INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REPAIR PROTOCOLS AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO POLYMER- INFILTRATED CERAMIC NETWORK MATERIAL
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 37 - 46 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7126/cumudj.802118 İndeks Tarihi: 09-08-2022
INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REPAIR PROTOCOLS AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO POLYMER- INFILTRATED CERAMIC NETWORK MATERIAL
Öz: Objectives:The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of different repair protocols and artificial aging on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a composite to polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN). Materials and methods: A total of 120 PICN (Vita Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik) specimens were prepared, artificially aged (5000 thermal cycles between 5°C-55°C), and assigned to 5 repair protocols: (1)TS: tribochemical silica coating (Rocatec Soft; 3M ESPE)+Single Bond Universal (SBU; 3M ESPE) (2)ES: etching with hydrofluoric acid (HF; Bisco)+SBU (3)EU:HF+Ultradent Porcelain Repair (UPRS; Ultradent Products Inc.) (4)GU: grinding with diamond bur (G)+UPRS (5)GI:G+Ivoclar Vivadent Ceramic Repair (Ivoclar Vivadent). All specimens received a composite resin cylinder (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic,Kuraray) formed with a silicone mold (4mm diameter, 2mm height) to simulate repair. Then, 2 subgroups were composed according to the artificial aging procedures as baseline and aging (5000 thermal cycles between 5°C-55°C) (n=12). The SBS tests were performed by using a universal testing machine. Failure types were classified as cohesive failure in PICN, cohesive failure in composite, adhesive,and mixed. The SBS data were analyzed with 1-way ANOVA, factorial ANOVA, LSD, and Duncan tests (α=0.05). Failure modes were calculated as a percentage for each group. Results:The baseline results showed that the mean SBS values for ES and GU were higher than TS (p<0.05). Considering artificially aged groups, ES showed higher SBS than EU and GU (p<0.05). SBS values for ES, EU, and GU groups decreased significantly after the artificial aging procedure compared to baseline (p<0.05). At baseline, the dominant failure mode was cohesive in PICN for all groups and no adhesive failures were observed for ES and GU groups. However, after aging, the only group that did not show adhesive failure was ES. Conclusions: Considering the time-efficiency and effectiveness, etching with HF followed by Single Bond Universal application can be recommended as the intraoral repair protocol for PICN.
Anahtar Kelime: Farklı Onarım Protokollerinin ve Yapay Yaşlandırmanın Kompozitin Polimer-İnfiltre Seramik Ağ Materyaline Bağlanma Kuvvetine Etkisi
Öz: Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı onarım protokollerinin ve yapay yaşlandırmanın PICN malzemesinin onarımında kullanılan kompozitin kayma bağlantı dayanımı (SBS) üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Toplam 120 PICN (Vita Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik) numunesi hazırlandı, yapay olarak yaşlandırıldı (5°C ile 55°C arasında 5000 termal döngü) ve 5 onarım protokolüne göre gruplandı: (1) TS: tribokimyasal silika kaplama (Rocatec Soft; 3M ESPE)+Single Bond Universal (SBU; 3M ESPE) (2) ES: hidroflorik asit ile pürüzlendirme (HF; Bisco)+SBU (3) EU: HF +Ultradent Porselen Onarım Sistemi (UPRS; Ultradent Products Inc.) (4) GU: elmas frezle aşındırma (G)+UPRS (5) GI: G +Ivoclar Vivadent Seramik Onarım Sistemi (Ivoclar Vivadent AG). Onarımı simüle etmek amacıyla tüm örneklere silikon bir kalıpla (4 mm çap, 2 mm yükseklik) oluşturulmuş kompozit silindirler (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic, Kuraray) uygulandı. Daha sonra yapay yaşlandırma prosedürüne göre başlangıç ve yaşlandırma (5 ° C ile 55 ° C arasında 5000 termal döngü) olarak 2 alt grup oluşturuldu (n = 12). SBS testleri universal test cihazı kullanılarak gerçekleştirildi. Başarısızlık tipleri PICN içinde koheziv, kompozit içinde koheziv, adeziv ve karışık olarak sınıflandırıldı. SBS verileri istatistiksel olarak tek yönlü ANOVA, faktöryel ANOVA, LSD ve Duncan testleri ile analiz edildi. (α=0.05) Başarısızlık tipleri her grup için yüzde olarak hesaplandı. Bulgular: Başlangıç sonuçları, ES ve GU için ortalama SBS değerlerinin TS'den daha yüksek olduğunu gösterdi (p<0.05). Yapay olarak yaşlandırılmış gruplara bakıldığında ES grubu EU ve GU'dan daha yüksek SBS gösterdi (p<0.05). ES, EU ve GU grupları için SBS değerleri, suni yaşlandırmadan sonra başlangıca göre önemli ölçüde azaldı (p<0.05). Başlangıçta, dominant başarısızlık modu tüm gruplar için PICN içinde kohezifti ve ES ve GU grupları için adezif başarısızlık gözlenmedi. Bununla birlikte, yaşlandırmadan sonra adezif başarısızlık göstermeyen tek grup ES idi. Sonuçlar: Zaman verimliliği ve etkinlik göz önüne alındığında, HF ile aşındırmanın ardından Single Bond Universal uygulaması PICN için ağız içi onarım protokolü olarak önerilebilir.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
- 1. Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res 2016;60:72-84.
