Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 32 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 231 - 238 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.17567/ataunidfd.1038856 İndeks Tarihi: 09-09-2022

Çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanılan farklı radyografi tekniklerinde radyasyon dozunu azaltıcı önlemler

Öz:
Çocuk diş hekimliğinde teşhis, tedavi ve takip amacıyla radyografik görüntüleme yöntemlerine başvurulmaktadır. Radyografik yöntemlerin çalışma prensibi iyonize edici radyasyona dayanmaktadır. Kullanılan radyografik yöntemlerin ihmal edilebilir düzeyde hasta dozu oluşturduğu kabul edilse de günümüzde iyonize radyasyon maruziyetinin herhangi bir eşik doz olmaksızın kanser gelişim riskine neden olabileceği bilinmektedir. Çocuk hastalarda erişkinlere kıyasla daha yüksek mitotik aktivite gösteren, daha az gelişmiş ve daha az farklılaşmış hücrelerin varlığı bunun yanı sıra çocukların fiziksel olarak küçük olmaları sebebiyle direk veya saçılmış radyasyona daha çok organ ve dokunun maruz kalması kanser gelişme riskini arttırmaktadır. Çocuklarda radyasyona en duyarlı olan doku ve organlar tiroid, meme, kemik iliği, beyin ve cilt olarak gösterilmiş olup, dental radyografik muayene sırasında birincil veya saçılan X ışınlarından en çok etkilenen alanlardır. Bu nedenle, gerekli olduğu durumlarda radyografik muayeneye başvurulmalı ve radyasyon dozunu azaltan önlemler alınmalıdır. Bu derlemedeki amacımız; radyasyona daha duyarlı olan çocuk hastalarda, hangi durumlarda radyografik yöntemlerin kullanılması gerektiğini, X ışını cihazlarındaki bazı modifikasyonlar ile çocuk hastalarda radyasyon dozunu azaltabilecek uygulamaları ve kullanılabilecek koruyucu ekipmanları yapılan pek çok çalışma yardımıyla ortaya koymaktır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Measures to reduce radiation dose in different radiography techniques used in pediatric dentistry

Öz:
Radiographic imaging methods are used in pediatric dentistry for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. The operation principle of radiographic methods is based on ionizing radiation. Even though the patient dose of the radiographic methods used is accepted to be at a negligible level, it is now known that ionizing radiation exposure can cause cancer without a threshold dose. The presence of less developed and less differentiated cells showing higher mitotic activity in pediatric patients compared to adults, as well as the exposure of more organs and tissues to direct or scatter radiation because children are physically small increases the risk of cancer development. It has been shown that the thyroid, breast, bone marrow, brain, and skin are the tissues and organs most sensitive to radiation in children, and they are the areas most affected by primary or scattered X-rays during dental radiographic examination. Therefore, radiographic examinations should be performed only when necessary, and steps should be taken to reduce radiation exposure. With the help of numerous studies, our aim in this study is to present in which situation the radiographic methods should be used in pediatric patients who are more sensitive to radiation, some modifications in X-ray devices, applications that can reduce the radiation dose in pediatric patients, and protective equipment that can be used on pediatric patients.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Espelid I, Mejàre I, Weerheijm K. EAPD guidelines for use of radiographs in children. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2003;4(1):40-48.
  • 2. Van Acker J, Pauwels N, Cauwels R, Rajasekharan S. Outcomes of different radioprotective precautions in children undergoing dental radiography: a systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020;21(4):463-508. [Crossref]
  • 3. UNSCEAR. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) 2013 Report, Volume II. In: Scientific Annex B: Effects of radiation exposure of children. United Nations Publication; 2014:5-25 e-ISBN: 978-92-1-054215-9. [Crossref]
  • 4. Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C, Hunter R, Benavides E, Samuelson D, Scheske MJ. Effective dose of dental CBCT—a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140197. [Crossref]
  • 5. UNSCEAR. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect s of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) 2000 Report. Volume I: Sources. United Nations Publication; 2000. ISBN 92-1-142238-8:4-22.
  • 6. Qiang W, Qiang F, Lin L. Estimation of effective dose of dental X-ray devices. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2019;183(4): 418-422. [Crossref]
  • 7. Whaites E, Drage N. Essentials of Dental Radiography and Radiology. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2013:85-119,135-143,171-209.
