Coaching for Better Teaching: A Study on Student-Centered Instructional Coaching
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 31 Sayfa Aralığı: 159 - 182 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14689/enad.31.1607 İndeks Tarihi: 24-09-2022
Coaching for Better Teaching: A Study on Student-Centered Instructional Coaching
Öz: As the appeal and need for greater student achievement have been increasing each day steadily, so does the wish to find ways to reach those levels. The student-centered coaching (SCC) model is designed to improve teachers' instructional abilities that will improve student achievement. This research study aimed to examine the perceived impact of SCC on teachers’ instructional practices and the challenges to and facilitating factors in implementation. The study employed a qualitative phenomenological research design to investigate the student-centered coaching practice of a school district in Northern USA. Qualitative data collected from seven teachers and three coaches who were conveniently available to participate in the study through semi-structured interviews were subjected to content analysis. The results suggested that the respondents considered SCC as an effective model to change teacher practice and ultimately impact student learning. Based on the qualitative data, a few recommendations were offered to help address potential challenges in implementing the SCC in the future.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Bean, R. M., Draper, J. A., Hall, V., Vandermolen, J., & Zigmond, N. (2010). Coaches and coaching in reading first school: A reality check. The Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 87–114.
- Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5 th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Collins, L. D. (2021). The impact of student-centered coaching on teacher self- efficacy: An exploratory case study. All Theses and Dissertations. 352. Retrieved from https://dune.une.edu/theses/352
- Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (2011). Kappan classic: Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 81–92. Retrieved from http://cupds.idm.odc.org /login?url=https://searchproquestcom.cupdxidm.occ.org/docvie w/859109094?accounid-10248
- Denton, C. A., Swanson, E. A., & Mathes, P. G. (2007). Assessment-based instructional coaching provided to reading intervention teachers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20(6), 569– 590. Retrieved from http://cupdx.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search proquestcom.cupdx.oclc.org/docview/62042544?accontid=10248
- Galey, S. (2016). The evolving role of instructional coaches in U.S. policy contexts. The William & Mary Educational Review, 4(2), 54-71. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.wm.edu/wmer/vol4/iss2/11.
- Galvan, R. J. (2016). Principal and coach influences on teacher planning and preparation using a student centered coaching model. Edgewood College, Department of Education, US.
- Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L. M., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Analysis of a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.
- Gillham, B. (2000). Developing a questionnaire. London: Continuum
- Grimm, E. D., Kaufman, T., & Doty, D. (2014). Rethinking classroom observation. Professional Learning: Reimagined, 71, 24–29. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educationalleadership/may14/vol71/num08/RethinkingClassroom-Observation.aspx
- Hebgen, L. M. (2017). Examining the effectiveness of a professional learning opportunity focused on student-centered coaching: Perceptions from instructional coaches. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/examining effectiveness-professional-learning/docview/1873522354/se-2?accountid=13014
- Killion, J. (2013). Establishing time for professional learning. Learning Forward. Retrieved from http://www.literacyinlearningexchange.org/sites /default/files/establishing-time for-professionallearning.pdf.
- Knight, J. (2007). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781107415324.004
- Knowles, M., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (2011). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (7 th ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier.
- Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588.
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Maclin, M. (2018). A case study: The influence of literacy professional development on teaching practices and teacher self-efficacy. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/2130944495/
- Mangin, M. M., & Stoelinga, S. R. (2008). Teacher leadership: What it is and why it matters. In Mangin, M. M., Stoelinga, S. R. (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 10–35). New York: Teachers College Press.
- Martin, A., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 327–365.
- Marzano, R. J. (2011). Making the most of instructional rounds. Educational Leadership, 68(5), 80–81. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/Default. aspx
- Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2 nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage, London.
- Nelson, B. S., & Sassi, A. (2000). Shifting approaches to supervision: The case of mathematics supervision. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(4), 553-584.
- Neufeld, B., & Roper, D. (2003). Coaching: A strategy for developing instructional capacity: Promises & practicalities. Boston: Education Matters, Inc.
- Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3 rd ed.). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage Publications: London.
- Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J. (2002). Supervision: A redefinition (7 th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Shernoff, E. S., Lakind, D., Frazier, S. L., & Jakobsons, L. (2015). Coaching early career teachers in urban elementary schools: A mixed-method study. School Mental Health, 7(1), 6-20.
- Sweeney, D. (2011). Student-centered coaching: A guide for K–8 coaches and principals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
- Sweeney, D., & Harris, L. S. (2017). Student-centered coaching the moves. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
- Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. The Elementary School Journal, 104(1), 3–28.
- Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2016). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. (10 th ed.) Ankara: Seckin Yayincilik.
| APA | tekir s (2022). Coaching for Better Teaching: A Study on Student-Centered Instructional Coaching. , 159 - 182. 10.14689/enad.31.1607 |
| Chicago | tekir serpil Coaching for Better Teaching: A Study on Student-Centered Instructional Coaching. (2022): 159 - 182. 10.14689/enad.31.1607 |
| MLA | tekir serpil Coaching for Better Teaching: A Study on Student-Centered Instructional Coaching. , 2022, ss.159 - 182. 10.14689/enad.31.1607 |
| AMA | tekir s Coaching for Better Teaching: A Study on Student-Centered Instructional Coaching. . 2022; 159 - 182. 10.14689/enad.31.1607 |
| Vancouver | tekir s Coaching for Better Teaching: A Study on Student-Centered Instructional Coaching. . 2022; 159 - 182. 10.14689/enad.31.1607 |
| IEEE | tekir s "Coaching for Better Teaching: A Study on Student-Centered Instructional Coaching." , ss.159 - 182, 2022. 10.14689/enad.31.1607 |
| ISNAD | tekir, serpil. "Coaching for Better Teaching: A Study on Student-Centered Instructional Coaching". (2022), 159-182. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.31.1607 |
| APA | tekir s (2022). Coaching for Better Teaching: A Study on Student-Centered Instructional Coaching. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 0(31), 159 - 182. 10.14689/enad.31.1607 |
| Chicago | tekir serpil Coaching for Better Teaching: A Study on Student-Centered Instructional Coaching. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi 0, no.31 (2022): 159 - 182. 10.14689/enad.31.1607 |
| MLA | tekir serpil Coaching for Better Teaching: A Study on Student-Centered Instructional Coaching. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, vol.0, no.31, 2022, ss.159 - 182. 10.14689/enad.31.1607 |
| AMA | tekir s Coaching for Better Teaching: A Study on Student-Centered Instructional Coaching. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2022; 0(31): 159 - 182. 10.14689/enad.31.1607 |
| Vancouver | tekir s Coaching for Better Teaching: A Study on Student-Centered Instructional Coaching. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2022; 0(31): 159 - 182. 10.14689/enad.31.1607 |
| IEEE | tekir s "Coaching for Better Teaching: A Study on Student-Centered Instructional Coaching." Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 0, ss.159 - 182, 2022. 10.14689/enad.31.1607 |
| ISNAD | tekir, serpil. "Coaching for Better Teaching: A Study on Student-Centered Instructional Coaching". Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi 31 (2022), 159-182. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.31.1607 |