- 2. Ustun O, Buyukhatipoglu IK, Secilmis A. Shear bond strength of repair systems to new CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthodont 2018;27:748-754.
- 3. Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:587-593.
- 4. Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, Iwasaki N, Asakawa Y, Oki M, Finger WJ, Arksornnukit M. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J 2014;33:705-710.
- 5. Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1141-1150.
- 6. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic network materials. Dent Mater 2013;29:419-426.
- 7. Elsaka SE. Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems. Dent Mater J 2015;34:161-167.
- 8. Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high- temperature polymerization. Dent Mater 2012;28:529-534.
- 9. Silva P, Martinelli-Lobo CM, Bottino MA, Melo RM, Valandro LF. Bond strength between a polymer- infiltrated ceramic network and a composite for repair: Effect of several ceramic surface treatments. Braz Oral Res 2018;32:e28.
- 10. Nguyen JF, Ruse D, Phan AC, Sadoun MJ. High- temperature-pressure polymerized resin-infiltrated ceramic networks. J Dent Res 2014;93:62-67.
- 11. Della Bona A, Corazza PH, Zhang Y. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic- network material. Dent Mater 2014;30:564-569.
- 12. Al-Turki L, Merdad Y, Abuhaimed TA, Sabbahi D, Almarshadi M, Aldabbagh R. Repair bond strength of dental computer-aided design/computer-aided manufactured ceramics after different surface treatments. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;32:726-733.
- 13. Ramos Nde C, Campos TM, Paz IS, Machado JP, Bottino MA, Cesar PF, Melo RM. Microstructure characterization and SCG of newly engineered dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2016;32:870-878.
- 14. Subasi MG, Alp G. Repair bond strengths of non- aged and aged resin nanoceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:364-370.
- 15. Hickel R, Brushaver K, Ilie N. Repair of restorations--criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater 2013;29:28-50.
- 16. Reston EG, Filho SC, Arossi G, Cogo RB, Rocha Cdos S, Closs LQ. Repairing ceramic restorations: final solution or alternative procedure? Oper Dent 2008;33:461-466.
- 17. Blum IR, Nikolinakos N, Lynch CD, Wilson NH, Millar BJ, Jagger DC. An in vitro comparison of four intra-oral ceramic repair systems. J Dent 2012;40:906- 912.
- 18. Queiroz JR, Souza RO, Nogueira Junior L, Jr., Ozcan M, Bottino MA. Influence of acid-etching and ceramic primers on the repair of a glass ceramic. Gen Dent 2012;60:e79-85.
- 19. Sismanoglu S, Yildirim-Bilmez Z, Erten-Taysi A, Ercal P. Influence of different surface treatments and universal adhesives on the repair of CAD-CAM composite resins: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:e231-e239.
- 20. Veríssimo AH, Duarte Moura DM, de Oliveira Dal Piva AM, Bottino MA, de Fátima Dantas de Almeida L, da Fonte Porto Carreiro A, de Assunção E Souza RO. Effect of different repair methods on the bond strength of resin composite to CAD/CAM materials and microorganisms adhesion: An in situ study. J Dent 2020;93:103266.
- 21. Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N. Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:299-308.
- 22. Arpa C, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV, Perdigão J. Repair bond strength and nanoleakage of artificially aged CAD-CAM composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:523-530.
- 23. Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GA, Bottino MA. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater 2007;23:1276-1282.
- 24. Loomans BA, Mesko ME, Moraes RR, Ruben J, Bronkhorst EM, Pereira-Cenci T, Huysmans MC. Effect of different surface treatment techniques on the repair strength of indirect composites. J Dent 2017;59:18-25.
- 25. Ho GW, Matinlinna JP. Evaluation of the Microtensile Bond Strength between Resin Composite and Hydrofluoric Acid Etched Ceramic in Different Storage Media. J Adhes Sci Technol 2011;25:2671-2685.
- 26. Ho GW, Matinlinna JP. Insights on Ceramics as Dental Materials. Part II: Chemical Surface Treatments. Silicon 2011;3:117-123.
- 27. Campos F, Almeida CS, Rippe MP, de Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Resin Bonding to a Hybrid Ceramic: Effects of Surface Treatments and Aging. Oper Dent 2016;41:171-178.
- 28. Wu X, Xie H, Meng H, Yang L, Chen B, Chen Y, Chen C. Effect of tribochemical silica coating or multipurpose products on bonding performance of a CAD/CAM resin-based material. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019;90:417-425.
- 29. Sismanoglu S, Gurcan AT, Yildirim-Bilmez Z, Turunc-Oguzman R, Gumustas B. Effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2020;12:22-32.
- 30. Javidi H, Tickle M, Aggarwal VR. Repair vs replacement of failed restorations in general dental practice: factors influencing treatment choices and outcomes. Br Dent J 2015;218:e2.
- 31. Demirel G, Baltacioglu IH. Influence of different universal adhesives on the repair performance of hybrid CAD-CAM materials. Restor Dent Endod 2019;44:e23.
- 32. Zaghloul H, Elkassas DW, Haridy MF. Effect of incorporation of silane in the bonding agent on the repair potential of machinable esthetic blocks. Eur J Dent 2014;8:44-52.
- 33. Awad MM, Albedaiwi L, Almahdy A, Khan R, Silikas N, Hatamleh MM, Alkhtani FM, Alrahlah A. Effect of universal adhesives on microtensile bond strength to hybrid ceramic. BMC Oral Health 2019;19:178.
- 34. Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Yamauti M, Pashley DH, Tay F. Durability of resin- dentin bonds: effects of direct/indirect exposure and storage media. Dent Mater 2007;23:885-892.
- 35. Sirisha K, Rambabu T, Ravishankar Y, Ravikumar P. Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:420-426.
| APA | Oguz E, Çiçekci G (2021). INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REPAIR PROTOCOLS AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO POLYMER- INFILTRATED CERAMIC NETWORK MATERIAL. , 37 - 46. 10.7126/cumudj.802118 |
| Chicago | Oguz Ece Irem,Çiçekci Gökhan INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REPAIR PROTOCOLS AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO POLYMER- INFILTRATED CERAMIC NETWORK MATERIAL. (2021): 37 - 46. 10.7126/cumudj.802118 |
| MLA | Oguz Ece Irem,Çiçekci Gökhan INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REPAIR PROTOCOLS AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO POLYMER- INFILTRATED CERAMIC NETWORK MATERIAL. , 2021, ss.37 - 46. 10.7126/cumudj.802118 |
| AMA | Oguz E,Çiçekci G INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REPAIR PROTOCOLS AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO POLYMER- INFILTRATED CERAMIC NETWORK MATERIAL. . 2021; 37 - 46. 10.7126/cumudj.802118 |
| Vancouver | Oguz E,Çiçekci G INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REPAIR PROTOCOLS AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO POLYMER- INFILTRATED CERAMIC NETWORK MATERIAL. . 2021; 37 - 46. 10.7126/cumudj.802118 |
| IEEE | Oguz E,Çiçekci G "INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REPAIR PROTOCOLS AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO POLYMER- INFILTRATED CERAMIC NETWORK MATERIAL." , ss.37 - 46, 2021. 10.7126/cumudj.802118 |
| ISNAD | Oguz, Ece Irem - Çiçekci, Gökhan. "INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REPAIR PROTOCOLS AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO POLYMER- INFILTRATED CERAMIC NETWORK MATERIAL". (2021), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.802118 |
| APA | Oguz E, Çiçekci G (2021). INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REPAIR PROTOCOLS AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO POLYMER- INFILTRATED CERAMIC NETWORK MATERIAL. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 24(1), 37 - 46. 10.7126/cumudj.802118 |
| Chicago | Oguz Ece Irem,Çiçekci Gökhan INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REPAIR PROTOCOLS AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO POLYMER- INFILTRATED CERAMIC NETWORK MATERIAL. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 24, no.1 (2021): 37 - 46. 10.7126/cumudj.802118 |
| MLA | Oguz Ece Irem,Çiçekci Gökhan INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REPAIR PROTOCOLS AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO POLYMER- INFILTRATED CERAMIC NETWORK MATERIAL. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , vol.24, no.1, 2021, ss.37 - 46. 10.7126/cumudj.802118 |
| AMA | Oguz E,Çiçekci G INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REPAIR PROTOCOLS AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO POLYMER- INFILTRATED CERAMIC NETWORK MATERIAL. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2021; 24(1): 37 - 46. 10.7126/cumudj.802118 |
| Vancouver | Oguz E,Çiçekci G INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REPAIR PROTOCOLS AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO POLYMER- INFILTRATED CERAMIC NETWORK MATERIAL. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2021; 24(1): 37 - 46. 10.7126/cumudj.802118 |
| IEEE | Oguz E,Çiçekci G "INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REPAIR PROTOCOLS AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO POLYMER- INFILTRATED CERAMIC NETWORK MATERIAL." Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 24, ss.37 - 46, 2021. 10.7126/cumudj.802118 |
| ISNAD | Oguz, Ece Irem - Çiçekci, Gökhan. "INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REPAIR PROTOCOLS AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO POLYMER- INFILTRATED CERAMIC NETWORK MATERIAL". Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 24/1 (2021), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.802118 |
