Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 224 - 236 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i2055 İndeks Tarihi: 20-03-2023

Assessing the performance of machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine for land use and land cover analysis: A case study of Muğla province, Türkiye

Öz:
Regions with high tourism density are very sensitive to human activities. Ensuring sustainability by preserving the cultural characteristics and natural structure of these regions is of critical importance in order to transfer these assets to the future world heritage. Detecting and mapping changes in land use and land cover (LULC) using innovative methods within short time intervals are of great importance for both monitoring the regional change and making administrative planning by taking necessary measures in a timely manner. In this context, this study focuses on the creation of a 4-class LULC map of Muğla province over the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform by utilizing three different machine learning algorithms, namely, Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Classification and Regression Tree (CART), and on comparison of their accuracy assessments. For improved classification accuracy, as well with the Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 satellite images, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) are also derived and used in classification of the major land use classes, which are ‘built-up area & barren land’, ‘dense vegetation’, ‘water surface’, and ‘shrub, grassland & sparse vegetation’. Experimental results show that the most relevant algorithm is RF with 0.97 overall accuracy and 0.96 Kappa value, followed by SVM and CART algorithms, respectively. These results indicate that the RF classifier outperforms both SVM and CART classifiers in terms of accuracy. Moreover, based on the results of the RF classifier, 19% (2,429 km2) of the study region is classified as built-up area & barren land, 48% (6,135 km2) as dense vegetation, 2% (301 km2) as water surface and 30% (3,832 km2) as shrub, grassland & sparse vegetation class.
Anahtar Kelime: Google Earth Engine (GEE) land use/land cover (LULC) maps machine learning remote sensing

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aghlmand, M., Kalkan, K., Onur, M. İ., Öztürk, G., & Ulutak, E. (2021). Google Earth Engine ile arazi kullanımı haritalarının üretimi. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(1), 38-47.
  • Atmaca, İ., Derakhshandeh, M., Pekkan, Ö. I., Özenen-Kavlak, M., Tunca, Y. S., & Çabuk, S. N. (2022). Lojistik regresyon ve coğrafi bilgi sistemleri kullanılarak orman yangını risk modellemesi: Muğla-Milas örneği. Doğal Afetler ve Çevre Dergisi, 8(1), 66-75.
  • Avtar, R., Tripathi, S., Aggarwal, A. K., & Kumar, P. (2019). Population–urbanization–energy nexus: a review. Resources, 8(3), 136.
  • Bahar, O. (2008). Muğla turizminin Türkiye ekonomisi açısından yeri ve önemi. Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(21), 61-80.
  • Bhandari, A., Kumar, A., & Singh, G. K. (2015). Improved feature extraction scheme for satellite images using NDVI and NDWI technique based on DWT and SVD. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8(9), 6949-6966.
  • Bingöl, Z. (2022). İl kültür ve turizm müdürlüklerinin görev, yetki ve sorumluluklarına dair esaslar. Retrieved from http://www.mugla.gov.tr/il-kultur-ve-turizm-mudurlugu
  • Borrelli, P., Robinson, D. A., Fleischer, L. R., Lugato, E., Ballabio, C., Alewell, C., Ferro, V. (2017). An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nature communications, 8(1), 1-13.
  • Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), 5-32.
  • Canters, F. (1997). Evaluating the uncertainty of area estimates derived from fuuy land-cover classification. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens, 63(4), 403-414.
  • Carrasco, L., O’Neil, A. W., Morton, R. D., & Rowland, C. S. (2019). Evaluating combinations of temporally aggregated Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 for land cover mapping with Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing, 11(3), 288.
  • Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011). LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM transactions on intelligent systems and technology (TIST), 2(3), 1-27.
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 37-46.
  • Congalton, R. G., & Green, K. (2019). Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices: CRC press.
  • Dikici, M. (2022). Drought analysis for the Seyhan Basin with vegetation indices and comparison with meteorological different indices. Sustainability, 14(8), 4464.
  • Dou, P., Shen, H., Li, Z., & Guan, X. (2021). Time series remote sensing image classification framework using combination of deep learning and multiple classifiers system. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 103, 102477.
