Idealized Family Types: Turkey 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks from 1978 to 2018

Ahmed Emin OSMANOĞLU, (Bingöl Üniversitesi, Bingöl,Türkiye)
Mustafa ŞEKER, (Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Gülsüm ŞEN (Bingöl Üniversitesi, Bingöl,Türkiye)
OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi
1 0
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 45 Sayfa Aralığı: 50 - 68 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.26466/opusjsr.1063230 İndeks Tarihi: 15-08-2022

Idealized Family Types: Turkey 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks from 1978 to 2018

Öz:
The aim of this study is to investigate the family phenomenon included in the 5th-grade social studies textbooks published in Turkey between the years 1978-2018. This study was structured according to a qualitative research approach. The holistic multi-state pattern of this approach was preferred. The data sources of the study were chosen from the purposeful sampling methods in accordance with the critical case sampling. The data were collected according to the document analysis method. The analysis method of the research is content analysis. While the analysis was carried out, frequency and categorical analysis techniques, which are among the content analysis techniques, were employed. The following results were obtained in the study: In the interfamilial relations category, division of labour and responsibilities in the family, sharing, democracy, solidarity, special days, communication, discipline and control were included. Women were rather associated with shopping and children. In addition to these, women's motherhood and emotionality, feeding the family, and artistic spirit of women were also included. 1990 and 2010 textbooks focused on the legal status of the family. Islam and family relations were included only in 2000. The most abundant data on family functions were included in the 2018 textbook. Family types were not included in the textbooks of 1978, 1990 and 2000. In 2010 and 2018 textbooks, extended family was mentioned most.
Anahtar Kelime: Family Textbook Content Analysis Social Studies

