Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 37 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 403 - 423 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.16986/HUJE.2020064992 İndeks Tarihi: 14-09-2022

Müdahaleye Yanıt: Boylamsal Çalışmaların Bir Sistematik Derlemesi

Öz:
Risk grubunda olan öğrencileri, özel eğitime yönlendirme öncesinde müdahaleye yanıt yaklaşımı, 20. yüzyılın en önemli eğitsel reformlarındandır. Bu çalışmada müdahaleye yanıt kapsamında boylamsal olarak yürütülmüş uygulamalı araştırmalar gözden geçirilmiştir. Bu kapsamda Ocak, 2004- Aralık, 2017 tarihleri arasında yürütülmüş ve İngilizce dilinde yayımlanmış otuz boylamsal araştırma, risk grubunda olan öğrenci özellikleri, öğretim içerikleri, sonuçlar ve sınırlılıklar gibi çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, müdahaleye yanıtı konu edinen araştırmaların daha çok okuma bozukluğu riski olan gruplara yönelik olduğunu, matematik bozukluğu riski ve davranış bozukluğu riski olan gruplara yönelik müdahale yanıt uygulamalarının ise daha az olduğu yönündedir. Sonuç olarak, doğrudan öğretim, çeşitli öğretim uyarlamaları ve düzenlemeler ve gerektiğinde daha yoğun öğretimle risk grubunda yer alan öğrencilerin okul başarısının artabileceği, uzun süreli uygulamaların etkili olduğu ve risk grubunda yer alan öğrencileri özel eğitime yönlendirme oranlarında düşüşlerin olabileceği ortaya konulmuştur. Elde edilen bulgular alanyazın dikkate alınarak tartışılmıştır. Türkiye gibi gelişmekte olan ülke eğitim sistemlerinde uygulanabilirliğinin desteklenmesine yönelik çeşitli öneriler sunulmuştur.
Anahtar Kelime:

Response to Intervention: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies

Öz:
Response to intervention is one of the most important educational reforms of the 20th century before directing students at risk group to special education. In this study, applied studies carried out longitudinally within the scope of response to the intervention were reviewed. In this context, it was conducted between January, 2004- December, 2017 and published in English. Thirty longitudinal studies were examined in terms of various variables such as student characteristics, teaching contents, results and limitations in the risk group. The findings indicate that the studies that are subject to the response to the intervention are conducted with groups with the risk of reading difficulty, and the response to interventions with the groups with the risk of mathematics difficulty and those with the risk of behavioral disorders are less. As a result, it was revealed that the school success of the students in the risk group may increase with the direct special education, various teaching adaptations and arrangements and more intensive education when necessary, long-term practices are effective and there may be a decrease in the rates of directing the students in the risk group to special education. The findings were discussed by considering the literature. Several recommendations to support the viability of developing countries such as Turkey, the education system is presented.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • * ile işaretlenmiş kaynaklar analize dahil edilmişlerdir.
  • *Albrecht, S. F., Mathur, S. R., Jones, R. E., & Alazemi, S. (2015). A school-wide three-tiered program of social skills intervention: Results of a three-year cohort study. Education And Treatment Of Children, 38(4), 565–586.
  • *Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., Chaparro, E. A., Smith, J. L. M., & Fien, H.(2015). Using regression discontinuity to test the impact of a tier 2 reading intervention in first grade. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(2), 218-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2014.909548
  • *Beach, K. D., & E. O’Connor, R. E.(2015). Early response-to-intervention measures and criteria as predictors of reading disability in the beginning of third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(2), 196–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413495451
  • Brown, J. E., & Doolittle, J. (2008). A cultural, linguistic, and ecological framework for response to intervention with English language learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(5), 66-72.
  • Brown-Chidsey, R., & Steege, M. W.(2010). Response to intervention principles and strategies for effective practice. The Guilford Press.
