Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops

Işıl Ruhi Sipahioğlu, (TOBB Ekonomi ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
GÜNSU MERIN ABBAS, (TOBB Ekonomi ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
Burçin Yılmaz (Eindhoven University of Technology, Hollanda)
Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning
3 0
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 44 - 63 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011 İndeks Tarihi: 20-03-2023

Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops

Öz:
Over the last fifteen years, apart from compulsory curricular studios, extracurricular intensive studios in architectural design (ISAD) have become a mainstream educational environment worldwide. ISADs cover an actual weight in non-formal architectural education. However, to date, there is no review on the methods, processes, or implementation of extracurricular ISADs. The field needs to enhance the visibility of workshop results with regular reporting of workshop activities to raise awareness among future professionals and the wider public. This review aims to make visible existing learning-teaching-experiencing environments and pedagogical conditions, practices, tendencies, and implementations in ISADs. The study follows three stages. It first conducts a scoping study to examine the research outputs on ISADs indexed in SCOPUS and Web of Science from January 1975 to September 2020. Second, it expands the workshop pool by including past ISADs reached via websites/papers. It codes each workshop with the codes and themes determined through the scoping study. Finally, it creates an interactive mapping detailing the following analysis: (1) Quantitative analysis of ISADs (Geographical distribution; outputs; principles, as elements creating the atmosphere and tactics); (2) Qualitative analysis to reveal the impact of workshop outputs on the interested stakeholders. The review suggests that ISADs, including their processes and outputs, contribute to the knowledge triangle in architecture by serving two fundamental roles: (1) A research-by-design activity to address socio-economic-ecological problems caused by the built environment; (2) A pioneering venture in improving the curriculum and practices of teaching and learning. Within the scope of the exigencies of the education field, this review uncovers the potential of ISADs in overcoming time-related, geographical, economic limitations; providing fresh perspectives on content and methods concerning architectural education; expanding the intellectual resources of students; enabling international collaboration between HEIs; breeding an experimental/flexible learning and research environment in the 1st and 2nd cycles to absorb ever-changing tools/methods promoted in professional/research sides of the field. This review provides the reader with an array of diverse teaching and learning practices on these non/informal grounds. The number of workshops included in this study is relatively small, therefore, researchers are encouraged to expand the number of workshops for further analysis.
Anahtar Kelime: architectural education non-formal education summer school workshop

