Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 72 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 251 - 258 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/forestist.2022.21028 İndeks Tarihi: 30-08-2022

Functional Features and Benefits of Residential Gardens: The Case of İstanbul (European Side)

Öz:
This article investigates the extent to which residential gardens affect human welfare in Istanbul (the European side). The developing technology, population growth, and immigration are factors which expose the city of Istanbul to intense construction. Consequently, the gardens in the houses located at the center of Istanbul are decreasing day by day, limiting outdoor activities for the residents, and affecting them physically and mentally. In this study, a questionnaire was applied to 400 people in Istanbul’s European side to investigate the extent to which residential gardens affect human well-being. These questionnaires were applied according to five-point Likert scales and the results were analyzed in the SPSS program by applying correlation analysis. The data obtained from the applied questionnaires were analyzed in the SPSS program. As a result of the analysis, it was concluded that residential gardens have a positive influence on the physical and psychological development of people, and also contribute to the protection of nature and biological diversity. Statistically, it has been determined that people mostly use their gardens in the summer months (49.30%) and on the weekends, and spend an average of 0–2 hours (57.50%) in their gardens. In addition, these analyses were associated with participant characteristics such as age (18–25, 26–30, 31–40, 41–50, 51–60, 60 and older), gender (female/male), socioeconomic status (occupation and income) and social demography (change in population). As a result, this study showed that residential gardens in urban areas contribute significantly to people and nature, that more garden areas should be added to the residences to be built in urban areas, and that these areas should be designed in a functional and sustainable way for people to benefit from nature in the best way.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • • Akdeniz, N. S., & Çelik, A. (2017). Evaluation of the opportunities offered by open-green spaces for urban users: Kocaeli/Turkey Sample. Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry, 19(1), 32–40.
  • • Altınçekiç, H., & Şentürk, E. (2017). Changes in home gardens and investigation of current trends during the Turkish Republic Era. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Architecture Sciences and Applications, 2(2), 42–59.
  • • Batman, Z. P., Özer, P., & Ayaz, E. (2019). The evaluation of ecology-based tourism potential in coastal villages in accordance with landscape values and user demands: The Bursa-Mudanya-Kumyaka case. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 26(2), 166–178. [CrossRef]
  • • Beer, A. R. (1991). Urban design: The growing influence of environmental psychology. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(4), 359–371. [CrossRef]
  • • Cervinka, R., Roderer, K., & Hammerle, I. (2014). Evaluation of hospital gardens and implications for design: Benefits from environmental psychology for architecture and landscape planning. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 31(1), 43–56.
  • • Çoban, S., Yener, Ş. D., & Bayraktar, S. (2021). Woody plant composition and diversity of urban green spaces in Istanbul, Turkey. Plant Biosystems: An International Journal Dealing with All Aspects of Plant Biology, 155(1), 83–91. [CrossRef]
  • • Dönmez, Y., Özyavuz, M., & Gökyer, E. (2015). Determination of green areas of residential and site areas of Safranbolu city. İnonu University Journal of Art and Design, 5(11), 1–12.
  • • Erdem, E. (2008). Evaluation of houses with swot analysis according to Maslow’s needs hierarchy theory [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Ankara: Ankara University, Institute of Science and Technology.
  • • Ertin, D. G. (2011). Garden arrangements of traditional Edirne houses [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Edirne: Trakya University, Institute of Science.
  • • Gagliardi, C., & Piccinini, F. (2019). The use of nature-based activities for the well-being of older people: An integrative literature review. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 83, 315–327. [CrossRef]
  • • Gürel, A., & Gündüz, A. E. (2011). A research on the ecological structure of Istanbul. Journal of Marmara Social Research, 1, 1–12.
  • • Herzog, T. R. (1989). A cognitive analysis of preference for urban nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9(1), 27–43. [CrossRef]
  • • Jonveaux, T. R., Batt, M., Fescharek, R., Benetos, A., Trognon, A., Bah Chuzeville, S., Pop, A., Jacob, C., Yzoard, M., Demarche, L., Soulon, L., Malerba, G., & Bouvel, B. (2013). Healing gardens and cognitive behavioral units in the management of Alzheimer’s disease patients: The Nancy experience. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease , 34(1), 325–338. [CrossRef]
  • • Kaplan, R. (1973). Some psychological benefits of gardening. Environment and Behavior, 5(2), 145–162. [CrossRef]
  • • Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • • Kellett, J. E. (1982). The private garden in England and Wales. Landscape Planning, 9(2), 105–123. [CrossRef]
  • • Kendle, A. D., & Rohde, C. R. E. (1995). Relative importance of uncontrolled and ordered nature for people in urban areas. In J. De Waal (Ed.), Ecological aspect of green areas in urban environments (p. 5.5558). Vereniging Voor Openbaar Groen, Bruge: Proceedings of the 1995 IFPRA World Conference.
  • • Kiyota, E., & Oliver Selfridge, J. O. (2004). Eden alternative: The experience of residents in an “Edenized” nursing home. Proceedings of the international conference on urban horticulture. Acta Horticulture, 643(643), 215–219. [CrossRef]
  • • Koçhan, A. (2003). Semantic connection with the natural environment: Sustainable housing design. Structor Journal, 256, 49–55.
  • • Lewis, C. A. (1990). Gardening as healing process. In M. Francis & R. T. Hester (Eds.), The meaning of gardens: Idea, place and action (pp. 244–251). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • • Lewis, C. A. (1992). Effects of plants and gardening in creating interpersonal and community well-being. In D. Relf (Ed.), The role of horticulture in human well-being and social development (pp. 55–66). Oregon: Timber Press.
  • • Loram, A., Thompson, K., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2008). Urban domestic gardens (XII): The richness and composition of the flora in five UK cities. Journal of Vegetation Science, 19(3), 321–330. [CrossRef]
  • • Lundquist K. (2000). Bider till kännedom om begreppet trädgård ochom trädgårdsväxternas historia i Sverige. Rapport. Alnarp: Landskapsplanering Enstitüsü, 2000(1).
  • • Meneghello, F., Marcassa, G., Koch, I., Sgaravatti, P., Piccolomini, B., Righetto, C., Gianquinto, G. P., & Orsini, F. (2016). Garden therapy in neurorehabilitation: Well-being and skills improvement. XXIX. International Horticultural Congress on Horticulture: Sustaining lives, livelihoods and landscapes (IHC2014): XII. International People Plant Symposium: Horticulture and human communities. Acta Horticulture, 1121, 13–18.
  • • Milligan, C., Gatrell, A., & Bingley, A. (2004). ‘Cultivating health’: Therapeutic landscapes and older people in northern England. Social Science and Medicine, 58(9), 1781–1793. [CrossRef]
  • • Ozdamar, K. (2002). Statistical data analysis with package programs (4th ed.). Eskisehir: Kaan Publishing.
  • • Öztürk, S., & Özdemir, Z. (2013). The effect of urban open and green areas on quality of life “the case of Kastamonu”. Kastamonu University, Journal of Faculty of Forestry, 13(1), 109–116.
  • • Parry-Jones, W. L. I. (1990). Natural landscape, psychological well-being and mental health. Landscape Research, 15(2), 7–11. [CrossRef]
  • • Righetto, C., Prosdocimi Gianquinto, G., Orsini, F., Meneghello, F., Marcassa, G., Koch, I., Sgaravatti, P., & Piccolomini, B. (2016). Realization of a neurorehabilitation therapeutic garden: Design criteria and horticultural choices. Acta Horticulturae, 1121(1121), 51–58. [CrossRef]
  • • Sağlık, E., & Kelkit, A. (2019). Determination of urban identity components by city dwellers: Çanakkale city case study. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Journal of Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, 5(1), 63–79.
  • • Şahin, C. K. (2008). A Study on the Investigation of Herbal Materials in Isparta City Center Residential Gardens, [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Isparta: Suleyman Demirel University, Institute of Science.
  • • Sanrkowicz, H. (2003). The history of gardens and parks. (pp. 8–21). Ankara: Dost Publishing House.
  • • Siriphanich, S., Wachiratrungsalid, P., Tepwongsirirat, P., & Chaipivaporn, N. (2016). Landscape element application guidelines for physical therapy exercise. XXIX. International Horticultural Congress on Horticulture: Sustaining lives, Livelihoods and Landscapes (IHC2014): XII. International People Plant Symposium: Horticulture and human Communities. Acta Horticulture, 1121, 69–78.
  • • Stigsdotter, A. (2005). Landscape architecture and health. Evidence-based health-promoting design and planning [Doctoral thesis]. Alnarp: Faculty of Landscape Planning, Horticulture and Agricultural Science, Department of Landscape Planning, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
  • • The General Directorate of Meteorology. (2021). Retrieved from https ://ww w.mgm .gov. tr/ve rideg erlen dirme /il-v e-ilc eler- istat istik .aspx ?m=IS TANBU L. Accessed on 13 November 2020.