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. & Yıldırım, E. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri SPSS uygulamalı [Research Methods in Social Sciences SPSS Applied] İstanbul: Sakarya Publishing.
  • Baltacı, A. (2019). Social system theory and its effects on educational organizations. Journal of Civilization Studies, 3(1), 1-19.
  • Başol, S., Ünal, F. Azer, H., Yıldız, A. & Evirgen, Ö. F. (2010). İlköğretim sosyal bilgiler ders kitabı 5. [Elementary social studies textbook 5] İstanbul: Ministry of National Education.
  • Bayırlı, H. (2018). Values education in the context of life science lesson: Giving importance to family unity (Unpublished master's thesis). Sakarya University, Sakarya.
  • Berg, B. L. & Lune, H. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. [Qualitative research methods for the social sciences] (Trans. Eds. Hasan Aydın). Konya: Eğitim Publishing.
  • Bilgin, N. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde içerik analizi teknikler ve örnek çalışmalar. [Content analysis techniques and case studies in social sciences] Ankara: Siyasal Publishing.
  • Bilgin, S. (2019). Gender in secondary schools social studies textbook (Unpublished master's thesis). Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E.,
  • Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2020). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods in education.] (28th Edition). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
  • Can, İ. (2014). Moderniteden postmoderniteye ailenin ontolojisi ya da modern çekirdek aile çerezleşiyor mu? [Is the ontology of the family or the modern nuclear family being cookie from modernity to postmodernity?] Mustafa Aydın (Ed.), in Aile sosyolojisi yazıları [Family sociology articles] (p.51- 83). İstanbul: Açılım Kitap.
  • Canatan, K. & Ergün, Y. (2016). Aile hakkında kuramsal perspektifler. [Theoretical perspectives on the family] Mustafa Aydın. (Ed.), in Aile sosyolojisi [Family sociology] (p.31-50). İstanbul: Açılım Kitap.
  • Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Pub.
  • Çayır, K. (2014). Ders kitaplarında insan hakları III projesi: Tarama sonuçları “Biz” kimiz? Ders kitaplarında kimlik, yurttaşlık, haklar. [Human Rights III project in textbooks: Screening results Who are “we”? Identity, citizenship, rights in textbooks] İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Publications.
  • Çeçen, M. A. (2015). Türkçe ders kitaplarında toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri. [Gender roles in Turkish course books] Duygu Uçgun, Ahmet Balcı (Eds.), in Akademik hayatının 25. yılında Türkçe eğitimi alanının ilk profesörü Prof. Dr. Murat Özbay’a armağan [The gift to the Professor Murat Özbay, who is the first professor in Turkish education field, in the 25th year of his academic life] (p.211-229). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
  • Çelik, H. (2016). The reflections of Turkish woman’s image on the current social studies textbooks. Turkish History Educational Journal, 5(1), 263- 279.
  • Çimen, C. A. & Bayhan, S. (2019). Değişen ders kitaplarında sekülerizm ve toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği araştırması-II. [Secularism and Gender Equality in Changing Textbooks Survey Final Report] (Location not specified): Comparative Education Society Publications.
  • Demirci, S. & Köseli, M. (2011). İkincil veri ve içerik analizi. [Secondary data and content analysis] Kaan Böke (Ed.), in Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri [Research methods in social sciences] (p.319-364). İstanbul: Alfa.
  • Ekiz, D. (2003). Eğitimde araştırma yöntem ve metotlarına giriş. [Introduction to research methods in education] Ankara: Anı.
  • Ertan, T. (2018). Science fiction, ideology and family: Family as an ideological narrative element in Hollywood cinema (Unpublished master’s thesis). Fırat University, Elazığ.
  • Genç, T. (2001). Toplumsal iş bölümü. [Social division of labour] Education and Science, 15(80), 48-56.
  • Gholami, H., Dehghani, Y. and Behroozi, M. (2018). Analysis of social studies textbook of elementary school sixth grade for national citizen applicability. International Journal of Philosophy and Social-Psychological Sciences, 4(2), 16.
  • Gökçe, O. (2006). İçerik analizi, kuramsal ve pratik bilgiler. [Content analysis, theoretical and practical information] İstanbul: Siyasal Publishing.
  • Güçlü, S. (2012). Aileye ilişkin kuramsal yaklaşımlar. [Theoretical approaches to the family] Nurşen Adak. (Ed.), in Değişen toplumda değişen aile [Changing family in a changing society] (p.65-92). Ankara: Siyasal Publishing.
  • Güneş, H. N. (2018). Feminist akımlarda aile. [Family in feminist currents] Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(3), 142-153.
  • Helvacıoğlu (Gümüşoğlu), F. (1994). 1928’den 1994’e ders kitaplarında cinsiyetçilik. [Sexism in textbooks from 1928 to 1994] (Unpublished master's thesis). İstanbul University, İstanbul.
  • İnal, K. (2004). Eğitim ve iktidar: Türkiye'de ders kitaplarında demokratik ve milliyetçi değerler.[ Education and power: Democratic and nationalist values in textbooks in Turkey] Ankara: Ütopya Publishing.
  • İnal, K. (2008). Eğitim ve ideoloji. [Education and ideology] İstanbul: Kalkedon Publishing.
  • Kara, K. Vural, İ. & Kaman, N. (2000). İlkokul Sosyal Bilgiler Ders Kitabı 5. [Primary School Social Studies Textbook 5] Ankara: Ministry of National Education.
  • Karadağ, Ş. (2015). The role of i̇nto family communication in marital adjustment: Case of Konya (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Selçuk University, Konya.
  • Kasapoğlu, A. (2012). Sosyolojik yaklaşımlar temelinde aile kuramları. [Family theories on the basis of sociological approaches] Aytül Kasapoğlu and Nadide Karkıner (Eds.), in Aile sosyolojisi [Family sociology] (p.2-28). Anadolu University, Eskişehir.
  • Keskin, D. (2017). The change i̇n the percepti̇ve of reli̇gi̇ous educati̇on i̇n the fami̇ly i̇n the peri̇od of change from tradi̇ti̇onal fami̇ly into modern fami̇ly (Unpublished master’s thesis). Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale.
  • Kır, İ. (2011). The functions of family as a social institution. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 10(36), 381-404.
  • Koyuncu, A. A. (2013). Aile kurumu ve ailenin tanımı. [Family institution and definition of family] Mustafa Aydın (Ed.). in Sistematik aile sosyolojisi [Systematic family sociology] (p.17-36). Konya: Çizgi publishing.