  • Bruhn, A. L., Lane, K. L., & Hirsch, S. E. (2014). A review of tier 2 interventions conducted within multitiered models of behavioral prevention. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22(3), 171-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426613476092
  • Burns, M. K., Appleton, J. J., & Stehouwer, J. D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(4), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290502300406
  • *Case, L., Speece, D., Silverman, R., Schatschneider, C., Montanaro, E., & Ritchey, K.(2014). İmmediate and long-term effects of tier 2 reading instruction for first-grade students with a high probability of reading failure. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(1), 28-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2013.786771
  • *Catts, H. W., Nielsen, D. C., Bridges, M. S., Liu, Y-S., & Bontempo, D. E.(2015). Early identification of reading disabilities within an RTI framework. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(3), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413498115
  • *Catts, H. W., Nielsen, D. C., Bridges, M. S., & Liu, Y-S.(2016). Early identification of reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(5), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221941455612
  • Choi, E., Yoon, S. M., & Hong, S. (2012). A literature review of implementing response to intervention for english language learners. Thte Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 1(2). Tarihinde adresinden erişildi https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1127776.pdf
  • *Dentón, C. A., Nimon, K., Mathes, P. G., Swanson, E. A., Kethley, C., Kurz, T. B., & Shih, M.(2010). Effectiveness of a supplemental early reading intervention scaled up in multiple schools. Exceptional Children, 76(4), 394-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600402
  • Dexter, D. D., Hughes, C. A., & Farmer, T. W. (2008). Responsiveness to intervention: A review of field studies and implications for rural special education. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 27(4), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687050802700402
  • *Doabler, C. H., Clarke, B., Kosty, D. B., Kurtz-Nelson, E., Fien, H., Smolkowski, K., & Baker, S. K.(2016). Testing the efficacy of a tier 2 mathematics intervention: a conceptual replication study. Exceptional Children, 83(1), 92-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916660084
  • Dougherty-Stahl, K. A. (2016). Response to intervention: is the sky falling? Reading Teacher, 69(6), 659–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1457
  • *Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Bryant, J., & Davis, G. N.(2007). Making ‘‘secondary intervention’’ work in a three-tier responsiveness-to-intervention model: Findings from the first-grade longitudinal reading study of the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 413 –436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9083-9
  • Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 39(5), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990703900503
  • Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
  • *Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Craddock, C., Kurstin N. Hollenbeck, K. N., & Hamlett, C. L., Schatschneider, C.(2008). Effects of small- group tutoring with and without validated classroom instruction on at-risk students’ math problem solving: Are two tiers of prevention better than one? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 491–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.100.3.491
  • Gersten, R., Baker, S., & Lloyd, J. W. (2000). Designing high-quality research in special education: Group experimental design. The Journal of Special Education, 34(1), 2-18.
  • *Gilbert, J. K., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Bouton, B., Barquero, L. A., & Cho, E.(2013). Efficacy of a first-grade responsiveness-to-intervention prevention model for struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2), 135-154. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.45
  • Glover, T. A., & Vaughn, S.(2010). The promise of response to intervention evaluating current science and practice. The Guilford Press
  • Gresham, F. M. (2005). Response to intervention: An alternative means of identifying students as emotionally disturbed. Education and Treatment of Children, 28(4), 328-344.
  • Gresham, F. M. (2007). Evolution of the response-to-intervention concept: Empirical foundations and recent developments. İçinde Handbook of Response to Intervention. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49053-3_2
  • Hill, D. R., King, S. A., Lemons, C. J., & Partanen, J. N. (2012). The Division for learning disabilities of the council for exceptional children fidelity of implementation and instructional alignment in response to intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(3), 116–124.
  • Hughes, C. A., & Dexter, D. D.(2011). Response to intervention: A research-based summary. Theory Into Practice, 50(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.534909
  • Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2007). Response to intervention at school: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. İçinde Handbook of Response to Intervention. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49053-31
  • Lane, K. L., Menzies, H. M., Oakes, W. P., & Ka berg, J. R. (2011). Systematic screenings of behavior to support instruction: From preschool to high school. Guilford Press.