  • 8. Aps J. To beam or not to beam: that is the question. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(2):20120375. [Crossref]
  • 9. LudlowJ.B, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2008;106(1):106-114. [Crossref]
  • 10. Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Haurdakis CJ. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT. Eur J Radiol. 2005;56(3):413-417. [Crossref]
  • 11. Prins R, Dauer LT, Colosi DC, et al. Significant reduction in dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) eye dose through the use of leaded glasses. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2011;112(4):502-507. [Crossref]
  • 12. Mehta V, Ahmad N. Cone beamed computed tomography in pediatric dentistry: Concepts revisited. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020;10(2):210. [Crossref]
  • 13. Mettler FA. Medical effects and risks of exposure to ionising radiation. J Radiol Prot. 2012;32(1):9. [Crossref]
  • 14. Smith N. Risk assessment: the philosophy underlying radiation protection. Int Dent J. 1987; 37(1):43-51.
  • 15. Stecker MS, Balter S, Towbin RB, et al. Guidelines for patient radiation dose management. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(7):263-273. [Crossref]
  • 16. Okano T, Sur J. Radiation dose and protection in dentistry. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2010;46(2):112-121. [Crossref]
  • 17. Svenson B, Söderfeldt B, Gröndahl HG. Analysis of dentists’ attitudes towards risks in oral radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996;25(3):151-156. [Crossref]
  • 18. Kleinerman RA. Cancer risks following diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36(2):121-125. [Crossref]
  • 19. Preston-Martin S, Thomas DC, White SC, Cohen D. Prior exposure to medical and dental x-rays related to tumors of the parotid gland. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988;80(12):943-949. [Crossref]
  • 20. Preston-Martin S, White SC. Brain and salivary gland tumors related to prior dental radiography: implications for current practice. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;120(2):151-158. [Crossref]
  • 21. Claus EB, Calvocoressi L, Bondy ML, Schildkraut JM, Wiemels JL, Wrensch M. Dental x-rays and risk of meningioma. Cancer. 2012;118(18): 4530-4537. [Crossref]
  • 22. Neta G, Rajaraman P, Gonzalez AB, et al. A prospective study of medical diagnostic radiography and risk of thyroid cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177(8):800-809. [Crossref]
  • 23. Memon A, Godword S, Williams D, Siddique I, Al-Saleh IC.Dental x-rays and the risk of thyroid cancer: a case-control study. Acta Oncol. 2010;49(4):447-453. [Crossref]
  • 24. Lorenzoni DC, Fracalossi ACC, Carlin V, Ribeiro DA, Sant’Anna EF. Mutagenicity and cytotoxicity in patients submitted to ionizing radiation: a comparison between cone beam computed tomography and radiographs for orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(1):104-109. [Crossref]
  • 25. Cerqueira EMM, Meireles JRC, Junqueira VC, Gomes- Filho IS, Trinade S, Machado-Santelli GM. Genotoxic effects of X-rays on keratinized mucosa cells during panoramic dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37(7): 398-403. [Crossref]
  • 26. Senior A, Almeida FT, Geha H, Pacheco-Pereiro C. Intraoral imaging in dental private practice—A rectangular collimator study. J Can Dent Assoc. 2020;86(k16):1488-2159.
  • 27. Boeddinghaus R, Whyte A. Current concepts in maxillofacial imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2008;66(3):396-418. [Crossref]
  • 28. Berkhout WE. The ALARA-principle: Backgrounds and enforcement in dental practices. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2015;122(5): 263-270. [Crossref]
  • 29. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. The use of dental radiographs: update and recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(9):1304-1312. [Crossref]
  • 30. Raadal M, Amarante E, Espelid I. Prevalence, severity and distribution of caries in a group of 5-year-old Norwegian children. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2000;1(1):13-20.
  • 31. Radiation Protection. European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology. The safe use of radiographs in dental practice. European Committee Issue. 2004;20-23,41-52,63-68. ISBN 92-894-5958-1.
  • 32. Crane GD, Abbott P. Radiation shielding in dentistry: an update. Aust Dent J. 2016;61(3):277-281. [Crossref]
  • 33. White SC, Heslop EW, Hollender LG, Mosier KM, Ruprecht A, Shrout MK. Parameters of radiologic care: An official report of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2001;91(5): 498-511. [Crossref]
  • 34. White SC, Pharoah M. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. 7th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby Elsevier; 2009:448-452.
  • 35. Horner K, Hirschmann P. Dose reduction in dental radiography. J Dent. 1990;18(4):171-184. [Crossref]
  • 36. Horner K. Radiation protection in dental radiology. Br J Radiol. 1994;67(803): 1041-1049. [Crossref]
  • 37. Aps J, Scott J. Oblique lateral radiographs and bitewings; estimation of organ doses in head and neck region with Monte Carlo calculations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(6):20130419. [Crossref]
  • 38. Hayakawa Y, Fujimori H, Kuroyanagi K. Absorbed doses with intaoral radiography: Function of various technical parameters. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 1993;76(4): 519-524. [Crossref]
  • 39. Geist J, Brand J. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001;30(3): 147-152. [Crossref]
  • 40. Akgün ÖM, Oflaz Ü, Altun C. Çürük Tespitinde Güncel Yaklaşımlar. Türkiye Klinikleri. J Health Sci. 2018;4(1):10-14
  • 41. Wenzel A. Bitewing and digital bitewing radiography for detection of caries lesions. J Dent Res. 2004;83(1):72-75. [Crossref]
  • 42. Astvaldsdottir A, Ahlund K,Holbrook WP, de Verdler B, Tranaeus S. Approximal caries detection by DIFOTI: in vitro comparison of diagnostic accuracy/efficacy with film and digital radiography. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:326401. [Crossref]
  • 43. Abdelaziz M, Krejci I. DIAGNOcam: A Near Infrared Digital Imaging Transillumination (NIDIT) technology. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015;10(1):158-165.
  • 44. Stookey GK, González-Cabezas C. Emerging methods of caries diagnosis. J Dent Educ. 2001;65(10):1001-1006. [Crossref]
  • 45. Choi J-W. Assessment of panoramic radiography as a national oral examination tool: review of the literature. Imaging Sci Dent. 2011;41(1):1-6. [Crossref]
  • 46. Temur KT, Hatıpoglu O. Awareness and use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) of Turkish dentist. J Dent Fac Ataturk Univ. 2019;29(2):169-175. [Crossref]
  • 47. Lecomber A, Faulkner K. Dose reduction in panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1993;22(2):69-73. [Crossref]
  • 48. Hayakawa Y, Kobayashi N, Kurayanagi K, Nishizawa K. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001;30(5):285-292. [Crossref]
  • 49. Davis A, Safi H, Maddison S. The reduction of dose in paediatric panoramic radiography: the impact of collimator height and programme selection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(2):20140223. [Crossref]
  • 50. Rottke D, Grossekettler L, Sawado K, Poxleitner P, Schulze D. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(10):20130302. [Crossref]
  • 51. Gijbels F, Sanderink G, Wyatt J, Dam JV, Nowak B, Jacobss R. Radiation doses of collimated vs non-collimated cephalometric exposures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003;32(2):128-133. [Crossref]
  • 52. Mandall N, O’Brien K, Worthington H. Radiation reduction using a modified collimated lateral skull radiograph during orthodontic treatment. Clin Orthod Res. 1999;2(4):179-185. [Crossref]
  • 53. Alcaraz M, Garcia-Vera MC, Bravo LA, et al. Collimator with filtration compensator: clinical adaptation to meet European Union recommendation 4F on radiological protection for dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38(6):413-420. [Crossref]
  • 54. Wiechmann D, Decker A, Hohoff A, Kleinheinz J, Stamm T. The influence of lead thyroid collars on cephalometric landmark identification. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2007;104(4):560-568. [Crossref]
  • 55. Hsiao TH, Chang HP, Liu KM. A method of magnification correction for posteroanterior radiographic cephalometry. Angle Orthod. 1997;67(2):137-142.
  • 56. Mazonakis M, Damilakis J, Raissaki M, Gourtsayiannis N. Radiation dose and cancer risk to children undergoing skull radiography. Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34(8):624-629. [Crossref]
  • 57. Robb J. Estimates of radiation detriment in a UK population. National Radiological Protection Board; 1994:40. ISBN 0 85951 385 0.
  • 58. Kyriou J, Fitzgerald M, Pettett A, Cook JV, Pablot SM. A comparison of doses and techniques between specialist and non-specialist centres in the diagnostic X-ray imaging of children. Br J Radiol. 1996;69(821):437-450. [Crossref]
  • 59. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Dijck EV, et al. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71(3):461-468. [Crossref]
  • 60. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(9):1237-1243. [Crossref]
  • 61. Theodorakou C, Walker A, Horner K, Pauwels R, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1010):153-160. [Crossref]
  • 62. Al Najjar A, Colosi D, Dauer LT, et al. Comparison of adult and child radiation equivalent doses from 2 dental cone-beam computed tomography units. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;143(6):784-792. [Crossref]
  • 63. Oenning AC, Pauwels R, Stratis A, et al. Halve the dose while maintaining image quality in paediatric Cone Beam CT. Scientific reports. 2019;9(1):1-9. [Crossref]
  • 64. Shin HS, Nam KC, Park H, Choi HU, Kim HY, Parks CS. Effective doses from panoramic radiography and CBCT (cone beam CT) using dose area product (DAP) in dentistry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(5):20130439. [Crossref]
  • 65. EzEldeen M, Stratis A, Coucke W, Codari M, Politis C, Jacobs R. As low dose as sufficient quality: optimization of cone-beam computed tomographic scanning protocol for tooth autotransplantation planning and follow-up in children. J Endod. 2017;43(2):210-217.[Crossref]
  • 66. Hidalgo A, Davies J, Horner K, Theodorakou C. Effectiveness of thyroid gland shielding in dental CBCT using a paediatric anthropomorphic phantom. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(3):20140285. [Crossref]
  • 67. Goren A, Prins RD, Dauer LT, et al. Effect of leaded glasses and thyroid shielding on cone beam CT radiation dose in an adult female phantom. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(6):20120260. [Crossref]
  • 68. Ainsbury E, Bouffler SD, Dörr W, Graw J, Muirhead CR, Edwards AA, Cooper J Radiation cataractogenesis: a review of recent studies. Radiat Res. 2009;172(1):1-9. [Crossref] 238 Curr Res
APA Baş A, Şimşek Derelioğlu S (2022). Çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanılan farklı radyografi tekniklerinde radyasyon dozunu azaltıcı önlemler. , 231 - 238. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1038856
Chicago Baş Aybike,Şimşek Derelioğlu Sera Çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanılan farklı radyografi tekniklerinde radyasyon dozunu azaltıcı önlemler. (2022): 231 - 238. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1038856
MLA Baş Aybike,Şimşek Derelioğlu Sera Çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanılan farklı radyografi tekniklerinde radyasyon dozunu azaltıcı önlemler. , 2022, ss.231 - 238. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1038856
AMA Baş A,Şimşek Derelioğlu S Çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanılan farklı radyografi tekniklerinde radyasyon dozunu azaltıcı önlemler. . 2022; 231 - 238. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1038856
Vancouver Baş A,Şimşek Derelioğlu S Çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanılan farklı radyografi tekniklerinde radyasyon dozunu azaltıcı önlemler. . 2022; 231 - 238. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1038856
IEEE Baş A,Şimşek Derelioğlu S "Çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanılan farklı radyografi tekniklerinde radyasyon dozunu azaltıcı önlemler." , ss.231 - 238, 2022. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1038856
ISNAD Baş, Aybike - Şimşek Derelioğlu, Sera. "Çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanılan farklı radyografi tekniklerinde radyasyon dozunu azaltıcı önlemler". (2022), 231-238. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.1038856
APA Baş A, Şimşek Derelioğlu S (2022). Çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanılan farklı radyografi tekniklerinde radyasyon dozunu azaltıcı önlemler. Current research in dental sciences (Online), 32(3), 231 - 238. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1038856
Chicago Baş Aybike,Şimşek Derelioğlu Sera Çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanılan farklı radyografi tekniklerinde radyasyon dozunu azaltıcı önlemler. Current research in dental sciences (Online) 32, no.3 (2022): 231 - 238. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1038856
MLA Baş Aybike,Şimşek Derelioğlu Sera Çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanılan farklı radyografi tekniklerinde radyasyon dozunu azaltıcı önlemler. Current research in dental sciences (Online), vol.32, no.3, 2022, ss.231 - 238. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1038856
AMA Baş A,Şimşek Derelioğlu S Çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanılan farklı radyografi tekniklerinde radyasyon dozunu azaltıcı önlemler. Current research in dental sciences (Online). 2022; 32(3): 231 - 238. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1038856
Vancouver Baş A,Şimşek Derelioğlu S Çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanılan farklı radyografi tekniklerinde radyasyon dozunu azaltıcı önlemler. Current research in dental sciences (Online). 2022; 32(3): 231 - 238. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1038856
IEEE Baş A,Şimşek Derelioğlu S "Çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanılan farklı radyografi tekniklerinde radyasyon dozunu azaltıcı önlemler." Current research in dental sciences (Online), 32, ss.231 - 238, 2022. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1038856
ISNAD Baş, Aybike - Şimşek Derelioğlu, Sera. "Çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanılan farklı radyografi tekniklerinde radyasyon dozunu azaltıcı önlemler". Current research in dental sciences (Online) 32/3 (2022), 231-238. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.1038856