  • Krippendorf, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodolgy. (4th edition) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded form case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Miles, M.B., Huberman, A. M. (2019). Nitel veri analizi [Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook] (Trans. from 2th edition). Sadegül Akbaba Altun and Ali Ersoy (Trans. Eds.). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
  • Ministry of National Education, (1990). İlkokullar için sosyal bilgiler 5. [Social studies for primary schools 5] Ankara: Ministry of National Education State Books.
  • Official Gazette, (2012). “Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Ders Kitapları ve Eğitim Araçları Yönetmeliği”, [Ministry of National Education Textbooks and Education Tools Regulation] 12 September 2012, number: 28409.
  • Oktik, N. (2018). Aile ve toplum: Sosyolojik yaklaşımlar. [Family and society: Sociological approaches] Nurgün Oktik, Halime Ünal Reşitoğlu (Eds.), in Aileyi anlamak-Disiplinler arası yaklaşım [Understanding the family-Interdisciplinary approach] (p.1-30). Ankara: Nobel.
  • Ozer, D. A., Karatas, Z. & Ergun, O. E. (2019). Analysis of gender roles in primary school (1st to 4th Grade) Turkish textbooks. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 79(2019), 1-20.
  • Özkan, T. & Özkan, Z. S. (2018). Investigation of texts and images in life science textbooks in terms of values. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 6(1), 172-204.
  • Özmeriç Taştekin, G. (2019). Gender representations in primary school textbooks: A quantitative content analysis (Unpublished master’s thesis). İstanbul University, İstanbul.
  • Patton, M.Q. (2018). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri [ Qualitative evaluation and research methods] (Translate from 3th edition). Mesut Bütün and Selçuk Beşir Demir (Trans. Eds.). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
  • Sanır, F. Asal, T. & Akşit, N. (1978). Sosyal bilgiler 5. [Social studies 5] İstanbul: State Books.
  • Sönmez, K. (2020). Analysis of primary school social studies textbook in terms of gender (Unpublished master’s thesis). Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir.
  • Şahin, E. (2018). Ortaokul ve imam hatip ortaokul sosyal bilgiler 5. [Secondary school and “imam hatip” secondary school social studies 5] Ankara: Anadol Publishing.
  • Şeker, M. (2014). Aile ve kadın temalarının sosyal bilgiler ders kitaplarında veriliş biçimlerinin incelenmesi: Nitel bir araştırma. [Examining the ways in which family and women themes are presented in social studies textbooks: A qualitative research] Folklore/Literature, 20(78), 107-120.
  • Toruk, İ. (2005). The representation of the social- economical environment and the cultural life in Turkey between 1990-2000 through advertisements. The Journal of Institute Social Sciences, 14, 493-50
  • Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
  • Zhao, W., Zhang, Z., Liu, J. (2017). The “Family” section in current elementary social studies textbooks in China. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(10), 54-59.
APA Osmanoğlu A, SEKER M, Şen G (2022). Idealized Family Types: Turkey 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks from 1978 to 2018. , 50 - 68. 10.26466/opusjsr.1063230
Chicago Osmanoğlu Ahmed Emin,SEKER MUSTAFA,Şen Gülsüm Idealized Family Types: Turkey 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks from 1978 to 2018. (2022): 50 - 68. 10.26466/opusjsr.1063230
MLA Osmanoğlu Ahmed Emin,SEKER MUSTAFA,Şen Gülsüm Idealized Family Types: Turkey 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks from 1978 to 2018. , 2022, ss.50 - 68. 10.26466/opusjsr.1063230
AMA Osmanoğlu A,SEKER M,Şen G Idealized Family Types: Turkey 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks from 1978 to 2018. . 2022; 50 - 68. 10.26466/opusjsr.1063230
Vancouver Osmanoğlu A,SEKER M,Şen G Idealized Family Types: Turkey 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks from 1978 to 2018. . 2022; 50 - 68. 10.26466/opusjsr.1063230
IEEE Osmanoğlu A,SEKER M,Şen G "Idealized Family Types: Turkey 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks from 1978 to 2018." , ss.50 - 68, 2022. 10.26466/opusjsr.1063230
ISNAD Osmanoğlu, Ahmed Emin vd. "Idealized Family Types: Turkey 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks from 1978 to 2018". (2022), 50-68. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1063230
APA Osmanoğlu A, SEKER M, Şen G (2022). Idealized Family Types: Turkey 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks from 1978 to 2018. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 19(45), 50 - 68. 10.26466/opusjsr.1063230
Chicago Osmanoğlu Ahmed Emin,SEKER MUSTAFA,Şen Gülsüm Idealized Family Types: Turkey 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks from 1978 to 2018. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi 19, no.45 (2022): 50 - 68. 10.26466/opusjsr.1063230
MLA Osmanoğlu Ahmed Emin,SEKER MUSTAFA,Şen Gülsüm Idealized Family Types: Turkey 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks from 1978 to 2018. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol.19, no.45, 2022, ss.50 - 68. 10.26466/opusjsr.1063230
AMA Osmanoğlu A,SEKER M,Şen G Idealized Family Types: Turkey 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks from 1978 to 2018. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2022; 19(45): 50 - 68. 10.26466/opusjsr.1063230
Vancouver Osmanoğlu A,SEKER M,Şen G Idealized Family Types: Turkey 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks from 1978 to 2018. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2022; 19(45): 50 - 68. 10.26466/opusjsr.1063230
IEEE Osmanoğlu A,SEKER M,Şen G "Idealized Family Types: Turkey 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks from 1978 to 2018." OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 19, ss.50 - 68, 2022. 10.26466/opusjsr.1063230
ISNAD Osmanoğlu, Ahmed Emin vd. "Idealized Family Types: Turkey 5th Grade Social Studies Textbooks from 1978 to 2018". OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi 19/45 (2022), 50-68. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1063230
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
18-04-2024 4:1

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları