Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 352 - 358 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.676 İndeks Tarihi: 21-09-2022
Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane
Öz: Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of four different fixation techniques for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures considering the fracture morphology in the sagittal plane. Materials and methods: We constructed three different fracture morphologies in the sagittal plane in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: posteriorly angled at 20°, neutral, and anteriorly angled at 20°. We set up four fixation devices, including three cannulated screws (3CS), a dynamic hip screw with an antirotational screw (DHS+CS), a proximal femoral locking plate (PFLP), and three cannulated screws with a medial buttress plate (3CS+MBP). The twelve models were created and analyzed using the finite element analysis. Results: The finite element analysis revealed that 3CS+MBP yields better results in total vertical and rotational displacements, regardless of the fracture angle in the sagittal plane. For the anterior and posterior angled fractures in the sagittal plane, the PFLP was superior to the DHS+CS. However, the DHS+CS exhibited less displacement than the PFLP in the neutral fracture line in the sagittal plane. The 3CS group demonstrated poor mechanical stability for Pauwels type III fractures. Conclusion: Regardless of the fracture line in the sagittal plane, the 3CS+MBP showed better biomechanical behaviors than the 3CS, DHS+CS, and PFLP. In addition, in contrast to the DHS+CS, the PFLP displayed less vertical and rotational displacement in the anterior and posterior fracture lines in the sagittal plane.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Cha YH, Yoo JI, Hwang SY, Kim KJ, Kim HY, Choy WS, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation of pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: A systematic review of various fixation methods. Clin Orthop Surg 2019;11:1-14.
- 2. Panteli M, Rodham P, Giannoudis PV. Biomechanical rationale for implant choices in femoral neck fracture fixation in the non-elderly. Injury 2015;46:445-52.
- 3. Xia Y, Zhang W, Zhang Z, Wang J, Yan L. Treatment of femoral neck fractures: Sliding hip screw or cannulated screws? A meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2021;16:54.
- 4. Freitas A, Toledo Júnior JV, Ferreira Dos Santos A, Aquino RJ, Leão VN, Péricles de Alcântara W. Biomechanical study of different internal fixations in Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture - A finite elements analysis. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2020;14:145-50.
- 5. Li J, Yin P, Zhang L, Chen H, Tang P. Medial anatomical buttress plate in treating displaced femoral neck fracture a finite element analysis. Injury 2019;50:1895-900.
- 6. Wang SH, Yang JJ, Shen HC, Lin LC, Lee MS, Pan RY. Using a modified Pauwels method to predict the outcome of femoral neck fracture in relatively young patients. Injury 2015;46:1969-74.
- 7. Öner K, Durusoy S, Özer A. Is the fracture morphology in the sagittal plane important in determining the ideal placement of the lag screw in intertrochanteric femoral fractures?: Ideal lag screw placement in intertrochanteric fractures in the sagittal plane. Injury 2021;52:562-8.
- 8. Wang K, Ni M, Liao P, Dou B, Yan X, Lv L, et al. Fracture morphology and biomechanical characteristics of Pauwels III femoral neck fractures in young adults. Injury 2021;52:3227-38.
- 9. Li J, Zhao Z, Yin P, Zhang L, Tang P. Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture-a finite element analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2019;14:76.
- 10. Zeng W, Liu Y, Hou X. Biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation implants for femoral neck fractures: A comparative finite element analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2020;196:105714.
- 11. Liang C, Peng R, Jiang N, Xie G, Wang L, Yu B. Intertrochanteric fracture: Association between the coronal position of the lag screw and stress distribution. Asian J Surg 2018;41:241-9.
- 12. Atik OŞ. Which articles do the editors prefer to publish? Jt Dis Relat Surg 2022;33:1-2.
- 13. Chan DS. Femoral neck fractures in young patients: State of the art. J Orthop Trauma 2019;33 Suppl 1:S7-S11.
- 14. Stoffel K, Zderic I, Gras F, Sommer C, Eberli U, Mueller D, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the femoral neck system in unstable pauwels III femoral neck fractures: A comparison with the dynamic hip screw and cannulated screws. J Orthop Trauma 2017;31:131-7.
- 15. Wang Z, Yin Y, Li Q, Sun G, Peng X, Yin H, et al. Comparison of early complications between the use of a cannulated screw locking plate and multiple cancellous screws in the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in young adults: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Orthop Surg Res 2018;13:201.
- 16. Kunapuli SC, Schramski MJ, Lee AS, Popovich JM Jr, Cholewicki J, Reeves NP, et al. Biomechanical analysis of augmented plate fixation for the treatment of vertical shear femoral neck fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2015;29:144-50.
- 17. Tan V, Wong KL, Born CT, Harten R, DeLong WG Jr. Two- screw femoral neck fracture fixation: A biomechanical analysis of 2 different configurations. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2007;36:481-5.
- 18. Berkes MB, Little MT, Lazaro LE, Cymerman RM, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Catastrophic failure after open reduction internal fixation of femoral neck fractures with a novel locking plate implant. J Orthop Trauma 2012;26:e170-6.
- 19. Liu JF, Zhang SD, Huang L, Zhu JH, Hou XD, Ge S, et al. Dynamic limited axial compression yields favorable functional outcomes in the fixation of Pauwels type-3 femoral neck fractures: A retrospective cohort study. Injury 2020;51:1851-7.
- 20. Felton J, Slobogean GP, Jackson SS, Della Rocca GJ, Liew S, Haverlag R, et al. Femoral neck shortening after hip fracture fixation is associated with inferior hip function: Results from the FAITH trial. J Orthop Trauma 2019;33:487-96.
| APA | OZER A, Öner K, Okutan A, Ayas M (2022). Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane. , 352 - 358. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.676 |
| Chicago | OZER Alaettin,Öner Kerim,Okutan Ahmet Emin,Ayas Muhammet Salih Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane. (2022): 352 - 358. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.676 |
| MLA | OZER Alaettin,Öner Kerim,Okutan Ahmet Emin,Ayas Muhammet Salih Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane. , 2022, ss.352 - 358. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.676 |
| AMA | OZER A,Öner K,Okutan A,Ayas M Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane. . 2022; 352 - 358. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.676 |
| Vancouver | OZER A,Öner K,Okutan A,Ayas M Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane. . 2022; 352 - 358. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.676 |
| IEEE | OZER A,Öner K,Okutan A,Ayas M "Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane." , ss.352 - 358, 2022. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.676 |
| ISNAD | OZER, Alaettin vd. "Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane". (2022), 352-358. https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2022.676 |
| APA | OZER A, Öner K, Okutan A, Ayas M (2022). Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane. Joint diseases and related surgery, 33(2), 352 - 358. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.676 |
| Chicago | OZER Alaettin,Öner Kerim,Okutan Ahmet Emin,Ayas Muhammet Salih Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane. Joint diseases and related surgery 33, no.2 (2022): 352 - 358. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.676 |
| MLA | OZER Alaettin,Öner Kerim,Okutan Ahmet Emin,Ayas Muhammet Salih Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane. Joint diseases and related surgery, vol.33, no.2, 2022, ss.352 - 358. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.676 |
| AMA | OZER A,Öner K,Okutan A,Ayas M Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane. Joint diseases and related surgery. 2022; 33(2): 352 - 358. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.676 |
| Vancouver | OZER A,Öner K,Okutan A,Ayas M Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane. Joint diseases and related surgery. 2022; 33(2): 352 - 358. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.676 |
| IEEE | OZER A,Öner K,Okutan A,Ayas M "Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane." Joint diseases and related surgery, 33, ss.352 - 358, 2022. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.676 |
| ISNAD | OZER, Alaettin vd. "Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane". Joint diseases and related surgery 33/2 (2022), 352-358. https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2022.676 |