  • Farda, N. (2017). Multi-temporal land use mapping of coastal wetlands area using machine learning in Google earth engine. Paper presented at the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.
  • Feizizadeh, B., Omarzadeh, D., Kazemi Garajeh, M., Lakes, T., & Blaschke, T. (2021). Machine learning data-driven approaches for land use/cover mapping and trend analysis using Google Earth Engine. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1-33.
  • Fonseca, L. M., Körting, T. S., Bendini, H. d. N., Girolamo-Neto, C. D., Neves, A. K., Soares, A. R., . . . Maretto, R. V. (2021). Pattern recognition and remote sensing techniques applied to land use and land cover mapping in the Brazilian Savannah. Pattern recognition letters, 148, 54-60.
  • Gao, B.-C. (1996). NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote sensing of environment, 58(3), 257-266.
  • GEE. (2022). Google Earth Engine. Retrieved from https://earthengine.google.com/
  • Harper, A. B., Powell, T., Cox, P. M., House, J., Huntingford, C., Lenton, T. M., Collins, W. J. (2018). Land-use emissions play a critical role in land-based mitigation for Paris climate targets. Nature communications, 9(1), 1-13.
  • Hayati, A., Hestrio, Y., Cendiana, N., & Kustiyo, K. (2021). Indices extraction from multitemporal remote sensing data for mapping urban built-up. Paper presented at the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.
  • Huang, H., Chen, Y., Clinton, N., Wang, J., Wang, X., Liu, C., Zheng, Y. (2017). Mapping major land cover dynamics in Beijing using all Landsat images in Google Earth Engine. Remote sensing of environment, 202, 166-176.
  • Julien, Y., & Sobrino, J. A. (2009). The Yearly Land Cover Dynamics (YLCD) method: An analysis of global vegetation from NDVI and LST parameters. Remote sensing of environment, 113(2), 329-334.
  • Khatami, R., Mountrakis, G., & Stehman, S. V. (2016). A meta-analysis of remote sensing research on supervised pixel-based land-cover image classification processes: General guidelines for practitioners and future research. Remote sensing of environment, 177, 89-100.
  • Kiliç, S. (2015). Kappa test. Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 5(3), 142.
  • Li, Q., Qiu, C., Ma, L., Schmitt, M., & Zhu, X. X. (2020). Mapping the land cover of Africa at 10 m resolution from multi-source remote sensing data with Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing, 12(4), 602.
  • Long, H., Qu, Y., Tu, S., Zhang, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2020). Development of land use transitions research in China. Journal of geographical sciences, 30(7), 1195-1214.
  • Loukika, K. N., Keesara, V. R., & Sridhar, V. (2021). Analysis of land use and land cover using machine learning algorithms on google earth engine for Munneru River Basin, India. Sustainability, 13(24), 13758.
  • Lu, D., & Weng, Q. (2007). A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(5), 823-870.
  • Mantero, P., Moser, G., & Serpico, S. B. (2005). Partially supervised classification of remote sensing images through SVM-based probability density estimation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(3), 559-570.
  • McFeeters, S. K. (1996). The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(7), 1425-1432.
  • Muğla Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2022a). Muğla Büyükşehir Belediyesi Meclis Kararı. (136). Muğla: Muğla Büyükşehir Belediyesi Retrieved from https://www.mugla.bel.tr/uploads/mevzuattr/cf3411c0-bc98-4ccd-8ffe-5274c47df44d_21.06.2022_imar_yonetmelik.pdf.
  • Muğla Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2022b). Yönetmelik ve yönergeler. Retrieved from https://www.mugla.bel.tr/mevzuat/
  • Muğla OBM. (2021). 2021 yılı orman yangınları değerlendirme raporu. Retrieved from Muğla:
  • Muğla Valiliği. (2022). Muğla. Retrieved from http://www.mugla.gov.tr/ilcelerimiz
  • Mutti, P. R., Lúcio, P. S., Dubreuil, V., & Bezerra, B. G. (2020). NDVI time series stochastic models for the forecast of vegetation dynamics over desertification hotspots. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 41(7), 2759-2788.
  • Olfaz, M., Tirink, C., & Önder, H. (2019). Use of CART and CHAID algorithms in Karayaka sheep breeding. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1).
  • Ozenen Kavlak, M., Cabuk, S. N., & Cetin, M. (2021). Development of forest fire risk map using geographical information systems and remote sensing capabilities: Ören case. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(25), 33265-33291.
  • Ozyavuz, M., Bilgili, B., & Salici, A. (2015). Determination of vegetation changes with NDVI method. Journal of environmental protection and ecology, 16(1), 264-273.
  • Parida, B. R., & Mandal, S. P. (2020). Polarimetric decomposition methods for LULC mapping using ALOS L-band PolSAR data in Western parts of Mizoram, Northeast India. SN Applied Sciences, 2(6), 1-15.
  • Phiri, D., & Morgenroth, J. (2017). Developments in Landsat land cover classification methods: A review. Remote Sensing, 9(9), 967.
  • Qiu, C., Schmitt, M., Geiß, C., Chen, T.-H. K., & Zhu, X. X. (2020). A framework for large-scale mapping of human settlement extent from Sentinel-2 images via fully convolutional neural networks. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 163, 152-170.
  • Qu, L. a., Chen, Z., Li, M., Zhi, J., & Wang, H. (2021). Accuracy improvements to pixel-based and object-based lulc classification with auxiliary datasets from Google Earth engine. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 453.
  • Qu, Y., & Long, H. (2018). The economic and environmental effects of land use transitions under rapid urbanization and the implications for land use management. Habitat International, 82, 113-121.
  • Rajbongshi, P., Das, T., & Adhikari, D. (2018). Microenvironmental heterogeneity caused by anthropogenic LULC foster lower plant assemblages in the riparian habitats of lentic systems in tropical floodplains. Science of the Total Environment, 639, 1254-1260.
  • Richards, J., Landgrebe, D., & Swain, P. (1982). A means for utilizing ancillary information in multispectral classification. Remote sensing of environment, 12(6), 463-477.
  • Rokach, L., & Maimon, O. (2005). Decision trees. In Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook (pp. 165-192): Springer.
  • Sari, F. (2021). Forest fire susceptibility mapping via multi-criteria decision analysis techniques for Mugla, Turkey: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Forest Ecology and Management, 480, 118644.
  • Sazib, N., Mladenova, I., & Bolten, J. (2018). Leveraging the Google Earth Engine for drought assessment using global soil moisture data. Remote Sensing, 10(8), 1265.
  • Shaharum, N. S. N., Shafri, H. Z. M., Ghani, W. A. W. A. K., Samsatli, S., Al-Habshi, M. M. A., & Yusuf, B. (2020). Oil palm mapping over Peninsular Malaysia using Google Earth Engine and machine learning algorithms. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 17, 100287.
  • Shirmohammadi, B., Malekian, A., Salajegheh, A., Taheri, B., Azarnivand, H., Malek, Z., & Verburg, P. H. (2020). Scenario analysis for integrated water resources management under future land use change in the Urmia Lake region, Iran. Land Use Policy, 90, 104299.
  • Sidhu, N., Pebesma, E., & Câmara, G. (2018). Using Google Earth Engine to detect land cover change: Singapore as a use case. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 51(1), 486-500.
  • Stehfest, E., van Zeist, W.-J., Valin, H., Havlik, P., Popp, A., Kyle, P., Bodirsky, B. L. (2019). Key determinants of global land-use projections. Nature communications, 10(1), 1-10.
  • Sunar, F., Özkan, C., & Osmanoğlu, B. (2016). Uzaktan algılama. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Basımevi.
  • T.C. KTB. (2022). Neredeyim: İdari ve ekonomik yapı. Retrieved from https://mugla.ktb.gov.tr/TR-270593/idari-ve-ekonomik-yapi.html
  • Tamiminia, H., Salehi, B., Mahdianpari, M., Quackenbush, L., Adeli, S., & Brisco, B. (2020). Google Earth Engine for geo-big data applications: A meta-analysis and systematic review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 164, 152-170.