  • Lembke, E. S., Garman, C., Deno, S. L., & Stecker, P. M. (2010). One elementary school’s implementation of response to intervention (RTI). Reading & Writing Quarterly, 26(4), 361-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2010.500266
  • *Linan-Thompson, S., Vaughn, S., Prater, K., & Cirino., P. T.(2006). The response to intervention of english language learners at risk for reading problems. Journal Of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390050201
  • *Lonigan, C. J., & Phillips, B. M.(2016). Response to instruction in preschool: Results of two randomized studies with children at significant risk of reading difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000054
  • Metcalf, L. (2010). Solution-Focused RTI. İçinde Solution-Focused RTI: A Positive and Personalized Approach to Response to Intervention. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269473
  • *McAlenney, A. L., & Coyne, M. D.(2015). Addressing false positives in early reading assessment using intervention response data. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(1), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948713514057
  • Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • *Murray, C. S., Woodruff, A. L., & Vaughn, S. (2010). First-grade student retention within a 3-tier reading framework. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 26(1). 26-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560903396934
  • *O’Connor, R. E., Harty, K. R., & Fulmer, D.(2005). Tiers of intervention in kindergarten through third grade. Journal Of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380060901
  • *O’Connor, R. E., Bocian, K. M., Beach, K. D., Sanchez, V., & Flynn, L. J.(2013). Special education in a 4-year response to intervention (RTI) environment: Characteristics of students with learning disability and grade of identification. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(3), 98–112.
  • *Otaiba, S. A., Kim, Y-S., Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., & Wagner, R.K.(2014) Long-term effects of first-grade multitier intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(3), 250-267, https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2014.906692
  • *Powell, S. R., Fuchs, L. S., Cirino, P. T., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., & Changas, P. C.(2015). Effects of a multitier support system on calculation, word problem, and prealgebraic performance among at-risk learners. Exceptional Children. 81(4), 443-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563702
  • *Pyle, N., & Vaughn, S.(2012). Remediating reading difficulties in a response to intervention model with secondary students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(3), https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21593
  • *Richards-Tutor, C., Solari, E. J., Leafstedt, J. M., Gerber, M. M., Filippini, A., & Aceves, T. C. (2012). Response to intervention for english learners: Examining models for determining response and nonresponse. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 38(3), 172-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508412461522
  • *Ritchey, K. D., Silverman, R. D., Montanaro, E. A., Speece, D., & Schatschneider, C. (2012). Effects of a tier 2 supplemental reading intervention for at-risk fourth-grade students. Exceptional Children, 78(3), 318-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800304
  • *Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Fletcher, J., Stuebing, K., & Barth, A. (2013). Effects of a response-based, tiered framework for intervening with struggling readersin middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.47
  • *Sanchez, V. M., & O’Connor, R. E. (2015). Building tier 3 intervention for long-term slow growers in grades 3–4: A pilot study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30(4), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12085
  • *Scheltinga, F., Leij, A., & Struiksma, C.(2010). Predictors of response to intervention of word reading fluency in Dutch. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(3), 212-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409345015
  • *Simmons, D. C., Coyne, M. D., Kwok, O-M., McDonagh, S., Harn, B. A., & Kame’enui, E. J. (2008). Indexing response to intervention: A longitudinal study of reading risk from kindergarten through third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(2), 158-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219407313587