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Balaid, A., Abd Rozan, M. Z., Hikmi, S. N., & Memon, J. (2016). Knowledge maps: A systematic literature review and directions for future research. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.02.005
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Brooks-Harris, J. E., & Stock-Ward, S. R. (1999). Workshops: Designing and facilitating experiential learning. SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Cabral Filho, J. dos S. (2005). Digital Art-A Field of Inquiry for Contemporary Architecture. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 3(3), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1260/147807705775377276
  • Ciravoğlu, A. (2003). Mimari tasarım eğitiminde formel ve enformel çalışmalar üzerine [On formal and informal studies in architectural design education]. Yapı, 257, 43–47.
  • Couceiro da Costa, M., Formiga, B. & Abbas, G. M. (Eds.) (2019). Materiality as a process. Caleidoscopio.
  • Diniz, N. (2015). The anatomy of a prototype: Situating the prototype and prototyping on design conceptual thinking. In L. Combs & C. Perry (Eds.), Computational ecologies : design in the anthropocene : ACADIA 2015, October 19-25, Cincinnati_Ohio: exhibition catalog of the 35th annual conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA) (pp. 323-332). ACADIA. http://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/acadia15_323.pdf
  • Doyle, S., Forehand, L., Hunt, E., Loughrey, N., Schneider, S., & Senske, N. (2018). Cyborg sessions: A case study for gender equity in technology. In T. Fukuda, W. Huang, P. Janssen, K. Crolla & S. Alhadidi (eds.), Learning, adapting and prototyping - Proceedings of the 23rd CAADRIA Conference (pp. 71–80). The Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA). http://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/caadria2018_259.pdf
  • Ernst, S., & Edwards, A. (2013). Reducing risk and promoting sustainability in the foothills of the Himalayas: A Pedagogy for Teaching and Practicing Sustainable Development. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 7(3), 93–107.
  • Fernandez-Antolin, M.-M., del Rio, J. M., & Gonzalez-Lezcano, R.-A. (2020). The use of gamification in higher technical education: Perception of university students on innovative teaching materials. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09583-0
  • Garcia Saez, M. S., Tomas Marquez, S., La Spina, V., Mileto, C., & Vegas Lopez-Manzanares, F. (2016). Learning by doing of traditional construction techniques: Gypsum flooring. In L.G. Chova, A.L. Martinez & I.C. Torres (Eds.), INTED2016 Proceedings (pp. 1684–1689). IATED.
  • Guner, A. F., Benli, G., Karacar, P., & Kasapseckin, M. A. (2017). Design-build workshops in architectural education: A case study, adobe bus stop in northern cyprus. In L.G. Chova, A.L. Martinez & I.C. Torres (Eds.), EDULEARN17 Proceedings (pp. 6868–6876). IATED.
  • Habraken, N. J. (2006). Questions that will not go away: Some remarks on long-term trends in architecture and their impact on architectural education. Open House International, 31(2), 12–19.
  • Hardy, M. (2008). Experiments in traditional building, architecture and urbanism education: INTBAU’s recent work. In S. Roaf & A. Bairstow (Eds.), Oxford Conference: A Re-evaluation of education in architecture (pp. 405–410). WIT Press.
  • Jimenez Delgado, A., & Piedecausa-Garcia, B. (2013). Teaching-learning process of historical heritage: A journey as a beginning, path and end. In L.G. Chova, A.L. Martinez & I.C. Torres (Eds.), EDULEARN13 proceedings (pp. 5321–5326). IATED.
  • Kahvecioglu, H., Erdem, A., & Paker-Kahvecioglu, N. (2002). Short term workshop: An alternative strategy in architectural design education. In D. Marjanovic (Ed.), DESIGN 2002: Proceedings of the 7th International Design Conference, Vols 1 and 2 (pp. 997–1001).
  • Karadağ, D., & Tuker, C. (2020). A proposal for a computational design and ecology based approach to architectural design studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09594-x
  • Kuyrukcu, Z., & Kuyrukcu, E. Y. (2015). An educational tool the importance of informal studies/studios in architectural design education: A workshop summary. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2666-2673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.950
  • Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
  • MATERIART (2020). Art and Science of Materiality in Architectural Design Education. https://www.materiart.org
  • Milovanovic, A., Kostic, M., Zoric, A., Dordevic, A., Pesic, M., Bugarski, J., Todorovic, D., Sokolovic, N., & Josifovski, A. (2020). Transferring COVID-19 challenges into learning potentials: Online workshops in architectural education. Sustainability, 12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177024
  • Momirski, L. A. (2019). Urban design workshops in the education curriculum: Advantages and disadvantages. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471(10). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/10/102048
  • Orhan, M. (2017). The role and importance of workshops in the architectural design education; Case of “Self Made Architecture I-II. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3, 131–136. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjhss.v3i3.1545
  • Paszkowski, Z. W., & Gołebiewski, J. I. (2020). International design workshops as an intensive form of architectural education. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 18(1), 51–56.
  • Pereira, S. M., & Roche, J. (2016). Across disciplinary and national borders: A pedagogical tool for reuse. In A. Tostoes & Z. Ferreira (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Docomomo Conference - Adaptive Reuse: The Modern Movement Towards the Future (pp. 854–860). Docomomo.
  • Polatoğlu, Ç., & Vural, M. (2012). As an educational tool the importance of informal studies/studios in architectural design education; Case of walking İstanbul 1&2. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 480–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.684
  • Ruhi Sipahioğlu, I., & Alanlı, A. (2020). A Threshold in-between Education and Profession: The Final Architectural Design Studio. In N. Çağlar, I. G. Curulli, I. Ruhi Sipahioğlu, & L. Mavromatidis (Eds.), Thresholds in Architectural Education. Wiley-ISTE. doi:10.1002/9781119751427.ch7
  • Ruhi Sipahioğlu, I., Öztoprak, Z., Yılmaz, B., & Çağlar, N. (2020). The Dialogy of Architectural Design Studio and Learning Milieux. In V. Trova & I. Lykourioti (Eds.), Materiality in the architectural studio process: Good practices (pp. 36-53). Caleidoscópio.
  • Ruhi Sipahioğlu, I., Abbas, G.M., & Sönmez, B. (2021). Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops. [Visualization]. https://public.tableau.com/views/OutsidetheschoolAreviewofthenon-formalshort-termarchitecturalworkshops/FINALSTORY?:language=en&:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link
  • Sas-Bojarska, A., & Rembeza, M. (2020). International architectural-urban-landscape design workshops to strengthen students’ education, capabilities and mobility. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 18(2), 190–196.