  • Yücel, B., & Ertin, G. (2019). Muğla kentinin kültür turizmi potansiyeli. Uluslararası Global Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 99-112.
APA YALÇIN BAYRAKDAR H, Özenen Kavlak M, YILMAZEL B, Çabuk A (2022). Assessing the performance of machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine for land use and land cover analysis: A case study of Muğla province, Türkiye. , 224 - 236. 10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i2055
Chicago YALÇIN BAYRAKDAR HAZAL,Özenen Kavlak Mehtap,YILMAZEL Burcu,Çabuk Alper Assessing the performance of machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine for land use and land cover analysis: A case study of Muğla province, Türkiye. (2022): 224 - 236. 10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i2055
MLA YALÇIN BAYRAKDAR HAZAL,Özenen Kavlak Mehtap,YILMAZEL Burcu,Çabuk Alper Assessing the performance of machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine for land use and land cover analysis: A case study of Muğla province, Türkiye. , 2022, ss.224 - 236. 10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i2055
AMA YALÇIN BAYRAKDAR H,Özenen Kavlak M,YILMAZEL B,Çabuk A Assessing the performance of machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine for land use and land cover analysis: A case study of Muğla province, Türkiye. . 2022; 224 - 236. 10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i2055
Vancouver YALÇIN BAYRAKDAR H,Özenen Kavlak M,YILMAZEL B,Çabuk A Assessing the performance of machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine for land use and land cover analysis: A case study of Muğla province, Türkiye. . 2022; 224 - 236. 10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i2055
IEEE YALÇIN BAYRAKDAR H,Özenen Kavlak M,YILMAZEL B,Çabuk A "Assessing the performance of machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine for land use and land cover analysis: A case study of Muğla province, Türkiye." , ss.224 - 236, 2022. 10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i2055
ISNAD YALÇIN BAYRAKDAR, HAZAL vd. "Assessing the performance of machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine for land use and land cover analysis: A case study of Muğla province, Türkiye". (2022), 224-236. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i2055
APA YALÇIN BAYRAKDAR H, Özenen Kavlak M, YILMAZEL B, Çabuk A (2022). Assessing the performance of machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine for land use and land cover analysis: A case study of Muğla province, Türkiye. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 3(2), 224 - 236. 10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i2055
Chicago YALÇIN BAYRAKDAR HAZAL,Özenen Kavlak Mehtap,YILMAZEL Burcu,Çabuk Alper Assessing the performance of machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine for land use and land cover analysis: A case study of Muğla province, Türkiye. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning 3, no.2 (2022): 224 - 236. 10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i2055
MLA YALÇIN BAYRAKDAR HAZAL,Özenen Kavlak Mehtap,YILMAZEL Burcu,Çabuk Alper Assessing the performance of machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine for land use and land cover analysis: A case study of Muğla province, Türkiye. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, vol.3, no.2, 2022, ss.224 - 236. 10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i2055
AMA YALÇIN BAYRAKDAR H,Özenen Kavlak M,YILMAZEL B,Çabuk A Assessing the performance of machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine for land use and land cover analysis: A case study of Muğla province, Türkiye. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning. 2022; 3(2): 224 - 236. 10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i2055
Vancouver YALÇIN BAYRAKDAR H,Özenen Kavlak M,YILMAZEL B,Çabuk A Assessing the performance of machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine for land use and land cover analysis: A case study of Muğla province, Türkiye. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning. 2022; 3(2): 224 - 236. 10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i2055
IEEE YALÇIN BAYRAKDAR H,Özenen Kavlak M,YILMAZEL B,Çabuk A "Assessing the performance of machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine for land use and land cover analysis: A case study of Muğla province, Türkiye." Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 3, ss.224 - 236, 2022. 10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i2055
ISNAD YALÇIN BAYRAKDAR, HAZAL vd. "Assessing the performance of machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine for land use and land cover analysis: A case study of Muğla province, Türkiye". Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning 3/2 (2022), 224-236. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i2055