  • *Simmons, D. C., Kim, M. , Kwok, O-M., Coyne, M. D., Simmons, L. E., Oslund, E., Fogarty, M., Hagan-Burke, S., Little, M. E., & Rawlinson, D.(2015). Examining the effects of linking student performance and progression in a tier 2 kindergarten reading intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(3), 255-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413497097
  • Stewart, R. M., Benner, G. J., Martella, R. C., & Marchand-Martella, N. E. (2007). Three-tier models of reading and behavior: A research review. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(4), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007070090040601
  • Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2008). What we know and need to know about preventing problem behavior in schools. Exceptionality, 16(2), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830801981138
  • Tran, L., Sanchez, T., Arellano, B., & Swanson, H. L. (2011). A meta-analysis of the RTI literature for children at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(3), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410378447
  • Turse, K. A., & Albrecht, S. F. (2015). The ABCs of RTI: An introduction to the building blocks of response to intervention. Preventing School Failure, 59(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2013.837813
  • *Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Zhang, H., & Schatschneider, C.(2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 21, 437–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9098-2
  • Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: the promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(3), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00070
  • *Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Leroux, A., Roberts, G., Dentón, C., Amy Barth, A., & Fletcher, J.(2012). Effects of intensive reading intervention for eighth-grade students with persistently inadequate response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(6), 515-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411402692
APA Vuran S, AYDIN O, uysal h, ŞAHİN V (2022). Müdahaleye Yanıt: Boylamsal Çalışmaların Bir Sistematik Derlemesi. , 403 - 423. 10.16986/HUJE.2020064992
Chicago Vuran Sezgin,AYDIN Orhan,uysal halil,ŞAHİN Volkan Müdahaleye Yanıt: Boylamsal Çalışmaların Bir Sistematik Derlemesi. (2022): 403 - 423. 10.16986/HUJE.2020064992
MLA Vuran Sezgin,AYDIN Orhan,uysal halil,ŞAHİN Volkan Müdahaleye Yanıt: Boylamsal Çalışmaların Bir Sistematik Derlemesi. , 2022, ss.403 - 423. 10.16986/HUJE.2020064992
AMA Vuran S,AYDIN O,uysal h,ŞAHİN V Müdahaleye Yanıt: Boylamsal Çalışmaların Bir Sistematik Derlemesi. . 2022; 403 - 423. 10.16986/HUJE.2020064992
Vancouver Vuran S,AYDIN O,uysal h,ŞAHİN V Müdahaleye Yanıt: Boylamsal Çalışmaların Bir Sistematik Derlemesi. . 2022; 403 - 423. 10.16986/HUJE.2020064992
IEEE Vuran S,AYDIN O,uysal h,ŞAHİN V "Müdahaleye Yanıt: Boylamsal Çalışmaların Bir Sistematik Derlemesi." , ss.403 - 423, 2022. 10.16986/HUJE.2020064992
ISNAD Vuran, Sezgin vd. "Müdahaleye Yanıt: Boylamsal Çalışmaların Bir Sistematik Derlemesi". (2022), 403-423. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2020064992
APA Vuran S, AYDIN O, uysal h, ŞAHİN V (2022). Müdahaleye Yanıt: Boylamsal Çalışmaların Bir Sistematik Derlemesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 403 - 423. 10.16986/HUJE.2020064992
Chicago Vuran Sezgin,AYDIN Orhan,uysal halil,ŞAHİN Volkan Müdahaleye Yanıt: Boylamsal Çalışmaların Bir Sistematik Derlemesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 37, no.1 (2022): 403 - 423. 10.16986/HUJE.2020064992
MLA Vuran Sezgin,AYDIN Orhan,uysal halil,ŞAHİN Volkan Müdahaleye Yanıt: Boylamsal Çalışmaların Bir Sistematik Derlemesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.37, no.1, 2022, ss.403 - 423. 10.16986/HUJE.2020064992
AMA Vuran S,AYDIN O,uysal h,ŞAHİN V Müdahaleye Yanıt: Boylamsal Çalışmaların Bir Sistematik Derlemesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 37(1): 403 - 423. 10.16986/HUJE.2020064992
Vancouver Vuran S,AYDIN O,uysal h,ŞAHİN V Müdahaleye Yanıt: Boylamsal Çalışmaların Bir Sistematik Derlemesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 37(1): 403 - 423. 10.16986/HUJE.2020064992
IEEE Vuran S,AYDIN O,uysal h,ŞAHİN V "Müdahaleye Yanıt: Boylamsal Çalışmaların Bir Sistematik Derlemesi." Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37, ss.403 - 423, 2022. 10.16986/HUJE.2020064992
ISNAD Vuran, Sezgin vd. "Müdahaleye Yanıt: Boylamsal Çalışmaların Bir Sistematik Derlemesi". Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 37/1 (2022), 403-423. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2020064992