  • Shatarova, R. (2015). The commune as an alternative learning experience in architectural education: The case of EASA (European Architecture Students Assembly). In F. Uslu (Ed.), ADVED 15: International Conference on Advances in Education and Social Sciences Abstracts & Proceedings (pp. 730–740). Ocerint Publishing.
  • Shi, X., Fang, X., Chen, Z., Phillips, T. K., & Fukuda, H. (2020). A didactic pedagogical approach toward sustainable architectural education through robotic tectonics. Sustainability, 12(5), 1757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051757
  • Smatanová, K., & Dubovcová, A. (2016). Workshop as a tool in architectural education. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 14(1), 123–128.
  • Sorguç, A. G., Yemiscioglu, M. K., & Ozgenel, C. F. (2019). A computational design workshop experience for 21st century architecture education. In J.P. Sousa, G.C. Henriques & J.P. Xavier (Eds.), ECAADE SIGRADI 2019: Architecture in the age of the 4th industrial revolution (pp. 127–136). eCAADe. https://doi.org/10.5151/proceedings-ecaadesigradi2019_353
  • Symans, M., Mistur, M., & Danziger, B. (2010, June). Facilitating collaboration of engineering and architecture students via an international travel-study workshop [Paper presentation]. 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky.
  • Tang, G. (2013). Timber gridshells: Beyond the drawing board. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Construction Materials, 166(6), 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1680/coma.12.00046
  • Tanyeli, U. (2013). Why Cannot (Even) Architectural Education Be Flexible in Turkey? In S. Lökçe, O. Turan, & B. B. Hisarligil (Eds.), MIMED Forum IV: Flexibility in Architectural Education (pp. 77–88). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • The European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union. (2013). Directive 2013/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union, 132–170.
  • Topcu, U., Taberna, J., & Hofert, K. (2015). A visual tale of two cities: Video as a tool for representation through informal learning. In D. Garcia-Escudero & B. Bardi i Mila (Eds.), III workshop on educational innovation in architecture (JIDA’15) (pp. 255–265). UPC.
  • Topcu, Umran, & Taberna Torres, J. (2018). Multicultural education in Barcelona. In L.G. Chova, A.L. Martinez & I.C. Torres (Eds.), 12TH INTED proceedings (pp. 2777–2785). IATED.
  • Turgut, H., & Cantürk, E. (2015). Design workshops as a tool for informal architectural education. Open House International, 40(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-02-2015-B0012
  • Twardoch, A., & Stangel, M. (2016). Beyond the university: Socially engaged student’s workshops on public space and housing. In M. Perinkova & M. Nedved (Eds.), 8th Architektura v Perspektiv 2016 (pp. 23–25). Technicka univerzita Ostrava.
  • Tzaka, A., Kalogirou, N., Papakostas, G., & Symeonidou, I. (2010). SKG IN_FLUX: An urban `process-plan’. In G. Schmitt, L. Hovestad, L. VanGool, F. Bosche, R. Burkhard, S. Coleman, J. Halatsch, M. Hansmeyer, S. KonsorskiLang, A. Kunze & M. SehmiLuck (Eds.), ECAADE 2010: Future cities (pp. 107–114). ETH Zurich; Autodesk; BASF; Bentley; IBM.
  • Tzonis, A. (2014). Architectural education at the crossroads. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3(1), 476–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.01.001
  • Ucci, M., Law, S., Andrews, R., Fisher, A., Smith, L., Sawyer, A., & Marmot, A. (2015). Indoor school environments, physical activity, sitting behaviour and pedagogy: A scoping review. Building Research & Information, 43(5), 566–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2015.1004275
  • UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. (2012). UNESCO Guidelines on the Recognition, Validation and Accreditation of the Outcomes of Non-formal and Informal Learning. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000216360_eng
  • Berg, H.v.d. (2008). (Re-)building communities: A case study in architectural education. Open House International, 33(2), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-02-2008-B0010
  • Yang, J. (2015). Recognition, validation and accreditation of non-formal and informal learning in UNESCO member states. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
APA RUHİ-SİPAHİOĞLU I, ABBAS G, yılmaz b (2021). Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops. , 44 - 63. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011
Chicago RUHİ-SİPAHİOĞLU IŞIL,ABBAS GÜNSU MERIN,yılmaz burçin Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops. (2021): 44 - 63. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011
MLA RUHİ-SİPAHİOĞLU IŞIL,ABBAS GÜNSU MERIN,yılmaz burçin Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops. , 2021, ss.44 - 63. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011
AMA RUHİ-SİPAHİOĞLU I,ABBAS G,yılmaz b Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops. . 2021; 44 - 63. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011
Vancouver RUHİ-SİPAHİOĞLU I,ABBAS G,yılmaz b Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops. . 2021; 44 - 63. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011
IEEE RUHİ-SİPAHİOĞLU I,ABBAS G,yılmaz b "Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops." , ss.44 - 63, 2021. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011
ISNAD RUHİ-SİPAHİOĞLU, IŞIL vd. "Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops". (2021), 44-63. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011
APA RUHİ-SİPAHİOĞLU I, ABBAS G, yılmaz b (2021). Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 2(1), 44 - 63. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011
Chicago RUHİ-SİPAHİOĞLU IŞIL,ABBAS GÜNSU MERIN,yılmaz burçin Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning 2, no.1 (2021): 44 - 63. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011
MLA RUHİ-SİPAHİOĞLU IŞIL,ABBAS GÜNSU MERIN,yılmaz burçin Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, vol.2, no.1, 2021, ss.44 - 63. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011
AMA RUHİ-SİPAHİOĞLU I,ABBAS G,yılmaz b Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning. 2021; 2(1): 44 - 63. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011
Vancouver RUHİ-SİPAHİOĞLU I,ABBAS G,yılmaz b Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning. 2021; 2(1): 44 - 63. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011
IEEE RUHİ-SİPAHİOĞLU I,ABBAS G,yılmaz b "Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops." Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 2, ss.44 - 63, 2021. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011
ISNAD RUHİ-SİPAHİOĞLU, IŞIL vd. "Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops". Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning 2/1 (2021), 44-63. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 3:1

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları