Comparing Urban Parks’ Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey

Hüseyin ÖGÇE, (İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Elif ŞATIROĞLU, (Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi, Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümü, Rize, Türkiye)
Fatih BEKİRYAZICI, (Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi, Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümü, Rize, Türkiye)
Deryanur DİNÇER (Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi, Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümü, Rize, Türkiye)
FORESTIST
4 1
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 72 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 266 - 274 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.54614/forestist.2022.21038 İndeks Tarihi: 30-08-2022

Comparing Urban Parks’ Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey

Öz:
Plant diversity is critical to regulating the urban ecosystem and offers myriad positive benefits in a logical and well-planned structure. This article aims to demonstrate the woody plant diversity of the selected urban parks and their importance for the urban ecosystem. As a material, seven urban parks were selected from different locations in Turkey, located in Aydın, Istanbul, Kayseri, Samsun, Rize, Trabzon, and Van. In methodology, we recorded the plants’ families and species and calculated the diversity and dissimilarity values of the selected urban parks through Shannon (α) and Whittaker (β) indexes on the Paleontological Statistics and Biodiversity Component Calculation Software programs. The results showed that 71 plant species belonging to 32 families were recorded, and the most dominant families were Pinaceae and Rosaceae. As a result of planting design styles, the non-native woody plant species were higher than the native ones. Moreover, the alpha diversity of seven parks was 0.4099 (Park I), 1.931 (Park II), 1.936 (Park III), 2.564 (Park IV), 2.622 (Park V), 2.124 (Park VI), and 1.881 (VII) values. On the other hand, the beta results showed that the highest similarity value (1 − dissimilarity) was 0.28 between Parks IV and V. In conclusion, there were huge differences among the selected parks concerning plant biodiversity because of limited native plants usage.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • • Acar, C., Acar, H., & Eroğlu, E. (2007). Evaluation of ornamental plant resources to urban biodiversity and cultural changing: A case study of residential landscapes in Trabzon city (Turkey). Building and Environment, 42(1), 218–229. [CrossRef]
  • • Alizadeh, B., & Hitchmough, J. D. (2020). Designing sustainable urban landscape and meeting the challenge of climate change: A study of plant species adaptation and fitness under different climate change scenarios in public landscape of UK. Landscape Research, 45(2), 228–246. [CrossRef]
  • • Asik, Y., & Kara, B. (2021). Variation in avian diversity in relation to plant species in urban parks of Aydin, Turkey. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 19(3), 2013–2035. [CrossRef]
  • • Askan, G., & Yılmaz, H. (2016). Erzincan Kenti açık-yeşil Alanlarında Kullanılan Bitkisel Materyalin Belirlenmesi. Erzincan Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 2016. [CrossRef]
  • • Avcı, M. (1993). Türkiye’nin flora böl geleri ve Anadolu diagonali ne coğrafi bir yaklaşım. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi, 28, 225–248.
  • • Baruch, Z., Liddicoat, C., Cando-dumancela, C., Laws, M., Weinstein, P., Young, J., & Breed, M. F. (2020). Increased plant species richness associates with greater soil bacterial diversity in urban green spaces. Environmental Research, 110425. [CrossRef]
  • • Choudhury, M. A. M., Marcheggiani, E., Despini, F., Costanzini, S., Rossi, P., Galli, A., & Teggi, S. (2020). Urban tree species identification and carbon stock mapping for urban green planning and management. Forests, 11(11), 1226. [CrossRef]
  • • Çoban, S., Doğanay, Y. Ş., & Bayraktar, S. (2020). Woody plant composition and diversity of urban green spaces in Istanbul, Turkey. Plant Biosystems, 155(1), 83–91. [CrossRef]
  • • Cowling, R. M., Rundel, P. W., Lamont, B. B., Kalin Arroyo, M. K., & Arianoutsou, M. (1996). Plant diversity in Mediterranean-climate regions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11(9), 362–366. [CrossRef]
  • • Czortek, P., & Pielech, R. (2020). Surrounding landscape influences functional diversity of plant species in urban parks. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 47, 126525. [CrossRef]
  • • Dadvand, P., Gascon, M., & Markevych, I. (2019). Green spaces and child health and development. In Biodiversity and health in the face of climate change (pp. 121–132). Springer Nature.
