COMPARISON OF TWO AEROSOL-FREE CARIES REMOVAL METHODS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 266 - 273 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7126/cumudj.920058 İndeks Tarihi: 10-08-2022
COMPARISON OF TWO AEROSOL-FREE CARIES REMOVAL METHODS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
Öz: Objectives: The management of deep caries lesions in immature permanent molars can be challenging in clinical practice, but minimally invasive caries removal methods can maintain apexogenesis by preventing extensive tissue loss. Here we compare a chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) gel and polymer bur in terms of time spent on caries removal, patient acceptability, and clinical success. Materials and Methods: The teeth of 30 children were randomly divided into two groups. The duration of each method, the level of cooperation during each method, and the child’s choice of caries removal method were recorded. Patients were followed at six-month intervals for at least two years. Results: The difference between the patients’ preferences was not statistically significant, while the average caries removal time of the polymer bur method was significantly shorter (p<0.05) than the CMCR method. The rates of apical closure without pathology in the CMCR and polymer bur groups were 63.2% and 73.7%, respectively; 10% of each group underwent further treatment due to their clinical and/or radiographic pathology. Conclusions: These methods were thought to serve as an interim treatment in managing immature permanent teeth with deep caries. Furthermore, these methods, which do not involve water cooling, can minimize the risk of contamination and cross-infection.
Anahtar Kelime: Aerosol İçermeyen İki Farklı Çürük Temizleme Yönteminin Karşılaştırılması-Bölünmüş Ağız Randomize Klinik Çalışma
Öz: Amaç: Kök gelişimini tamamlamamış daimi azı dişlerinde görülen derin çürük lezyonlarının tedavisi klinik pratikte zorlayıcı olabilmektedir. Minimal girişimsel çürük temizleme yöntemleri, gereksiz doku kaybını önleyerek apeksogenezin sürdürülmesine olanak vermektedir. Bu çalışmada, kemo-mekanik çürük temizleme jeli ve polimer frez, çürüğün tamamen uzaklaştırılması için harcanan süre, hasta kabul edilebilirliği ve klinik başarı açısından karşılaştırılmaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Otuz çocuk hastanın çift taraflı çürük azı dişleri rastgele iki gruba ayrılmıştır. Klinik prosedürlerin uygulanma süresi, işlem sırasındaki kooperasyon düzeyi ve çocuğun çürük temizleme yöntemi arasındaki seçimi kaydedilmiştir. Hastalar 6 aylık aralıklarla en az 2 yıl olacak şekilde takip edilmiştir. Bulgular: Hastaların tercihleri arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmamıştır, polimer frez ile çürük temizleme yönteminin ortalama süresi anlamlı olarak daha kısadır (p<0,05). Çürük temizleme jeli ve polimer frez gruplarında patoloji görülmeksizin kök ucu kapanma oranları sırasıyla % 63,2 ve % 73,7 iken, her grubun % 10'una klinik ve/veya radyografik patoloji nedeniyle ek tedaviler uygulanmıştır. Sonuçlar: Bu yöntemlerin, derin çürük kavitesine sahip ve kök ucu kapanmamış kalıcı dişlerin tedavisinde geçici bir tedavi görevi görebileceği düşünülmektedir. Ayrıca, su soğutması içermeyen bu yöntemler çapraz enfeksiyon riskini anlamlı derecede azaltmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
- 1. Da Mota A, Leal C, Olivan S, et al. Case Report of Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Dental Caries on Primary Teeth. J Lasers Med Sci Spring. 2016;7(2):131-133.
- 2. Divya G, Prasad M, Vasa A, Vasanthi D, Ramanarayana B, Mynampati P. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Caries Removal Using Polymer Bur, Stainless Steel Bur, Carisolv, Papacarie - An Invitro Comparative Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(7):42-46.
- 3. Chowdhry S, Saha S, Samadi F, Jaiswal J, Garg A, Chowdhry P. Recent vs Conventional Methods of Caries Removal: A Comparative in vivo Study in Pediatric Patients. ’Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;8(1):6-11.
- 4. Ge Z, Yang L, Xia J, Fu X, Zhang Y. Possible aerosol transmission of COVID-19 and special precautions in dentistry. J Zhejiang Univ B. 2020;21(5):361-368.
- 5. Maru V, Kumar A, Badiyani B, Sharma A, Sharma J, Dobariya C. Behavioral changes in preschoolers treated with/without rotary instruments. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014;4(2):77-81.
- 6. Boob A, Manjula M, Reddy E, Srilaxmi N, Rani T. Evaluation of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Minimally Invasive Methods of Caries Removal: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014;7(1):11-18.
- 7. Hernandéz-Gatón P, Serrano C, Nelson Filho P, et al. Stepwise Excavation Allows Apexogenesis in Permanent Molars with Deep Carious Lesions and Incomplete Root Formation. Caries Res. 2015;49(6):637-639.
- 8. AAPD. Guideline on Pulp Therapy for Primary and Immature Permanent Teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38(6):280-288.
- 9. Schwendicke F, Dörfer C, Paris S. Incomplete caries removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ’J Dent Res. 2013;92(4):306-314.
- 10. Jawa D, Singh S, Somani R, Jaidka S, Sirkar K, R J. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal agent (Papacarie) and conventional method of caries removal: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010;28(2):73-77.
- 11. Torresi V, Bsereni L. Effectiveness of the atraumatic caries removal method using papain. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 2017;71(3):266-269.
- 12. Turgut Coşgun M, Tulga Öz F. Current Developments in Chemomechanical Caries Removal Method. Turkiye Klin J Dent Sci. 2019;25(3):344-350.
- 13. Frankl S, Shiere F, Fogels H. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory? J Dent Child. 1962;29:150-163.
- 14. Maltz M, Koppe B, Jardim JJ, et al. Partial caries removal in deep caries lesions: a 5-year multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(3):1337-1343.
- 15. Ajram J, Khalil I, Gergi R, Zogheib C. Management of an Immature Necrotic Permanent Molar with Apical Periodontitis Treated by Regenerative Endodontic Protocol Using Calcium Hydroxide and MM-MTA: A Case Report with Two Years Follow Up. Dent J. 2019;7(1):1.
- 16. Jacobsen T, Norlund A, Englund GS, Tranæus S. Application of laser technology for removal of caries: A systematic review of controlled clinical trials. Acta Odontol Scand. 2011;69(2):65-74.
- 17. Peruchi C, Santos-Pinto L, Santos-Pinto A, Barbosa e Silva E. Evaluation of cutting patterns produced in primary teeth by an air-abrasion system. Quintessence Int. 2002;33(4):279-283. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/11989377
- 18. Aswathi K, Rani S, Athimuthu A, Prasanna P, Patil P, Deepali K. Comparison of efficacy of caries removal using polymer bur and chemomechanical caries removal agent: A clinical and microbiological assessment - An in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017;35(1):6-13.
- 19. Banerjee A. Minimal intervention dentistry: part 7. Minimally invasive operative caries management: rationale and techniques. Br Dent J. 2013;214(3):107-111.
- 20. Alkhouli MM, Al Nesser SF, Bshara NG, AlMidani AN, Comisi JC. Comparing the efficacies of two chemo mechanical caries removal agents (2.25% sodium hypochlorite gel and brix 3000), in caries removal and patient cooperation: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent. 2020;93:103280.
- 21. Aswathi Kk, Rani Sp, Athimuthu A, Prasanna P, Patil P, Deepali K. Comparison of efficacy of caries removal using polymer bur and chemomechanical caries removal agent: A clinical and microbiological assessment - An in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017;35(1):6.
- 22. ALLEN KL, SALGADO TL, JANAL MN, THOMPSON VP. Removing carious dentin using a polymer instrument without anesthesia versus a carbide bur with anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(5):643- 651.
- 23. Schwendicke F, Leal S, Schlattmann P, et al. Selective carious tissue removal using subjective criteria or polymer bur: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (SelecCT). BMJ Open. 2018;8(12):e022952.
- 24. Lohmann J, Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. Histological determination of cariously altered collagen after dentin caries excavation with the polymer bur PolyBur P1 in comparison to a conventional bud bur. Head Face Med. 2019;15(1):19.
- 25. Mahdi M, Haidar A. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Caries Removal Using Papain Gel (Brix 3000) and Smart Preparation Bur(in vivo Comparative Study). J Pharm Sci Res. 2019;11:444-449.
- 26. Inamdar M, Chole D, Bakle S, Gandhi N, Hatte N, Rao M. Comparative evaluation of BRIX3000, CARIE CARE, and SMART BURS in caries excavation: An in vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2020;23(2):163.
- 27. Pozos-Guillén A, Chavarría-Bolaños D, Garrocho- Rangel A. Split-mouth design in Paediatric Dentistry clinical trials. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017;18(1):61-65.
- 28. A R J, Choudhar K, R V. Clinical and Microbiological Evaluation of Caries Removal Using Brix 3000 Gel, Polymer Bur and Laser Technique in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study. Acta Sci Dent Scienecs. 2020;4:105-111.
- 29. Dammaschke T, Rodenberg TN, Schäfer E, Ott KHR. Efficiency of the Polymer Bur SmartPrep Compared with Conventional Tungsten Carbide Bud Bur in Dentin Caries Excavation. Oper Dent. 2006;31(2):256-260.
- 30. Somani R, Jaidka S, Singh DJ, Chaudhary R. Comparative Microbiological Evaluation after Caries Removal by Various Burs. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;12(6):524-527.
- 31. Motta LJ, Bussadori SK, Campanelli AP, et al. Pain during Removal of Carious Lesions in Children: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Int J Dent. 2013;2013:1-4.
- 32. Gatón Hernandéz P, Serrano CR, Silva LAB, et al. Minimally interventive restorative care of teeth with molar incisor hypomineralization and open apex—A 24 month longitudinal study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2020;30(1):4-10.
| APA | Duman C, Kalaoglu E, sirinoglu capan b, EGIL E (2021). COMPARISON OF TWO AEROSOL-FREE CARIES REMOVAL METHODS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. , 266 - 273. 10.7126/cumudj.920058 |
| Chicago | Duman Canan,Kalaoglu Elif Ece,sirinoglu capan belen,EGIL EDIBE COMPARISON OF TWO AEROSOL-FREE CARIES REMOVAL METHODS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. (2021): 266 - 273. 10.7126/cumudj.920058 |
| MLA | Duman Canan,Kalaoglu Elif Ece,sirinoglu capan belen,EGIL EDIBE COMPARISON OF TWO AEROSOL-FREE CARIES REMOVAL METHODS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. , 2021, ss.266 - 273. 10.7126/cumudj.920058 |
| AMA | Duman C,Kalaoglu E,sirinoglu capan b,EGIL E COMPARISON OF TWO AEROSOL-FREE CARIES REMOVAL METHODS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. . 2021; 266 - 273. 10.7126/cumudj.920058 |
| Vancouver | Duman C,Kalaoglu E,sirinoglu capan b,EGIL E COMPARISON OF TWO AEROSOL-FREE CARIES REMOVAL METHODS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. . 2021; 266 - 273. 10.7126/cumudj.920058 |
| IEEE | Duman C,Kalaoglu E,sirinoglu capan b,EGIL E "COMPARISON OF TWO AEROSOL-FREE CARIES REMOVAL METHODS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL." , ss.266 - 273, 2021. 10.7126/cumudj.920058 |
| ISNAD | Duman, Canan vd. "COMPARISON OF TWO AEROSOL-FREE CARIES REMOVAL METHODS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL". (2021), 266-273. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.920058 |
| APA | Duman C, Kalaoglu E, sirinoglu capan b, EGIL E (2021). COMPARISON OF TWO AEROSOL-FREE CARIES REMOVAL METHODS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 24(3), 266 - 273. 10.7126/cumudj.920058 |
| Chicago | Duman Canan,Kalaoglu Elif Ece,sirinoglu capan belen,EGIL EDIBE COMPARISON OF TWO AEROSOL-FREE CARIES REMOVAL METHODS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 24, no.3 (2021): 266 - 273. 10.7126/cumudj.920058 |
| MLA | Duman Canan,Kalaoglu Elif Ece,sirinoglu capan belen,EGIL EDIBE COMPARISON OF TWO AEROSOL-FREE CARIES REMOVAL METHODS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , vol.24, no.3, 2021, ss.266 - 273. 10.7126/cumudj.920058 |
| AMA | Duman C,Kalaoglu E,sirinoglu capan b,EGIL E COMPARISON OF TWO AEROSOL-FREE CARIES REMOVAL METHODS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2021; 24(3): 266 - 273. 10.7126/cumudj.920058 |
| Vancouver | Duman C,Kalaoglu E,sirinoglu capan b,EGIL E COMPARISON OF TWO AEROSOL-FREE CARIES REMOVAL METHODS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2021; 24(3): 266 - 273. 10.7126/cumudj.920058 |
| IEEE | Duman C,Kalaoglu E,sirinoglu capan b,EGIL E "COMPARISON OF TWO AEROSOL-FREE CARIES REMOVAL METHODS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL." Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 24, ss.266 - 273, 2021. 10.7126/cumudj.920058 |
| ISNAD | Duman, Canan vd. "COMPARISON OF TWO AEROSOL-FREE CARIES REMOVAL METHODS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL". Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 24/3 (2021), 266-273. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.920058 |
