Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 157 - 169 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2017 İndeks Tarihi: 20-03-2023

Re-viewing the role of culture in architecture for sustainable development

Öz:
Architecture is most often defined as the art and technique of creating space. The understanding and use of space in a society is the most important means that concretely reflects the cultural system and way of life, which is the sum of all the experiences, talents and values of that society. While the physical environment created by people in history is mostly shaped according to local values, the spaces designed by architects have been the scene of conflict among universal and regional values, especially after the Industrial Revolution, with the development of Modern Architecture. This study which evaluates the architectural approaches adopted after Modern Architecture, within the framework of economic, technological and socio-cultural developments in the world and discusses them with their reflections in Turkey, emphasizes the validity of striving for lasting values instead of fashions in architecture. In this context, the issue of culture and identity comes to the fore. Cities have their own unique appearance, physical structure and way of life, as well as a "spirit" that makes them distinctive. The characteristics of the city which make it different from the others constitute "urban identity". Especially in developing countries, many cities face the risk of losing their identity in the process of urban development, which consists of the expansion of the streets and the demolition of buildings that can actually be evaluated. The cultural and natural heritage that makes cities different is also the foundation of urban identity. These values are also a prerequisite for the sustainability of cities. Cultural heritage can be considered not only as a trace of the past, but as a wealth for the future of people. When properly managed, there are many opportunities to create a strong relationship between identity, culture and heritage. Since these opportunities vary in each settlement, different solutions need to be developed. However, it is important that different solutions are produced in a consistent and meaningful integrity, and not as independent initiatives of cities that share the same geography and culture in regional scale. In this process, it is necessary for central administrative bodies, local governments and civil society to work together for an effective and sustainable urban structure.
Anahtar Kelime: architecture cultural values sustainability

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ahunbay, Z. (1996). Tarihi Çevre Koruma ve Restorasyon, İstanbul: YEM Yayın.
  • Benevolo, L. (1977). History of Modern Architecture, vol. 1, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Conrads, U. (1975). Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-Century Architecture, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
  • Dostoğlu, N. (1995). “Modern Sonrası Mimarlık Anlayışları”, Mimarlık, no. 263, 46-50.
  • Erzen, J. N., (2013). Mimarlık Dünyayı Yaşamak, Ankara: ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Basım İşliği.
  • Feilden, B. M. and Jokilehto, J. (1993). Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites, Rome: ICCROM.
  • Frampton, K. (1980). Modern Architecture: A Critical History, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Güvenç, B., (1997). Kültürün ABC’si, İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  • Güzer, C. A. (1994). ‘Las Vegas'ın Öğretemedikleri', Mimarlık, no.260.
  • Habermas, J. (1990). "Modernlik: Tamamlanmamış Bir Proje", ref. Zeka, N„ Postmodernizm, İstanbul: Kıyı Yayınları.
  • Huxtable, A., ref. Harries, K. (1985). ‘Modernity's Bad Conscience’, AA Files, n:10.
  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York: Vintage Books.
  • Kuban, D., (1984). Mimarlık Kavramları: Mimarlığın Kuramsal Sözlüğüne Giriş, İstanbul: Çevre Yayınları.
  • Le Corbusier (1970). Towards a New Architecture, Londra: The Architectural Press.
  • Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City, Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press.
  • Lyotard, J.F. (1979) La Condition Postmoderne, ret. Zeka, N.
  • Metropolitan Municipality of Bursa Archives
  • Nystrom, L. and Fudge, C. eds. (1999). City and Culture: Cultural Processes and Urban Sustainability, Stockholm: The Swedish Urban Environment Council.
  • Oliver, P. (1997). Encyclopedia of Vernacular Architecture of the World: Cultures and Habitats, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997
  • Pugh, C., ed. (1996). Sustainability, the Environment and Urbanization, Londra: Earthscan Publications, Ltd.
  • Rossi, A. (1982). The Architecture of the City, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
  • Rowe, C. & Koetter, F. (1984). Collage City, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
  • United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development ed. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Venturi, R. (1977). Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture, New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
  • Wallerstein, I. (1974). The Modern World System. Vol. 1, Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.
  • Zeka, N. (1990). ‘Yolları Çalallanan Bahçe, Aynalı Gökdelenler, Dil Oyunları ve Robespierre', Zeka, N., deri., Postmodernizm, İstanbul: Kıyı Yayınları.
  • URL-1 www.mynet.com /Iguazu-selalesi-nerede
  • URL-2 www.news.artnet.com
  • URL-3 www.researchgate.net
  • URL-4 www.archdaily.com
  • URL-5 https://en.wikiarquitectura.com/
  • URL-6 www.otelklassisresort
  • URL-7 www.arkitektuel.com
  • URL-8 www.archnet.com
  • URL-9 www.arkiv.com.tr
APA DOSTOGLU N (2021). Re-viewing the role of culture in architecture for sustainable development. , 157 - 169. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2017
Chicago DOSTOGLU NESLIHAN Re-viewing the role of culture in architecture for sustainable development. (2021): 157 - 169. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2017
MLA DOSTOGLU NESLIHAN Re-viewing the role of culture in architecture for sustainable development. , 2021, ss.157 - 169. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2017
AMA DOSTOGLU N Re-viewing the role of culture in architecture for sustainable development. . 2021; 157 - 169. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2017
Vancouver DOSTOGLU N Re-viewing the role of culture in architecture for sustainable development. . 2021; 157 - 169. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2017
IEEE DOSTOGLU N "Re-viewing the role of culture in architecture for sustainable development." , ss.157 - 169, 2021. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2017
ISNAD DOSTOGLU, NESLIHAN. "Re-viewing the role of culture in architecture for sustainable development". (2021), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2017
APA DOSTOGLU N (2021). Re-viewing the role of culture in architecture for sustainable development. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 2(2), 157 - 169. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2017
Chicago DOSTOGLU NESLIHAN Re-viewing the role of culture in architecture for sustainable development. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning 2, no.2 (2021): 157 - 169. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2017
MLA DOSTOGLU NESLIHAN Re-viewing the role of culture in architecture for sustainable development. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, vol.2, no.2, 2021, ss.157 - 169. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2017
AMA DOSTOGLU N Re-viewing the role of culture in architecture for sustainable development. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning. 2021; 2(2): 157 - 169. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2017
Vancouver DOSTOGLU N Re-viewing the role of culture in architecture for sustainable development. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning. 2021; 2(2): 157 - 169. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2017
IEEE DOSTOGLU N "Re-viewing the role of culture in architecture for sustainable development." Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 2, ss.157 - 169, 2021. 10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2017
ISNAD DOSTOGLU, NESLIHAN. "Re-viewing the role of culture in architecture for sustainable development". Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning 2/2 (2021), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2017