  • • Damialis, A., Traidl-Hoffmann, C., & Treudler, R. (2019). Climate change and pollen allergies. In Biodiversity and health in the face of climate change (1st ed, pp. 47–66). Springer Nature.
  • • Daniels, B., Jedamski, J., Ottermanns, R., & Ross-Nickoll, M. (2020). A “plan bee” for cities: Pollinator diversity and plant-pollinator interactions in urban green spaces. PLoS ONE, 15(7), e0235492. [CrossRef]
  • • Davis, P. H., & Hedge, I. C. (1975). The Flora of Turkey: Past, present and future. Candollea, 30, 331–351.
  • • de Vries, S., & Snep, R. (2019). Biodiversity in the context of ‘biodiversity – mental health’ research. In Biodiversity and health in the face of climate change (1st ed, pp. 159–174). Springer Nature.
  • • Deniz, B., & Sirin, U. (2010). A study of ecological integrity based on native plants in Kusadasi (Turkey) urban area and surrounding natural environment. Scientific Research and Essays, 5(14), 1820–1828.
  • • Dunn, C. P. (2017). Biological and cultural diversity in the context of botanic garden conservation strategies. Plant Diversity, 39(6), 396–401. [CrossRef]
  • • Ergüner, Y., Kumar, J., Hoffman, F. M., Dalfes, H. N., & Hargrove, W. W. (2019). Mapping ecoregions under climate change: A case study from the biological ‘crossroads’ of three continents, Turkey. Landscape Ecology, 34(1), 35–50. [CrossRef]
  • • Gogoi, A., Ahirwal, J., & Sahoo, U. K. (2021). Plant biodiversity and carbon sequestration potential of the planted forest in Brahmaputra flood plains. Journal of Environmental Management, 280, 111671. [CrossRef]
  • • Grant, C. (2012). Analogies and links between cultural and biological diversity. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 2(2), 153–163. [CrossRef]
  • • Güler, B. (2020). Plant species diversity and vegetation in urban grasslands depending on disturbance levels. Biologia, 75(9), 1231–1240. [CrossRef]
  • • Gülsoy, S., & Özkan, K. (2008). Importance of biodiversity from the ecological standpoint and some diversity indexes. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 1, 168–178.
  • • Güner, A. (2012). Türkiye Bitkileri listesi (1st ed). ANG Vakfı. kitabına ait ISBN no: 978-605-60425-7-7, İl: İstanbul pp. 1290.
  • • Guo, Q. F., Fei, S. L., Shen, Z. H., Iannone, B. V., Knott, J., & Chown, S. L. (2018). A global analysis of elevational distribution of non-native versus native plants. Journal of Biogeography, 45(4), 793–803. [CrossRef]
  • • He, Z. S., & He, W. M. (2020). Asymmetric climate warming does not benefit plant invaders more than natives. Science of the Total Environment, 742, 140624. [CrossRef]
  • • IUCN. (2021). Turkey. Retrieved from https://www.iucn.org/regions/europe. Access Date: 24.06.2021.
