Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 88 - 95 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7126/cumudj.855065 İndeks Tarihi: 10-08-2022

INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT LED CURING-UNITS ON DEPTH OF CURE AND MICRO-HARDNESS OF NANO-HYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE

Öz:
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of two second generation LED Light curing units and a third-generation polywave LED Ligth curing unit at three different irradiation durations on surface microhardness and detpth of cure of nano-hybrid composite resin material. Materials and Methods: EliparTM S10, EliparTM Deep Cure-S, VALO Cordless, was evaluated at 10s, 20s, 40s curing periods in this study. A nano-hybrid composite FiltekTM Z550 that contains camphorquinone as photoinitiator is used as test material. For microhardness test ninety 6 mm diameter, 4 mm deep cylindrical composite blocks in teflon molds were prepared. For each light source at each application times 10 specimen were prepared (n=10) and tested. Also ninety, 4 mm diameter, 6 mm deep cylindrical composite specimens in a split aluminum mold polymerized with three different light sources at three different durations (n=10) were tested for depth of cure measurement. Data were analyzed statistically by SPSS (Ver: 22.0) one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons were performed by Tukey’s post- hoc test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The values of cure depth were found significantly higher at 40 seconds of irradiation time for all light sources used (p<0.05). Elipar Deep Cure-S showed the higher top surface microhardness at 40s polymerization (p<0.05) Conclusions: All light devices used in the study provided adequate polymerization of the nano-hybrid composite at all application durations in this study. The highest polymerization depth and microhardness values were achieved at 40 sec. polymerization time for all LCUs.
Anahtar Kelime: Light Curing Unit Depth of Cure Micro-Hardness Deep Cure-S

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • 1. Firouzmandi M, Doozandeh M, Jowkar Z, Abbasi S. Effect of composite/amalgam thickness on fracture resistance of maxillary premolar teeth, restored with combined amalgam-composite restorations. J Clin Exp Dent 2016;8:e268-272.
  • 2. Kemaloglu H, Pamir T, Tezel H. A 3-year randomized clinical trial evaluating two different bonded posterior restorations: Amalgam versus resin composite. Eur J Dent 2016;10:16-22.
  • 3. Dietschi D, Marret N, Krejci I. Comparative efficiency of plasma and halogen light sources on composite micro-hardness in different curing conditions. Dent Mater 2003;19:493-500.
  • 4. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Clinical effectiveness ofdirect class II restorations - a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 2012;14:407-431.
  • 5. Sunnegardh-Gronberg K, van Dijken JW, Funegard U, Lindberg A, Nilsson M. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden. J Dent 2009;37:673-678.
  • 6. Rho YJ, Namgung C, Jin BH, Lim BS, Cho BH. Longevity of direct restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities: a retrospective study. Oper Dent 2013;38:572-582.
  • 7. Rasines Alcaraz MG, Veitz-Keenan A, Sahrmann P, Schmidlin PR, Davis D, Iheozor-Ejiofor Z. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;3.
  • 8. Hammouda IM. Effect of light-curing method on wear and hardness of composite resin. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2010;3:216-222.
  • 9. Ferracane JL, Berge HX, Condon JR. In vitro aging of dental composites in water--effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;42:465-472.
  • 10. Haenel T, Hausnerova B, Steinhaus J, Price RB, Sullivan B, Moeginger B. Effect of the irradiance distribution from light curing units on the local micro-hardness of the surface of dental resins. Dent Mater 2015;31:93-104.
  • 11. Jandt KD, Mills RW. A brief history of LED photopolymerization. Dent Mater 2013;29:605-617.
  • 12. Gonulol N, Ozer S, Tunc ES. Effect of a third-generation LED LCU on microhardness of tooth- colored restorative materials. Int J Paediatr Dent 2016;26:376-382.
  • 13. Yaman BC, Efes BG, Dorter C, Gomec Y, Erdilek D, Buyukgokcesu S. The effects of halogen and light-emitting diode light curing on the depth of cure and surface microhardness of composite resins. J Conserv Dent 2011;14:136-139.
  • 14. Tsai PC, Meyers IA, Walsh LJ. Depth of cure and surface microhardness of composite resin cured with blue LED curing lights. Dent Mater 2004;20:364-369.
  • 15. de Oliveira DC, Rocha MG, Correa IC, Correr AB, Ferracane JL, Sinhoreti MA. The effect of combining photoinitiator systems on the color and curing profile of resin-based composites. Dent Mater 2016;32:1209-1217.
  • 16. Shimokawa CA, Turbino ML, Harlow JE, Price HL, Price RB. Light output from six battery operated dental curing lights. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2016;69:1036-1042.
  • 17. Agrawal A, Manwar NU, Hegde SG, Chandak M, Ikhar A, Patel A. Comparative evaluation of surface hardness and depth of cure of silorane and methacrylate-based posterior composite resins: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2015;18:136-139.
  • 18. Menees TS, Lin CP, Kojic DD, Burgess JO, Lawson NC. Depth of cure of bulk fill composites with monowave and polywave curing lights. Am J Dent 2015;28:357-361.
  • 19. Alshali RZ, Silikas N, Satterthwaite JD. Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventional resin-composites at two time intervals. Dent Mater 2013;29:e213-217.
  • 20. Mousavinasab SM, Meyers I. Comparison of Depth of Cure, Hardness and Heat Generation of LED and High Intensity QTH Light Sources. Eur J Dent 2011;5:299-304.
  • 21. MM AL, Haenel T, Sullivan B, Labrie D, Alqahtani MQ, Price RB. Effect of a broad-spectrum LED curing light on the Knoop microhardness of four posterior resin based composites at 2, 4 and 6-mm depths. J Dent 2016;45:14-18.
  • 22. de Moraes Porto IC, Ramos de Brito AC, Parolia A. Effect of cross infection control barriers used on the light-curing device tips on the cure depth of a resin composite. J Conserv Dent 2013;16:224-228.
  • 23. Leprince J, Devaux J, Mullier T, Vreven J, Leloup G. Pulpal-temperature rise and polymerization efficiency of LED curing lights. Oper Dent 2010;35:220-230.
  • 24. Roberts HW, Berzins DW, Charlton DG. Hardness of three resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials as a function of depth and time. J Esthet Restor Dent 2009;21:262-272.
  • 25. Campregher UB, Samuel SM, Fortes CB, Medina AD, Collares FM, Ogliari FA. Effectiveness of second-generation light-emitting diode (LED) light curing units. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007;8:35-42.
  • 26. Hürmüzlü F, Kılıç V. Analysis of Monomer Elution from Bulk-fill and Nanocomposites Cured with Different Light Curing Units Using High Performance Liquid Chromatography. J Photopolym Sci Technol 2020;33:27-36.
  • 27. Kilic V, Hürmüzlü F. Effect of Light Sources on Bond Strength of Different Composite Resins Repaired with Bulk-Fill Composite. Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2021;23:103-115.
  • 28. Shimokawa CAK, Turbino ML, Giannini M, Braga RR, Price RB. Effect of light curing units on the polymerization of bulk fill resin-based composites. Dent Mater 2018;34:1211-1221.
APA KAPTAN A, Kaya S, Eren D (2021). INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT LED CURING-UNITS ON DEPTH OF CURE AND MICRO-HARDNESS OF NANO-HYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE. , 88 - 95. 10.7126/cumudj.855065
Chicago KAPTAN ALPER,Kaya Seher,Eren Diğdem INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT LED CURING-UNITS ON DEPTH OF CURE AND MICRO-HARDNESS OF NANO-HYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE. (2021): 88 - 95. 10.7126/cumudj.855065
MLA KAPTAN ALPER,Kaya Seher,Eren Diğdem INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT LED CURING-UNITS ON DEPTH OF CURE AND MICRO-HARDNESS OF NANO-HYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE. , 2021, ss.88 - 95. 10.7126/cumudj.855065
AMA KAPTAN A,Kaya S,Eren D INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT LED CURING-UNITS ON DEPTH OF CURE AND MICRO-HARDNESS OF NANO-HYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE. . 2021; 88 - 95. 10.7126/cumudj.855065
Vancouver KAPTAN A,Kaya S,Eren D INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT LED CURING-UNITS ON DEPTH OF CURE AND MICRO-HARDNESS OF NANO-HYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE. . 2021; 88 - 95. 10.7126/cumudj.855065
IEEE KAPTAN A,Kaya S,Eren D "INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT LED CURING-UNITS ON DEPTH OF CURE AND MICRO-HARDNESS OF NANO-HYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE." , ss.88 - 95, 2021. 10.7126/cumudj.855065
ISNAD KAPTAN, ALPER vd. "INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT LED CURING-UNITS ON DEPTH OF CURE AND MICRO-HARDNESS OF NANO-HYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE". (2021), 88-95. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.855065
APA KAPTAN A, Kaya S, Eren D (2021). INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT LED CURING-UNITS ON DEPTH OF CURE AND MICRO-HARDNESS OF NANO-HYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 24(1), 88 - 95. 10.7126/cumudj.855065
Chicago KAPTAN ALPER,Kaya Seher,Eren Diğdem INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT LED CURING-UNITS ON DEPTH OF CURE AND MICRO-HARDNESS OF NANO-HYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 24, no.1 (2021): 88 - 95. 10.7126/cumudj.855065
MLA KAPTAN ALPER,Kaya Seher,Eren Diğdem INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT LED CURING-UNITS ON DEPTH OF CURE AND MICRO-HARDNESS OF NANO-HYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , vol.24, no.1, 2021, ss.88 - 95. 10.7126/cumudj.855065
AMA KAPTAN A,Kaya S,Eren D INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT LED CURING-UNITS ON DEPTH OF CURE AND MICRO-HARDNESS OF NANO-HYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2021; 24(1): 88 - 95. 10.7126/cumudj.855065
Vancouver KAPTAN A,Kaya S,Eren D INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT LED CURING-UNITS ON DEPTH OF CURE AND MICRO-HARDNESS OF NANO-HYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2021; 24(1): 88 - 95. 10.7126/cumudj.855065
IEEE KAPTAN A,Kaya S,Eren D "INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT LED CURING-UNITS ON DEPTH OF CURE AND MICRO-HARDNESS OF NANO-HYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE." Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 24, ss.88 - 95, 2021. 10.7126/cumudj.855065
ISNAD KAPTAN, ALPER vd. "INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT LED CURING-UNITS ON DEPTH OF CURE AND MICRO-HARDNESS OF NANO-HYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE". Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 24/1 (2021), 88-95. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.855065