim yöntemiyle asit uygulama prosedürleri ve termal yorgunluk işlemlerine göre alt gruplara ayrıldı (n=10). Monolitik zirkonya restorasyonlar, CAD/CAM sistemi kullanılarak 3 mm kalınlığında ve 7 mm çapında üretildi. Dentin yüzeylerine asit uygulaması işleminin ardından, uygulanan asitlerin etkinliğini değerlendirmek üzere makaslama bağlantı dayanım testi uygulandı. Yüzey modifikasyonları taramalı elektron mikroskobu yardımıyla incelendi. Bulgular: Çalışma grupları, termal yorgunluk uygulanmayan gruplar için (sitrik asit> tartarik asit> fosforik asit> borik asit> kontrol) ve termal yorgunluk uygulanan gruplar için (sitrik asit> tartarik asit) ve (fosforik asit> borik asit> kontrol) en yüksek bağlanma değerine göre sıralandı (p<0,05). Termal yorgunluk uygulanan gruplarda; tartarik asit grubu ile fosforik asit grubu arasında bağlantı dayanım değerlerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlılık saptanamadı (p>0,05). Sonuç: Termal yorgunluk içeren ve içermeyen her iki prosedürde; etkinlik sırasına göre sitrik, tartarik, fosforik ve borik asit uygulaması, monolitik zirkonya ile dentin arasındaki bağlantı dayanımını arttırmada daha başarılı olmuştur. Termal yorgunluk uygulaması tüm gruplarda bağlanma dayanımını azaltmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
- 1. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009;28:44-56.
- 2. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater. 2008;24:299-307.
- 3. Torricelli P, Verne E, Brovarone CV, Appendino P, Rustichelli F, Krajewski A, Ravaglioli A, Pierini G, Fini M, Giavaresi G, Giardino R. Biological glass coating on ceramic materials: in vitro evaluation using primary osteoblast cultures from healthy and osteopenic rat bone. Biomaterials 2001;22:2535-2543.
- 4. Stawarczyk B, Egli R, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hämmerle CH. The impact of in vitro aging on the mechanical and optical properties of indirect veneering composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106:386-398.
- 5. Swain MV. Unstable cracking (chipping) of veneering porcelain on all-ceramic dental crowns and fixed partial dentures. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:1668-1677.
- 6. Tuncel I, Turp I, Usumez A. Evaluation of translucency of monolithic zirconia and framework zirconia materials. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8:181-186.
- 7. Raadsheer MC, Van Eijden TMGJ, Van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen B. Contribution of jaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite force magnitude. J Dent Res. 1999;78:31-42.
- 8. Lan TH, Liu PH, Chou MM, Lee HE. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns with different occlusal thicknesses in implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:76-83.
- 9. Lan TH, Liu PH, Chou MM, Lee HE. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns with different occlusal thicknesses in implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:76-83.
- 10. Nakamura K, Harada A, Inagaki R, Kanno T, Niwano Y, Milleding P, Örtengren U. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73:602-608.
- 11. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1-25.
- 12. Ural Ç, Kulunk T, Külünk S, Kurt M. The effect of laser treatment on bonding between zirconia ceramic surface and resin cement. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010;68:354-359.
- 13. Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater. 1999;15:426-433.
- 14. Ersu B, Yuzugullu B, Ruya Yazici A, Canay S. Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass- infiltrated alumina-ceramics prepared using various surface treatments. J Dent. 2009;37:848-856.
- 15. Xible AA, de Jesus Tavarez RR, de Araujo Cdos R, Bonachela WC. Effect of silica coating and silanization on flexural and composite-resin bond strengths of zirconia posts: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95:224-229.
- 16. Ulgey M, Zan R, Hubbezoglu I, Gorler O, Uysalcan G, Cotur F. Effect of different laser types on bonding strength of CAD/CAM-customized zirconia post to root canal dentin: an experimental study. Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Feb 14.
- 17. Lussi, A. Dental erosion clinical diagnosis and case history taking. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996;104:191-198.
- 18. Garrett JS, Crigger M, Egelberg J. Effects of citric acid on diseased root surfaces. J Periodontal Res. 1978;13:155-163.
- 19. Pérez-Heredia M, Ferrer-Luque CM, González- Rodríguez MP, Martín-Peinado FJ, González López S. Decalcifying effect of 15% EDTA, 15% citric acid, 5% phosphoric acid and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite on root canal dentine. Int Endod J. 2008;41:418-423.
- 20. Attin T, Meyer K, Hellwig E, Buchalla W, Lennon AM. Effect of mineral supplements to citric acid on enamel erosion. Arch Oral Biol. 2003;48:753-759.
- 21. Ravikumar J, Bhavana V, Thatimatla C, Gajjarapu S, Reddy SG, Reddy BR. The effect of four different irrigating solutions on the shear bond strength of endodontic sealer to dentin - An In-vitro study. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6:85-88.
- 22. Akisue E, Araki AT, Michelotto AL, Moura-Netto C, Gavini G. Effect of chemical and Er:YAG laser treatment on bond strength of root canal resin-based sealers. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28:253-258.
- 23. Kameyama A, Kawada E, Takizawa M, Oda Y, Hirai Y. Influence of different acid conditioners on the tensile bond strength of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin to Er:YAG laser-irradiated bovine dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2000;2:297-304.
- 24. Demiryürek EO, Külünk S, Saraç D, Yüksel G, Bulucu B. Effect of different surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:74-80.
- 25. Nicholson JW, Brookman PJ, Lacy OM, Wilson AD. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study of the role of tartaric acid in glass-ionomer dental cements. J Dent Res. 1988;67:1451-1454.
- 26. Wiktorsson AM, Zimmerman M, Angmar-Månsson B. Erosive tooth wear: prevalence and severity in Swedish winetasters. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997;105:544-550.
- 27. Fu B, Shen Q, Qian W, Zeng Y, Sun X, Hannig M. Interfacial interaction of tartaric acid with hydroxyapatite and enamel. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005;16:827-831.
- 28. Shimada Y, Yamaguchi S, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of dual-cured resin cement to glass ceramics. Dent Mater. 2002;18:380-388.
- 29. Juloski J, Goracci C, Rengo C, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Enamel and dentin bond strength of new simplified adhesive materials with and without preliminary phosphoric acid-etching. Am J Dent. 2012;25:239-243.
- 30. Poggio C, Beltrami R, Colombo M, Chiesa M, Scribante A. Influence of dentin pretreatment on bond strength of universal adhesives. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2017;3:30-35.
- 31. Alaghehmand H, Nezhad Nasrollah F, Nokhbatolfoghahaei H, Fekrazad R. An In Vitro Comparison of the Bond Strength of Composite to Superficial and Deep Dentin, Treated With Er:YAG Laser Irradiation or Acid-Etching. J Lasers Med Sci. 2016;7:167-171.
- 32. Davari A, Sadeghi M, Bakhshi H. Shear Bond Strength of an Etch-and-rinse Adhesive to Er:YAG Laser- and/or Phosphoric Acid-treated Dentin. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013;7:67-73.
- 33. Azevedo M, Celeste C, Ana MV Cavaleiro. The acid–base titration of a very weak acid: boric acid. J Chem Educ. 2012;89:767-770.
- 34. Cangul S, Yildirim ZS, Bahsi E, Sagmak S, Satici O. Do ozone and boric acid affect microleakage in class V composite restorations?. Ozone-Sci Eng 2019;41:92-101.
- 35. Ercan E, Colak H, Hamidi MM, Ibrahimov D, Gulal E. "Can Dentin Surfaces Be Bonded Safely With Ozone and Boric Acid?." Ozone-Sci Eng 2015;37:556-562.
- 36. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999:27;89-99.
- 37. Earar K, Antoniac VI, Baciu S, Bran S, Onisor F, Milea C, et al. Etching treatment effect on surface morphology of dental structures. Rev Chim 2017;68:2700-2703.
| APA | ULGEY M, Gorler O (2021). THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ACID TREATMENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA AND DENTIN SURFACE. , 1 - 9. 10.7126/cumudj.804149 |
| Chicago | ULGEY MELİH,Gorler Oguzhan THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ACID TREATMENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA AND DENTIN SURFACE. (2021): 1 - 9. 10.7126/cumudj.804149 |
| MLA | ULGEY MELİH,Gorler Oguzhan THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ACID TREATMENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA AND DENTIN SURFACE. , 2021, ss.1 - 9. 10.7126/cumudj.804149 |
| AMA | ULGEY M,Gorler O THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ACID TREATMENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA AND DENTIN SURFACE. . 2021; 1 - 9. 10.7126/cumudj.804149 |
| Vancouver | ULGEY M,Gorler O THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ACID TREATMENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA AND DENTIN SURFACE. . 2021; 1 - 9. 10.7126/cumudj.804149 |
| IEEE | ULGEY M,Gorler O "THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ACID TREATMENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA AND DENTIN SURFACE." , ss.1 - 9, 2021. 10.7126/cumudj.804149 |
| ISNAD | ULGEY, MELİH - Gorler, Oguzhan. "THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ACID TREATMENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA AND DENTIN SURFACE". (2021), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.804149 |
| APA | ULGEY M, Gorler O (2021). THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ACID TREATMENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA AND DENTIN SURFACE. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 24(1), 1 - 9. 10.7126/cumudj.804149 |
| Chicago | ULGEY MELİH,Gorler Oguzhan THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ACID TREATMENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA AND DENTIN SURFACE. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 24, no.1 (2021): 1 - 9. 10.7126/cumudj.804149 |
| MLA | ULGEY MELİH,Gorler Oguzhan THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ACID TREATMENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA AND DENTIN SURFACE. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , vol.24, no.1, 2021, ss.1 - 9. 10.7126/cumudj.804149 |
| AMA | ULGEY M,Gorler O THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ACID TREATMENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA AND DENTIN SURFACE. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2021; 24(1): 1 - 9. 10.7126/cumudj.804149 |
| Vancouver | ULGEY M,Gorler O THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ACID TREATMENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA AND DENTIN SURFACE. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2021; 24(1): 1 - 9. 10.7126/cumudj.804149 |
| IEEE | ULGEY M,Gorler O "THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ACID TREATMENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA AND DENTIN SURFACE." Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 24, ss.1 - 9, 2021. 10.7126/cumudj.804149 |
| ISNAD | ULGEY, MELİH - Gorler, Oguzhan. "THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ACID TREATMENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA AND DENTIN SURFACE". Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 24/1 (2021), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.804149 |