  • • Jochum, M., Fischer, M., Isbell, F., Roscher, C., van der Plas, F., Boch, S., Boenisch, G., Buchmann, N., Catford, J. A., Cavender-Bares, J., Ebeling, A., Eisenhauer, N., Gleixner, G., Hölzel, N., Kattge, J., Klaus, V. H., Kleinebecker, T., Lange, M., Le Provost, G., Meyer, S., … Manning, P. (2020). The results of biodiversity– ecosystem functioning experiments are realistic. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 4(11), 1485–1494. [CrossRef]
  • • Kadereit, G., & Freitag, H. (2011). Molecular phylogeny of Camphorosmeae (Camphorosmoideae, Chenopodiaceae): Implications for biogeography, evolution of C4-photosynthesis and taxonomy. Taxon, 60(1), 51–78. [CrossRef] • Keten, A., Eroglu, E., Kaya, S., & Anderson, J. T. (2020). Bird diversity along a riparian corridor in a moderate urban landscape. Ecological Indicators, 118, 106751. [CrossRef]
  • • Koricho, H. H., Shumi, G., Gebreyesus, T., Song, S., & Fufa, F. (2021). Woody plant species diversity and composition in and around Debre Libanos church forests of North Shoa Zone of Oromiya, Ethiopia. Journal of Forestry Research, 32(5), 1929–1939. [CrossRef]
  • • Li, E., Parker, S. S., Pauly, G. B., Randall, J. M., Brown, B. V., & Cohen, B. S. (2019). An urban biodiversity assessment framework that combines an urban habitat classification scheme and citizen science data. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 277. [CrossRef]
  • • Li, X., Jia, B., Zhang, W., Ma, J., & Liu, X. (2020). Woody plant diversity spatial patterns and the effects of urbanization in Beijing, China. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 56, 126873. [CrossRef]
  • • Lindley, S. J., Cook, P. A., Dennis, M., & Gilchrist, A. (2019). Biodiversity, physical health and climate change: A synthesis of recent evidence. In Biodiversity and health in the face of climate change (1st ed, pp. 17–46). Springer Nature.
  • • Meyer-Grandbastien, A., Burel, F., Hellier, E., & Bergerot, B. (2020). A step towards understanding the relationship between species diversity and psychological restoration of visitors in urban green spaces using landscape heterogeneity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 195, 103728. [CrossRef]
  • • Muthulingam, U., & Thangavel, S. (2012). Density, diversity and richness of woody plants in urban green spaces: A case study in Chennai metropolitan city. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 11(4), 450–459. [CrossRef]
  • • Nilon, C. H., Aronson, M. F. J., Cilliers, S. S., Dobbs, C., Frazee, L. J., Goddard, M. A., O’Neill, K. M. O., Roberts, D., Stander, E. K., Werner, P., Winter, M., & Yocom, K. P. (2017). Planning for the future of urban biodiversity: A global review of city-scale initiatives. BioScience, 67(4), 332–342. [CrossRef]
  • • Özkan, K., Küçüksille, E. U., Mert, A., Gülsoy, S., Süel, H., & Başar, M. (2020). Biyolojik Çeşitlilik Bileşenleri (BİÇEB) hesaplama yazılımı. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 21, 344–348.
  • • Öztürk, M., Yücel, E., Yargı, C., Çelik, A., & Aksoy, A. (1998). Plant diversity in the Turkish Black Sea region and strategies for its conservation. In Conservation of tile biological diversity as a prerequisite for sustainable development in tile Black Sea Region (pp. 155–173). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • • Pilania, P. K., Gujar, R. V., & Panchal, N. S. (2014). Carbon sequestration by different tree species in tropical dry deciduous forest of Panchmahal District (Gujarat) in India. Environment Conservation Journal, 15(3), 101–107. [CrossRef]
  • • Rudov, A., Mashkour, M., Djamali, M., & Akhani, H. (2020). A review of C4 plants in southwest Asia: An ecological, geographical and taxonomical analysis of a region with high diversity of C4 eudicots. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 546518. [CrossRef]
  • • Saifuddin, M., Osman, N., & Khandakera, M. M. (2020). Carbon sink and biochemical potentially of two legume tree species. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 32(3), 217–226. [CrossRef]
  • • Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423. [CrossRef]
  • • Silveira, C. S., Oliveira, L. De, & Talamini, E. (2020). Which species perform best in carbon sequestration and storage in planted forests? A review of the potential of Pinus and Eucalyptus. International Forestry Review, 22(4), 544–557. [CrossRef]
  • • Solon, J. (1996). The biological diversity of vegetational landscapes: Problems with evaluation. In A. Breymeyer, et al. (Eds.), Biodiversity conservation in transboundary protected areas (pp. 15–24). National Academy Press. [CrossRef]
  • • Stas, M., Aerts, R., Hendrickx, M., Dendoncker, N., Dujardin, S., Linard, C., Nawrot, T., Van Nieuwenhuyse, A., Aerts, J., Van Orshoven, J., & Somers, B. (2020). An evaluation of species distribution models to estimate tree diversity at genus level in a heterogeneous urban-rural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 198, 103770. [CrossRef]
  • • Swan, C. M., Johnson, A., & Nowak, D. J. (2017). Differential organization of taxonomic and functional diversity in an urban woody plant metacommunity. Applied Vegetation Science, 20(1), 7–17. [CrossRef]
  • • Talal, M. L., & Santelmann, M. V. (2020). Vegetation management for urban park visitors: A mixed methods approach in Portland, Oregon. Ecological Applications, 30(4), e02079. [CrossRef]
  • • Tarakcı-Eren, E., & Var, M. (2016). Parkların bitkisel tasarımında kullanılan taksonlar: Trabzon kent merkezi örneği. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 200–213. [CrossRef]
  • • Whittaker, R. H. (1972). Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21(2–3), 213–251. [CrossRef]
  • • Yener, Ş. D., & Ayaşlıgil, Y. (2016). İstanbul Marmara kıyılarının odunsu bitki varlığı açısından değerlendirilmesi. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 66(1), 1–15. [CrossRef]
APA Ögçe H, ŞATIROĞLU E, bekiryazıcı f, Dinçer D (2022). Comparing Urban Parks’ Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey. , 266 - 274. 10.54614/forestist.2022.21038
Chicago Ögçe Hüseyin,ŞATIROĞLU Elif,bekiryazıcı fatih,Dinçer Deryanur Comparing Urban Parks’ Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey. (2022): 266 - 274. 10.54614/forestist.2022.21038
MLA Ögçe Hüseyin,ŞATIROĞLU Elif,bekiryazıcı fatih,Dinçer Deryanur Comparing Urban Parks’ Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey. , 2022, ss.266 - 274. 10.54614/forestist.2022.21038
AMA Ögçe H,ŞATIROĞLU E,bekiryazıcı f,Dinçer D Comparing Urban Parks’ Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey. . 2022; 266 - 274. 10.54614/forestist.2022.21038
Vancouver Ögçe H,ŞATIROĞLU E,bekiryazıcı f,Dinçer D Comparing Urban Parks’ Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey. . 2022; 266 - 274. 10.54614/forestist.2022.21038
IEEE Ögçe H,ŞATIROĞLU E,bekiryazıcı f,Dinçer D "Comparing Urban Parks’ Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey." , ss.266 - 274, 2022. 10.54614/forestist.2022.21038
ISNAD Ögçe, Hüseyin vd. "Comparing Urban Parks’ Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey". (2022), 266-274. https://doi.org/10.54614/forestist.2022.21038
APA Ögçe H, ŞATIROĞLU E, bekiryazıcı f, Dinçer D (2022). Comparing Urban Parks’ Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey. FORESTIST, 72(3), 266 - 274. 10.54614/forestist.2022.21038
Chicago Ögçe Hüseyin,ŞATIROĞLU Elif,bekiryazıcı fatih,Dinçer Deryanur Comparing Urban Parks’ Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey. FORESTIST 72, no.3 (2022): 266 - 274. 10.54614/forestist.2022.21038
MLA Ögçe Hüseyin,ŞATIROĞLU Elif,bekiryazıcı fatih,Dinçer Deryanur Comparing Urban Parks’ Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey. FORESTIST, vol.72, no.3, 2022, ss.266 - 274. 10.54614/forestist.2022.21038
AMA Ögçe H,ŞATIROĞLU E,bekiryazıcı f,Dinçer D Comparing Urban Parks’ Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey. FORESTIST. 2022; 72(3): 266 - 274. 10.54614/forestist.2022.21038
Vancouver Ögçe H,ŞATIROĞLU E,bekiryazıcı f,Dinçer D Comparing Urban Parks’ Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey. FORESTIST. 2022; 72(3): 266 - 274. 10.54614/forestist.2022.21038
IEEE Ögçe H,ŞATIROĞLU E,bekiryazıcı f,Dinçer D "Comparing Urban Parks’ Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey." FORESTIST, 72, ss.266 - 274, 2022. 10.54614/forestist.2022.21038
ISNAD Ögçe, Hüseyin vd. "Comparing Urban Parks’ Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey". FORESTIST 72/3 (2022), 266-274. https://doi.org/10.54614/forestist.2022.21038
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 2:53

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları