DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES

Gömleksiz, Seda; Göktolga Akın, Emine Gülşah

doi:10.7126/cumudj.747021

DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES

Seda GÖMLEKSİZ, (Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, Erzincan, Türkiye.)

Emine Gülşah GÖKTOLGA AKIN (Sakarya Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, Sakarya, Türkiye)

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal

5 0

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 10 - 20 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7126/cumudj.747021 İndeks Tarihi: 09-08-2022

DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES

Öz:

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the bond strength and micro-leakage of three different universal adhesive systems applied in self-etch mode to dentin. Materials and Methods: To evaluate bond strength, the mid-coronal dentin surfaces of forty-five human molar teeth were exposed and randomly assigned into three groups according to the following adhesive application: Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE), Optibond XTR (Kerr), and Tokuyama Universal (Tokuyama Dental) (n=15). The shear bond strength test was performed after composite build-up. Then, the fractured surfaces were evaluated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). To evaluate micro-leakage, facial class V cavities were prepared to forty-five human premolars and randomly assigned into identical three experimental groups described above (n=15). After composite resin restoration of cavities, the specimens were thermo- cycled for 500 cycles and then immersed in basic fuchsine, sectioned, and examined under a stereo-microscope. Data were evaluated using one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s, Chi-square and Mann Whitney U tests. Results: Among the adhesives, the highest bond strength was achieved in Optibond XTR, while Tokuyama Universal showed the lowest bond strength values (p<0.05). In micro-leakage results, no significant difference was reported in occlusal margins among groups. In gingival margins, Optibond XTR showed less leakage compared to Tokuyama and Single Bond Universal (p<0.05). Conclusions: The study findings indicated that two-step universal adhesive system is more successful than one-step universal adhesive systems in bonding to dentin. Considering that bonding plays a major role in the longevity of the restoration, it can be said that the use of two- step universal adhesive systems in dentin can give more successful results.

Anahtar Kelime: Adhesive systems dentin bond strength micro-leakage

Üç Farklı Üniversal Adeziv Sistemin Dentine Makaslama Bağlanma Dayanımlarının ve Mikrosızıntı Değerlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Öz:

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, self-etch modda kullanılan üç farklı üniversal adeziv sistemin dentine olan bağlanma dayanımını ve mikrosızıntısı değerlendirmek ve karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bağlanma dayanımını değerlendirmek için, 45 adet çekilmiş insan molar dişlerinin orta koronal dentin yüzeyleri açığa çıkartıldı, hazırlanan dişler adeziv sistemler uygulanmak üzere rastgele 3 gruba ayrıldı: Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE), Optibond XTR (Kerr) ve Tokuyama Universal (Tokuyama Dental) (n=15). Kompozit rezin yerleştirilmesinin ardından örneklere makaslama bağlanma dayanımı testi uygulandı. Kırılan örnekleri kopma yüzeyleri taramalı elektron mikroskobunda incelendi. M,ikrosızıntıyı değerlendirmek için, 45 adet çekilmiş insan premolar dişlerinin bukkal yüzeylerinde Sınıf V kaviteler hazırlandı. Hazırlanan dişlere bağlanma dayanımında belirtilen gruplarda olduğu gibi aynı adeziv sistemler uygulandı (n=15). Kaviteler kompozit rezin ile restore edildi ve örnekler 500 devir termal siklusa tabi tutuldu. Ardından bazik fuksinde bekletilen örnekler ikiye ayrıldı ve kesit yüzeyleri stereomikroskop altında incelendi. Veriler tek yönlü ANOVA, Tukey, Ki-kare ve Mann Whitney U testleri kullanılarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Çalışmada kullanılan adeziv sistemler arasında en yüksek bağlanma dayanımı Optibond XTR’de görülürken, en düşük bağlanma dayanımı ise Tokuyama Üniversal’de gözlendi. (p<0,05). Mikrosızıntı değerleri incelendiğinde ise, okluzal kenarlarda gruplar arasında anlamlı bir farklılık görülmezken; gingival kenarlarda Optibond XTR’nin, Tokuyama Üniversal’den anlamlı derecede daha az sızıntı gösterdiği görüldü. (p<0,05) Sonuçlar: Çalışma bulguları, dentine bağlanmada iki aşamalı universal adeziv systemin tek aşamalı universal adeziv sistemlerden daha başarılı olduğunu göstermiştir. Bağlanmanın restorasyonun uzun ömürlülüğünde major bir rol oynadığı düşünüldüğünde, dentinde iki aşamalı universal adeziv sistemlerinin kullanımının daha başarılı sonuçlar verebileceği söylenebilir. Anahtar kelimeler: Adeziv sistemler, dentine bağlanma dayanımı, mikrosızıntı.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

1. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, Dorigo EDS. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008;24:90-101.
2. Reis A, Grande R, Oliveira G, Lopes G, Loguercio A. A 2-year evaluation of moisture on microtensile bond strength and nanoleakage. Dent Mater 2007;23:862-870.
3. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 2010;26:1176-1184.
4. Tuncer D, Çelik Ç, Çehreli SB, Arhun N. Comparison of microleakage of a multi-mode adhesive system with contemporary adhesives in class II resin restorations. J Adh Sci Technol 2014;28:1288-1297.
5. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems
20 and dentine. J Dent 2012;40:475-484. 6. St AG, Wilder JA, Perdigão J, Swift JE. Microleakage of class V composites using different placement and curing techniques: an in vitro study. Am J Dent 2002;15:244-247.
7. Taschner M, Kümmerling M, Lohbauer U, Breschi L, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Effect of double-layer application on dentin bond durability of one-step selfetch adhesives. Oper Dent 2014;39:416-426.
8. Sezinando A, Perdigão J, Regalheiro R. Dentin bond strengths of four adhesion strategies after thermal fatigue and 6 month water storage. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012;24:345-355.
9. Rengo C, Goracci C, Juloski J, Chieffi N, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Influence of phosphoric acid etching on microleakage of a self etch adhesive and a self adhering composite. Aust Dent J 2012;57:220-226.
10. Krämer N, Tilch D, Lücker S, Frankenberger R. Status of ten self etch adhesives for bonding to dentin of primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 2014;24:192-199.
11. Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Visintini E, Diolosà M, Turco G, Salgarello S, Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M, Breschi L. Influence of ageing on self etch adhesives: one step vs. two step systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2013;121:43-49.
12. Juloski J, Goracci C, Rengo C, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Vulicevic A, Ferrari M. Enamel and dentin bond strength of new simplified adhesive materials with and without preliminary phosphoric acid-etching. Am J Dent 2012;25:239.
13. Meharry M, Moazzami S, Li Y. Comparison of enamel and dentin shear bond strengths of current dental bonding adhesives from three bond generations. Oper Dent 2013;38:237-245.
14. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J 2005;24:1-13.
15. Giannini M, Makishi P, Ayres APA, Vermelho PM, Fronza BM, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Self-etch adhesive systems: a literature review. Braz Dent J 2015;26:3-10.
16. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-258.
17. Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NHC. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2013;41:404-411.
18. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Sai K, Tsujimoto A, Imai A, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of different smear layers on bond durability of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2018;34:246-259.
19. Michaud PL, Brown M. Effect of universal adhesive etching modes on bond strength to dualpolymerizing composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:657-662.
20. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Watanabe H, Johnson WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Comparison between universal adhesives and two step self etch adhesives in terms of dentin bond fatigue durability in self etch mode. Eur J Oral Sci 2017;125:215-222.
21. Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Okihara T, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Chemical interaction of glycero-phosphate dimethacrylate (GPDM) with hydroxyapatite and dentin. Dent Mater 2018;34:1072-1081.
22. Kameyama A, Hoshika S, Suyama Y, Inokoshi M, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Immediate and aged bond strength to differently prepared dentin surfaces. IADR/CED 2011. Date:2011/01/02-2011/01/09.
23. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235.
24. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010;26:100-121.
25. Katsumata A, Saikaew P, Ting S, Katsumata T, Hoshika T, Sano H, Nishitani Y. Microtensile bond strength bonded to dentin of a newly universal adhesive. J Oral Tissue Engin 2017;15:18-24.
26. Pleffken PR, de Almeida Lourenco AP, Torres C, Buhler Borges A. Influence of application methods of self-etching adhesive systems on adhesive bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2011;13:517-525.
27. Amano S, Yamamoto A, Tsubota K, Rikuta A, Miyazaki M, Platt JA, Moore BK. Effect of thermal cycling on enamel bond strength of single-step selfetch systems. Oper Dent 2006;31:616-622.
28. Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Peumans M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek M. Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2005;84:183-188. Özkanoğlu S, et al. 21
29. Tay FR PD, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Iitthqgarun A. Single- step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002;30:371–382.
30. Ito S, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Yoshiyama M, Saito T, Brackett WW, Waller JL, Pashley DH. Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:133-141.
31. Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 2002;30:83-90.
32. Rueggeberg F, Margeson D. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990;69:1652-1658.
33. Sadeghi M. Microleakage comparison of three types of adhesive systems versus GIC-based adhesive in class V composite restorations. JDMT 2016;5:86-93.
34. Baygin O KF, Arslan I. Effects of different types of adhesive systems on the microleakage of compomer restorations in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser in primary teeth. Dent Mater J 2012;31:20614.
35. Delme K, Deman P, De Moor R. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation. J Oral Rehab 2005;32:676-685.
36. da Cunha Mello FS-T, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Sealing ability of eight resin bonding systems in a Class II restoration after mechanical fatiguing. Dent Mater 1997;13:372-376.
37. Santini A, Mitchell S. Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage. Am J Dent 1998;11:219-224.
38. Santini A, Mitchell S. Microleakage of composite restorations bonded with three new dentin bonding agents. J Esthet Restor Dent 1998;10:296-304.
39. Owens B, Johnson W. Effect of single step adhesives on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composites. Oper Dent 2007;32:67-72.
40. Santini A, Ivanovic V, Ibbetson R, Milia E. Influence of cavity configuration on microleakage around class v restorations bonded with seven self etching adhesives. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:128-135.

APA	Gömleksiz S, Göktolga Akın E (2021). DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES. , 10 - 20. 10.7126/cumudj.747021
Chicago	Gömleksiz Seda,Göktolga Akın Emine Gülşah DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES. (2021): 10 - 20. 10.7126/cumudj.747021
MLA	Gömleksiz Seda,Göktolga Akın Emine Gülşah DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES. , 2021, ss.10 - 20. 10.7126/cumudj.747021
AMA	Gömleksiz S,Göktolga Akın E DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES. . 2021; 10 - 20. 10.7126/cumudj.747021
Vancouver	Gömleksiz S,Göktolga Akın E DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES. . 2021; 10 - 20. 10.7126/cumudj.747021
IEEE	Gömleksiz S,Göktolga Akın E "DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES." , ss.10 - 20, 2021. 10.7126/cumudj.747021
ISNAD	Gömleksiz, Seda - Göktolga Akın, Emine Gülşah. "DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES". (2021), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.747021

APA	Gömleksiz S, Göktolga Akın E (2021). DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 24(1), 10 - 20. 10.7126/cumudj.747021
Chicago	Gömleksiz Seda,Göktolga Akın Emine Gülşah DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 24, no.1 (2021): 10 - 20. 10.7126/cumudj.747021
MLA	Gömleksiz Seda,Göktolga Akın Emine Gülşah DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , vol.24, no.1, 2021, ss.10 - 20. 10.7126/cumudj.747021
AMA	Gömleksiz S,Göktolga Akın E DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2021; 24(1): 10 - 20. 10.7126/cumudj.747021
Vancouver	Gömleksiz S,Göktolga Akın E DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2021; 24(1): 10 - 20. 10.7126/cumudj.747021
IEEE	Gömleksiz S,Göktolga Akın E "DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES." Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 24, ss.10 - 20, 2021. 10.7126/cumudj.747021
ISNAD	Gömleksiz, Seda - Göktolga Akın, Emine Gülşah. "DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES". Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 24/1 (2021), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.747021