  • • TUIK. (2018). Retrieved from https ://eg ezege n.com /yasa m/ist anbul -avru pa-ve -anad olu-y akasi -nufu s-far klari /. Accessed on 05 April 2020.
  • • Turan, İ., Şimşek, Ü., & Aslan, H. (2015). The use and analysis of Likert scale and Likert-type questions in educational research. Sakarya University, Journal of Education Faculty, 30, 186–203.
  • • Ulrich, R. S. (1991). Effects of health facility interior design on wellness: Theory and scientific research. Journal of Health Care Design, 3, 97–109
APA Bozkurt S, Yener Ş, seyidoglu akdeniz n (2022). Functional Features and Benefits of Residential Gardens: The Case of İstanbul (European Side). , 251 - 258. 10.5152/forestist.2022.21028
Chicago Bozkurt Selvinaz Gülçin,Yener Ş. Doğanay,seyidoglu akdeniz nilufer Functional Features and Benefits of Residential Gardens: The Case of İstanbul (European Side). (2022): 251 - 258. 10.5152/forestist.2022.21028
MLA Bozkurt Selvinaz Gülçin,Yener Ş. Doğanay,seyidoglu akdeniz nilufer Functional Features and Benefits of Residential Gardens: The Case of İstanbul (European Side). , 2022, ss.251 - 258. 10.5152/forestist.2022.21028
AMA Bozkurt S,Yener Ş,seyidoglu akdeniz n Functional Features and Benefits of Residential Gardens: The Case of İstanbul (European Side). . 2022; 251 - 258. 10.5152/forestist.2022.21028
Vancouver Bozkurt S,Yener Ş,seyidoglu akdeniz n Functional Features and Benefits of Residential Gardens: The Case of İstanbul (European Side). . 2022; 251 - 258. 10.5152/forestist.2022.21028
IEEE Bozkurt S,Yener Ş,seyidoglu akdeniz n "Functional Features and Benefits of Residential Gardens: The Case of İstanbul (European Side)." , ss.251 - 258, 2022. 10.5152/forestist.2022.21028
ISNAD Bozkurt, Selvinaz Gülçin vd. "Functional Features and Benefits of Residential Gardens: The Case of İstanbul (European Side)". (2022), 251-258. https://doi.org/10.5152/forestist.2022.21028
APA Bozkurt S, Yener Ş, seyidoglu akdeniz n (2022). Functional Features and Benefits of Residential Gardens: The Case of İstanbul (European Side). FORESTIST, 72(3), 251 - 258. 10.5152/forestist.2022.21028
Chicago Bozkurt Selvinaz Gülçin,Yener Ş. Doğanay,seyidoglu akdeniz nilufer Functional Features and Benefits of Residential Gardens: The Case of İstanbul (European Side). FORESTIST 72, no.3 (2022): 251 - 258. 10.5152/forestist.2022.21028
MLA Bozkurt Selvinaz Gülçin,Yener Ş. Doğanay,seyidoglu akdeniz nilufer Functional Features and Benefits of Residential Gardens: The Case of İstanbul (European Side). FORESTIST, vol.72, no.3, 2022, ss.251 - 258. 10.5152/forestist.2022.21028
AMA Bozkurt S,Yener Ş,seyidoglu akdeniz n Functional Features and Benefits of Residential Gardens: The Case of İstanbul (European Side). FORESTIST. 2022; 72(3): 251 - 258. 10.5152/forestist.2022.21028
Vancouver Bozkurt S,Yener Ş,seyidoglu akdeniz n Functional Features and Benefits of Residential Gardens: The Case of İstanbul (European Side). FORESTIST. 2022; 72(3): 251 - 258. 10.5152/forestist.2022.21028
IEEE Bozkurt S,Yener Ş,seyidoglu akdeniz n "Functional Features and Benefits of Residential Gardens: The Case of İstanbul (European Side)." FORESTIST, 72, ss.251 - 258, 2022. 10.5152/forestist.2022.21028
ISNAD Bozkurt, Selvinaz Gülçin vd. "Functional Features and Benefits of Residential Gardens: The Case of İstanbul (European Side)". FORESTIST 72/3 (2022), 251-258. https://doi.org/10.5152/forestist.2022.21028